Please can you make the custom form area more user-friendly, I'd love to see a search function, bulk edit option for all forms - so if I need to add groups or change permissions then I can do that for all forms. Also be helpful if they displayed A-Z even if grouped.
The current Workload Balancer Filter Sharing Module allows all users to enable "View System-Wide Setting". This would cause the unnecessary and approved filter to share with all users.It would be great if the System Administrator had the option to disable/hide the "View System-Wide Setting" for the Workload Balancer Filter Sharing Module.
We've recently noticed some campaigns taking a long time to process e.g. almost an hour to make a trigger-based data update. The answer from support is that it's because of the priority that Marketo gives to the campaign queue as outlined here: https://nation.marketo.com/t5/knowledgebase/how-campaign-processing-works/ta-p/248264 This creates a challenge where our priorities for the campaign queue doesn't match what Marketo developers think our priority should be. For example, Change Status in SFDC Campaign is a medium priority for Marketo but for our company, this is for reporting purposes only and should be the lowest priority. In contrast, Change data value is in many cases a high priority e.g. someone fills out a demo request on our Website and we want to make sure all of the correct data gets populated as soon as possible before our BDR Team is notified. You can see on this page that Send Alert is the highest priority but then means the alert (which has tokenized data in it) goes out without the right data because change data value is low priority. The suggestion is that each Marketo customer can specify the overall priority for each of these items for their instance of Marketo and then in addition, prioritize certain Smart Campaigns beyond this.
Hi i wonder if you could implement this : be able to get an evidence that one customer well received an email. Indeed, i would like to have the email as it would look on the outlook platform of the customer Because this one said that he did not received this email, whereas he did, but the email went probably on the spam inbox, i already checked in the results of the email. I would like to get a copy of the email with his contact email address as recipient with the date and the hour (when he received it) is it somehting possible? Because in my case, we got a security issue on our product so we sent a press release to the customers concerned, one of them is complaining about not be aware of the problem. We wanted to have the evidence that he received the communication, we would like to get the visuel of the email he got on Outlook. it will be very interesting to create this feature thanks best regards valentine
Test for customer
Hello,It would be very useful to have combo charts in analysis workspace so that we can trend metrics against previous periods like we can do in the standard reports:Thank you,Melissa
Stop forcing everything to be in alphabetical order onlyWorkload Balancer does not have an option to view other than by user, this is so inflexible.We resource hundreds of hours daily across 50 users, yet if I filter these team members by multiple roles or groups in Balancer it automatically puts them in one alphabetised bucket paying no attention to the sub groups that I listed, designers, writers, producers.If I filter by multiple roles, groups, projects etc then I would like the resource list to be have a view functionality to allow me to list them as such and not as one long list by name, this forces me to view one sub group at a time, then switch to another sub group, back to the original sub group etc. so much time wasted.Give us more flexibility ways to group views within Balancer please.
When requesting a campaign for a contact, it'd be awesome to be able to "favorite" 3-5 campaigns, so they would appear below the search bar (screenshot attached of where I'd like it to be). It's a super small thing, but I think would be helpful if you frequent a specific set of campaigns, as I do.
Firstly, love the improcements to Analysis Workspace and the overall menu changes throughout the Marketing Cloud, what a difference it's making to our teams already.Are there any plans to improve the PDF output from Analysis Workspace either by splitting up the document up in to Pages or allowing users to define pages within a project?
Allow users to copy and paste custom form fields so you can make new ones that utilize similar options in other forms without overriding shared fields. Or allow the user to "hide" certain fields on various forms in different ways so we can use similar things in different forms but add or subtract different things. Example we have custom forms that we use in the US and similar in Europe, we both have similar project types that we do but in each of the regions, we have ones that the other doesn't offer.
We required option Custom form fields make Non editable once user filledProject/Task level Draft option . it is available Issue level the same requires in Project/task level as well
1.Task Level Custom Forms fields need to show in Project level Update Stream.2.if any updates in custom fields or system fields , those will be track as Old Value: New value , but right now it is showing only New values3.if any updates in Custom fields need to send notification (if requires)
Workfront shows comments in the Update section of a record at user level but this info does not show the record the comment is related to so it is useless and also appears like duplicates.
Currently when you add a custom form to Project Details, it is added to both Project Details and Business Case. Would like the ability to add a custom form to Project Details, add a different custom form to Business Case and they not show up in both places. Selectively choose which form is in each section, and not automatically in both.
Workfront's reports are supposed to be content aware and auto-size report columns accordingly, however this is rarely ever true or accurate. The below report is a perfect example; there's no reason the Task Name column should be wider than the Project Name column when the project names are longer than task names. You can use text mode to force the column widths, sure, but there are many problems with this as well. Sometimes a column with very little content will end up larger than the width you chose, and columns with lots of content will get squished into narrow, hard to read columns (despite the text mode telling it otherwise).Instead of having to manually set the pixels for each column in a report, can we please have the ability to use a percentage of total space available? I believe this would also help users who switch from laptop to desktop/monitors, since reports rarely look the same from screen-to-screen. If a % of total space isn't an option, please at least improve the "content aware" column sizing, as it is not working the way it should. It's difficult to drive user adoption and expand WF within our organization when our reports look like such a mess.
Description - Usage logs in CJAWhy is this feature important to you - These logs would help find the what kind of changes have been made to connections similar to Adobe analytics Usage logs.How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if these usage logs are available in the UI of CJACurrent Behaviour - Though API to get these logs is already available, it would be great if it is a feature in the UI as well
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM template/component policy enhancements Use-case: Ability to easily make policy updates and see a record/history of updates in AEM Current/Experienced Behavior: When policies are manually changed, there is no record/history of changes, which makes policy management difficult when there are multiple template editors A code deployment is needed to make quick CSS changes needed for policies Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability for template editors to see a record/history of all manual changes made to a template/component policy, when and by whom in AEM Ability for admins to make quick CSS changes needed for policies in AEM in ACS e.g. ability to upload CSS packages in ACS, similar to what could be done in CRXDE in AMS Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Customer-name/Organization name: Deloitte Screenshot (if applicable): N/A Code package (if applicable): N/A
Currently, when someone uses the email reply to an update, the text of the update posted in WF will have the user's comment, the comment they are replying to, and the URL also. This is too much information and appears unclear and confusing. We would like to propose the change to include just the person's comments in the updates section. Please see attached screenshot. We only need the section in yellow. The blue section is the previous user's comment and the red is the WF link.
Description - I would like the ability to simply create a NEW project using a single panel or collection of panels from an existing Workspace.Current Behavior - Currently, you have to open the project you need, in a separate tab, create a BLANK project, go back to the open project, select "Copy panel," return to the BLANK project, and then "Insert copied panel." OR, the other option would to SAVE AS, and then start deleting panels from the project (not fun).Why is this feature important to you - Oftentimes, I have larger workspaces that contain singular panels that may have relevance in a one-off report. This becomes an operation of efficiency and improve productivity in reducing the amount of time I have to either copy and paste between projects or save a large project and then start deleting multiple panels. Also, I might not always need to save the new project if I'm just doing a data review or pull for quick turnaround. The goal is to prevent me from contaminating an existing project I use on a frequent reporting basis.How would you like the feature to work -Version 1: Add the option to "Create new project from panel" to the list of drop-down choices.Version 2: Add the ability to select MULTIPLE panels and then provide a list of relevant options, including:Copy panel(s)Create new project from panel(s)Duplicate panel(s)
Issue: Currently, you have to go to individual campaigns to see their priority as explained in the thread below: https://nation.marketo.com/t5/product-discussions/campaign-priority-override-see-all-overridden-campaigns/m-p/326202/highlight/true#M184136 Goal: To see all smart campaigns, their priority, and whether they have been overridden in one place As per Darshil Shah: "It'd be great to have a couple columns added to added to the Campaign Inspector tab that'll show if the campaign priority and whether the default campaign priority has been overriden or not for all the trigger campaigns at one place."
There should be an option to filter out all spider and bot traffic from SiteCatalyst reports, very similar to what was available from the HBX User Agent Filtering option.
Requesting the ability to go to Setup, select a form, and export to Excel all of the fields in order on the form along with field choices where applicable. This would still include the attributes of Type, Is Required, Description etc. that are currently available
As documented at https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/target/using/implement-target/client-side/upgrading-from-atjs-1x-to-atjs-20.html#… , The following at.js 1.x parameters are NOT currently supported for audience creation when using at.js 2. x :browserHeightbrowserWidthbrowserTimeOffsetscreenHeightscreenWidthscreenOrientationcolorDepthdevicePixelRatioIt would be great if something similar could be made available in at.js 2.x to have access to for sites using Responsive Web Design to enable targeting.
We'd love to be able to assign document access at the folder level on a project template. There are some folders that we don't want our clients to have access to and some folders where they need access.
When sorting on a column, if the column width is reduced enough, the sort arrow can become hidden, which makes it difficult to recognize this situation. The arrow should either always be visible or the heading should be styled differently along with the sort direction arrow. For example, making the sorted column's header backgound color blue or some other color to indicate that it is sorted would help, even if the column width is reduced to a minimum. Alternatively, add a button to "reset" the UI to help users restore their view.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
