Build better products with our product team
When requesting a campaign for a contact, it'd be awesome to be able to "favorite" 3-5 campaigns, so they would appear below the search bar (screenshot attached of where I'd like it to be). It's a super small thing, but I think would be helpful if you frequent a specific set of campaigns, as I do.
Firstly, love the improcements to Analysis Workspace and the overall menu changes throughout the Marketing Cloud, what a difference it's making to our teams already.Are there any plans to improve the PDF output from Analysis Workspace either by splitting up the document up in to Pages or allowing users to define pages within a project?
Allow users to copy and paste custom form fields so you can make new ones that utilize similar options in other forms without overriding shared fields. Or allow the user to "hide" certain fields on various forms in different ways so we can use similar things in different forms but add or subtract different things. Example we have custom forms that we use in the US and similar in Europe, we both have similar project types that we do but in each of the regions, we have ones that the other doesn't offer.
We required option Custom form fields make Non editable once user filledProject/Task level Draft option . it is available Issue level the same requires in Project/task level as well
1.Task Level Custom Forms fields need to show in Project level Update Stream.2.if any updates in custom fields or system fields , those will be track as Old Value: New value , but right now it is showing only New values3.if any updates in Custom fields need to send notification (if requires)
Workfront shows comments in the Update section of a record at user level but this info does not show the record the comment is related to so it is useless and also appears like duplicates.
Currently when you add a custom form to Project Details, it is added to both Project Details and Business Case. Would like the ability to add a custom form to Project Details, add a different custom form to Business Case and they not show up in both places. Selectively choose which form is in each section, and not automatically in both.
Workfront's reports are supposed to be content aware and auto-size report columns accordingly, however this is rarely ever true or accurate. The below report is a perfect example; there's no reason the Task Name column should be wider than the Project Name column when the project names are longer than task names. You can use text mode to force the column widths, sure, but there are many problems with this as well. Sometimes a column with very little content will end up larger than the width you chose, and columns with lots of content will get squished into narrow, hard to read columns (despite the text mode telling it otherwise).Instead of having to manually set the pixels for each column in a report, can we please have the ability to use a percentage of total space available? I believe this would also help users who switch from laptop to desktop/monitors, since reports rarely look the same from screen-to-screen. If a % of total space isn't an option, please at least improve the "content aware" column sizing, as it is not working the way it should. It's difficult to drive user adoption and expand WF within our organization when our reports look like such a mess.
Description - Usage logs in CJAWhy is this feature important to you - These logs would help find the what kind of changes have been made to connections similar to Adobe analytics Usage logs.How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if these usage logs are available in the UI of CJACurrent Behaviour - Though API to get these logs is already available, it would be great if it is a feature in the UI as well
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM template/component policy enhancements Use-case: Ability to easily make policy updates and see a record/history of updates in AEM Current/Experienced Behavior: When policies are manually changed, there is no record/history of changes, which makes policy management difficult when there are multiple template editors A code deployment is needed to make quick CSS changes needed for policies Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability for template editors to see a record/history of all manual changes made to a template/component policy, when and by whom in AEM Ability for admins to make quick CSS changes needed for policies in AEM in ACS e.g. ability to upload CSS packages in ACS, similar to what could be done in CRXDE in AMS Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Customer-name/Organization name: Deloitte Screenshot (if applicable): N/A Code package (if applicable): N/A
Currently, when someone uses the email reply to an update, the text of the update posted in WF will have the user's comment, the comment they are replying to, and the URL also. This is too much information and appears unclear and confusing. We would like to propose the change to include just the person's comments in the updates section. Please see attached screenshot. We only need the section in yellow. The blue section is the previous user's comment and the red is the WF link.
Description - I would like the ability to simply create a NEW project using a single panel or collection of panels from an existing Workspace.Current Behavior - Currently, you have to open the project you need, in a separate tab, create a BLANK project, go back to the open project, select "Copy panel," return to the BLANK project, and then "Insert copied panel." OR, the other option would to SAVE AS, and then start deleting panels from the project (not fun).Why is this feature important to you - Oftentimes, I have larger workspaces that contain singular panels that may have relevance in a one-off report. This becomes an operation of efficiency and improve productivity in reducing the amount of time I have to either copy and paste between projects or save a large project and then start deleting multiple panels. Also, I might not always need to save the new project if I'm just doing a data review or pull for quick turnaround. The goal is to prevent me from contaminating an existing project I use on a frequent reporting basis.How would you like the feature to work -Version 1: Add the option to "Create new project from panel" to the list of drop-down choices.Version 2: Add the ability to select MULTIPLE panels and then provide a list of relevant options, including:Copy panel(s)Create new project from panel(s)Duplicate panel(s)
Issue: Currently, you have to go to individual campaigns to see their priority as explained in the thread below: https://nation.marketo.com/t5/product-discussions/campaign-priority-override-see-all-overridden-campaigns/m-p/326202/highlight/true#M184136 Goal: To see all smart campaigns, their priority, and whether they have been overridden in one place As per Darshil Shah: "It'd be great to have a couple columns added to added to the Campaign Inspector tab that'll show if the campaign priority and whether the default campaign priority has been overriden or not for all the trigger campaigns at one place."
There should be an option to filter out all spider and bot traffic from SiteCatalyst reports, very similar to what was available from the HBX User Agent Filtering option.
Requesting the ability to go to Setup, select a form, and export to Excel all of the fields in order on the form along with field choices where applicable. This would still include the attributes of Type, Is Required, Description etc. that are currently available
As documented at https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/target/using/implement-target/client-side/upgrading-from-atjs-1x-to-atjs-20.html#… , The following at.js 1.x parameters are NOT currently supported for audience creation when using at.js 2. x :browserHeightbrowserWidthbrowserTimeOffsetscreenHeightscreenWidthscreenOrientationcolorDepthdevicePixelRatioIt would be great if something similar could be made available in at.js 2.x to have access to for sites using Responsive Web Design to enable targeting.
We'd love to be able to assign document access at the folder level on a project template. There are some folders that we don't want our clients to have access to and some folders where they need access.
When sorting on a column, if the column width is reduced enough, the sort arrow can become hidden, which makes it difficult to recognize this situation. The arrow should either always be visible or the heading should be styled differently along with the sort direction arrow. For example, making the sorted column's header backgound color blue or some other color to indicate that it is sorted would help, even if the column width is reduced to a minimum. Alternatively, add a button to "reset" the UI to help users restore their view.
Urgently seeking: Create sync history and last sync time of all intergrations with Marketo
Budgeted HoursWe have recently adopted the Resource Planner to allocate the amount of time we would like each team member to work on a particular client. For context.....We have not adopted a fully task based approach ( ie: create and assign a task for every piece of client work we do ) , instead we have a very simple approach that allows us to be malleable and efficient. We use projects aligned to our clients and then tasks to define the products and services we provide for the client. Our team members simply add these to their timesheets and track time as needed. This is a very easy approach that captures the information we need ( Actual hours ) and works well for us at this time. Where we are now is that we need to capture the Planned work. To meet this requirement we use Budgeted Hours in the Resource Planner to align each user in our teams to the clients they work on and allocated them a set number of "budgeted hours" for each client. This is the time over the course of the month we expect them to work on that client. With this information in place we can then report ( sadly not in Workfront ) on Budgeted ( how much time we planned/aimed to work on each client ) versus Actual ( time we actually worked for the client ). Whilst onboarding he teams I noticed that the Resource Planner is soley aligned to a user job role and not the user. If the users job role is changed ( what happens a lot in our agency ) then all budgeted hours both current and future and historic will be removed. This has a significant impact and essentially renders the Resource Planner useless - even for a very simple approach like ours. I have spent some time looking at work arounds and the only way to mitigate the impact is to firstly run a budgeted hours report against the effected user(s) make the changes and then re-add their hours against their new role. As we grow and move forward with our adoption of the Resource Planner the effort involved in simply retaining data accuracy is going to become a huge effort simply when a job role is changed. I think there needs to be a total rethink on budgeted hours and the resource planner functionality in general. Hours should be aligned to the individual user and not the job role. Like wise a wider rethink is needed on the User View. This is completely ring-fenced towards task based efforts. How come you can budget hours against a project or role but not a user? It makes no sense. % UtilisationAs an agency its important to us to be able to understand staff utilisation yet we have to use external reports and other methods to acquire this information as the very feature available in Workfront is only available to those who create individual tasks for every piece of work. The annoying this is all the metrics are there in Workfront. User Availability Budgeted hoursActual Hours% UtilizationSadly it is not possible to view this information in a combined meaningful way. This ( in my opinion ) renders the Resource Planner nothing more than a gimmick that provides no real or meaningful benefit to the Workfront offering. To summarise:You can budget hours ( but don't change users roles )% Utilisation for budgeted vs available hours - not available We are a rapidly expanding agency desperate to adopt Workfront as our primary platform but this lack of development insights and are making user buy-in difficult and challenging. Theres no real point adopting a system if it makes your work day harder not easier. Workfront has some brilliant functionality and does provide value but the Resource Planner is letting the side down with the lack of simple business metrics reporting and offerings.
Adobe Launch referencing of data elements We have quite a number of dataelements.However in terms of maintenance we are in need of a referencing system in Launch.Where are data elements being used (in conditions, extensions, action, …) ?There is no such feature in Launch.The equivalent does exist in AEM for assets, hence the ask whether Launch could provide the same tool.
We would like to request that the innovation lab consider working on a solution to automatically program a script so that when moving a proof to the next task, we do not have to look through multiple jobs or find the next task number to find the next task. Is it possible to automate it so that when moving, the next task name automatically populates instead of searching for it?
Description -Today in the Adobe Analytics Launch Extension, we can't manage Context Data variables or List Variables in the same way we can manage eVars or props but only through Custom Code. However, both types of variables are very important to Adobe Analytics customers. For example, on adobe.com, we can't see any direct mapping to props and eVars in the frontend but only Context Data.Why is this feature important to you -Managing variables through Custom Code is error prone, often separate from the rest of the variables, and much more cumbersome than using the "normal" frontend of the Launch Extension. Having both in the regular list of variables would make managing them much smother and quicker, especially for users who are not comfortable with using Custom Code.How would you like the feature to work -Extend the variable list with a section for List Variables and Context Data.Current Behaviour -Much Custom Code and tears.
At the most basic level: allow users to breakdown dimension values in one table based on selections in another table.Why is this feature important to youWhen a breakdown is applied to dimensions in a table, everything is locked to the items or positions within the table. This would allow me to link the values in a breakdown table to specific items in other (hidden) tables. Two examples:I break down a Cities dimension the top 10 pages for each city. But what if I want to see the Visitors and Visits to the top 10 most overall viewed pages for each city, but I don't want my table to include pageviews, only Visitors and Visits (because pageviews by city isn't relevant in this case). Currently I would need to individually select top 10 viewed pages, and break the cities down by these. But the sorting will be based on Visitors or Visits (and not guaranteed to be in the same order as overall pageviews). Another example would be creating 10 tables, one for each of the top 10 cities with a pages breakdown. Once each of these 10 is created it's locked. There's no way to make sure the table in position 2 in my panel is always the city at rank 2 (without creating a complex calculated metric to sort by and display only rank 2). While I can create a chart that shows the top pages for the city at rank 2, I can't use a table. How would you like the feature to workI would like to be able to right click on a dimension header (where I would click to filter), or maybe within the filter interface, have the option to filter dynamically based on selected values (position or item) for the same dimension in another table in the same panel. Alternatively I would like to be able to "turn on" dynamic filtering and be able to just select rows in one table to dynamically filter the values in another, or the entire panel. The cross table filtering available in Data Studio is very similar (though more robust) to what I'm attempting to describe. Current Behaviour - n/a
Currently, Datetime field types in general (including lead fields and not just custom objects) are limited to be filtered in a smart list by date and not including time.We use a custom object for our webinar (through a webinar provider). Within the custom object there is a field called "Registration Date". It has a "type" as "datetime" When I view an object I can see the time stamp. However when I run a smart list based on the webinar object fields, I am unable to use the "time". Our use case is that we want to capture true no-shows for a webinar so we need to be able to filter people from the time the registration date within the object. So if the webinar started at 9:00am on 4/15, we would do a Smart list filter to say give me all leads who registered before 9:00am on 4/15/19 and have no views of the webinar. Those are the true no-shows.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
