Currently, the only way I know of to access reCAPTCHA info from form submissions is to use trigger/filter constraints. It'd be helpful, however, to allow reCAPTCHA info to be passed through as tokens so that they can be used in internal email notifications for new form submissions. Since we just recently implemented the reCAPTCHA on forms, we'd like to monitor the reCAPTCHA info before automatically blocking bot-like traffic to make sure it'll work as intended if we do. I'm aware we can set up separate smart campaigns with their own triggers/constraints based on the reCAPTCHA info, but that'd result in duplicate smart campaigns to accomplish the same goal
When we create segment basis hit level it shows the other items also (which are present in the hit) For eg. In a single s.products was fired with values ";ABC;10;1,;XYZ;1;20". So there are 2 products purchased in a single hit ABC and XYZ.we classified ABC as Home category and XYZ as Electronics. Now if we create a Hit based segment with classification=Home, the report will show both Home and Electronics as the products associated with them where there in the same Hit. but our business users want to see the numbers from there perspective categories, which we are not able to achive with this hit based segments, which is creating lot of problems in reportings.
it comes as a great surprise to us that changing the Owner of a project does not automatically give that person manage access to the project.Seems kinda odd you'd want a view-only Owner of a project.So hoping to get some traction around making Manage the default, or perhaps an option in preferences so I don't remove someone else's preference for current behavior.
We need to have Workfront maintain the status of the request/issue after it is converted to a project and not change the status of the request back to "New". Currently, this is what happens in WF:Requestor submitted a request/issue to a reviewer for project executionThe status of the request changed to "New" The requestor approved the request for project execution and the status of the request turned "Approved" The customized queue that we built sends this approved request to the queue owner and he/she would change the status of the request to "Approved for Prioritization" (a customized status).However, when this request/issue is converted to Project object, the status changed to "New" for the request...we do not want that...we want it to keep its status at "Approved for Prioritization".
I think by adding read receipts to updates on a task or project level would be beneficial to Project Managers as well as others working within WF. It would allow the PM to see if their messages have been seen or read that way they can follow up when necessary. Currently you don't really know if someone you assigned a task to or @mentioned in an update has seen your message unless they select work on (one of the biggest pain points for our team currently). Adding this feature would definitely help to alleviate that! Thanks!
Description - Why is this feature important to you - it's a got great content and is a good resource. Sometimes I miss things if I'm too busy at work and it is a great reminder to visit the site. How would you like the feature to work - a monthly email Current Behaviour - it is only posted here!
We need to be able to select text across a page break in a proof, to make a copy edit using the text tools. Right now, I have to make two separate comments. It's extra work for me and confusing to others reading the comments. Please enable text selection across multiple pages.
Description - Update the Workload Balancer Bulk Assignments tool so that it functions the same way that the Scheduler Assignments tools does so that when a role is selected the drop down list populates with all (and ONLY) the users associated with the role. The current 'Smart Assignments' tool does not work as well. Why is this feature important to you - It seems small, but the original function to display the users associated to the roles is key to why the roles are assigned in Workflow templates in the first place. Only displaying recent assignments does not help owners see when the list of workers associated with roles changes (like when new users are added or when users change roles). It also no longer provides the crucial support to new owners who will not have assigned anyone at first or know the team well enough to just know what users associate to what role. So, this change takes away a big part of what made that tool so valuable. How would you like the feature to work - When a role is selected the drop down list populates with all (and ONLY) the users associated with the role. If 'Smart Assignments is desired, it should simply order the recent assignments at the top of the list although I personally think alphabetical is still the best option. Current Behaviour - In the Project level Workload balancer tool for Bulk Assigning tasks, the Assign User action is no longer populating the User list to assign based on the Task Role assignment selected the way that the Scheduler Assignments tool worked.NOTE: Tech Support confirmed this is not a "bug" so this idea submission is required for an update to be made: After reviewing our documentation here, the user list is not specifically designed to pre-populate with users who fit the role assignment. Instead, it follows the criteria for smart assignments, as listed below:See full article: Smart Assignments Overview In other words, if no users are populating when attempting to bulk assign a specific task role, it likely means that the logged-in user has not assigned anyone with that role in the past 30 days. One way you can test this is to manually assign a user with that specific role to any task, and then go back to the bulk-assign tool. You should now see that the user pre-populates in the list as expected.
Description - A feature in ProofHQ to manage bounce back from undelivered proofs. Why is this feature important to you - We are sending proofs to hundreds of external customers every day. Most of them are old customers, some new. Lately, we have noticed that a lot of proofs that we sent are not being opened at all. We tried resending the proofs again and again via ProofHQ but the customer still hasn't opened the proofs. So I tried sending the proofs via direct email (gmail corporate), not via ProofHQ, and then I received bouncebacks. This means that those customers never received the proofs that they requested and just end up canceling their orders. My question is, how do you handle those proofs that do have bounce-back notifications? How would you like the feature to work - The artist who created the proofs should be able to receive the bounce back notification in their inbox so that they can act on it, rather than the proof sitting there in limbo and the customer waiting. Current Behaviour - There is no option or way to know whether the proofs were actually delivered to the customer.
It would be super helpful to have access to the time off hours that are identified in the Workload Balancer, and the AVL (available hours) field/column from the Resource Planner, so that I could include them in Hours reports, and even in custom calculated columns.I have an Hours report whereby I want to account for (subtract) time off, associated to users, in the results of my report.
Adobe has announced that scheduled reports and data extracts are coming 'end of life' in 2023: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/analytics/analyze/reports-analytics/scheduled-reports-eol.html?lang=en#:~:text=On%20December%2031%2C%202023%2C%20Reports,new%20ones%20can%20be%20scheduled. In Analysis Workspace it's currently possible to schedule email/ftp extracts containing up to 400 rows of data but the outgoing functionality supported up to 50,000 rows! Data Warehouse is also not an acceptable alternative because it's not as flexible (for example, it doesn't support calculated metrics). Adobe product team: you recently introduced the option to manually download up to 50K items from Workspace - now please enhance the "Send file on schedule" feature to accommodate the same number of rows (ideally more). Peter
Workfront calendar's need a way to sort events. Our campaign names get seperated from their tactics even though they begin their names the same.
One of Marketo’s most innovative ideas in the early days of the company was Revenue Cycle Explorer (RCE), now named Advanced BI Analytics. — Marketo data extracted and transformed to a cloud repository/BI tool dedicated to advanced analytics. It was a good idea ahead of its time, but the product struggled largely because it lacked the right kind of documentation, and a really well-thought out library of example reports and dashboards. Today RCE may be Adobe/Marketo’s biggest missed opportunity. The idea remains sound, but it needs a rethink that allows for 1) flexibility to house the data in any cloud data store, 2) ability to use Marketo data with other data sets, 3) better and more attribution models users can tinker with, 3) better query optimization and faster data processing, 4) support for any of the modern BI tools in use today, and 5) a robust set of standard dashboards and reports. The world changed radically since RCE was released, now the world needs a better, modern way to leverage valuable Marketo data alongside other datasets to analyze and optimize their marketing.
Marketo's primary metrics for programs are number of successes and new names. We collect those data points in programs we build, and report on how programs and tactics performed on those measures. It would be very useful for marketing planning and optimization to provide slots on the program object for forecasted new names and number of successes. Marketers would be able to employ a simple, and relevant method to plan their marketing and measure outcomes against the plan.
Make the Custom form view standardized through-out the application. When we design the custom form, that's how we expect it to show throughout Workfront. The problem now is the our custom form views do not carry throughout the Workfront application. I have found 3 views of the same form & data. Ex: We have a project custom form, that we use for projecting team hours. The form has the fields organized with 3 fields in one row. Below you will see the 3 views in Workfront. 1. View when entering previewing the form or editing the form. This is how the form is designed & we expect it to be displayed. 2. View when viewing the form, without choosing Edit. Example of the problem: The fields on the rows are not aligned - All 3 fields are on one row, but the view is messy & not aligned. This is the view most users will see.3. View when we export the business case. Now we lose the 3 fields on a row, and all fields are on a separate row - which makes the form long.
We recently were trying to sync additional fields to Revenue Explorer and kept receiving an error. After opening up a support ticket, we were told that "this is now expected behavior to improve functionality and behavior results within the UI. Standard fields can no longer be synced as Dimensions and we ask that you should create custom fields to store this data, as this is now the intended design". So basically the only way to sync these fields is to create a new proxy field for every field we want to sync. How does that make any sense at all?! Please bring this functionality back.
Description - When a user is assigned as a project owner, their sharing of the project is capped by their license type. If they have a "Contribute" permission on a project they own, and their license is upgraded to allow "Manage" rights, as the project owner, their sharing permission should automatically be elevated. This is for 2 reasons: They own the project so they should be a manager of the project no different than if they created it, and the current behavior is that no one, even those with "Manage" rights, can change the project owner's sharing rights. Only the admins can change the owner's sharing permission. This is a design flaw in my opinion. Why is this feature important to you - Users who are project owners cannot be set with Manage permission except by an admin, but more importantly, their sharing permission should automatically be elevated if they get upgraded to a Plan license and they own the project. How would you like the feature to work - If a project owner had a "Contribute" max sharing, and they get a Plan license, the project that they own when opening should automatically elevate their sharing permission to "Manage". If the project owner's permission will not get elevated automatically, then other users with "Manage" permission on the project should be able to change the project owner's sharing permission to "Manage". Current Behaviour - The sharing permission does not change, so the project owner cannot manage the project, even if they get a Plan license. Other users who have "Manage" rights also cannot change the owner's sharing permission. Only Admins can make this change, which means someone who was assigned as a project owner but had a Work license, must file a support ticket to fix their permission.
Description - Allow systems/users with SSO setup to use that password for all areas within Workfront. i.e. do not need a separate "Workfront" password for resetting user passwords, logging into preview/test environment, etc. Why is this feature important to you - It's difficult to manage, keep track of, and unclear on what password to use where. How would you like the feature to work - If SSO is enabled that password should work wherever a Workfront/Adobe password is needed. Current Behaviour - A separate password is needed for resetting user passwords and logging into other enviroment's
Description - When subscribing a user to a project, it would be great if the system displayed both "Name" and "Email Address." Why is this feature important to you - The challenge is when there are multiple users with the same first and last name. If there are multiple John Smiths in the org, there's no way to tell which is the correct user to select. How would you like the feature to work - Display both name and email address. Current Behavior - Today, the system only displays the name. If there are three John Smiths in the org, you will see three John Smiths to select from with no other distinguishing characteristics.
Description - On Custom Forms it would be great to have Sub-Sections. Why is this feature important to you - Need to group data and or hide multiple fields within a section How would you like the feature to work -They would have the overall behavior of the main section but then could have additional subsection attributes such as Display Logic. Thus if the Parent Section is skipped then this whole sub-section is skipped but otherwise its logic is layered on top of the Parent Section. Same goes with Access Rights Current Behaviour - not possible
Description - Enable users to click on the section icon to navigate back to the main section area instead of clicking on the home menu and then the icon. Apologies if this has already been submitted, I couldn't seem to find it in my searching. Why is this feature important to you - Reduce click fatigue from end users. How would you like the feature to work - As an example, our users would like to be able to click on the portfolio icon here to get back to the main list of portfolios. With this also functioning for other areas like dashboards, programs, projects, etc. Current Behavior - Currently clicking on the icon has no action.
Description - If you include a Typeahead field, the user selects a value. Should allow a Calculated Custom Field to read the fields in the Object that is selected in the Typeahead Why is this feature important to you - I want to be able to display that information easily on the object I am on and it be directly related to the object I link to in the typeahead How would you like the feature to work - Add the Ability to search for a Typeahead field within the object Current Behaviour - Cannot read the Typeahead field in the Calculated Custom Field
Description - I would love for the Illustrator extension to enable creatives to timesheet as the Indesign and Photoshop extension does. Why is this feature important to you - This is the main tool our creatives use so would be amazing.
Description - If you're on an unactivated stage in routing and someone @'s you in the proof, you should be able to reply directly to that comment, but right now, you can't. Why is this feature important to you - We have a few designers with specific skills that are on a File Build Check stage but if a client asks a question regarding the project to one of those designers, they're unable to respond in the proof because they're stage isn't active or their role and have to go through additional steps to correspond, mostly outside of the proof/Workfront. It seems unnecessary. How would you like the feature to work - Just make it that if you're @'d in a comment on the proof you can respond directly to that comment even if your stage is not activated. Current Behaviour - If you want to respond to that comment you're @'d in, you either have to have someone change your role and move you to a previous stage or you have to carry the conversation over to the project, or find a way to correspond outside o Workfront.
Description - When you open a user's profile page in Workfront, you would see their title on top. This title is not necessarily associated with the work they perfom within Workfront. Meaning I could be a senior manager but my job in Workfront is to strategize campaign so my role is Strategic Marketer. It would make more sense to have the job roloe show up instead of my title Why is this feature important to you - This way the admins do not need to keep updating the user titles are they switch roles. How would you like the feature to work - Another way could be to just hide the title from the profile page so user's cannot see it. Current Behaviour - Currently we see the title on top of the user name and it is a manual task where the admin team will need to go into each profile and match the title to their current title in the org. Since we do not get notified about this unless the user themselves come and tell us or else the admin team will need to put a weekly/monthly process in ploace to make such changes proactively.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
