Ability to set up and use similar functionality to Advanced Column Rules on Chart, that would allow to call out specific data within a chart based on the grouped criteria. IE.. We use Pie Charts to show how much work is in our queues grouped by due date. Would like to be able to call out $$TODAY as a bold or a pull out or red text to allow users to do a quick assessment of the data being reported and what has the highest priority.
We'd like our sign-off team to be able to pick from a drop-down list of reasons as to why they rejected a document or a proof. If we can report on this, then we can understand the most common reasons for rejections and amends, and give colleagues the support and training they need to stop getting rejected for the same things over and over.
Hi Marketo Community, We have an option to download all Landing pages from design Studio but there is no option for emails and Forms. Sometimes, we need to audit all the emails and forms and we are unable to download all information at one place.
I find that I sometimes forget who the requester is once I get to the screen where I turn the Request into a Project, after having attached a template. It would be nice if the person requesting populated under Basic Information or somewhere near the top. Because we assign the requester as Project Sponsor, it's something I need to know once I get to that screen.
Would love to be able to stylize comments in Proof, Bold, Color, Italics, Highlight, Underline Options, so that they can be be implemented directly as intendend
A feature to show tasks that people may remember but are no longer valid by striking through completed tasks.
Currently a Typehead field must be connected to a "Referenced Object Type" which includes Company, Group, Job Role, Portfolio, Program, Project, Team, Template and User. While this is very helpful, the current Typeahead feature is limited in functionality and misses important option.Users should be able to connect the Typeahead fields to a list of values as an option to Checkboxes and Dropdowns allowing a single or multiple value selection. Example: We have a list of approximately 250 aircraft a user should be able to select from. Scrolling through a Dropdown list of 250 values is not practical. 250 Checkboxes is not a good option either.Short of having this option, we are using a Single Line Text Field for the user to enter the aircraft number which leads to inconsistent data entries. Please help !!!
Description - Allow asset transfers for Alerts, whether Enabled or Disabled, Active or Expired.Why is this feature important to you - We have a lot of employee churn, and when employees leave, the remaining employees may need to take over their assets, in this case expired as well as current Alerts.How would you like the feature to work - The Adobe Legacy User management console, attempting to transfer assets, including Alerts between users, the transfer of a disabled or expired Alert should work without error or issue. Current Behavior - Currently in the Adobe Legacy User management console, attempting to transfer assets, including Alerts between users, the transfer of a disabled or expired Alert doesn't work. The UI seems to give the indication that 'transfer complete', but continually checking the old a new user for the transferred alerts, shows no change.
Request to see past PM who worked on this request - when you hover over a project and see the general pop up with info, it would be nice to see the past pm
Currently some of the smart list options have inconsistencies in the queries available for different data types.For example: Member of program: "Progam" has options "Is", "Is not", "Any". Program Status Was Changes: "Program" has options "Is", "is not", "Starts With", "Not Starts With", "Contains", "Not Contains", "Is Any".Another example Person Score: "Person Score" has options "Is", "Is not", "Between", "Greater Than", "less than", "At Least", "At most", "is Empty" "is "not Empty"Score was Changed: "Change" has options "Is", "Is Not"All fields should have a set field type String, Date, Integer,... All fields of the same type should have the same options available. By this my suggestion is to add the missing options (rather than remove available options)
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In AEM 6.4, we are able to configure audit logs for have audit logs for User and group changes (creating/deleting users/groups and adding/removing users from group) but not for ACL permission changes. Having audit logs for ACL permission changes will be of great help when a content author reports an issue that he's not able access a path anymore for which the user had access to previously. Use-case: This feature will be helpful where the content authors report issues saying they lost access to a specific path for which they had access earlier. Current/Experienced Behavior: No Audit logs for ACL changes, We have audit logs only for User and group changes (creating/deleting users/groups and adding/removing users from group) Improved/Expected Behavior: Audit logs for ACL permission changes done for a user/group Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.4.8 Customer-name/Organization name: Merck Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Month labelled at every week as it gets confusing when scrolling across 12 week view or multi month view (see attached)
MarketoとZoomで連携してWebinarを実施しているのですが、 複数のZoomアカウントと連携する際にトラブルを経験したので情報共有します。 Zoomの複数アカウントをMarketoに連携する際、Zoomの契約によって、エラーが発生するようです。 Adobeさんに調査いただいたところ、単体のZoomアカウントであれば複数の連携が可能でした。 一方でEnterprise版のZoomでは、1ユーザーは連携できたのですが、 複数のユーザーで連携しようとすると、1つのユーザー以外はエラーが発生しました。 これは、MarketoとZoomではアカウント単位での連携となっていて、 Enterprise版のZoomでは1アカウントを複数ユーザーに分けているため、 というのがエラーの原因と理解しました。 Enterprise版のZoomの複数ユーザーでMarketoとの連携を活用する場合は、 連携したZoomユーザーの設定の最下段にある「スケジュールする権限」に Enterprise版のZoomにある他の有料ユーザーを追加すれば、 Marketoと連携したユーザーとしてWebinarをスケジューリングできるので、 Marketoと連携してのWebinar開催が可能となります。 出来ないのは、Zoom Webinarを同日時に複数開催することだと思いますが、 この辺り、現時点では運用で回避するしかないようです。 ご参考まで。
When editing the Planner access level, Workfront will not allow you to select "User Admin (All Users)" without also selecting "Create", "Delete". We want group admins to be able to pull users into their group, but we do not want them to be able to create or delete users.
It would be great if Workfront added to the roadmap (maybe as part of the transition to Adobe Experience League/Admin Console) an alternative to the .cmd extension used for SSO users. Our network blocks the use of .cmd extensions in browsers for regular SSO users. This is usually not an issue since most SSO connections do not use the .cmd or provide alternative ACS URLs due to the security risks presented by .cmd extension being allowed in a browser. Our team has reached out to Workfront support on this already and there is no current alternative so we hope this innovation lab idea will help start the process.Here are links to the previous support cases for reference:Case: 00308693 (workfront.com)Case: 00312618 (workfront.com)
The current Adobe CC & Photoshop Extension only allows users to add documents to tasks (and issues). We prefer working from the project level and lose out on core functionality.
Description -Currently, the segments and metrics available in the Annotation Builder are only those that are created by the organization. They do not include segments and metrics that are managed by Adobe (e.g. the 'All Visits' segment, or the 'Weighted Bounce Rate' metric). Why is this feature important to you -Organizations that use Adobe's segment and metric definitions will not be able to have Annotations applied to them, as these segments and metrics are not available in the Annotation Builder How would you like the feature to work -Make Adobe-managed segments and metrics available in the Annotation Builder.
I use folders to organize thousands of offers. I don't always remember what folder a piece of content is in.The search only works within the directory you are currently in - I need for search to search the entire library of offers. Without that function, it is pretty worthless. Thanks.
Within the Calendars area of Workfront, when “Gantt” is the selected view, the vertical scroll bar is always visible, but in order to access the horizontal scroll bar, a user has to scroll to the bottom of the calendar window which often takes the items/days/weeks being looked at out of view. This is not user friendly. It would be helpful if the horizontal scroll bar was locked in place, so both scroll bars are always visible without losing site of the work/calendar items/dates being viewed
We are looking into Workspace reports’ usage. The goal is to have visits or pageviews of each report (Dashboard) we have in Workspace in order to classify them by importance and then delete the ones that are not used. This would be very useful for reporting teams in the long term.
Having a typeahead field that is bringing in Portfolio Names is great because now we don't have to maintain a separate dropdown field with the Portfolio Names as new ones are added or old ones marked "InActive". The problem is that I have other fields that need to display based on the Portfolio selected and I don't want other fields to display when that Portfolio is selected. Allowing display logic to use the typeahead field is a great next step.
Prevent issues/requests from being converted into tasks/projects:I would love for a setting that completely prevents users from converting certain request types (ones I select as an admin, not all requests) into projects? Despite our attempts to educate users on specific work processes, some users convert requests into projects, even though they are to be managed only as requests.Add option to lock issues from editing after they are converted to task/project:Our users have a habit that's hard to break in which they will continue to update an Issue that's been converted to a Project, rather than update the Project. They just don't realize the difference between the two objects, and I realize part of it is ongoing training even though this has been communicated over and over. I know that in Project Preferences > Tasks & Issues there is an option to delete an issue once it's been converted to a project but we do not want to have the original issue deleted. Could we add an option so that issues can be 'locked' from editing after conversion?
Description - On the Projects page, the user should be able to filter the projects for any tags and have the full list be relevant to the chosen values, instead of a combination of all pinned, and then the results afterward.Why is this feature important to you - I have any number of projects at the top of my list that I have pinned for ease of use when I come into Adobe Analytics, and requiring me to scroll past them every time I go to filter for a report I need to open is frustrating and a productivity killer.How would you like the feature to work - Upon entering the first tag, the ENTIRE LIST of projects is filtered according to the value listed in the TAGS.Current Behavior - All favorite/pinned projects remain visible at the top of my results list, regardless of the tags I have entered into my filter, and then I am forced to scroll past my pinned projects to find the results I am filtering to find. EDIT: Aside from all this, I really do appreciate all of the changes that have been made to the Workspace Projects page so far. It's definitely better than it was before.
We should be able to copy documents- moving documents is helpful but the ability to copy could save our team loads of time. We have the ability to copy/duplicate projects, tasks, programs, reports etc. not sure why documents are not a part of that
The Text Field with Formatting is a great new display type that we'd love to convert a lot of our existing fields to. This display type can only be selected when creating a new field, so existing fields can't enjoy the benefits of text formatting.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
