Description - Adobe provided playground environment for developers and admins to practice skills learned throughout training.Why is this feature important to you - While the examples provided during training cover the basic skills necessary to operate within the platform, those are based on the OTB offerings. A playground environment for training would allow a safe space for practice outside of training especially for those of us whose Prod environments are highly customized.How would you like the feature to work - It wouldn't need to be a direct copy of each users' Prod environment, rather a playground environment which you can use for all trainings and always have available for further practice outside of training.Current Behaviour - Currently our account has a QA environment which is doubling as a playground.
Documents uploaded to a task, request or issue can be modified by multiple users with access. However we are only able to report on the last change.We are interested in tracking the name changes of a document in this particular case although this idea could be expanded to other properties as well. It would be helpful to have the ability to report on every change made to the document and not just the last one. I think this logic would be helpful for other areas of the product.We could have a list of usernames, date of change, previous value, new value, etc.
It is very often when the legend part of the visualization requires manual edit for making the chart look cleaner and easier to read. It would be very helpful to add a new setting that would allow to not include Metrics and Metric Filters (column names) in the legend labels. This is how it looks when a metric is filtered by dimension, segment, date range or their combination. The legend becomes too heavy that is especially critical for dashboards. This is a desirable way of how the legend should be displayed that today requires manual update of each label. Here is how that new setting could look in the settings popup.
Being able to set labels in our visualizations is great, we can immediately see where the label is going and how it will look... but the problem comes when the freeform table has the slightest change (like the dimension breakdown, which doesn't impact the columns), forces the labels to re-populate with the default value. Let's take a simple example. I create a freeform table with Referrer Instances at the top, and that broken down into columns by Referrer Type. Then I use Day as my dimension. When I visualize this, what do I get:Referrer Instances [Referrer Type: Search Engines]Referrer Instances [Referrer Type: Typed/Bookmarked]Referrer Instances [Referrer Type: Social Networks]Referrer Instances [Referrer Type: Other Websites]Since I am going to label my visualization and add a description of what this data is, I don't need it repeated in this fashion all through the legend labels. I want them to be clean, not this ugly version: So here is where renaming comes in, great! Love that I can rename them. (Search, Direct, Social, Other - done) But here's where the issue of the default comes in... let's say I want users to be able to select a set of rows from the table to focus on one part of the overall data.... the labels on the visualization reset to the default values... Or if I want to duplicate a table to do a different dimension... I want my columns to have the same visualization labels, but I have to rename every iteration. So in some cases I am wasting time on every report re-labeling the same sets of columns to make the report look presentable... or having to leave the defaults in there because once users start selecting rows it makes no difference cause I can't control what shows... There is obviously a need for these default generated values (something that we can always revert to), but I would love to be able to also set "actual values" or even "defined how the auto-label should populate" at the column (or even report level - even if it's take the "top" or "bottom" value (metric or segments, etc) on stacked value, or concatenate in this order, etc (I'm sure there are a lot of options that could factor into this). The modify at visualization level would then take priority over that.So it would be (in order of prioritization):1. Visualization Level Set Value2. Column Level Set Value (new)3. Report Level Custom Generated Values (new)4. Standard Default Generated Values Providing more control on how our labels are generated could save so much time on creating and styling our reports, and make the interactivity of the reports work better and more consistently with what our users would want to see (ease of reading)
It would be helpful to see achievements in the user profile update feed such as completion of tasks and requests as well as proof decisions.
It would be very helpful to have an interactive filter (magnifier) at top of report list on report screen rather than having to create a filter for every search term when looking for a specific report or key word
It would be helpful if we could attach emails to Updates because they would show the flow of the conversations. Having to add them under Documents loses the conversation thread.
First, I'm aware there's a "Completion Mode" for Project Settings that you can set to "Automatic" so that a Project's status changes to Complete when all tasks are done. But unfortunately, by default it is always "Manual" unless you apply a template (which we don't always use since projects vary sometimes)... It would be wonderful if we can set the default to ALL new projects to always be "Automatic". And not just upon Completion, but it would be great if a Project's status also automatically updates to "In Progress" as soon as a task on the project is started. I was told be a representative that this feature does not exist at all, so it would be great to have this setting. This would help so much to keep Projects current, since at the moment Admins have to manually change the project status when team members start on their tasks and they can't always do it immediately.
Currently, if SSO is enabled within Workfront Proof, system administrators lose the ability to log in as other users for troubleshooting and auditing. We would like to enbable SSO in Proof, but have not because of this downfall. Would like to see this enabled like it is within the Workfront interface.
Idea lab still has items from Classic that are no longer relevant. It also has lots of duplicate or near duplicate ideas. If you have 10 ideas that are the same with 300 points each vs. one idea with 3,000 points, that's a HUGE difference. Maybe create an Archive section for the old stuff or non-relevant stuff and then combine duplicates (and their points).Now there's an idea!That being said, when you have items that are delivered with only 20 points and then items not under consideration that have 500 points, it erodes the credibility of the vote system. People tend to give up on it knowing their idea won't get done even they garner a lot of votes.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: DAM Librarians want to be able to multi-select images with Smart tags, and click Manage Tags, to remove/edit Smart tags in bulk. Use-case: DAM Librarians want to be able to multi-select images with Smart tags, and click Manage Tags, to remove/edit Smart tags in bulk. Current/Experienced Behavior: Tags can only be edited on a single asset at a time via the UI. Improved/Expected Behavior: Tags can be removed/added to multiple assets when selected via UI as a multiselect. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.9+ Customer-name/Organization name: Humana Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When I am working in a report in Classic WF, I am able to select a single item from the report (via the check box), select Edit , then jump to the bottom of the pop-up form and add a comment. Currently, I CAN NO LONGER do this in WF New Experience.In the New Experience, if I am working in a report and I select a single Item to edit, the outcome is NOT the same as before. I DO NOT have the option to add a comment any more.Please note that if I select more than 1 Item on the report (ie Bulk Edit), the pop-up box that displays is the Classic WF look / feel and the Comment box is available for use (at least for right now).Workfront Support provided the following response when I inquired why I no longer have the ability to do something that I used to.I was able to confirm that with the New Workfront Experience, the functionality of the Comment Section has been removed as overall there was very low usage and as the Comment section is to essentially post an update to the update stream, this can be done in other areas such as the Updates tab of the object. The reason you are able to still see the Comment section is due to the interface of bulk editing work objects still being the Classic interface which is still being worked on and may eventually go away within that process as well.­Why in earth would this have been removed? Surely our organization can't be the only one that found this useful when working in a report. It was really handy in both single and bulk edit mode. Needless to say, I'm not happy that I'm having to ask to have something like this back. :(
All users, regardless of license type, should not be able to see each others requests (Requests > All Requests tab). I don't want even my Plan users to be able to see each others requests since some of our requests are sensitive. Anyone who has access to the project that a request queue's requests go to can see everyone's requests from those that have the same access to submit a request. Just because I need everyone to be able to SUBMIT a request doesn't mean I want them to SEE everyone's requests that have been submitted into that queue! WF, please change this!
It would be helpful to see a few metrics when looking at the backlog:Total Number of StoriesTotal number of estimated points (the only way to currently get this is to manually scroll through the backlog and add these up)Number of stories with no estimateNumber of stories marked "ready"I am sure there are more but these would be very helpful when managing the backlog.
It would be helpful if the Filter and View Options said the Actual Filter Name instead of Report Default because that tells the user nothing about the filter that is applied. Same for Review View.
I would like to see Filter/View/Group when I do a hover-over. This saves a lot of time whne there are lots of filters/views.
Hi There,We'd like to export all fields in Marketo that are mapped to Microsoft Dynamics fields. As there are currently no direct option in Marketo to export the full mapping of Marketo fields with Dynamics, could you help with investigating this possibility?
We would like to to see the "New request" screen match the "Preview" that can be viewed in the custom form builder. Currently, the New Request screen functions as a pop out and distorts how the form is viewed versus how it shows in Preview in the custom form builder. The current view shrinks down the width of the form which cuts off longer questions and causes some questions to appear side by side unintentionally. The current view shows the Request home page to the left of the form in the foreground which provides no additional functionality to the users and only takes away from allowing the form to appear larger.
After a project is marked Complete, an opportunity for the project sponsor to provide a rating (i.e. 5-star rating) on how the project went, would help project managers know when further review or a retrospective meeting is needed. This rating could be kept private and only viewable by certain roles or users.
When I choose a particular combination of filter view and group, I would like for it to stay that way PER project. I typically have multiple projects open in tabs at any given moment and when I change the selections in one tab, it changes all the project task list filter/view/group settings in the others upon refresh. It wold be very helpful for them to be set pre project rather than across the board.
The idea would be the same as with a task or issue. Everyone on the team is notified and then someone clicks 'work on it' and then make the decision.
Description:Add indicator that track and report on rule execution metricsCurrent Behavior: Currently when Launch rules get fired the tool does not keep track of number of times and duration. Why is this feature important to you?It will be valuable if the marketer have this data on the spot with in Launch, that will save time and add efficiency. How would you like the feature to work?The feature request is to add indicator that track and report on rule execution metrics, so the marketer can use the information to monitor and manage the tag performance.
Would it be possible to include variables in the title of reports or dashboards? For example, a report title that shows:[$$USERID] 's current task listor a dashboard title showing[$$USER.homeTeamID] Project DashboardThanks!
Currently we have the ability to raise risks/issues at project level. But not all risks belong to project. Some risks can effect the entire program/portfolio. Is it possible to enhance program/portfolio view to have "Requests" option on the left pane?
It would be great if people can delegate their tasks during their time off as they can with approvals, so coverage is automatic.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
