Description - Currently, there is no way to "lock" a project from activity. This is a feature that would help prevent accidental changes after a project/iteration is completed. We have run into issues where someone accidentally transferred tasks from an old iteration to a new iteration. By Locking the finished iteration, it should not allow those tasks to be transferred. Why is this feature important to you - The goal is to prevent users from accidentally moving old completed iteration tasks to a different iteration How would you like the feature to work - Ability to Lock the Iteration after it is Complete. It can only be unlocked by specified people and NOT everyone in the team. Specified People Include: Iteration Owner, Team Owner, Admins. This lock will lock out any changes to the Iteration Cannot remove a task/issue if it is in an Iteration that is locked (from the iteration or from anywhere in the system (example from a Project or report) Notify the user that your attempt to move tasks was not allowed because one or more of the tasks are in a locked Iteration. Cannot add a task/issue to an Iteration that is locked Custom Form Data can only be changed by specified people above or if one of the specified people unlocked the Iteration. And to correct the bad behavior below – there should at minimum be a dialog pop up that says you are about to move XXX number of tasks to an iteration that include task XX number of Summary tasks and tasks that have not been explicitly selected for the move. Current Behaviour - Projects/Iterations/Tasks can be easily moved without warning.
We would love the ability in a report that if there is a role assigned on tasks, but the person assigned has that role as a secondary job role, to still be able to pull in the name of the person. Currently, you are only able to pull in the name of the person if that person's Primary Job Role is equivalent to the role assigned on the task. We have a lot of instances where a person will jump in to help with work when extra help is needed. It's not their primary function, but they assist as needed.
When a user clicks on the New Task button on the MyWork page, this new task does not need to be associated with a Project, and it can accept hours. The problem is that we transfer all of our time data in Workfront to our financial system, and all of the time data needs to be associated with a Project because the Project contains all the metadata that we need. So, we need the ability to prevent users from creating their own tasks that are not associated with any project, so that users don't accidentally log time on these orphan tasks.
The task to review a proof should be integrated with the Proof itself - ability to have a proof in a Workfront project that is the same as reviewing the proof. Provide a decision on the proof, marks the task complete and continues with the Workfront workflow. Some of our team is waiting for a ProofHQ e-mail when all decisions are made, but combining the Proof, the act of reviewing that proof, and a task within Workfront will help streamline the workflow.
Our internal InfoSec team wants to access the Workfront Audit Logs through Workfront Support API. We understand the Workfront support API’s for audit logs are not available currently, hence we are putting this request (new feature request) to Workfront for developing the Audit Log API’s so that our SIEM solution can pull the audit logs
Currently, animated GIFs can only be proofed separately. I want Workfront to remove this restriction and allow animated GIFs to be combined together as well as be combined with static files and still retain their interactive animation ability. Email campaigns often have multiple GIFs and static elements so this would help us keep all assets together in the review and approval cycle. Anyone else dislike this restriction?
Whether in custom fields or system fields, would love to have the capacity to enable whether user can choose a date later than today's date. Entered on behalf of Lindsay Wescott.
It would be helpful if we could use custom form Date fields to drive display logic. For example, if an activity start date is less than 30 days from $$TODAY, display a text field to explain the urgency.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - managers think this is a simple give someone else to delegate but then they get upset when the user updates that item they didnt have access too. How would you like the feature to work - hide the option for the Delegate Approval button on home page or put it in a different location, so that when they click it, it display a message saying the user will have access to this now until you physically remove it. Current Behaviour - button on home page and anyone can click it.
Description - Allow the ability on a task to allow or not allow time entry and/or for it to appear on a timesheet Why is this feature important to you - Need to push all time on a project to be on a task but only 1 time entry task for the project How would you like the feature to work - Add an option on tasks to "Allow Time Entry"/"Not allow Time Entry" Only tasks where the option of Allowing Time Entry would be able to receive actual hours and show up/be available on timesheets Current Behaviour - All tasks assigned to a person will go to a timesheet
Our company has multiple large groups. To utilize an Automatic Reminder for late tasks/issues, the whole company receives the reminder. One group may want to handle late tasks/issues differently than the next group. If you could manage by group, like notices, the Automatic Reminder would be easier to implement. Also, an Automatic Reminder would be more versatile if we could pick the frequency in which it is sent. Daily reminders can be exhausting for some users and they may pay more attention if the summary arrived once a week.
Here's an easy way to get this data from the Marketo API. I've worked with many Marketo teams and one thing on their wishlist is to be able to piece together the customer journey using data inside of Marketo. This is typically for the purpose of: Gaining insights into which activities and content are driving funnel progression Attribution At the time of writing this article, the Marketo UI does not provide an easy way to show this data. However the API allows for pulling this data and then you can feed this into Excel, a database, or any visualization tool to start extracting insights. Here is my bitbucket link to a simple Python script you can use to pull this data from the API. Test with one day's worth of data first. And here is the requirements.txt file to be able to run that script using Python 3. backoff==2.1. certifi==2022.6.15 charset-normalizer==2.1.0 idna==3.3 marketorestpython==0.5.19 pytz==2022.1 requests==2.28.1 urllib3==1.26.10 This will output a CSV file that looks like this: Rather than pull all activity types into the dataset, I would focus on key customer journey touch points such as: Page Views Email Sends, Opens, Clicks Content Downloads Video Views Status Changes This will help keep the analysis focused, the data sizes smaller and the reporting and analytics faster. Feel free to reach out with any questions on this and happy analyzing! * * * At Datajoin, we’re building Micro Integrations that take all the systems your teams are already using (Salesforce, Google Ads, Adobe EC, Marketo, Mailchimp, etc.) and seamlessly integrate them together. Rather than centralizing data from these systems in one hard-to-reach location, our Micro Integrations push customer-level data between systems–giving you access to vital operational data right in the tool you’re already using (no dashboard required). Go to datajoin.com to learn more.
Zoomと連携して、ウェビナー参加リンクをトークンで自動取得することができることを以下のヘルプから学びましたが、「Zoomのキャンセルリンク」もトークンがあるとありがたいです。 https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/demand-generation/events/create-an-event/create-an-event-with-zoom.html?lang=ja キャンセルリンクはZoomにしかないので、結局MarketoとZoom、両方から登録完了メールを送っています。 開発、ご検討いただけるとありがたいです。 よろしくお願いいたします。
Description - Support this Object: Awaiting Approvals (AWAPVL) Why is this feature important to you - A client is currently using in a document version report but we have had at least two instances when User ID (userID) in Awaiting Approvals is blank, and Adobe Support will not support. This report is part of a critical compliance process that needs to work for the client. How would you like the feature to work - as is, but supported. Current Behaviour - works, expect when it doesn't and Adobe Support will not support.
Description - "The stage has been created" activity to show the User who created. Why is this feature important to you - Auditability How would you like the feature to work - Show the User Name like other Activities show User Name Current Behaviour - Doesn't show User Name.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM 6.5 Assets, Metadata Schema Editor has only Single Line Text which outputs input element however there is no Multi Line Text type which would have put textarea element so it's very hard to read description like fields. Old UI has textarea fields but touch ui doesn't Use-case: dc:description can have long text and the existing Single Line Text is very small Current/Experienced Behavior: dc:description can have long text and the existing Single Line Text is very small Improved/Expected Behavior: Bind dc:description to a new field like Multi Line Text Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP7 Customer-name/Organization name: General Motors Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - For fetching Entities in Target recommendation, maximum number of entities that can be referenced in a design, either hardcoded or via loops, is 99. Why is this feature important to you - Offers are core of our business. Fetching just 99 is limiting us to show only limited offers How would you like the feature to work - Default can remain as 99, but this should be configurable if any customer needs to fetch more entities. Current Behaviour - 99 is the hard limit. You can't fetch more entities after 99.
Description - The experience in locking and unlocking a proof is inconsistent in different areas Why is this feature important to you - to minimize confusion among users How would you like the feature to work - Consistent icons and experience throughout Current Behaviour - In the proofing tool when a proof is locked it appears as a locked padlock icon at the top of the page with a link to the right to unlock the proof. In the lef-hand nav menu to unlock you click on an icon that looks like an open padlock. In the workflow view in Workfront you click directly on a locked padlock icon to unlock the proof.
Description - The new task/request delegation for when someone is OOO is great. However, on default (since this isn't something admins can change), it shouldn't include any tasks/requests in canceled status (the object or the project it lives in) from getting delegated. We had someone delegate while they were OOO and it delegated old canceled tasks since they were 0% complete. This feature should strip out anything canceled. Why is this feature important to you - helps work keep going while people are OOO How would you like the feature to work - see above in description. Just add this filter to the new delegation feature please! Current Behaviour - it delegates anything incomplete from the delegator - it should not delegate anything in canceled status (or if project the task/request lives in is in Canceled either).
Sharing PDF's is great since it gives a right away picture of the insight. Problem is that the PDF seems to be always only one long, very long page. Would be great to be able to personalize the format of the PDF, such as the ability to add page breaks.
Ability to create a global filter and set it as the default for all users in the Workload Balancer. Based on how each organization utilizes the tool, the current default is not helpful and causes extra items to be loaded taking time and causing delays for our end users.
When in a project, you can add a task by clicking 'New Task' at the top left of the task list, or 'Add More Tasks' at the bottom left of the task list. The one up top opens a modal, the one at the bottom is much more useful bc it allows you to add tasks in-line. This is especially helpful when using a custom view to add your new task easily, filling in the view columns left to right. Apparently, this bottom option disappears if your task sort is not sequential. Based on different use cases, we don't use sequential ordering for tasks but rather a view column. It makes no sense that this adding task option goes away if you change the sort. Please keep this showing at all times, WF!
We are using custom forms as briefs. A large number of those briefs are shared with external agencies. I would like to be able to export the form from the project/issue without all of the descriptive text also being exported as its not relevant content. I understand I could make a view/report, but that is one extra step.
Right now, there is no way to restrict All Requests/Issues to only a certain teams, roles, or individuals. We want increased controls around this and only allow submitters to see their own issues.
Hello! We have been working with Workfront for 11 years, which means we have seen it develop from the attask days onwards. One part that has not really been improved over the years is the search functionality. I open this idea now as I really do not understand why nobody has layed an eye on so simple things like row logic. In 95 % of my search cases I am searching for a Project. Means I have to set "Project" as filter first (why is there no option to set "Project" as my default filter). And then there is no grouping by status and always completed projects are listed first. But mainly I am searching for open projects... I am curious if other users feel the same pain. Thx Stephan
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
