Build better products with our product team
Currently, if SSO is enabled within Workfront Proof, system administrators lose the ability to log in as other users for troubleshooting and auditing. We would like to enbable SSO in Proof, but have not because of this downfall. Would like to see this enabled like it is within the Workfront interface.
Idea lab still has items from Classic that are no longer relevant. It also has lots of duplicate or near duplicate ideas. If you have 10 ideas that are the same with 300 points each vs. one idea with 3,000 points, that's a HUGE difference. Maybe create an Archive section for the old stuff or non-relevant stuff and then combine duplicates (and their points).Now there's an idea!That being said, when you have items that are delivered with only 20 points and then items not under consideration that have 500 points, it erodes the credibility of the vote system. People tend to give up on it knowing their idea won't get done even they garner a lot of votes.
When I am working in a report in Classic WF, I am able to select a single item from the report (via the check box), select Edit , then jump to the bottom of the pop-up form and add a comment. Currently, I CAN NO LONGER do this in WF New Experience.In the New Experience, if I am working in a report and I select a single Item to edit, the outcome is NOT the same as before. I DO NOT have the option to add a comment any more.Please note that if I select more than 1 Item on the report (ie Bulk Edit), the pop-up box that displays is the Classic WF look / feel and the Comment box is available for use (at least for right now).Workfront Support provided the following response when I inquired why I no longer have the ability to do something that I used to.I was able to confirm that with the New Workfront Experience, the functionality of the Comment Section has been removed as overall there was very low usage and as the Comment section is to essentially post an update to the update stream, this can be done in other areas such as the Updates tab of the object. The reason you are able to still see the Comment section is due to the interface of bulk editing work objects still being the Classic interface which is still being worked on and may eventually go away within that process as well.­Why in earth would this have been removed? Surely our organization can't be the only one that found this useful when working in a report. It was really handy in both single and bulk edit mode. Needless to say, I'm not happy that I'm having to ask to have something like this back. :(
All users, regardless of license type, should not be able to see each others requests (Requests > All Requests tab). I don't want even my Plan users to be able to see each others requests since some of our requests are sensitive. Anyone who has access to the project that a request queue's requests go to can see everyone's requests from those that have the same access to submit a request. Just because I need everyone to be able to SUBMIT a request doesn't mean I want them to SEE everyone's requests that have been submitted into that queue! WF, please change this!
It would be helpful if the Filter and View Options said the Actual Filter Name instead of Report Default because that tells the user nothing about the filter that is applied. Same for Review View.
I would like to see Filter/View/Group when I do a hover-over. This saves a lot of time whne there are lots of filters/views.
We would like to to see the "New request" screen match the "Preview" that can be viewed in the custom form builder. Currently, the New Request screen functions as a pop out and distorts how the form is viewed versus how it shows in Preview in the custom form builder. The current view shrinks down the width of the form which cuts off longer questions and causes some questions to appear side by side unintentionally. The current view shows the Request home page to the left of the form in the foreground which provides no additional functionality to the users and only takes away from allowing the form to appear larger.
The idea would be the same as with a task or issue. Everyone on the team is notified and then someone clicks 'work on it' and then make the decision.
Would it be possible to include variables in the title of reports or dashboards? For example, a report title that shows:[$$USERID] 's current task listor a dashboard title showing[$$USER.homeTeamID] Project DashboardThanks!
Currently we have the ability to raise risks/issues at project level. But not all risks belong to project. Some risks can effect the entire program/portfolio. Is it possible to enhance program/portfolio view to have "Requests" option on the left pane?
We have a team of proofreaders that pick up work out of a queue. We also have situations were someone is out of the office and a team could back them up on proof approvals. If we could assign proof approvals to a team, rather than individual, this would be a big win.
Marketo's dynamic chat as of now records 4 types of activities in Marketo which is great. Apart from this the ability to natively configure sending of these and possibly more custom dynamic chat activities to the 3rd party web apps would be great since dynamic chat is added on a webpage via an iFrame, it becomes rather difficult to configure the custom DOM updates on the parent landing page that can trigger sending of the chat activities to the 3rd party apps. Of-course, exporting the activities using API from Marketo is one option, but it would be great if there could be a direct way to send the events w/o having to send / query from Marketo.
Sometimes a project custom form I want filtered in a task report isn't the first custom form in the project and I'm realizing that it's not pulling tasks from projects where that form isn't the top form. The only option right now is 'Project > Category ID' and no option for 'Categories' (similar to if you pull Assigned To in a task report it'll only show the primary task assignee, not all assignees and should use 'Assignment Users' instead. So then you have task reports that only pull if form you're using in the report happens to be the first form used in the project, so when projects use other forms and this happens to not be first, it’s not including those tasks I want only because of this. WF says because it's two table jumps there is no way around this.
When you click on the "Projects I'm On" button, it turns blue and changes the filter to "Projects I'm On".When you clicks on "Projects I'm On" again, the button turns back to gray, as if it is unselected. But the view doesn't return to the previous projects view. It reverts to "My Projects". This happens regardless of what view was selected before or what the user's default view is. This creates confusion. I would like eitherUnselecting the filter returns to the previous filterOr the ability for the system admins to remove these buttons.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK