Description - Currently, the "make this public" link that you can use for sharing documents for download ONLY works for people that are not Workfront users. If you share the so called "public" link, it will fail in the web browser for anyone that has a Workfront account. We need a link that is truly "public" that can be used by anyone, whether in Workfront or not. Why is this feature important to you - When sending final art notifications to our customers, it would not only save them time to be able to click a simple link to download the file, but it would also save a lot of headache trying to explain to people that use once or twice a year where to go and how to download a file. Since we have about 11,000 requesters, dealing with user navigation / issues is a very common occurrence even though instructions are provided each time a file is released. How would you like the feature to work - the same way it does now EXCEPT be public to anyone with the link, even if they are a Workfront user. Current Behaviour - Only those people that do not have a user profile in Workfront can access the "public" link for download
Description - Why is this feature important to you - because i like to log my hours How would you like the feature to work - like something that has been tested extensively Current Behaviour - clarify how to add, delete, hide jobs. Rolling up a task just to hide the hours row is silly. The add remove icon look and feel as well as functionality is difficult to decipher. initially un-clear how to search available projects or projects just within the timesheet. Missing clear way to sort. Missing "tool tips" theres no rollover hints on links and icons.
Description - There are tasks that before we allow marked as completed we would like required information completed in a field. Why is this feature important to you - Governance and audit requirements. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to Predecessor, allow to tie a task to field Current Behaviour - N/A
Description - Allow project template relationships to be removed Why is this feature important to you - The first project template is not always relevant. Sometimes projects are drastically modified. Sometimes a different template is attached later. How would you like the feature to work - In the edit interface and in the copy interface, allow for removal of the template relationship. Current Behaviour - The first project template to be attached is there forever. Even when you make a copy of the project.
Hi,Hopefully there is value in this suggestion. I find that in certain filters in Marketo there is information displayed when you mouse-over (eg. on the Wait filter in the flow). Screenshot below. In other filters, where I am selecting either emails, lists / smart lists, smart campaigns etc, if the naming convention exceeds the length of the text box it is un-viewable. I would find great use in having a tooltip of sorts that will display the selection when you mouseover. I do know that if there are multiple selections made this is current functionality, it does not seem to work when there is just one selection.
Description - It is difficult to design a form because the form preview is not accurate for some field types. This forces you to open a separate tab or window with a live request queue to see what the form will actually look like when in use. Why is this feature important to you - Since it is a "live form" that you are using to visualize layout, you then have to refresh that "new request" screen after applying each change to the form. It is very cumbersome and also racks up drafts if you aren't careful. If you view the same form from the Request section of the queue project, you get a THIRD and completely different layout view that shows the beautiful orange section breaks that I miss so much . That little bit of color really helped break up the form for readability. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the display of the form to be consistent in all three places and would really like the colored section breaks back, or at least the option. Current Behaviour - inconsistent display of custom form in form preview, live queue and request section of queue project.
We need to iframe some of our Marketo landing pages into a platform on a different domain, but are unable to because the X-Frame-Options only have DENY or SAMEORIGIN values. I suggest opening this up to specify ALLOW FROM to allow us to specify the domains where we can allow iframing.
If you make an update, and realize you made a mistake, there is no 'edit update' option when clicking the 3 dots next to the timestamp. You can only delete or copy the update. This is really frustrating especially if you want to edit an update in a comment thread and don't want to delete your comment from the thread and re-add out of order. I'm pretty sure this option used to be in Classic experience? Basically every other PM tool has this option, I'm surprised WF doesn't - it's a simple yet really needed option! Screenshot attached shows where it should be added.
Description - The ability to identify the % of effort by job role for t-shirt sizing/estimates Why is this feature important to you - In estimating projects, we have multiple-tiers of engagement from Sr. Executive engagement to feet on the ground. It would be nice to be able to indicate small, medium and large based on those roles and have it calculated. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the ability to setup overall system t-shirt sizing for each job role in the system, and also enable group administration of the same. Current Behaviour - Right now, if I say small for an executive who is only engaged on a limited cadence basis and small for a foot on the ground job role, the system indicates the resource commitment is the same are when in fact the level of commitment or resource load would be very different based on those job roles. This does not allow a realistic picture of resource Workload balancing...I should have some roles that can span many different projects (i.e. PM's) and have t-shirt sizing give a realistic perspective of their work..while the same may not be said for a Workfront Consultant...
Description - Have a filter/function on the left side panel on a users homepage that will show them proofs they are just a reviewer on. Or, have a way to generate a report with that information. Why is this feature important to you - It's been requested by several users. Most users don't want to sift through emails or notifications, they just want to see the project/proof and open it. How would you like the feature to work - Have it filter/function within the left side panel of a users homepage, or have it available to use within a proof report. Current Behaviour - Can't filter or create a report for Reviewers only at all.
Since we have started to work with Workfront (former Attask), the greatest pain for our 20 Project Managers and 60 Developers is, that the Description field of Tasks/Issues is only plain text. We need a powerful description field with WYSIWYG functionality and the option to add screenshots inline - as it is possible in many other systems. If there is no solution for that in near future my colleagues will more and more try to break out of Workfront. And I can't hear it anymore that it works in Jira or other systems as well. In that context I have to mention that it was one of the worst decisions to separate the Task description and Update stream. It does not make sense that I always have to switch between description and updates but how to write an update without having the original description in the spotlight?!
The majority of our project owners try to keep their task lists in order. It just makes it easier to see the steps involved in completing a task. When we move a task up or down in order under that project it would be nice if the predecessors changed to match the new order of the list. Make this feature optional so it doesn't affect those who choose to organize their lists differently but for those who want that option, make it easier to slide these tasks around without having to go back and reorder each predecessor.
Complementary to , we also need tags and channels to be leveraged in the "Program Status is Changed" trigger.-Greg
Description - Embedded Images (i.e. Screen Shots) in email responses from Outlook (or other mail system) are added to Workfront as document attachments. Why is this feature important to you - its important because people naturally take screenshots and paste them into emails - its part of being digitally dexterous. its part of being user friendly - and if a system is not user-friendly, it's user-unfriendly . How would you like the feature to work - Pasted screen-shots/images are uploaded as document attachments (just like email signature images) Current Behaviour - - you just see [cid:image002.png@01D8EFA4.CA868C40]
If I code a script to reference an object fields, I still need to "check the right pane", but I don't want to have to synchronize the "coding" with the "checkbox in the right pane".What is the purpose of synchronizing "coding" and "checkboxes in the right pane"? We believe that having two settings has the detrimental effect of causing a divergence between the two settings, which in turn leads to unintended behavior.I don't think checkboxes are necessary because the fields to be referenced are coded in the first place.We would like to see this changed so that it works only by coding.
Hi, For a while now, I'm struggling with the fact that when I collect data into Custom Object, I can't tokenize it to pass to CRM in any easy way. If I could use logic in a filter pointing out to CDO and field in it that should be passed into let's say, an Interesting moment and/or notes field we would have so much more control over our engagement information from Webinars and other integrations. Eloqua allows something like that with the usage of forms. CDO connects to a form and I have a choice to pass that data to another field (like comments) if I wish.
In big companies there are lots of people that would want to see data daily, but not make sense to add thousands new users for Adobe and email reports aren't so effective. Would be fun (and important) feature to make workspace projects available for non-logged-in people (directly or some kind of embed feature). Maybe you could choose option to "public link" and not "share link", and with the public link anyone could open the dashboard with read-only status. Of course would be important to have possiblity to share these with unique password (but no need to have Adobe account) or only in certain ip-addresses.(This idea was on the old forum, but after the migration I couldn't find it anymore so I wrote a new one)Ps. this idea Analysis Workspace: Full-screen mode with auto-switcher between panels is also great if we get these public dashboards.
Update the date and time stamp of comments to the actual date DD/MM/YY and time. Currently a task posted on Monday says 'Last Monday' when you view it a few days after during the same week - it can be confusing as to exactly which Monday the comment was posted (i.e. two days ago Monday or last week Monday).
Today, only admins and segment managers can edit segments. When training others, it is SO helpful to show them how existing segments are built. The preview feature on the (i) icon does not always show all the detail needed. Many times the best way to learning and customizing is building off of someone else's work. Request: Allow all users to edit and "save as" any existing custom calculated segment/metric Current flow: - User finds a product view segment - User would like to build on the product view segment for products they focus on - User can not see all information in existing segment, so they have to guess or ask an admin - User has to manually create a new segment and look back at what they can see in the shared segment, leaving lots of room for error Expected flow: - User finds a shared and approved product view segment - User would like to build on the product view segment for products they focus on - User can click edit, add product qualifiers, and only sees the option to "save as" which saves a local copy to their account
The current functionality of the new "Projects I'm On/ Projects I Own" buttons in the NWE is creating confusion for users. They are not making the connection that the buttons' only function is to apply the Projects I'm on/ Projects I Own filter from the drop down list. The result set given are of ALL projects they own or are on so users are going to the filter list to select "Active" and are not aware they are removing the filter they just applied from clicking those buttons. I'd like to request an enhancement where the Projects I own/ Projects I'm On buttons act as a top level filter and allow users to utilize the filter selector as a "sub filter" to narrow their result set to mimic the way that subtabs + filter selection worked in the classic UI.
Description - Anchor the hours row to the top of the screen in Workload balancer Why is this feature important to you - This would save time having to scroll to the top constantly How would you like the feature to work - Being able to always see the hours Current Behaviour - Currently when you scroll through long lists of projects in workload balancer the hours aren't visible as you work your way down the list.
Hello,I'd like to have the possibility to set multiple report suites in one workspace project.The idea would be to move the Report Suite setting from being project-level to be panel-level (the same as date range).Thanks,Lorenzo
I would like the ability to change the default proof size when uploading. We can currently change the resolution if we need to, but it requires extra clicks. The current default often causes issue with our process and we would like to be able to streamline the proofing process. Thanks!
We would like to be able to customize / format the Gantt charts. -For example: Sort of like an Excel spreadsheet. -This would make the chart more presentable and easier to read.
Feature Request: Agile Scrum Teams' Iteration and Backlog Views When highlighting/clicking the checkbox next to a task, can we add the feature to “Insert Task Above” or “Insert Task Below?” When you are in a Project this is possible but not in an iteration view or backlog view. This would be very helpful for planning purposes during Sprint Planning/ Refinement Sessions. Submitted on Behalf of Maged Armanyous
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
