Description - To minimize redundant fields in WF, we would like the ability to hide option that are needed by certain group in a dropdown or checkbox field. Why is this feature important to you - Allows us to reduce the number of redundant fields in the system. How would you like the feature to work - When adding an existing dropdown or checkbox field to a new form we would have the option to hide some of the choices. Current Behaviour - If a new group needs a field such as Channel but is digital only an previous groups included not digital formats such as Direct Mail, we must create a new field.
Hello, I noticed there is no seed list function in Marketo when sending marketing standalone or automated emails. Ideally, there would be a possibility to add as many people as we want (from contacts within the company), which skips the comms limit and doesn't end up influencing the email stats report. Currently I've added people to the global distribution lists but they would end up being counted towards stats and might skip receiving some sends due to current limits. Creating another program and sending each email would be too time consuming, hopefully you can come up with a great solution 🙂 Thanks, Livia
Currently, the entire list of program choices does not show up in the scrolling. We have about 25 choices but only 19 show up. If you happen to know there's more choices, you have to know exactly what it is and type it in. This is leaving a lot of room for misfiling by not realizing it is in the list.
Description - Make a Custom Reminder Notification a default that can be set for New Tasks in the Group Tasks & Requests Preferences Why is this feature important to you - I created a custom email notification to send to a task assignee if they miss completing their task on time. It works great, but I have to manually add it to each ad hoc task my group creates. I have a scheduled report sent to me every morning to add the missing reminder notifications, which is tedious. If I could set this as a default, I wouldn't have to check the 800-1,000 tasks every day to make sure the reminder is there. I don't have a back-up for this process either, so if I'm out of the office, it just doesn't get added and people miss their late tasks. How would you like the feature to work - Have the option to customize my Group's task settings in the "New Task Defaults: When I create a new task, set the..."Task Settings > Reminder notifications > 'custom notification' Current Behavior - Task Settings are not currently available to customize in the Group Tasks & Requests Preferences
Description - There is a lot of wasted screen real estate in the resource planner which means users have to scroll to the side just to see a years worth of data (MoM). There is plenty of space wasted in between columns and rows. Why is this feature important to you - By reducing the space between columns I could see a full years worth of data (maybe more) which is essential for annual planning and will reduce the likely hood of reverting to a spreadsheet. (Vertical optimization should also be considered) How would you like the feature to work - Reduce the padding around the elements and utilize the space freed up when elements are removed from view Current Behaviour - The current interface wastes an inordinate of space which is inefficient and frustrating (image attached)
Description - When a reviewer marks their decision as Not Relevant, it would be nice to give them the option to remove themselves from future proofs and notifications Why is this feature important to you - We have people that get added to a proof due to the group that they are in but not everyone would be needed. Think a department of people responsible for a large variety of products broken up amongst the people. When that department has an item featured on the proof the group gets added but it may only be relevant fro one or two people. How would you like the feature to work - When Not Relevant is selected, a checkbox that states "Remove from future versions" could be the simplest way to do it. If checked, they would be removed automatically from the proof moving forward. Current Behaviour - They check Not Relevant and we listen to them complain that they have to keep selecting not relevant when every new version goes up. 😛
Hi all, it would be great to enhance the Delete Custom Object API endpoint by the possibility to delete multiple records with one call* by e.g. allowing createdAt, UpdatedAt and individual dedupe fields as criteria. Examples: Delete all custom object records created on 1/1/2020 Delete all custom object records where dedupe field "ABC" = "XYZ" Kind regards, Thorsten * other than IDs or _all_ dedupe fields...
Description - We are looking for a solution to assign a new work item / task to a group and let the team members grab it marking the item as "work on it". Why is this feature important to you - As far as I understand, if a work item, e.g. a task is assigned to a team, the new task is not listed in the todo list of each member. As in our company not for all projects a planner position is necessary, this step should be skippable. How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice to have a setting to be able to assign a task to a whole group and let the members decide, who picks the task. Current Behaviour - Currently, the task is only visible to the team members, if it's exclusively assigned to the user. Also in the Creative Cloud Plugin (tested in InDesign), the task is not listed, if only assigned to the team. We want to give staff the opportunity to work without having to leave the Creative Cloud app. I also asked the community already, if this is somehow possible.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Due to character limit restriction, users are facing difficulty to maintain all the notes @ activity level How would you like the feature to work - Due to prolonged life of activity, it would be better to Increase NOTES dialog box length to capture detailed notes Current Behaviour - Character limitation
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Limits ability to use standard defined naming convention How would you like the feature to work - Increase MBOX dialog box length. Optimal size - Longest MBOX name has 65 Char as of today. Current Behaviour - Character limitation Reference support Id - E-000630604
Description - Why is this feature important to you - For better segment management, need ability to Tag a segment and perform necessary action. Example - Do an export, perform bulk delete, deactivate from destination, do not use for ML model building etc How would you like the feature to work - Tag and pull list of Archive segment or list of segment based of Product type or list of segment activated at a destination or list of segment with Zero profile count or list of segment used for Model building or list of segment to be deleted etc. Current Behaviour - Through API functionality, list of all segment available in AEP can be pulled and extracted.
I am going to invoke a couple of names like Tim Wilson and Brent Dykes when submitting this idea, because Adobe Analytics Workspace is currently very limited in its capabilities for us to do what these two visionaries have recommended we do in order to provide BETTER metrics to our audience. Adobe, YOU are supposed to be the leader in Digital Metrics, and so I implore you in giving us the tools to give us the means to better tweak the metrics we are trying to present to our data consumers. We are trying to tell them better stories, and if we cannot do something as simple as change the color of the line on a graph or even change the the graph in the background a different color, then how can we even begin to improve upon the message we are trying to convey to those who see our reports? Yes, we can export data to different tools, but aren't we told that Workspace is getting better every day?I find it frustrating that I have a graph like this with which I have almost no control. I can't change the line color, density, behavior, or even how the graph displays on the screen. I am stuck with the pre-defined configuration of what Adobe decided to choose for me, and that's it, yet the two people I mentioned above say that there is so much more to data visualization and informing our audience.My idea is we need a much more robust ability to control and customize our visualizations, which goes well beyond the graphs. This includes better control of resizing Summary Numbers, so we're not limited to a finite amount of items to a row that have bad formatting or incomplete-looking titles.These are IMPROVEMENTS THAT MATTER to us analysts and managers who are sending on out reports on a regular basis. In fact, I found a submission by someone who asked for customizations for graphs back in 2010 that I believe was completely overlooked.I hope and pray that this one gains more viewership and momentum. Onward!
Description - Meet the requirements for electronic records and electronic signatures as stated in 21 CFR Part 11 Why is this feature important to you - This would likely enable wider adoption of the platform for use in highly regulated industries, like nutritional supplements and pharmaceuticals, that are subjected to these requirements. I suspect several of the primary requirements are already being met. How would you like the feature to work - If the platform supported electronic signatures compliant with 21 CFR Part 11, I could see request queues and approval paths integrated to manage quality documentation in the industries subjected to these requirements (product specifications, product labels, certificates of analysis, etc). Current Behaviour - approval paths not 21 CFR Part 11 compliant for electronic signature standards.
Throwing out an idea that might assist with ADA compliance. We have a company that scans our website for ADA compliance and one of the items brought up is that browser-based AutoComplete (such as through Chrome, etc) does not function properly. It's probably possible to do this through external JavaScript or code, but it seems like something that should be built-in due to ADA needs.
Description - When creating a view, group, filter, or report it can be difficult to know if a given field is: (a) a default Workfront Field or a custom field, and/or (b) what type of custom field it is (e.g. text, drop down, checkbox date, etc). It would be great to have a visual indicator to show the field origin (default v custom) and field type. Why is this feature important to you - If there was an indicator it would make report, view, group, filter creation much easier. How would you like the feature to work - Simple visual indicator in the interface that indicates field type. See attached. Current Behaviour - There is no way to distinguish between custom and default fields nor a way to determine what type of field it is (date? Text? Choice?). I will often take a peek at text mode to see if there is a DE: just to be sure - an unnecessary waste of time.
Description - Clicking the Hyperlink button in an Update results in a clunky experience that can easily be simplified. Why is this feature important to you - It doesn't seem like much, but whenever a process can be changed to make the UI run smoother, the experience improves - little things can make a big difference. How would you like the feature to work - It would be much better if clicking the Hyperlink button in an Update resulted in opening the Create Link window with an active cursor in an empty URL box. Current Behavior - Currently, when the Create Link window opens, the text the user highlighted to add a link to pre-populates both the URL and Text to display boxes, and there is no active cursor. The user then has to highlight the pre-populated text in the URL box and paste in the URL for the Hyperlink. A fix would make it so the user just clicks the Hyperlink button and command-V pastes the URL.
Description - Currently, we visualize two dimensions in 2 separate visualizations (one line and one histogram). We prefer visualizing the two dimensions in the same visualization. We would like to request for product enhancement to get a similar view. Why is this feature important to you - Superimposing a line graph with one dimension and a histogram representing another dimension will give us the trends of 2 dimensions within the same visualization. How would you like the feature to work - Select two dimensions and the corresponding visualizations. Result is the dual-axis report trending the two dimensions over time. Current Behavior - We need to use two separate visualizations with only one Current View: Requested View: dimension per visualization.
It would be great if we could set certain views for certain queues/projects, at the individual user level. For example, as an admin who also is responsible for managing a few processes in Workfront it would be great if my view could stick for my Design queue versus my planning queue. Today, I have to toggle between views depending on where I am.
Activity (Target Test) URL determines the page that will qualify and renders the experience for your Target Activity to the users. When prompted during activity creation, typing the complete URL always will not necessarily assure that the content will be delivered on that site page. In this post/blog, we will look at some options while setting up the activity with URL having query string.We generally see the option to configure our activity URLs by clicking on ‘Configure’ icon, then select Page Delivery and then specify the URL. What if URL has query string? Will it work and show the personalized content?In this scenario irrespective of your Targeted audience, one must have the template rule in addition to the base URL which will define your query parameters. There could be number of options to do that. Few of which have been explained below.Option 1: Replicating the URL and keep it in the template rule with ‘contains’ option. This will reassure you that in any case, this URL will qualify for the test. But there are corner cases attached to it that can influence your reports data with the additional records to all those URLs which contains the base URL.Option 2: Restrict the URL contains condition with only query string. The corner case discussed in point number one will be applied in this option as well but here the conditional setup is limited to only query string.Option 3: This third option is something that Target tool provides w.r.t query parameters. Instead of targeting the complete URL, you can leverage the specific part of URL. Using the template rule with Query option eases your way to achieve the objective.Note: In all the above options, the base URL remains same including the query string. Let’s say you want to personalize your content through VEC so it is very important to keep an eye on the base URL since this is the one URL which will be loaded in VEC for you. Thanks!
Description - The Task Summary is available when looking at tasks in a project and is really useful for allowing team members to comment and interact with tasks. It would be great if this feature was available in reports. This way you could get this useful feature when managing work across projects. Why is this feature important to you - when reviewing work the task summary is useful because users do not need to click into the task (and away from the task view) to comment or see key details. This makes it easier for our team to do work. How would you like the feature to work - transpose the Task Summary and make it available on reports with tasks. Current Behaviour - Task summary only available when viewed in a project
Sometimes, we need to discard usage of a field. This means first removing all usage of the field, before being able to hide it.It would be very useful if we were able to export, for a given field, all assets where the field is used by with asset name and asset Marketo URL. The time saving would be huge!-Greg
Description - Workload balancer functionality does not allow you to move work forwards or backwards in time or extend/reduce the duration from within the Workload Balancer module. Users must go to the task and move/edit the task there. It would be useful if users could 'drag and drop' the task/work to change the work period and grab handles to change the work period. Why is this feature important to you - this would dramatically improve the utility of the workload balancer as you would be able to make the kind of changes you need to, in real time, without leaving the workload balancer. This would save time and improve adoption. How would you like the feature to work - There are two aspects to this: (i) provide the ability to 'grab' the work and slide it backwards and forwards in time (no change to duration), and (ii) ability to 'grab' an end of a work item to extend or reduce the duration of the work. Current Behaviour - Workload balancer "drag and drop' is limited to the current task timeframe between users or between assigned and unassigned areas.
Description - To speed up productivity and allow for task mirroring (same completion date and status), it would be helpful to have the option to turn on something like "Auto-Complete". This would occur for tasks that are chained to predecessors. This could be same-project or cross-project. As long as the predecessor has 0d lag and the successor task has 0day duration. Why is this feature important to you - Many tasks are tracked within other projects as dependencies within the project, but the predecessor is a linked task to another project's task. By allowing for this chaining of predecessor completion to the successor, project status can be chained. How would you like the feature to work - Either add an option on the successor task to enable this behavior, or add it to the predecessor options when chaining. The latter may be a more intuitive place to enable auto-completion of the successor task. Current Behaviour - Successor tasks do not share the completion status of predecessor tasks, no matter what. User has to manually complete the successor task, which is time consuming and unnecessary for specific conditions.
Every time a custom code block executes from a rule on our websites, within the html body there is a new script tag created containing '_satellite["_runScript' We have rules that admittedly trigger heavily, every time they trigger there is a new tag injected/appended, so may see 20-100 script tags added into the site, this leaves a highly visible footprint back to my team that I wish was not there. Wishing that Launch would instead find existing _satellite script tags in the DOM and replace them rather than appending each time or find some way to avoid writing to the DOM in this manner.
Description - Would love the ability to batch post Mp4's Why is this feature important to you - we do a lot with MP4's and each as to be posted separately How would you like the feature to work - would function just like the rest of proof Current Behaviour - have to post each item seperatly
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
