Build better products with our product team
It would be helpful if we could use custom form Date fields to drive display logic. For example, if an activity start date is less than 30 days from $$TODAY, display a text field to explain the urgency.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - managers think this is a simple give someone else to delegate but then they get upset when the user updates that item they didnt have access too. How would you like the feature to work - hide the option for the Delegate Approval button on home page or put it in a different location, so that when they click it, it display a message saying the user will have access to this now until you physically remove it. Current Behaviour - button on home page and anyone can click it.
Description - Allow the ability on a task to allow or not allow time entry and/or for it to appear on a timesheet Why is this feature important to you - Need to push all time on a project to be on a task but only 1 time entry task for the project How would you like the feature to work - Add an option on tasks to "Allow Time Entry"/"Not allow Time Entry" Only tasks where the option of Allowing Time Entry would be able to receive actual hours and show up/be available on timesheets Current Behaviour - All tasks assigned to a person will go to a timesheet
Our company has multiple large groups. To utilize an Automatic Reminder for late tasks/issues, the whole company receives the reminder. One group may want to handle late tasks/issues differently than the next group. If you could manage by group, like notices, the Automatic Reminder would be easier to implement. Also, an Automatic Reminder would be more versatile if we could pick the frequency in which it is sent. Daily reminders can be exhausting for some users and they may pay more attention if the summary arrived once a week.
Here's an easy way to get this data from the Marketo API. I've worked with many Marketo teams and one thing on their wishlist is to be able to piece together the customer journey using data inside of Marketo. This is typically for the purpose of: Gaining insights into which activities and content are driving funnel progression Attribution At the time of writing this article, the Marketo UI does not provide an easy way to show this data. However the API allows for pulling this data and then you can feed this into Excel, a database, or any visualization tool to start extracting insights. Here is my bitbucket link to a simple Python script you can use to pull this data from the API. Test with one day's worth of data first. And here is the requirements.txt file to be able to run that script using Python 3. backoff==2.1. certifi==2022.6.15 charset-normalizer==2.1.0 idna==3.3 marketorestpython==0.5.19 pytz==2022.1 requests==2.28.1 urllib3==1.26.10 This will output a CSV file that looks like this: Rather than pull all activity types into the dataset, I would focus on key customer journey touch points such as: Page Views Email Sends, Opens, Clicks Content Downloads Video Views Status Changes This will help keep the analysis focused, the data sizes smaller and the reporting and analytics faster. Feel free to reach out with any questions on this and happy analyzing! * * * At Datajoin, we’re building Micro Integrations that take all the systems your teams are already using (Salesforce, Google Ads, Adobe EC, Marketo, Mailchimp, etc.) and seamlessly integrate them together. Rather than centralizing data from these systems in one hard-to-reach location, our Micro Integrations push customer-level data between systems–giving you access to vital operational data right in the tool you’re already using (no dashboard required). Go to datajoin.com to learn more.
Zoomと連携して、ウェビナー参加リンクをトークンで自動取得することができることを以下のヘルプから学びましたが、「Zoomのキャンセルリンク」もトークンがあるとありがたいです。 https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/demand-generation/events/create-an-event/create-an-event-with-zoom.html?lang=ja キャンセルリンクはZoomにしかないので、結局MarketoとZoom、両方から登録完了メールを送っています。 開発、ご検討いただけるとありがたいです。 よろしくお願いいたします。
Description - Support this Object: Awaiting Approvals (AWAPVL) Why is this feature important to you - A client is currently using in a document version report but we have had at least two instances when User ID (userID) in Awaiting Approvals is blank, and Adobe Support will not support. This report is part of a critical compliance process that needs to work for the client. How would you like the feature to work - as is, but supported. Current Behaviour - works, expect when it doesn't and Adobe Support will not support.
Description - "The stage has been created" activity to show the User who created. Why is this feature important to you - Auditability How would you like the feature to work - Show the User Name like other Activities show User Name Current Behaviour - Doesn't show User Name.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM 6.5 Assets, Metadata Schema Editor has only Single Line Text which outputs input element however there is no Multi Line Text type which would have put textarea element so it's very hard to read description like fields. Old UI has textarea fields but touch ui doesn't Use-case: dc:description can have long text and the existing Single Line Text is very small Current/Experienced Behavior: dc:description can have long text and the existing Single Line Text is very small Improved/Expected Behavior: Bind dc:description to a new field like Multi Line Text Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP7 Customer-name/Organization name: General Motors Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - For fetching Entities in Target recommendation, maximum number of entities that can be referenced in a design, either hardcoded or via loops, is 99. Why is this feature important to you - Offers are core of our business. Fetching just 99 is limiting us to show only limited offers How would you like the feature to work - Default can remain as 99, but this should be configurable if any customer needs to fetch more entities. Current Behaviour - 99 is the hard limit. You can't fetch more entities after 99.
Description - The experience in locking and unlocking a proof is inconsistent in different areas Why is this feature important to you - to minimize confusion among users How would you like the feature to work - Consistent icons and experience throughout Current Behaviour - In the proofing tool when a proof is locked it appears as a locked padlock icon at the top of the page with a link to the right to unlock the proof. In the lef-hand nav menu to unlock you click on an icon that looks like an open padlock. In the workflow view in Workfront you click directly on a locked padlock icon to unlock the proof.
Description - The new task/request delegation for when someone is OOO is great. However, on default (since this isn't something admins can change), it shouldn't include any tasks/requests in canceled status (the object or the project it lives in) from getting delegated. We had someone delegate while they were OOO and it delegated old canceled tasks since they were 0% complete. This feature should strip out anything canceled. Why is this feature important to you - helps work keep going while people are OOO How would you like the feature to work - see above in description. Just add this filter to the new delegation feature please! Current Behaviour - it delegates anything incomplete from the delegator - it should not delegate anything in canceled status (or if project the task/request lives in is in Canceled either).
Sharing PDF's is great since it gives a right away picture of the insight. Problem is that the PDF seems to be always only one long, very long page. Would be great to be able to personalize the format of the PDF, such as the ability to add page breaks.
Ability to create a global filter and set it as the default for all users in the Workload Balancer. Based on how each organization utilizes the tool, the current default is not helpful and causes extra items to be loaded taking time and causing delays for our end users.
When in a project, you can add a task by clicking 'New Task' at the top left of the task list, or 'Add More Tasks' at the bottom left of the task list. The one up top opens a modal, the one at the bottom is much more useful bc it allows you to add tasks in-line. This is especially helpful when using a custom view to add your new task easily, filling in the view columns left to right. Apparently, this bottom option disappears if your task sort is not sequential. Based on different use cases, we don't use sequential ordering for tasks but rather a view column. It makes no sense that this adding task option goes away if you change the sort. Please keep this showing at all times, WF!
We are using custom forms as briefs. A large number of those briefs are shared with external agencies. I would like to be able to export the form from the project/issue without all of the descriptive text also being exported as its not relevant content. I understand I could make a view/report, but that is one extra step.
Right now, there is no way to restrict All Requests/Issues to only a certain teams, roles, or individuals. We want increased controls around this and only allow submitters to see their own issues.
Hello! We have been working with Workfront for 11 years, which means we have seen it develop from the attask days onwards. One part that has not really been improved over the years is the search functionality. I open this idea now as I really do not understand why nobody has layed an eye on so simple things like row logic. In 95 % of my search cases I am searching for a Project. Means I have to set "Project" as filter first (why is there no option to set "Project" as my default filter). And then there is no grouping by status and always completed projects are listed first. But mainly I am searching for open projects... I am curious if other users feel the same pain. Thx Stephan
Description - Why is this feature important to you - ability to edit access level should be strictly limited beyond the ability other user fields How would you like the feature to work - Group admins should have access to edit users so they can add teams etc. but should not be able edit access level Current Behaviour - Anybody with access to edit users can also edit access level
Description - The ability to create, update, delete, and de-activate issues, routing rules, queue topics, topic groups in bulk How would you like the feature to work - It would be ideal if there was a "Master Dashboard" for Group Admins that you could create, update, delete, and de-activate routing rules, queue topics, topic groups and apply forms and then assign them to projects and templates all in one place in bulk. Current Behaviour - When an update is needed or a new issue form needs to be added we have to manually add, update, delete, or de-activate the form, routing rule, queue topic, and topic group to over 1000's of projects and 100's of templates. This effort takes our team days to complete. Why is this feature important to you - We are making implementation decisions based on maintenance burden and if we could have bulk action, we could better meet the needs of our users without having to account for days of work to make all the updates.
Issue: Remote offer used to work in mobile app SDK v4.13 no longer supported in mobile app SDK v4.14.1+ Per Adobe internal Enginering ticket TNT-30045 currently the only supported offers are: html, widget and recs.Feature: Bring back support for remote offers in the latest version of the mobile app SDK.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow a Collection within AEM to be published, so the asset references can be accessed from the publish server. Use-case: We have a custom component that pulls assets from an AEM collection. The fact that this collection cannot be published stops us from being able to populate the component on the live sites. Current/Experienced Behavior: Unable to view collections and their asset references on a publish server Improved/Expected Behavior: Being able to view and utilize collections and their asset references on publish servers Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.11 currently Customer-name/Organization name: Securian Financial Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
The current column width adjustment control is about ~2 pixels wide when at 100% zoom. Users find it very hard to adjust column size, often time miss-clicking and not getting the column width resizing option. If the clickable zone was approximately twice the size, it would be far less finicky.
Currently comments in proofing documents are one-directional (from the proof to Workfront) and only for added comments. When a comment in the proof is deleted, it is not deleted from the document feed in Workfront. Also, when a user replies to a comment in the document feed, it is not posted to the proof. Both feeds need to speak to each other seamlessly. In the case of deleted comments in the proof, users are confused when they see 2 comments in the proof, but 8 comments in the document feed. They worry that they're missing key feedback.
Our delivery team has every sku as a task in our instance and we want a way to bulk edit task durations. Right now we have to individually update durations as things change for the due date of those items.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
