Not a new idea. This was submitted as an idea over four years ago. It is still a problem for many users. Please expand s.purchaseID to support unique strings larger than 20 characters. 64 characters would be just peachy as it would support a SHA256 output.https://forums.adobe.com/ideas/6214#comment-241670
We want to send app data to multiple report suites - an app specific one and a global rollup which also contains our website traffic data. Currently when we modify the mappings to evars and props processing rules are created in the app report suite but not the global report suite. This is causing a large admin overhead. It would be ideal if you could specify a secondary report suite for an app so that the processing rules are consistent across all report suites
IDEA: Allow me to filter via segments on A4T Target Activities in a Workspace project.Currently, when using A4T in Analytics, if you try to filter an entire Workspace project/panel using "Target Activities" it doesn't work, as visitors can be in more than one test at the same time. If you have a freeform table which includes the dimension "Target Activities" then you can filter that for a specific phrase, but if you are looking at other data related to the test and not specifically using the "Target Activities" dimension then you can only look at all activity.In theory the A4T Target information seems to act like a list var (i.e. you can have multiple values in a single hit) and its possible to segment/filter on list vars in Analytics.USE CASE: I want to create a project that allows me to see the aggregated performance and uplift of all Product X tests on a month by month basis.(May also be related to this idea: Target Activity Impressions in Segment builder )
when searching for items (projects, schedules, metrics, ...) i'm able to look for certain tags or flags.i would love to see an option to "exclude" all items that do not contain a certain flagexamples from the past where i could have used this option- show any calculated metrics that do not contain "test" => exclude tag "test"- show all calculated metrics that have no flags => exclude all tags- show only projects from other users => exclude "mine"- show projects that are approved but not shared with certain group => include "approved", exclude "certain group"i think there are a lot more examples where an exclude option could be useful
It would be great if we could:1. Delete or archive older data warehouse requests.2. Tag requests3. More Dynamic Filter / Sort.4. Also, related to FTP details, it would be great if you could provide the IP address that has pinged us for debugging purposes.
When I create a new Marketing Cloud user in the Admin console (for Analytics or Target, for example), the welcome email they received doesn't indicate what their username/login is, needed for when they try to log in and if they are logging into from a browser other than that the welcome email link resolves to, and needed for password resets. Also, the email doesn't indicate what kind of ID type they have: Adobe ID or Enterprise ID. My organization currently uses both for Adobe products (Marketing Cloud and Creative Cloud, respectively). Currently, I have to set solution permissions as a separate step in the user creation process, but I also have additional work when creating a user because I have to trouble-shoot with the user after they receive the "Welcome email" to resolve why they could log in initially with no password (yes, clicking on the welcome email link brings them directly into the solution with no password and logging in), but have been unable to log in subsequently, create a password or reset a password. If creating custom welcome emails was an option, as it is/was in Analytics, that would suffice. But the current "welcome" experience is confusing for the end-user and cumbersome for the admin, requiring much more work and time to resolve than the former process. Screenshot attached, no indication of username/login or ID type (required for login). Further, during the "Password Recovery" process, which was required because the user couldn't log in except from the welcome email, the Password Recovery email showed a "username" inconsistent with any user name I had entered, created or provided for this user. I have no idea where this name came from, except that it might have simply been a concatenation of the first and last name. Still, it was not the user name I created. And the email refers to SiteCatalyst, which hasn't been the product name for years! Screenshot attached.
...thus preventing unwanted/nuisance alerts :-) It would be great if there was a way to tell Adobe when our maintenance windows were so alerts weren't triggered. Potentially it may be neccessary to configure on a per alert (or group of alerts) basis as different areas of our site have different maintenance windows.
I have some stakeholders who want reports sent every quarter (instead of every month or every week). It would be great if one could schedule Workspace Projects to send with a quarterly cadence.
Came across an issue where the other party wanted numeric data specifically. Anything else would break the integration.So here is the idea:Allow for segments to be built on certain data types such as numeric, boolean, string, integer, etcAllow for segments to recognize space in a condition (ex: if evar1 contains space)
Hi Team,I am generating a report using DWH. I used Traffic variables, In the report head, I am seeing the variable number say prop61, prop62, prop63 appended to the variable name as below Page Name(prop63), Page ID(prop64). Could you please provide an option to show or hide the variable number in the column header?
I noticed a major privacy problem with API 2.0 while testing out the possibilities of restricted permissions for normal users:Using the command https://analytics.adobe.io/api/[mycompany]/users?limit=[XX] a normal user can get a list of all users in a given organization. This may pose a privacy issue as a normal user should not be able to see the usernames, admin status, email, first & last name, phone number, and title. Those are highly personalized information on any given user. Usually, I would think that only admins can get access to this information. Even though a "normal" user has no writing rights to manage, change or create users this is still a problem.Client Care says that the function is working as intended but this feature should not be an intended function for API 2.0. Please change this so that only admins can use this function and normal users only get information on their own account with https://analytics.adobe.io/api/[mycompany]/users/me.
If a calculated metric is used within another calculated metric, the nested calculated metric does not retain a link to the original. Instead the nested calculated metrics is a copy of the original. This means if the original calculated metric is changed the nested calculated metrics is unaffected.Current behaviour:Caculated metrics 'A' is nested in Calculated 'B'Calculated metric 'B' actually contains a copy Calculated Metric 'A'When the original Calculated Metric 'A' is changed the copy within Calculated metric 'B' is unaffectedTherefore, when calculated metric 'A' needs updating it is necessary to change the original metric and every copy individually (inefficient)Please can you consider making nested calculated metrics retain a link to the original to prevent us having to make changes in multiple places?
As an admin it would be useful to be able to filter for segments that are shared (but not necessarily shared with me)
What about having a feature where a rolling date range could go backwards. Example:timerange a: Starting July 16th 2018 and rollingtime rnage b: should end on july 15th 2018 and always roll backwards with the same amount of days just like time range a.Wouldnt this be a great feature!
Adobe captures a session timestamp. That timestamp, at present, is not surfaceable in processing rules. Understandable becauuse processing rules do not have regex or parsing capabilities. However, the atoms of that session timestamp, and associated metadata, are very valuable to a researcher. These include: "As a researcher, I want to cross the HH:MM with a video name so that I can calculate an AMA.""As a researcher, I want to cross the day of the week with a pagename so that I can compare Monday traffic patterns to Sunday traffic patterns in aggregate.""As a researcher, I want to cross HH:MM with timezone with a video so that I can understand how timeparting and timezones affects AMA." If specific components of the timestamp could be surfaced in processing rules, multiple timeparting features could be enabled. (The implementor would assign that data to specific variables to taste). A concrete example: a.hour : expected value 00, 01, 02, 03 ... 22, 23a.minute: expected value 00...59a.second: expected value 00...59a.twentyfourhourtime: expected value 0000....2359a.dayofweek: expected value monday, tuesday, wednesday, thursday, friday, saturday, sundaya.weekdayorweekend: expected value weekday, weekenda.timezoneoffsetgmt: expected value -12.....0.....+16a.timezoneoffsetutc: expected value -12.....0....+16 IF such technical debt is undesirable, the most straight forward three features: 1. Enable read-only priveledges to the session timestamp.2. Enable read-only priveledges to the timezone.3. Enable regex in processing rules.
The multi chart functionality works on ranked reports but not on trended reports even though it makes it look like you can do this. Would like this functionality on trended reports for the same reason it exists on ranked reports. Also even with ranked reports when they are added to the dahboard they no longer show the multiple charts.
Many times business team is concerned about data of last bucket because there is no visibility on chart about time of last update. I strongly suggest you to add this detail in the note of any chart, in the same way we have now other details:I ask that for standard reports in Adobe Analytics, but please figure out how to have it in Workspace as well.Jarno Rossijarno.rossi@luxottica.com
We're currently looking at importing offline sales data in order to help us evaluate the performance of our optimisation campaigns. Ideally I want to be able to look at the A4T ranked report with a number of online metrics and our offline sale metric. I've attached a screenshot which shows the standard A4T ranked report and the Sales metric that is being imported using Data Sources. Currently we're importing the sales metric as event11 and correlating with purchaseID, so when I look at the purchaseID report against event11 I'm seeing data as expected. However, if I try to breakdown A4T activity reporting by purchaseID and then tie to event11 it will show all as zeros. I'm assuming this is because the sales event is only correlated with the purchaseID but not the A4T activity report. It would be extremely useful to be able to evaluate Target campaign performance against offline data that forms a key part of the end to end purchase funnel.
I would love to see the ability to limit User capabilities within Analysis Workspace. I continue building out beautiful visualizations that someone destroys based on things they weren't supposed to click on. Right now all I can do is limit their ability to create and curate, but not edit. I would like to take away certain users ability to edit these dashboard but continue to leverage the interactive capabilities of Analysis Workspace. I spent more time re-building broken dashboards based on user error than anything else which is devaluing the tool.
It would be really beneficial to be able to download all data from workspace project into csv format. At present you can only download the current page data, and when wanting to split data by, for example. a customer ID and by multiple metrics this is not possible.
I created a rollup across 15 suites and noticed report builder can't pull the data in. Please give this ability, so we can easily schedule reports.
We want to create an Alert to tell us when a Tracking Code is outside the bounds of accepted codes, to tell us when a marketing person has created an improper code. But I notice when I drag Tracking Code dimension to the "filter" section, the UI ONLY allows for "equals" checking. This isn't feasible because we cannot possibly anticipate every badly formatted code. I tried using an asterisk, but that doesn't work either.Ideally we would like the Alerts to allow for "contains" or "starts with", etc., similar to what is available for segment creation. We use a standardized format for tracking codes per web property, so for instance for a certain web property we should only have tracking codes matching the format of EM_01_(whatever). So an alert we'd like is if a tracking code ever is something like EM_02_*, EM_03_*, etc.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.