Build better products with our product team
Description - We are looking for a solution to assign a new work item / task to a group and let the team members grab it marking the item as "work on it". Why is this feature important to you - As far as I understand, if a work item, e.g. a task is assigned to a team, the new task is not listed in the todo list of each member. As in our company not for all projects a planner position is necessary, this step should be skippable. How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice to have a setting to be able to assign a task to a whole group and let the members decide, who picks the task. Current Behaviour - Currently, the task is only visible to the team members, if it's exclusively assigned to the user. Also in the Creative Cloud Plugin (tested in InDesign), the task is not listed, if only assigned to the team. We want to give staff the opportunity to work without having to leave the Creative Cloud app. I also asked the community already, if this is somehow possible.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Due to character limit restriction, users are facing difficulty to maintain all the notes @ activity level How would you like the feature to work - Due to prolonged life of activity, it would be better to Increase NOTES dialog box length to capture detailed notes Current Behaviour - Character limitation
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Limits ability to use standard defined naming convention How would you like the feature to work - Increase MBOX dialog box length. Optimal size - Longest MBOX name has 65 Char as of today. Current Behaviour - Character limitation Reference support Id - E-000630604
Description - Why is this feature important to you - For better segment management, need ability to Tag a segment and perform necessary action. Example - Do an export, perform bulk delete, deactivate from destination, do not use for ML model building etc How would you like the feature to work - Tag and pull list of Archive segment or list of segment based of Product type or list of segment activated at a destination or list of segment with Zero profile count or list of segment used for Model building or list of segment to be deleted etc. Current Behaviour - Through API functionality, list of all segment available in AEP can be pulled and extracted.
I am going to invoke a couple of names like Tim Wilson and Brent Dykes when submitting this idea, because Adobe Analytics Workspace is currently very limited in its capabilities for us to do what these two visionaries have recommended we do in order to provide BETTER metrics to our audience. Adobe, YOU are supposed to be the leader in Digital Metrics, and so I implore you in giving us the tools to give us the means to better tweak the metrics we are trying to present to our data consumers. We are trying to tell them better stories, and if we cannot do something as simple as change the color of the line on a graph or even change the the graph in the background a different color, then how can we even begin to improve upon the message we are trying to convey to those who see our reports? Yes, we can export data to different tools, but aren't we told that Workspace is getting better every day?I find it frustrating that I have a graph like this with which I have almost no control. I can't change the line color, density, behavior, or even how the graph displays on the screen. I am stuck with the pre-defined configuration of what Adobe decided to choose for me, and that's it, yet the two people I mentioned above say that there is so much more to data visualization and informing our audience.My idea is we need a much more robust ability to control and customize our visualizations, which goes well beyond the graphs. This includes better control of resizing Summary Numbers, so we're not limited to a finite amount of items to a row that have bad formatting or incomplete-looking titles.These are IMPROVEMENTS THAT MATTER to us analysts and managers who are sending on out reports on a regular basis. In fact, I found a submission by someone who asked for customizations for graphs back in 2010 that I believe was completely overlooked.I hope and pray that this one gains more viewership and momentum. Onward!
Description - Meet the requirements for electronic records and electronic signatures as stated in 21 CFR Part 11 Why is this feature important to you - This would likely enable wider adoption of the platform for use in highly regulated industries, like nutritional supplements and pharmaceuticals, that are subjected to these requirements. I suspect several of the primary requirements are already being met. How would you like the feature to work - If the platform supported electronic signatures compliant with 21 CFR Part 11, I could see request queues and approval paths integrated to manage quality documentation in the industries subjected to these requirements (product specifications, product labels, certificates of analysis, etc). Current Behaviour - approval paths not 21 CFR Part 11 compliant for electronic signature standards.
Throwing out an idea that might assist with ADA compliance. We have a company that scans our website for ADA compliance and one of the items brought up is that browser-based AutoComplete (such as through Chrome, etc) does not function properly. It's probably possible to do this through external JavaScript or code, but it seems like something that should be built-in due to ADA needs.
Description - When creating a view, group, filter, or report it can be difficult to know if a given field is: (a) a default Workfront Field or a custom field, and/or (b) what type of custom field it is (e.g. text, drop down, checkbox date, etc). It would be great to have a visual indicator to show the field origin (default v custom) and field type. Why is this feature important to you - If there was an indicator it would make report, view, group, filter creation much easier. How would you like the feature to work - Simple visual indicator in the interface that indicates field type. See attached. Current Behaviour - There is no way to distinguish between custom and default fields nor a way to determine what type of field it is (date? Text? Choice?). I will often take a peek at text mode to see if there is a DE: just to be sure - an unnecessary waste of time.
Description - Clicking the Hyperlink button in an Update results in a clunky experience that can easily be simplified. Why is this feature important to you - It doesn't seem like much, but whenever a process can be changed to make the UI run smoother, the experience improves - little things can make a big difference. How would you like the feature to work - It would be much better if clicking the Hyperlink button in an Update resulted in opening the Create Link window with an active cursor in an empty URL box. Current Behavior - Currently, when the Create Link window opens, the text the user highlighted to add a link to pre-populates both the URL and Text to display boxes, and there is no active cursor. The user then has to highlight the pre-populated text in the URL box and paste in the URL for the Hyperlink. A fix would make it so the user just clicks the Hyperlink button and command-V pastes the URL.
Description - Currently, we visualize two dimensions in 2 separate visualizations (one line and one histogram). We prefer visualizing the two dimensions in the same visualization. We would like to request for product enhancement to get a similar view. Why is this feature important to you - Superimposing a line graph with one dimension and a histogram representing another dimension will give us the trends of 2 dimensions within the same visualization. How would you like the feature to work - Select two dimensions and the corresponding visualizations. Result is the dual-axis report trending the two dimensions over time. Current Behavior - We need to use two separate visualizations with only one Current View: Requested View: dimension per visualization.
It would be great if we could set certain views for certain queues/projects, at the individual user level. For example, as an admin who also is responsible for managing a few processes in Workfront it would be great if my view could stick for my Design queue versus my planning queue. Today, I have to toggle between views depending on where I am.
Activity (Target Test) URL determines the page that will qualify and renders the experience for your Target Activity to the users. When prompted during activity creation, typing the complete URL always will not necessarily assure that the content will be delivered on that site page. In this post/blog, we will look at some options while setting up the activity with URL having query string.We generally see the option to configure our activity URLs by clicking on ‘Configure’ icon, then select Page Delivery and then specify the URL. What if URL has query string? Will it work and show the personalized content?In this scenario irrespective of your Targeted audience, one must have the template rule in addition to the base URL which will define your query parameters. There could be number of options to do that. Few of which have been explained below.Option 1: Replicating the URL and keep it in the template rule with ‘contains’ option. This will reassure you that in any case, this URL will qualify for the test. But there are corner cases attached to it that can influence your reports data with the additional records to all those URLs which contains the base URL.Option 2: Restrict the URL contains condition with only query string. The corner case discussed in point number one will be applied in this option as well but here the conditional setup is limited to only query string.Option 3: This third option is something that Target tool provides w.r.t query parameters. Instead of targeting the complete URL, you can leverage the specific part of URL. Using the template rule with Query option eases your way to achieve the objective.Note: In all the above options, the base URL remains same including the query string. Let’s say you want to personalize your content through VEC so it is very important to keep an eye on the base URL since this is the one URL which will be loaded in VEC for you. Thanks!
Description - The Task Summary is available when looking at tasks in a project and is really useful for allowing team members to comment and interact with tasks. It would be great if this feature was available in reports. This way you could get this useful feature when managing work across projects. Why is this feature important to you - when reviewing work the task summary is useful because users do not need to click into the task (and away from the task view) to comment or see key details. This makes it easier for our team to do work. How would you like the feature to work - transpose the Task Summary and make it available on reports with tasks. Current Behaviour - Task summary only available when viewed in a project
Sometimes, we need to discard usage of a field. This means first removing all usage of the field, before being able to hide it.It would be very useful if we were able to export, for a given field, all assets where the field is used by with asset name and asset Marketo URL. The time saving would be huge!-Greg
Description - Workload balancer functionality does not allow you to move work forwards or backwards in time or extend/reduce the duration from within the Workload Balancer module. Users must go to the task and move/edit the task there. It would be useful if users could 'drag and drop' the task/work to change the work period and grab handles to change the work period. Why is this feature important to you - this would dramatically improve the utility of the workload balancer as you would be able to make the kind of changes you need to, in real time, without leaving the workload balancer. This would save time and improve adoption. How would you like the feature to work - There are two aspects to this: (i) provide the ability to 'grab' the work and slide it backwards and forwards in time (no change to duration), and (ii) ability to 'grab' an end of a work item to extend or reduce the duration of the work. Current Behaviour - Workload balancer "drag and drop' is limited to the current task timeframe between users or between assigned and unassigned areas.
Description - To speed up productivity and allow for task mirroring (same completion date and status), it would be helpful to have the option to turn on something like "Auto-Complete". This would occur for tasks that are chained to predecessors. This could be same-project or cross-project. As long as the predecessor has 0d lag and the successor task has 0day duration. Why is this feature important to you - Many tasks are tracked within other projects as dependencies within the project, but the predecessor is a linked task to another project's task. By allowing for this chaining of predecessor completion to the successor, project status can be chained. How would you like the feature to work - Either add an option on the successor task to enable this behavior, or add it to the predecessor options when chaining. The latter may be a more intuitive place to enable auto-completion of the successor task. Current Behaviour - Successor tasks do not share the completion status of predecessor tasks, no matter what. User has to manually complete the successor task, which is time consuming and unnecessary for specific conditions.
Every time a custom code block executes from a rule on our websites, within the html body there is a new script tag created containing '_satellite["_runScript' We have rules that admittedly trigger heavily, every time they trigger there is a new tag injected/appended, so may see 20-100 script tags added into the site, this leaves a highly visible footprint back to my team that I wish was not there. Wishing that Launch would instead find existing _satellite script tags in the DOM and replace them rather than appending each time or find some way to avoid writing to the DOM in this manner.
Description - Would love the ability to batch post Mp4's Why is this feature important to you - we do a lot with MP4's and each as to be posted separately How would you like the feature to work - would function just like the rest of proof Current Behaviour - have to post each item seperatly
Description - Currently, the "make this public" link that you can use for sharing documents for download ONLY works for people that are not Workfront users. If you share the so called "public" link, it will fail in the web browser for anyone that has a Workfront account. We need a link that is truly "public" that can be used by anyone, whether in Workfront or not. Why is this feature important to you - When sending final art notifications to our customers, it would not only save them time to be able to click a simple link to download the file, but it would also save a lot of headache trying to explain to people that use once or twice a year where to go and how to download a file. Since we have about 11,000 requesters, dealing with user navigation / issues is a very common occurrence even though instructions are provided each time a file is released. How would you like the feature to work - the same way it does now EXCEPT be public to anyone with the link, even if they are a Workfront user. Current Behaviour - Only those people that do not have a user profile in Workfront can access the "public" link for download
Description - Why is this feature important to you - because i like to log my hours How would you like the feature to work - like something that has been tested extensively Current Behaviour - clarify how to add, delete, hide jobs. Rolling up a task just to hide the hours row is silly. The add remove icon look and feel as well as functionality is difficult to decipher. initially un-clear how to search available projects or projects just within the timesheet. Missing clear way to sort. Missing "tool tips" theres no rollover hints on links and icons.
Description - There are tasks that before we allow marked as completed we would like required information completed in a field. Why is this feature important to you - Governance and audit requirements. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to Predecessor, allow to tie a task to field Current Behaviour - N/A
Description - Allow project template relationships to be removed Why is this feature important to you - The first project template is not always relevant. Sometimes projects are drastically modified. Sometimes a different template is attached later. How would you like the feature to work - In the edit interface and in the copy interface, allow for removal of the template relationship. Current Behaviour - The first project template to be attached is there forever. Even when you make a copy of the project.
Hi,Hopefully there is value in this suggestion. I find that in certain filters in Marketo there is information displayed when you mouse-over (eg. on the Wait filter in the flow). Screenshot below. In other filters, where I am selecting either emails, lists / smart lists, smart campaigns etc, if the naming convention exceeds the length of the text box it is un-viewable. I would find great use in having a tooltip of sorts that will display the selection when you mouseover. I do know that if there are multiple selections made this is current functionality, it does not seem to work when there is just one selection.
Description - It is difficult to design a form because the form preview is not accurate for some field types. This forces you to open a separate tab or window with a live request queue to see what the form will actually look like when in use. Why is this feature important to you - Since it is a "live form" that you are using to visualize layout, you then have to refresh that "new request" screen after applying each change to the form. It is very cumbersome and also racks up drafts if you aren't careful. If you view the same form from the Request section of the queue project, you get a THIRD and completely different layout view that shows the beautiful orange section breaks that I miss so much . That little bit of color really helped break up the form for readability. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the display of the form to be consistent in all three places and would really like the colored section breaks back, or at least the option. Current Behaviour - inconsistent display of custom form in form preview, live queue and request section of queue project.
We need to iframe some of our Marketo landing pages into a platform on a different domain, but are unable to because the X-Frame-Options only have DENY or SAMEORIGIN values. I suggest opening this up to specify ALLOW FROM to allow us to specify the domains where we can allow iframing.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
