Build better products with our product team
If you make an update, and realize you made a mistake, there is no 'edit update' option when clicking the 3 dots next to the timestamp. You can only delete or copy the update. This is really frustrating especially if you want to edit an update in a comment thread and don't want to delete your comment from the thread and re-add out of order. I'm pretty sure this option used to be in Classic experience? Basically every other PM tool has this option, I'm surprised WF doesn't - it's a simple yet really needed option! Screenshot attached shows where it should be added.
Description - The ability to identify the % of effort by job role for t-shirt sizing/estimates Why is this feature important to you - In estimating projects, we have multiple-tiers of engagement from Sr. Executive engagement to feet on the ground. It would be nice to be able to indicate small, medium and large based on those roles and have it calculated. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the ability to setup overall system t-shirt sizing for each job role in the system, and also enable group administration of the same. Current Behaviour - Right now, if I say small for an executive who is only engaged on a limited cadence basis and small for a foot on the ground job role, the system indicates the resource commitment is the same are when in fact the level of commitment or resource load would be very different based on those job roles. This does not allow a realistic picture of resource Workload balancing...I should have some roles that can span many different projects (i.e. PM's) and have t-shirt sizing give a realistic perspective of their work..while the same may not be said for a Workfront Consultant...
Description - Have a filter/function on the left side panel on a users homepage that will show them proofs they are just a reviewer on. Or, have a way to generate a report with that information. Why is this feature important to you - It's been requested by several users. Most users don't want to sift through emails or notifications, they just want to see the project/proof and open it. How would you like the feature to work - Have it filter/function within the left side panel of a users homepage, or have it available to use within a proof report. Current Behaviour - Can't filter or create a report for Reviewers only at all.
Since we have started to work with Workfront (former Attask), the greatest pain for our 20 Project Managers and 60 Developers is, that the Description field of Tasks/Issues is only plain text. We need a powerful description field with WYSIWYG functionality and the option to add screenshots inline - as it is possible in many other systems. If there is no solution for that in near future my colleagues will more and more try to break out of Workfront. And I can't hear it anymore that it works in Jira or other systems as well. In that context I have to mention that it was one of the worst decisions to separate the Task description and Update stream. It does not make sense that I always have to switch between description and updates but how to write an update without having the original description in the spotlight?!
The majority of our project owners try to keep their task lists in order. It just makes it easier to see the steps involved in completing a task. When we move a task up or down in order under that project it would be nice if the predecessors changed to match the new order of the list. Make this feature optional so it doesn't affect those who choose to organize their lists differently but for those who want that option, make it easier to slide these tasks around without having to go back and reorder each predecessor.
Complementary to , we also need tags and channels to be leveraged in the "Program Status is Changed" trigger.-Greg
Description - Embedded Images (i.e. Screen Shots) in email responses from Outlook (or other mail system) are added to Workfront as document attachments. Why is this feature important to you - its important because people naturally take screenshots and paste them into emails - its part of being digitally dexterous. its part of being user friendly - and if a system is not user-friendly, it's user-unfriendly . How would you like the feature to work - Pasted screen-shots/images are uploaded as document attachments (just like email signature images) Current Behaviour - - you just see [cid:image002.png@01D8EFA4.CA868C40]
If I code a script to reference an object fields, I still need to "check the right pane", but I don't want to have to synchronize the "coding" with the "checkbox in the right pane".What is the purpose of synchronizing "coding" and "checkboxes in the right pane"? We believe that having two settings has the detrimental effect of causing a divergence between the two settings, which in turn leads to unintended behavior.I don't think checkboxes are necessary because the fields to be referenced are coded in the first place.We would like to see this changed so that it works only by coding.
Hi, For a while now, I'm struggling with the fact that when I collect data into Custom Object, I can't tokenize it to pass to CRM in any easy way. If I could use logic in a filter pointing out to CDO and field in it that should be passed into let's say, an Interesting moment and/or notes field we would have so much more control over our engagement information from Webinars and other integrations. Eloqua allows something like that with the usage of forms. CDO connects to a form and I have a choice to pass that data to another field (like comments) if I wish.
In big companies there are lots of people that would want to see data daily, but not make sense to add thousands new users for Adobe and email reports aren't so effective. Would be fun (and important) feature to make workspace projects available for non-logged-in people (directly or some kind of embed feature). Maybe you could choose option to "public link" and not "share link", and with the public link anyone could open the dashboard with read-only status. Of course would be important to have possiblity to share these with unique password (but no need to have Adobe account) or only in certain ip-addresses.(This idea was on the old forum, but after the migration I couldn't find it anymore so I wrote a new one)Ps. this idea Analysis Workspace: Full-screen mode with auto-switcher between panels is also great if we get these public dashboards.
Update the date and time stamp of comments to the actual date DD/MM/YY and time. Currently a task posted on Monday says 'Last Monday' when you view it a few days after during the same week - it can be confusing as to exactly which Monday the comment was posted (i.e. two days ago Monday or last week Monday).
Today, only admins and segment managers can edit segments. When training others, it is SO helpful to show them how existing segments are built. The preview feature on the (i) icon does not always show all the detail needed. Many times the best way to learning and customizing is building off of someone else's work. Request: Allow all users to edit and "save as" any existing custom calculated segment/metric Current flow: - User finds a product view segment - User would like to build on the product view segment for products they focus on - User can not see all information in existing segment, so they have to guess or ask an admin - User has to manually create a new segment and look back at what they can see in the shared segment, leaving lots of room for error Expected flow: - User finds a shared and approved product view segment - User would like to build on the product view segment for products they focus on - User can click edit, add product qualifiers, and only sees the option to "save as" which saves a local copy to their account
The current functionality of the new "Projects I'm On/ Projects I Own" buttons in the NWE is creating confusion for users. They are not making the connection that the buttons' only function is to apply the Projects I'm on/ Projects I Own filter from the drop down list. The result set given are of ALL projects they own or are on so users are going to the filter list to select "Active" and are not aware they are removing the filter they just applied from clicking those buttons. I'd like to request an enhancement where the Projects I own/ Projects I'm On buttons act as a top level filter and allow users to utilize the filter selector as a "sub filter" to narrow their result set to mimic the way that subtabs + filter selection worked in the classic UI.
Description - Anchor the hours row to the top of the screen in Workload balancer Why is this feature important to you - This would save time having to scroll to the top constantly How would you like the feature to work - Being able to always see the hours Current Behaviour - Currently when you scroll through long lists of projects in workload balancer the hours aren't visible as you work your way down the list.
Hello,I'd like to have the possibility to set multiple report suites in one workspace project.The idea would be to move the Report Suite setting from being project-level to be panel-level (the same as date range).Thanks,Lorenzo
I would like the ability to change the default proof size when uploading. We can currently change the resolution if we need to, but it requires extra clicks. The current default often causes issue with our process and we would like to be able to streamline the proofing process. Thanks!
We would like to be able to customize / format the Gantt charts. -For example: Sort of like an Excel spreadsheet. -This would make the chart more presentable and easier to read.
Feature Request: Agile Scrum Teams' Iteration and Backlog Views When highlighting/clicking the checkbox next to a task, can we add the feature to “Insert Task Above” or “Insert Task Below?” When you are in a Project this is possible but not in an iteration view or backlog view. This would be very helpful for planning purposes during Sprint Planning/ Refinement Sessions. Submitted on Behalf of Maged Armanyous
Description - When sending a report in Workfront you can select recipients as well as the frequency and when the report will send. Ideally I would want something to send every Monday morning at 8am. However 8am in New York is 1pm in London and 8pm in China. Instead I would want to set this up to send relative to the recipient so all three locations would receive at 8am local time instead of 8am default schedule (New York) time. Why is this feature important to you - This would create consistency in communications throughout my global instance. Emails sent on a Friday morning that arrive on Saturday for Australia and Asia will be overlooked and buried by the time they start working on Monday. Also it will be late if they wait until Monday if it is something to be done by end of week. How would you like the feature to work - I would love an additional button that says "send at user's local time" that can be toggled on or off. This way the sender has the option to either have the report sent to everyone at the exact same instance or sent to everyone at the same time relative to their schedule. Current Behaviour - Reports are sent to the full recipient list at the same exact time based on the default schedule in the system
Description - When defining a filter condition on a dropdown field, using "Contains" to match multiple dropdown values is changed to "Equals" if the match string matches an existing value by text and case. This has the unintended consequence of changing the logical filter. Instead of matching all values for the string, it only selects the specific value. The application is automatically altering the intent of the user's filter, even if it's to "optimize" the search. Why is this feature important to you - The user may have a specific use-case for searching by "Contains", but if the match string is an exact value in the dropdown list, it automatically changes the logical intention. How would you like the feature to work - The filter criteria should honor the user's selection and not change the criteria, at least not without getting consent. If a user wants "Contains", it should keep it as "Contains". Current Behaviour - If the match string exactly equals an existing selection value, the criteria is automatically switched to "Equals", changing the logical intention.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like to add functionality to allow the following: Add a button or option to allow the user to create a smaller collection from assets already in a collection.. Use-case: The researchers will create a collection for their clients to send for review. Upon review of the collection, the client selects which images they would like to use from that pool. Prior to using Adobe, the researchers could then just save those final images into a new collection. In the Adobe system the researcher needs to search for the images/assets again and create a collection or go through and remove all the rejected images from the original collection. If the researcher could just highlight and save the selected photos to a new collection it would be easier and save time. Another scenario is that the researcher could keep larger collections of frequently used assets and then create tailored collections. Current/Experienced Behavior: Cannot create a collection from a collection Improved/Expected Behavior: Create a collection from a collecton Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5, SP-8 Customer-name/Organization name: General Motors Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Currently, only the document submitter receives notification of a document reviewer's comment. Comments are then monitored by the document submitter in the document updates area. Any comments we want the entire document approval committee to read have to be copied into a new update with notification to the approval committee. We would like for everyone in the document approval list (as well as anyone we'd like to subscribe) to be automatically notified of a document reviewer's comment.
Description - When creating an Audience in Target, the platform allows users to target visitor's based on their browser language. Per the documentation, only a handful of languages are offered: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/target/using/audiences/create-audiences/categories-audiences/browser.html?lang=en Since the platform only offers "major" language versions (English, Spanish, Italian, etc; ), it seems logical to assume that this would include language "subvariants" (i.e. English (United States). That is, if I create an Audience targetting "English" I would expect this to include visitors with a browser language of English (United States), English (United Kingdom), etc. Put another way, given that Target does not offer anything more specific, I would expect only the "primary subtag" of an IETF Language Tag to be taken into account; I would expect en, en-us, en-uk, and so on to be considered "English" for targetting purposes. However, this is not the case. An Audience that targets English language browsers does not match English (United States) or anything but "English" (with no variant). As such, this renders the language targetting nearly useless as the vast majority of users, at least in our region, will have some sort of language subvariant set in their browser (with en-us/English (United States being predominant for us). Why is this feature important to you - The current Language targetting feature is essentially non-functional for our organization. Most visitors will have their browser language set to "English (United States)" or similar. How would you like the feature to work - See above. Current Behaviour - See above.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Make AEM + Target a truly seamless integration Use-case: Delivering Personalized Experiences as Standard Content Management Current/Experienced Behavior: User creates the default experience on an AEM page, creates XF in AEM, exports those XF in AEM, then swivels the chair over to the Target UI to create a Personalization Activity, selecting from the experiences exported from AEM to then deliver back to AEM. This makes customers feel like Personalization is distinctly separate from Content Management, and that AEM and Target may "talk to each other" but are not truly an "integrated content marketing platform". Improved/Expected Behavior: Keep Target there behind the scenes, and even the UI for customers that don't have AEM. But for customers that do have AEM, allow Activities to be fully created directly within AEM such that to a content author they don't even need to know that Target is a separate tool/technology. I believe most, if not all of the APIs already exist to work with Target headlessly to create Activities, so let's just do those things inside AEM and not even talk about something called Target. Having Target as a separate tool that needs to be learned is increasing the barrier of entry to personalized experiences. Further, the more we can make personalization seem like just another "standard part" of content management, as opposed to some "special thing" you do with this other magical tool called Target, I think the more we'll see it used.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Lower the risk of having an unresponsive server by restricting the page reach for the functionality “Create launches” Use-case: A content author opens the Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Launches interface (/libs/launches/content/launches) and clicks “Create”. The next step is to click to top-left button “+ Add Pages” to select a page or a folder. On the next screen, the content author selects “Included subpages”. The top-right button “Next” is clicked, the next screen is displayed and “Inherit source page live data” is clicked along with “with existing content”. The button “create” is clicked. Current/Experienced Behavior: The current behaviour is described above, with the mention the content author is allowed to select any page or node, even the top folder that might include a very large number of pages that will trigger AEM to create copies for all those pages. Due to the number of nodes, a site-wide transversal is triggered, resulting in an unresponsive AEM instance. Improved/Expected Behavior: To prevent the situation described above we would suggest the following improved behaviour. When the content author selects a page or a node ensures he has the write permission for that page or node Restrict the number of pages or nodes to be included in the Launch by leveraging a configuration field via sling:osgiConfig. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Service Pack 14 Customer-name/Organization name: Service Canada / Government of Canada Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
