Build better products with our product team
Hi,We are able to see calendar events within Marketing Reports and Analytics (SiteCatalyst). Could we please enable this to also be seen when users are using Analysis Workspace?I would suggest enhancing this to have an icon that indicates there is an event, that way it can show up on across all reports.Thank youAndrew
スマートリストの「データ値の変更」トリガーで、数値型の項目を使ってSCを組もうと思っています。 数値型の項目の 「値が変わったら」「○以下から■以上になったら」 という条件は制約の追加で組めることは理解しているのですが、 「値が増えたら」 「値が減ったら」 という条件が作れないので実装してほしい。 PLG CRMとしてmarketoを活用していく上で、プロダクトの活用度が増減する中で 「プロダクトの活用度が上がったら」という設定がどうしても必要になります。
Description - We have project reports that include images that represent that project. We need the ability to export these project reports into an excel or PDF file without losing the images Currently, we can only view the images when the report is generated within the platform. We need to be able to export the reports from the system without losing any data- including the images.
Description - Have an option to grant specific users access to share Annotations with 'All Users' without granting them Admin access? After granting users who are not Admins the ability to create Annotations, they are only able to share them to specific users and it doesn't appear they have an option to share to 'All Users' Why is this feature important to you - It allows for non-admins the ability to share Annotations to approved user groups (or all users) without needing an Admin to do this How would you like the feature to work - Have an option in the admin console to grant specific access to individuals to be able to share Annotations to approved user groups or to All Users Current Behaviour - Only Admins can share Annotations to 'All users'
Description - Add a read receipt feature so users can quickly see if their updates have been seen and by whom. Why is this feature important to you - My stakeholders like to claim they didn't get an update or see a change. This feature would allow anyone to quickly see how many people have viewed the update and precisely who. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to the viewed icon in experience league but with the ability to click the eye icon and see a list of names of the people that viewed the update. This will need to remain small and unobtrusive. Current Behaviour - Unfortunately, there is no way to know if a notification went through. In extreme circumstances, I will log in as the recipient and check their notification list to confirm it was sent but I cannot confirm if they actually saw it.
Description - We would like to be able to remove access to proofs after comments have been made by outside users so additional internal review and comments can be made. Why is this feature important to you - We share proofs with external vendors to get feedback but need a method to discuss feedback on the proof, internally, without the initial proofer having access to internal comments. How would you like the feature to work - Simply be able to remove access and deactivate the user's proofing link. Current Behaviour - Currently there is no other known option but to either load a new proof, transpose the initial comments and share internally.
Hi It will be very usefull to create a form field on which we can upload files like pdf documents, images (png, jpeg). This is something that i really need. Please develop this feature thanks best regards valentine
It is very important for our SEO strategy that we can redirect PDFs with rich content back to specific pages on our website. This should be possible via a redirect rule on Marketo server, but it's currently not. Marketo, please make this a solution! So many community posts about this. It's crazy we can't redirect files!
Description - I would like to be able to copy a template from a list (or report) just as you can with projects Why is this feature important to you - This saves multiple clicks and ensures that our project templates are always set up appropriately. How would you like the feature to work - With a project list you can select the project and in the more menu "copy" is available. From there you can edit accordingly. I would like this exact option for lists of templates Current Behaviour - Open the template from the list and navigate to the more menu to select copy
Good Morning, Your decision making process currently does not allow for more than one person to "reject" an approval/decision. Times have changed since 2019, and most offices in the United States have been working remotely for almost 3 years now. If multiple decision makers are working remotely and need to make independent decisions, how can you expect the group to stay informed if the decision process ends as soon as the first "rejected" decision is made? What if only one department wants to reject and all of the rest make compelling arguments to move the project forward? What if two different departments want to reject for different reasons? What if the project leader wants to appeal a decision made during the approval process? How would they know who all they need to speak to if the "approval" process ends after one rejection out of 14 decisions needed? The way your approvals process is currently set up, it does not allow for any these scenarios to play out because the moment someone rejects.... the approval process ends. THIS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED! It has so many oversights the way it is currently constructed.
We would like to assign a Schedule to a Team, similar to assigning a schedule to a person or a project, because we have Teams that are available to work on our projects only certain days of the week. Currently, when we are setting up projects, we have to manually adjust the project tasks around the Team's availability to make sure they do not have work scheduled those days they are working in other areas. It would be nice for it work similar to assigning a schedule to a person or project. It should be ranked higher than project schedule but lower than the personal schedule when the system is looking up availability.
I would like to see the option of applying a metric or event-level filter. For example, if I'm viewing a product report for all of my sites products and looking at the number of product views and the number of units purchased, and I ONLY want to see products that had more than 15 product views during any given time frame, I can not do this today.
Description - There are around atleast 15% users who are located in different countries or different business entities location in the same Group organisation. And while set up of "Reports To" does not allow System Admin to assign between cross function business entities. Which shows a weakness user set up in Workfront. Must be allowed to select the above criteria. Why is this feature important to you - And while set up of "Reports To" does not allow System Admin to assign between cross function business entities. How would you like the feature to work - Just to allow the selection of cross function business entity manager. We donot need to be dependent from individual Manager, since if any work required, can be taken care from resource pool in project edit. In many cases it found, that more than one manager reqponsible for an user. Current Behaviour - No such funcationality, a big gap in connecting resources with respect to manager from other location / company from the Group Organisation. Mvh Kundan.
Allow a 24 option for Proofing Workflow templates. Currently it is set for business days and a time. Using this current option either gives the person less than 24 hours to review or more than 24 hours to review. The time selected in template determines whether of not they will get a full 24 hours or not. It all depends on the time of day the proof is uploaded. A 24 hour option would give someone exactly 24 hours to review when the proof is uploaded for review.
Description - Add a reference on the project to convertedOpTask to facilitate reporting on information on the request such as Topic Information Why is this feature important to you - Currently you can only do this in reporting at the Project level. There seems to be a hidden reference to convertedOpTask as I can access information but if i go further down the hierarchy i can no longer obtain the data (so task or issue or baseline task). If you could pull the data closer, ie to the project with a calculated custom field then I could report on it. But convertedOpTask is not available in Custom Form builder (and its not actually listed in the API explorer even though in reporting on a project it does work to get info How would you like the feature to work - As a reference linkable by the convertedOpTaskID Current Behaviour - Not available
In a WF calendar, you can choose to show weekends or not, which is great. However in the WF homepage, if using the calendar view instead of the task list view, even if selecting only M-F in your working days, Sat/Sun still show. After integrating my Outlook calendar into my WF Calendar view, and even my Outlook is only set for M-F, I still see weekends. Why have the selection of working days in the calendar settings if the user can't use them for what is shown? I confirmed with WF support that currently there is no way to remove weekends from showing, hence this idea. Please Like!
Currently, timesheet permissions is in a bit of an "all-or-nothing" state, where managers/directors/SVPs/etc can only see the timesheets of their direct reports, or as we've done, if you allow admin access to timesheets and hours, that level of management can see ALL timesheets for the whole company. We would like the ability to restrict this by group/dept as exposing the entire company's timesheets to management can still be quite sensitive. We are unclear if this exposure happened prior to the Timesheet UI overhaul, but we noticed it after the changes to the Timesheet UI were made.
Description - Add the ability to copy and submit as a new request to the Issue More Menu (. . . ) Why is this feature important to you - There is no good way to filter the My Requests page and if there are several thousand requests, it is time consuming to go through page after page looking for the job you want to copy and submit as new. If you could just search for the issue and copy and submit as new right from the original issue that would save a lot of time. How would you like the feature to work - I would lke to open the issue and be able to click on the More (. . . ) menu and choose copy and submit as new from there. Current Behaviour - Not available directly from within the issue.
Mindful that I'm currently having difficulties exporting the Sync Error Log - this may be due to it being rather large - is it possible to delete, reset or clear out the Sync Error Log once exported and therefore archived? If it's not, can we get a nice shiny button to reset the error log please? This export has now been running for nearly TWO hours.
For each of the lead, contact, account or opportunity sections within the 'Select Fields to Sync' dialogue, welcome thoughts on the idea of having an export section or export ALL if you need to fields the sync fields offline. From trying it recently, it's also not possible to copy by scrolling, the contents of each section.
The trigger tokens for Custom Objects work perfectly when the trigger is "Added to Custom Object" but the "Custom Object is Updated" trigger does not allow you to use these. In most cases, you need both of these triggers to work for a marketing process to function correctly.
The ability to have multiple fields in custom forms that are linked together in a relationship such as: Choosing a value from Field 1 determines what is available to choose from Field 2. For example: Choosing a value from Category determines what can be chosen from Brand which can then determine what can be chosen from Sub-Brand. This would be better than: In the example above: a huge long list of choices in Brand and Sub-Brand in order to encompass all Categories and Brands.In the example above: The workaround of having multiple "Brand" and "Sub-Brand" fields with hide/show conditionals plus awkward "ifblank" reporting concatenations. Whether this was via the Builder or some more back-end method (like a Kickstart) is fine by me. I honestly think a matrix Excel uploaded via the backend might be "easier" and then just a Builder UI element that is dropped in and linked to the Excel data. But...I leave such issues to the developers. :-)
Problem: Adobe Captivate and Adobe Learning Manager do not have a proofing platform. Authors must use their own environment to provide their customer with the content to review. Proposed Solution: Use Workfront’s proofing mechanism to review and collaborate on Training Content. Native publishing from proof approval to the Adobe Learning Manager's Content Library would be ideal.
Description Problem: Currently, the LMS does not provide a way to organize, view and structure Training Content. While the content is uploaded, the UX is limited in being able to sort or find content, content ownership, permissions, etc.. of the content uploaded. Typically, a company needs to implement an LCMS (learning content management system) for this. Why is this feature important to you - Organization and lifecycle management of training and learning objects is hard to do, and requires a CMS solution, with project management capabilities. I believe we have all of this between AEM, ALM, and WF. How would you like the feature to work Proposed Solution: Use Workfront Fusion to provide native connection for tracking the lifecycle of Training Content from concept to deployment within Workfront. I believe Workfront and additional connectors like AEM Assets or SharePoint for storage has all or most of the capabilities that an LCMS in the market today has. Current Behaviour - Authors of learning objects track their own content lifecycle, or dont and it becomes a mess. Disconnected systems with no end to end workflow, so a custom solution must be built.
Description - Could we add multiple owners on a Team? Why is this feature important to you - Allows multiple users to add/edit the people on a team and allows greater control when managing items throughout a group. How would you like the feature to work - Ability to select current owners on a teams or set 'resource managers' on a team. Current Behaviour - Only one name can be assigned to each team.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
