Description - When sending a report in Workfront you can select recipients as well as the frequency and when the report will send. Ideally I would want something to send every Monday morning at 8am. However 8am in New York is 1pm in London and 8pm in China. Instead I would want to set this up to send relative to the recipient so all three locations would receive at 8am local time instead of 8am default schedule (New York) time. Why is this feature important to you - This would create consistency in communications throughout my global instance. Emails sent on a Friday morning that arrive on Saturday for Australia and Asia will be overlooked and buried by the time they start working on Monday. Also it will be late if they wait until Monday if it is something to be done by end of week. How would you like the feature to work - I would love an additional button that says "send at user's local time" that can be toggled on or off. This way the sender has the option to either have the report sent to everyone at the exact same instance or sent to everyone at the same time relative to their schedule. Current Behaviour - Reports are sent to the full recipient list at the same exact time based on the default schedule in the system
Description - When defining a filter condition on a dropdown field, using "Contains" to match multiple dropdown values is changed to "Equals" if the match string matches an existing value by text and case. This has the unintended consequence of changing the logical filter. Instead of matching all values for the string, it only selects the specific value. The application is automatically altering the intent of the user's filter, even if it's to "optimize" the search. Why is this feature important to you - The user may have a specific use-case for searching by "Contains", but if the match string is an exact value in the dropdown list, it automatically changes the logical intention. How would you like the feature to work - The filter criteria should honor the user's selection and not change the criteria, at least not without getting consent. If a user wants "Contains", it should keep it as "Contains". Current Behaviour - If the match string exactly equals an existing selection value, the criteria is automatically switched to "Equals", changing the logical intention.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like to add functionality to allow the following: Add a button or option to allow the user to create a smaller collection from assets already in a collection.. Use-case: The researchers will create a collection for their clients to send for review. Upon review of the collection, the client selects which images they would like to use from that pool. Prior to using Adobe, the researchers could then just save those final images into a new collection. In the Adobe system the researcher needs to search for the images/assets again and create a collection or go through and remove all the rejected images from the original collection. If the researcher could just highlight and save the selected photos to a new collection it would be easier and save time. Another scenario is that the researcher could keep larger collections of frequently used assets and then create tailored collections. Current/Experienced Behavior: Cannot create a collection from a collection Improved/Expected Behavior: Create a collection from a collecton Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5, SP-8 Customer-name/Organization name: General Motors Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Currently, only the document submitter receives notification of a document reviewer's comment. Comments are then monitored by the document submitter in the document updates area. Any comments we want the entire document approval committee to read have to be copied into a new update with notification to the approval committee. We would like for everyone in the document approval list (as well as anyone we'd like to subscribe) to be automatically notified of a document reviewer's comment.
Description - When creating an Audience in Target, the platform allows users to target visitor's based on their browser language. Per the documentation, only a handful of languages are offered: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/target/using/audiences/create-audiences/categories-audiences/browser.html?lang=en Since the platform only offers "major" language versions (English, Spanish, Italian, etc; ), it seems logical to assume that this would include language "subvariants" (i.e. English (United States). That is, if I create an Audience targetting "English" I would expect this to include visitors with a browser language of English (United States), English (United Kingdom), etc. Put another way, given that Target does not offer anything more specific, I would expect only the "primary subtag" of an IETF Language Tag to be taken into account; I would expect en, en-us, en-uk, and so on to be considered "English" for targetting purposes. However, this is not the case. An Audience that targets English language browsers does not match English (United States) or anything but "English" (with no variant). As such, this renders the language targetting nearly useless as the vast majority of users, at least in our region, will have some sort of language subvariant set in their browser (with en-us/English (United States being predominant for us). Why is this feature important to you - The current Language targetting feature is essentially non-functional for our organization. Most visitors will have their browser language set to "English (United States)" or similar. How would you like the feature to work - See above. Current Behaviour - See above.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Make AEM + Target a truly seamless integration Use-case: Delivering Personalized Experiences as Standard Content Management Current/Experienced Behavior: User creates the default experience on an AEM page, creates XF in AEM, exports those XF in AEM, then swivels the chair over to the Target UI to create a Personalization Activity, selecting from the experiences exported from AEM to then deliver back to AEM. This makes customers feel like Personalization is distinctly separate from Content Management, and that AEM and Target may "talk to each other" but are not truly an "integrated content marketing platform". Improved/Expected Behavior: Keep Target there behind the scenes, and even the UI for customers that don't have AEM. But for customers that do have AEM, allow Activities to be fully created directly within AEM such that to a content author they don't even need to know that Target is a separate tool/technology. I believe most, if not all of the APIs already exist to work with Target headlessly to create Activities, so let's just do those things inside AEM and not even talk about something called Target. Having Target as a separate tool that needs to be learned is increasing the barrier of entry to personalized experiences. Further, the more we can make personalization seem like just another "standard part" of content management, as opposed to some "special thing" you do with this other magical tool called Target, I think the more we'll see it used.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Lower the risk of having an unresponsive server by restricting the page reach for the functionality “Create launches” Use-case: A content author opens the Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Launches interface (/libs/launches/content/launches) and clicks “Create”. The next step is to click to top-left button “+ Add Pages” to select a page or a folder. On the next screen, the content author selects “Included subpages”. The top-right button “Next” is clicked, the next screen is displayed and “Inherit source page live data” is clicked along with “with existing content”. The button “create” is clicked. Current/Experienced Behavior: The current behaviour is described above, with the mention the content author is allowed to select any page or node, even the top folder that might include a very large number of pages that will trigger AEM to create copies for all those pages. Due to the number of nodes, a site-wide transversal is triggered, resulting in an unresponsive AEM instance. Improved/Expected Behavior: To prevent the situation described above we would suggest the following improved behaviour. When the content author selects a page or a node ensures he has the write permission for that page or node Restrict the number of pages or nodes to be included in the Launch by leveraging a configuration field via sling:osgiConfig. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Service Pack 14 Customer-name/Organization name: Service Canada / Government of Canada Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi, I did an A/B test for this email campaign : It would be a good option if we could be able to see on the program dashboard the performance of the winner email because for the moment, it is not possible to see the global performance of the winner email. Thanks Best regards
Description - Custom criteria is taking max of 32 hours to show the updated feed. But we need the updated products in our recommendation in next 1 hour or half an hour of successful feed. Why is this feature important to you - Showing some trending products in our website in a scheduled manner like every Monday new products has to appear in our recommendation. How would you like the feature to work - Feed, criteria is imported successfully means in next half an hour or max of 1 hour new products should appear in recommendation. Current Behaviour - After successful feed and criteria updates, its taking more than 30hours to show the updated products
It would be great to design a form in which we could insert custom data as well as built-in data (standard data). For instance, to have the ability to put the description field in a custom form. Currently the form designer allows us to select only custom data and the project manager has to select a different section in project details to document built-in data. It might cumbersome. A structured presentation would ease the documentation. Thanks, David
Currently when you add a Parent group, only members of the parent group show up in the Workload Balancer filter. This means that all sub groups need to be added individually, which defeats the purpose of having a parent group. Would like to be able to add a parent group as a filter and all the users in the subgroups under that parent group would show up. This would be consistent with how these group hierarchies work across Workfront.
Description - allow user Profile switching in Debugger to allow Adobe organisations to be selected properly. Why is this feature important to you - when your Adobe ID is used with different organisations, then you need to switch to the appropriate profile to be able to access AEP resources, e.g. AA report suite, Edge logs, etc. How would you like the feature to work - allow Profile switching from the user avatar (at top-right of the Debugger) Current Behaviour - if you need to switch to another Profile, you must sign out, then sign in, then choose the appropriate Profile. Doing so signs you out of Adobe entirely, so this affects other browser windows where you may be signed into your Adobe account, potentially causing your work to be interrupted.
Just like we can customize proof decisions (i.e. instead of 'approved with changes,' 'approved with changes, do not need to see again'), why can we not customize document approval decisions? I want to make the decisions for both consistent and it's odd we can't modify document approval decisions. Please upvote!
Description - We roll out surveys for completed projects via MS Forms. These surveys are taken by Project Sponsors. I believe it will be good to have this functionality in Workfront. Why is this feature important to you - To use/maintain Time and Quality metrics How would you like the feature to work - Just like an approval process, trigger survey when a project passes through a certain phase (like 'Complete'). Current Behaviour - NA
It would be useful to have the continent and not only the country.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: By adding Dynamic Renditions as an option for Download of Collections, would save time of scrolling and selecting all images within a collection (sometimes collections have 500+ images) Use-case: Many accounts that we provide images to all accounts have different image specs/sizes that are needed and we have created dynamic presets for these accounts. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we have to select all images within a collection for the dynamic rendition option to be an option for download. We also are getting an error when collections contain a 100+ images and we select dynamic renditions- so we then have to download these collections in smaller batches. Improved/Expected Behavior: Saves time and improves efficiency and accuracy that all images have been downloaded and sized accordingly. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Ashley Furniture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - please enable the https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Timing-Allow-Origin header on responses from your servers (especially the tracking server for Analytics) Why is this feature important to you - By adding `Timing-Allow-Origin: *` we will be able monitor responses status/timings from our customers browsers to your servers, which will help us to detect network connectivity issues at scale (e.g. in cases of geographic or ISP issues). How would you like the feature to work - By adding `Timing-Allow-Origin: *` to all server responses (especially the tracking server for Analytics) Current Behaviour - No `Timing-Allow-Origin` response header is sent therefore it is impossible to determine whether there are any network connectivity issues at scale.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Orientation detection is not available OOTB Use-case: There is a filter to see assets based on orientation -- portrait, landscape, and square. However, this will not be useful if assets are not manually tagged with the orientation tag. Current/Experienced Behavior: Orientation detection is not available OOTB Improved/Expected Behavior: Orientation detection is available OOTB Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - In Segment builder, equals any of is comma delimited when entering the values and contains any of is space delimited. This can be confusing and is not clear when in segment builder. You have to go to the experience league documentation to learn that. So you can use a list in one operator and have it work, but not have it work in the other operator. If a reminder text appeared over the field where you entered the values just to say "separate by commas" or spaces, this would help users a lot. Why is this feature important to you - I want Adobe Analytics to be easy to use by users of all skill levels.How would you like the feature to work - When someone selects one of the operators, a reminder text appears above the text field: Current Behaviour - There is no reminder to inform someone how this should be formatted
I would be nice to have color coded fields and then once forms are submitted -have the ability hide/unhide based on color coded fields.
Why does product from company that owns Photoshop and other creators' tools look like copy and paste from 2000 Windows XP era? Why does a product that is paid a big money for not kept on par with competing marketing platforms? It does not even follow the same UI language as the Marketo / Adobe site. This has to change.
Please add Recent Updates (currently the left column on the old My Work) to the new My Home page. I depend on this daily to make sure I didn't miss anything.
"Accessing Workfront through Adobe Experience Cloud gives you a seamless, unified experience for managing all of your Adobe applications. Single identity management gives you one place to log in, without multiple URLs or login IDs." This update that was rolled back yesterday seems like it will be happening again soon. The "new Workfront experience" as well as this added toolbar takes up so much screen real estate that it makes a second monitor a necessity to use Workfront. Our users are all comfortable to continue to use multiple tabs/windows to switch between other Adobe products that we have. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/basics/navigate/adobe-unified-experience.html?lang=en When this was rolled out yesterday, many users directed complaints to our admin team.
Description - Return what components (segments, variables, props, events) are included in any given project in the Usage API Why is this feature important to you - At our organization, we support over 800 monthly active users. We have several hundred segments, conversion variables, events, and props in use. From time to time, we have to deprecate one of these, but we don't have a good way to know how many workspace projects are using any of these components to understand impact of deprecating them. How would you like the feature to work - Include a comma delimited list of components found in a project in response Current Behaviour - I understand we can use the Usage API to learn high level usage data for projects, like how many projects created, or how many were updated, but I would be interested to get what components were included in reports returned in the query.
Description - Add a new type of Custom Form for Reports. Why is this feature important to you - This would allow the classification of reports and ability to more easily find reports and store metadata relevant to a specific company about the report How would you like the feature to work - Add new Category for Reports and surface that in Report Settings Current Behaviour - No equivalent
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
