Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable a reporting tool that can extract the list of all pages Use-case: Be able to generate a report about pages that should include basic properties a well such as page status (published or not) Current/Experienced Behavior: Right now, what's being recommended is ACS Report builder. Improved/Expected Behavior: We want something that's truly out of the box not community created Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Proquire Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Long component dropdowns are quite useful in my projects, but are painstaking to create, because the components appear in the component list in the left rail in order of hit prevalence (which is also useful) but I'd like to make the dropdowns more user friendly by listing all the options in alphabetical order. Doing this is quite time consuming because the elements in a dropdown appear only the order in which they are selected and dragged from the left rail onto the dropdown. So to create an alphabetical dropdown from a long list of components requires a painstaking search of all components and individual selection, using an external reference list already sorted in alphabetical order, marking them off as you go to avoid duplication. This could all be avoided if the left rail component list/selector had a toggle to sort alphabetically or by hits. For extra credit bonus points, add this same capability to the dropdown segment itself.
Often when composing a new panel, I add multiple segments, then later realize that it would be best to display them in hierarchical order from left to right, especially putting fixed segments on the left, and dropdowns on the right. But they appear only in the order in which you add them, and can't be moved, with one exception: a Date Range dropdown can be dragged to the end in the blank "add segment" spot and then appears as a new, duplicate segment, so you can then delete the original and keep the date range on the end. It would be nice to be able to do this with other segments, but when I attempt it, I get an endless activity spinner. Better yet would be the ability to rearrange them all however you like.This feature would be especially useful in cases where I created dropdowns with many entries, which are tedious to redo, so I try to copy panels from other reports that already have them and then edit as needed. See the attached images for a use case. 1. Painstakingly created long dropdowns for Product Category and Product Code, either in situ here, or in this case, in a panel copied from another project.2. In this project, the whole panel should be filtered for Product Division (a static segment, not a dropdown), so I add this on the end. I would like to move it to the far left.The desired order would be Product Division | Product Category | Product Code Name | Date Range3. Existing Date Range dropdown can be dragged onto the empty, end position (Drag a Segment here box), creating a duplicate.4. Deleting the original Date Range leaves the new one at the far right, as desired (5) but this operation cannot be repeated with other segments or dropdowns, only Date Range. Would be even better to be able to reorder them at will by dragging, as you can with table columns.
When we use the add to calendar token for running webinars, the default reminder for when people save their event in the calendar is set to "none".This means that people will not get a reminder pop up before the webinar, like you would do a normal meeting in Outlook.Please could this be changed?
The currently data available to capture in a baseline is very limited. 2 options would increase the value of baselines dramatically Include one or several free form text fields to capture data about the specific baseline (describe some context about the project or reason for capturing the specific baseline). Include the ability to include specific custom data fields from the project. Both of these would allow users to add context to the baseline so a series of baselines can be better understood at the end of a project or during a retrospective.
Description - It would be great if there was an option to have the Kanban board automatically organize the order of the story and element/issue cards based on planned completion date (or priority). Why is this feature important to you - It would help the team understand what the most time sensitive or high priority items are without needing to organize the board. How would you like the feature to work - If we had a setting within the team page settings or an option on the Kanban board itself (next to the filter column) to sort Kanban cards by planned due date, we would have the most urgent or highest priority cards show up at the top of each column. Current Behaviour - Manually able to sort cards, but no other current method for organization.
Description - It would be useful/nice if the funnel quick search button above reports could filter for all words seen on the reports. Currently it seems to do so only for some. Scenario - I have created a Dashboards report, in which there are these two columns: Shared With, and Shared System-wide (both native fields found in the Columns portion of the report builder). Some of these dashboards are shared system-wide. For these ones, under the Shared With column, I can see one of the line items saying "System-Wide"; on the other column is says "True". If I use the little funnel filter above the report, I can filter for the word True and the relevant dashboards show up. If I filter for the words Sytem-Wide, the filter returns zero results. It should return the same number of rows as the previous search/filter. Why is this feature important to you - it's impractical, and inconsistent. I found this one behaviour in which the filter returns zero results on something listed within the cells of the report, but I am not sure what it is not being read. The other thing is that now I can't remove the Shared System-wide column, even though I have the information already listed in another way in the Share With column: my report shows duplication of data and that's not a best practice. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the funnel search/filter option to work on all words/information listed within the report, not just some.
We run 3 instances of Workfront across different business units, and would like the ability to have notifications generated from processes to be sent from a unique email address specific to the instance in which the process is contained. This is important to us because we have a very large user base across 3 business units with 100,000+ email notifications being sent each day. We recently had an issue (case number 00329247) caused by a user cancelling a large number of tasks, which produced close to 1M emails and overwhelmed the queues within our Exchange server. This resulted in our Communications team temporarily blocking the "from" address used for WF email notifications. However, since all notifications are sent from the same address, this resulted in all notifications across all of our instances being blocked. Unique "from" addresses would have allowed us to only block notifications within the instance that was causing the queue issues, as well as more quickly identifying the instance causing the increase in incoming notification emails.
Description - Currently, if a user is deactivated, that user cannot be searched for. This is fine for sharing or assignments, but not for reporting. We need to be able to include the work done by people who are no longer active in the company. Without being able to use typeahead for deactivated resources in report filters and regular filters, it prevents managers from being able to include everyone's work. Why is this feature important to you - In order to create reports on all work done by resources, including inactive resources. How would you like the feature to work - typeahead for inactive resources should be allowed in filters Current Behaviour - Filters do not show inactive resources when searching/typeahead.
Description - Has there been any discussion around having the "done with my part" added on tasks when there are users and another team(that the user isnt apart of) assigned? Currently if a user and another team is assigned the only option for the user is to mark the task completely done if someone from the other team has not been assigned yet, thus only half of the task actually was completed thus resulting in confusion and rework. Why is this feature important to you - This has been causing some confusion for some of our users if they complete a task but someone from the other team assigned has not been assigned for their portion of the task How would you like the feature to work - To have a task known when there is a team assigned and ensuring that someone from that team is assigned to work on the task so that "Done with my part" would populate Current Behaviour - If a user completes their portion of the task before a someone from the other assigned team has been assigned to the task, the only option is to mark done on the task completely when the task has not been completed fully.
Description - When looking at the project detail for a project, the field names have a smaller font than the data itself. This makes it hard to read and hard to find specific fields. This is the case on both the Overview section and the Custom Form section. Why is this feature important to you - It hard to read a smaller font and hard to find specific fields, especially when there are a lot of fields. How would you like the feature to work - Allow modification of font (size/color/bold/italic/underline) display for field names. Current Behaviour - Field name font is smaller than the data.
Description - In the Set up of Request Queues, add a section to set permissions so that entered requests within either the Queue or the Topic can be automatically granted permissions Why is this feature important to you - Allows for more granular sharing or access of objects as they are created How would you like the feature to work - On the Queue Topic and on the Request Queue Screens provide a sharing box that would allow the resultant request together with potentially the converted resolving object to have defined visibility set Current Behaviour - No current equivalent
Description - In a View enable the ability to Bulk Edit Sharing Permissions Why is this feature important to you - As Permissions are not always granted, it would be good to allow bulk edit of Permissions on objects such as Projects. Particularly to enable sharing to a Manager who may not be able to see or report on their Team's activities How would you like the feature to work - Add Option of Sharing on Views Current Behaviour - Have to go into the object to change permissions
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In order to troubleshoot issues effectively each AEMaaCS should expose an upgrade log so development team can debug issues effectively (i.e. there was no feature deployment and something stopped working all of a sudden). Information I'd like see inside:- timestamp- AEMaaCS version/release prior to and after the (up|down)grade - who (or what; mind that RO/RV is out there) scheduled/triggered a deployment- is given version already deployed or a deployment has to take place to enforce that- notes (i.e. if the upgrade was requested via support ticket then I'd love to see a reference to that) Moreover it'd be great if such a log is available via Cloud Manager API (1 per environment). Use-case: Identifying if, why and though whom an upgrade was executed (also to analyze why some feature "suddenly fails") .If a feature fails to work through an upgrade - this is impossible to determine or debug. Current/Experienced Behavior: If a feature fails to work through an upgrade - this is impossible to determine or debug. There is no way to identify an environment has been upgraded, when , for what reason and by whom. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to review the upgrades, eg. through an "upgrade log" (available for download and "Tail"):* timestamp * version before the upgrade * versions after the upgrade * identity/person/process triggering the upgrade * link to release notes * notes (eg. ticket though which an upgrade was requested), Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: At the time of writing AEMaaCS environment API [1] does not allow me to: inspect which version of AEMaaCS given environment runs check if the version I have is the latest upgrade the environment programmatically. The only way to do it is via Cloud Manager Web UI (non PROD envs) or support ticket (STAGE/PROD). The latter may not be something Adobe considers doable (due to RO/RV), but we'd love to see such a feature for lower level environments. We has dozens of dev environments spread across multiple programs, so it is cumbersome to keep them in sync [1] https://developer.adobe.com/experience-cloud/cloud-manager/reference/api/#tag/Environments Use-case: enable to "automate upgrades" and across many programs and environments (customers with up to 10 programs) - and to understand current and latest available verison. Current/Experienced Behavior: API and CLI do not provide information on * current AEM version of environment * latest available version provided for the environment * ability to execute upgrade though API/CLI Improved/Expected Behavior: API and CLI should offer the option to request * current AEM version of environment * latest available version provided for the environment * execution of an upgrade (add upgrade flag and execute full-stack-pieline) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When viewing the summary tab of a task and looking at the dependencies it would be nice to have tasks numbers and/or an indication of predecessor completion (similar to gray/green designation in the predecessor column).
Description -"Summary Change" visualisation functionality in a column Why is this feature important to you - To see the changes easily from day-to-day basis, rather then seeing only 1 at a time in visualization How would you like the feature to work - Drag and drop summary change visualization or similar in column in panel and see the data Current Behaviour - Not available
The new feature of being able to delegate work to another person is a great concept, however, as it functions now, it's not useful to us. Currently, if you delegate work to another person, the only place that work appears for the delagee (person you delegated to) is in their My Work area. That person doesn't get any predecessor task notices, or any update notes sent to the delegator. This is only useful if the task dates are exact, all work is completed exactly on schedule, and no one adds any notes in the Updates area. The ideal state would be for any notices that would normally go to the delegator, to be forwarded to the delagee, so they would get predecessor notices and Update notes intended for the delegator as well as see tasks in the My Work area.
Not everyone in our organization uses Workfront for project management. It has to lead to a miriad of issues when it comes to how other departments within our company make requests of the marketing department. I would like to have the ability to make a request form public, essentially granting access to non-authenticated users. Our current process for departments outside ours is to send them a Word Document with questions from our request forms. They email it back to us, and we convert to a project or task. If I could send a link to a request form, that would minimize the headache of setting that person up with an account and contacting IT to get them SSO access (which can take days if IT is busy). Thank you for taking the time to consider this idea.
Hello! Small suggestion, we're using the new UX and we've found when cloning an email it doesn't display the previous emails name like it used to do on the old UX. The reason for suggesting is we'd usually keep a tight naming structure, just swapping out the subject name, so it was easy to just copy that name, paste it in and tweak as needed. Since the UX change it's an extra step to have to click on the cloning email, copy the name then clone and paste the name to tweak is slightly.
Description - Add the ability to bulk edit queue topics and routing rules Why is this feature important to you - it would be a tremendous time saver if you needed to change something in a queue topic or routing rule if you could do this in bulk How would you like the feature to work - Select all that you want to update. Change the field that needs to be changed. Save Current Behaviour - No bulk edit feature
We would like to use Experience Platform as the behavioral data source for Target Recommendations. We currently already have datasets containing all purchases in AEP. We would like to use this as the data source to inform Recommendations with a People Who Bought These, Bought Those criteria. In this way, it would be possible for us to not only consider online but also offline purchases.
Dear Marketo, It will be really nice to add a feature to temporarily unblock a field from a particular campaign in the future releases. At the moment, whatever option is ticked in field management, it applies to the entire instance. We have some many scenarios, where we only need to block/unblock a particular field for a specific campaign, after the campaign is completed, the rule is no longer applied. Sincerely,Wayne
Description - It would be great to have the ability to duplicate Queue Topic Groups, Queue Topics and Routing Rules or to move or copy them to another project Why is this feature important to you - This would save time on filling out duplicate information, you would only need to change the name if you needed to create new items. And if you were creating a new form that required the same queue information you wouldn't need to create new items if you had the ability to move and copy them. How would you like the feature to work - A copy within existing project function and a move or copy to another project function (would also be great to be able to do this in bulk) Current Behaviour - No ability to copy or move
With request queues, I would like for requests that are emailed in to be assigned to a specific queue topic. Currently, they get randomly assigned which then applies the routing rule from the randomly assigned queue topic. These are usually getting assigned to the wrong topic and wrong people and the work is getting delayed because of it. It's also causing other people additional work because they are having to re-route work that is not theirs. I think it would be nice if there was a setting on the queue topic where you could check a box or something to say that all requests that are emailed to the queue should be assigned to this topic. Thanks!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
