Build better products with our product team
Description - For a system like Adobe Experience Cloud Experience Platform Dynamic Data Collection Launch, by Adobe Tags, it is very important to provide a clear view on what has been changed when and by whom. This information is available already through the amazing Audit Event tab. However, it can be tricky to figure out what has changed due to the information being presented in a different place from the resource in question, like a Rule's Action. For example, looking for information about who changed a Rule's Action is difficult, because the displayed information would only work if every Action has a unique name: To help with that, I would like to propose the following enhancements: In the view above, always include the ID of the resource and allow to search for it Make the results clickable, so users can jump directly to the Resource in question Display Audit Events in the context of the Resource they belong to. For example, add another menu item below the existing Notes button for qualifying Resources (like Rules, Rule Components, Data Elements, Extensions, Libraries) where only Audit Events for the respective Resource would appear: Why is this feature important to you - Because I like to know what is going on How would you like the feature to work - See above Current Behaviour - A lot of 🕵️♂ for very little 💡
Description - Callbacks provide a tremendously helpful way to integrate Adobe Experience Cloud Experience Platform Dynamic Data Collection Launch, by Adobe Tags with other systems, like ticketing or messaging tools. However, the fact that we need to use an API to set them up means not many customers a) know about the feature or b) use it to its full potential. To help with this, please provide a way to create, manage, and delete Callbacks from the Tags interface. Why is this feature important to you - Because Callbacks have a lot of value, so everybody should use it a lot (me included) How would you like the feature to work - Add the option to create, manage, and delete Callbacks from the Tags interface within a Property, maybe directly in the left-hand menu? Current Behaviour - A lot of 🩸💦 and 😭
Description -At the moment rules are triggered in a sequence determined by the rule order number. However, each rule executes asynchronously meaning that rules with a higher priority may finish after rules with a lower priority. This can cause issues where there is a dependency between rules. Why is this feature important to you -We are experiencing issues where there are dependencies between rules. They are hard to spot because the are intermittent and are difficult to resolve due the the asynchronous execution. How would you like the feature to work -I would like to be able to force rules set to different order numbers to wait for other rules. This would be similar to the "wait then" behaviour of actions within a rule.
I would like the ability for Marketo to be able to see the data layer objects on a page in order to use that data as part of triggers and filters in smart campaigns. This could be part of AEM integration with Marketo as well possibly. Example Use case - Leadscoring: Right now Marketo can only rely on URL structure and parameters in order to identify content type on a web page. This is limiting on our website as we have very complicated content with a lot of attributes to it that won't work in the url structure. Our site is utilizing tags in AEM to populate Data Layer objects to populate this data into other Adobe products such as Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target. If we could access the data layer objects this would make this task much easier
Description - Currently when working with combined proofs the order of files happens according to the default drag-and-drop option. After dragging files into the proof's creation menu, some files will be allocated "randomly". There is no way to order files by naming (A-Z), or other meta data information of the file. We are only able to drag-and-drop them manually. As we cannot see a preview of the files, and when working with large amounts of images in one proof, this becomes highly inefficient. Furthermore, when working with two or more versions of the same images we cannot guarantee that the right images will appear in the side-by-side comparison feature. Why is this feature important to you - We are not able to work efficiently with large, combined proofs. How would you like the feature to work - We would like to have a dropdown next to the file file list, to choose how to sort the list of files in the creation menu of a new proof (based on metadata, like the name). In addition, it would be great to be able to readjust the order of images within an existing proof. Current Behaviour - Currently there is no option to reorder files in combined proofs after creation, and only the option to manually adjust the order of files, after uploading files into the proof's creation menu.
We are looking for a way to easily run a report to show the programs without any activity for a specific time period. For example: I want to know which on-demand webinar events are still collecting data and if not then turn them off and archive them. Right now the only way to do this is to manually look at each program one by one which is not scalable.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:Support long term cache config to generate a hash each time clientlibs are modified for AEM on-prem instance.Use-case:Currently, we have to use ACS commons for long term cache config and that has lot of deprecated APIs and more features than required. So can Adobe add the feature of 'hash' for on-prem instances similar to AEM Cloud - beyond auto and none? [com.adobe.granite.ui.clientlibs.impl.LongCacheConfig]Current/Experienced Behavior:It generates a longtermkey based on system time of the service restart.Improved/Expected Behavior:Generate a new key based on last modification of clientlibs to make it dynamic.Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):AEM 6.5.5Customer-name/Organization name:TA DigitalScreenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Direct integration/connectors to Messaging protocols like MQTT within AEM Use-case: Messaging use case, M2M connections Current/Experienced Behavior: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-64/communities/develop/essentials-messaging.html?lang=en https://adapt.to/content/dam/adaptto/production/presentations/2016/adaptTo2016-Microservices-and-IoT-with-AEM-Carsten-Ziegeler-David-Bosschaert.pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/original.media_file.download_attachment.file/adaptTo2016-Microservices-and-IoT-with-AEM-Carsten-Ziegeler-David-Bosschaert.pdf and used of 3rd party integartion via APIs, java libraries etc. Improved/Expected Behavior: To use direct connectors to Messaging protocols similar to existing SMTP for MQTT,ZeroMQ etc. This protocol is useful for IoT communication via sites. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AR/VR Authoring experience in AEM/ Integartion of Adobe Aero Use-case: Future proof content authoringAR e-commerce CMS experience. Current/Experienced Behavior: Authoring mode in AEM / Adobe Areo Improved/Expected Behavior: AR authroing experience.AR asset management.Using AR to create content. AR website experiecne. Adobe Aero Integartion. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi, I'm looking for a way to make personalization (A/B tests, targeted ID, etc..) more visible on a page in editor mode for all authors. In classic UI the annotations are more visible and directly on the page. In Touch UI most authors do not notice the annotations in the right corner. Comments in the timeline could also be an option but that is still not very visible or specific.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Integration tests and UI tests are executed automatically on the Stage environment as part of a Production pipeline. We would like to run our integration tests earlier, when pushing code to one of our Development environments. This would allow us to catch bugs early without risking the timeline of Production deployment. Use-case: We have two Development environments. One receives the latest code, another is used as a stabilization/bugfixing environment before a Production release. We would like to run our integration tests on the stabilization environment to catch issues early. Current/Experienced Behavior: Integration tests can only be executed against the Stage environment, as part of a Production pipeline. Improved/Expected Behavior: Integration tests can be executed against a Non-Production pipeline. This could be another toggle in the UI, in addition to the Deployment Trigger and Important Metric Failures Behavior toggles. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: NI Screenshot (if applicable): N/A Code package (if applicable): N/A
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add a Save As Button to the Image Set Creation Screen Use-case: Currently there is no option to select an existing image set to modify it and then save under a different name; keeping the original image set as is. Current/Experienced Behavior: We are creating images sets that vary slightly and are basically creating the same image set; just giving it a new name due to business. Improved/Expected Behavior: Saves time and efficiency as we need to search/re-create image sets rather than being able to select an existing image set to add/delete re-arrange images and save under a different name. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as CS Customer-name/Organization name: Ashley Furniture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: To fecilitate Component documentation on component dialog within AEM and remove external dependencies Use-case: Each custom component/ core compoenents need documenation like authroing guide/ component use-case doc etc. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we have to provide separate doc. in sites or word doc and is not integarted within AEM; Another approach: Also there is a way to use cusomized js to read and show the html to achive this. https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager-blogs/aem-components-markdown-documentation/ba-p/540904 Improved/Expected Behavior: To have a property something like within AEM : granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/includeReadme That takes an additional path property pointing to a ".md" file. This enables author to view component docs, with ease and reduces efforts to use 3rd party sites/dependencies. Also as its associated within the custom components , author need not search for docs in case of huge database of components in a project. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable a reporting tool that can extract the list of all pages Use-case: Be able to generate a report about pages that should include basic properties a well such as page status (published or not) Current/Experienced Behavior: Right now, what's being recommended is ACS Report builder. Improved/Expected Behavior: We want something that's truly out of the box not community created Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Proquire Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When we use the add to calendar token for running webinars, the default reminder for when people save their event in the calendar is set to "none".This means that people will not get a reminder pop up before the webinar, like you would do a normal meeting in Outlook.Please could this be changed?
The currently data available to capture in a baseline is very limited. 2 options would increase the value of baselines dramatically Include one or several free form text fields to capture data about the specific baseline (describe some context about the project or reason for capturing the specific baseline). Include the ability to include specific custom data fields from the project. Both of these would allow users to add context to the baseline so a series of baselines can be better understood at the end of a project or during a retrospective.
Description - It would be great if there was an option to have the Kanban board automatically organize the order of the story and element/issue cards based on planned completion date (or priority). Why is this feature important to you - It would help the team understand what the most time sensitive or high priority items are without needing to organize the board. How would you like the feature to work - If we had a setting within the team page settings or an option on the Kanban board itself (next to the filter column) to sort Kanban cards by planned due date, we would have the most urgent or highest priority cards show up at the top of each column. Current Behaviour - Manually able to sort cards, but no other current method for organization.
Description - It would be useful/nice if the funnel quick search button above reports could filter for all words seen on the reports. Currently it seems to do so only for some. Scenario - I have created a Dashboards report, in which there are these two columns: Shared With, and Shared System-wide (both native fields found in the Columns portion of the report builder). Some of these dashboards are shared system-wide. For these ones, under the Shared With column, I can see one of the line items saying "System-Wide"; on the other column is says "True". If I use the little funnel filter above the report, I can filter for the word True and the relevant dashboards show up. If I filter for the words Sytem-Wide, the filter returns zero results. It should return the same number of rows as the previous search/filter. Why is this feature important to you - it's impractical, and inconsistent. I found this one behaviour in which the filter returns zero results on something listed within the cells of the report, but I am not sure what it is not being read. The other thing is that now I can't remove the Shared System-wide column, even though I have the information already listed in another way in the Share With column: my report shows duplication of data and that's not a best practice. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the funnel search/filter option to work on all words/information listed within the report, not just some.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK