I was so excited when PMCFs were launched, but it doesn't seem they've been shown much love since launch. I know its been mentioned to allow PMCFs to be used within smart lists, and to used to create reports. It would also be great if the individual PMCFs were visible outside of just the Program Members tab - in particular, as a field visible in smart list subscriptions that can be downloaded with reports. Currently its very manual to review what's captured in the PMCF and update it on external reporting.
Description - We have the following Issues:I raised this ticket here (Case #00337225) and was told that there is no solution at the moment, so I am putting this on record. This is an important issue because without this we don't know if the user logged into the system today and put in hours on past dates.1 - In the user updates it does not show on which date I posted the timesheet, it only shows me the update from when I attributed the hours.See, for example, I log into the Timesheet and fill in information from previous days, still in the example, Let's suppose I logged in today (October 21) and filled in hours from October 10.What happens today is that I don't have a clear view of when the user added those hours. Because the system shows me that the user logged into the timesheet on today's date, but does not tell me which dates he actually filled in. Is that clear to you? (attached screenshot of what I am saying)2 - The second issue is that when we post hours in the "General Hour" topics, which are: sick, vacation and etc... The system, besides not returning to me the real date that I filled that field, does not return to me the Hour Type name. Why is this feature important to you - is important, because then we will know the right time that the user posted his or her hours. How would you like the feature to work -That it is possible to check by user updates and have this field available in the report Current Behaviour - Currently, we do not have this information and we are unable to verify which moment (date/time) the user posted the time.
Adobe documentation on Data Feed mentions sftp and S3. I'd like to ask about supporting the Adobe data feed to GCS (Google Cloud Storage). The GCS API is an S3 compliant API. They have a transfer service from S3 as well: https://cloud.google.com/storage/transfer/
Description - Allow comments at start of calculation using standard syntax such as # Why is this feature important to you - While there is the instructions, this ends up displaying to the user. It would be better to have simple ability to write comments into the scriprt How would you like the feature to work - Allow # Current Behaviour - Not possible
Description - Modify the Config ID that's been set on the run of web SDK extension, based on a certain action of the user on page where a pageload /page refresh/ Navigation Why is this feature important to you - consider a scenario, where user provide a consent and a page load/ refresh doesn't happen. based on the consent of user if he enabled Analytics and disables personalization and Advertising opt In's. we need to send data using data streamA with service enabled only for analytics.user case 2: If user opt out Analytics and opt In Adverting and Personalization , we need to send data using data streamB with service enabled for event forwarding and Target. How would you like the feature to work - Providing a option to Developer to modify config ID in web SDK before send event. Current Behaviour - We are not able to change the config ID until a page reload / refresh / navigation takes place
Workfront Feature Request – Add comment counts to Unresolved, Unread, With Attachments and Current Page Only in the proof comment filter pane When filtering edits, there are currently comment counts under Actions but not under General I think it would be very useful to have comment counts in both sections If I knew how many unresolved comments still remain, I could figure I need to do XX number of edits per day to stay on track That would help avoid an unexpected last-minute scramble as the deadline approaches Also it doesn’t make any sense to me why the tick boxes under General are in two columns
We have received a lot of feedback that our users find the integration between the Workfront and Outlook calendars limited because you have to manually move the tasks over. Our request is that tasks automatically show up on the outlook calendar on the date the task is due, as all day events.
Hi Team,I think it would be great if there is a way to export full library as excel or csv including names of rules and data elements used in the rule which we can later utilise as way to integrate with reporting suite products as a reference of documentation for library.This will help us to do hassle free documentation and will add value for business users who wants to see all the third party tags installed with launch on the production website.Please let us know if there is some plan for this to happen or it would be already achievable through the present iteration itself.
At present, the user-defined campaign execution priority is only visible at the campaign level in the schedule tab, it'd be great if we could see the list of campaigns that have their execution priority overridden by the Marketo user along with the default/original and the overridden priority at one place, probably the best place to add this could be the campaign inspector within the Marketing Activities.
Currently, duration can be only be averaged at the project level, so if you attempt to add a filter for a specific summary task or template task, the system does not generate a number. As a new version of reporting is likely coming out, can we considering adding this functionality in so that we can break down project timelines by summary tasks, at least, to understand how long specific tasks take, without having to leverage text mode.
Please add Revenue Types to Issues. We stopped issues at all already about 7 years ago, as we had the problem that every logged hour on an issue results in Planned Revenue on a Project. In fact not every issue can be billed, so we would need the option to set a Revenue Type like "not billable" as we are uses from Tasks.
In using the new Single Page App (SPA) Visual Experience Composer in a React JS environment, there have been instances where I've made a modification like a heading text change which has persisted past the view on which it was defined. This is less than ideal.Would love to see added functionality that would provide the option to clear any visual editor changes for each of the following scenarios:user navigates away from the view in which the Visual Experience Composer modification was applied;user navigates to a view where the page delivery criteria doesn't much that of the view the user navigated to.Experiment changes should be reapplied of the user navigates back to the view where the change has been made.
Description - the ability to automate turning requests to project with project templates Why is this feature important to you - we have many teams that receive a LOT of requests every week in our org and as a planner, a lot of my job will centre around setting up projects for the various teams, despite not being a part of their team! I am the bottleneck in our Workfront instance. Being able to automatically convert a request to a project would save me hours of work every week and streamline our request process. How would you like the feature to work - have the option to automate the request > project action based on templates set up in the system. Current Behaviour - this option I don't believe is available based on posts in the Experience League community. Has to be done manually and means I'm a bottleneck for our request process.
Description - Allow the ability to Grant Edit and/or View Access to Section Breaks on Custom forms based on Team, Groups, or Access levels. Why is this feature important to you - This allows minor sections of custom forms that are needed for speciality teams to access and edit parts of a custom form that others cannot without having to create a whole new custom form. Allowing all the data needed to be kept in one form (Location). How would you like the feature to work - When placing a Section Break in a custom form allow either the ability to Grant access based on their access levels (how it is currently) or to grant Edit and/or View abilities based on a Team or Group assignment. Current Behaviour - Section Breaks in custom forms only allow the ability to Grant access based on their access levels, of Edit, View or Admin only.
Description - Currently the column sum function is a very simple "add all the values together" calculation... and this is fine, for some uses. However, when trying to create things like weighted averages for stackable metrics like Visits or Unique Visitors, there is no proper options available to us. See https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/weighting-dimension-values-using-custom-metric/td-p/554102 for an example... If you want to use the total visits or total unique visitors for the period in the math, it will always be inflated at this time. Why is this feature important to you - This will provide more controls to being able to use the data the way you need to. Since the column "totals" already show the de-duplicated values, we should be able to create within the same table a representation of that number. How would you like the feature to work - This could work in two ways, either add some additional settings on the existing "column sum" function (particularly for "stackable" metrics), allowing us to choose either a "full sum" or a "de-duped sum"; or have another function that represents "column total" (and replicates the de-duped column total (before the dimension breakdown) Current Behaviour - Column sum does a generic sum of the values, adding up each row... but offers no way to de-dup stacking metrics like Visit or Unique Visitor... there is no way to use the de-dup "totals" shown in the freeform table as part of calculated metrics when attempting to created weighted averages.
For the SFDC integration, there is multi-batch queuing (MBQ) support to help mitigate the occurrence of sync backlog. This would also be very useful for the native MSD integration, potentially solving a lot of the backlog issues that Marketo clients with larger databases currently experience. Could this be added to the roadmap please (if it's not already on it)?
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.