Build better products with our product team
Just how you can bulk edit shared fields in a task, user, project, etc. report, I want this ability for shared fields within reports in a dashboard, or selected reports within a dashboard that have the same field to edit. A lot of our dashboards have reports that share common filters (like a date range, category ID, etc) and when we need to modify the dashboard, I have to go into each report within the dashboard to change the same thing. It would save me SO MUCH time to be able to do this in bulk in a dashboard.
hello, I'd like to suggest to add a redirect rule scheduler to the Adobe Marketo Engage roadmap. I saw several threads around this topic or about a landing page scheduler in the Community. Alternatively, it may be interesting to create a redirection rule to a non-Marketo landing page and keep both URLs (like for Marketo landing page in Marketing Activities > Landing Page > URL settings), so that whenever the Marketo landing page URL is obsolete (unapproved/unpublished), the other non-Marketo landing page URL automatically takes over. Kind regards, Aurélie
The current newly redesigned Timesheet page top right filter shortcut button only applies to the OOTB filters which is "My Timesheet Approvals" and "My Timesheets".It would be great having ability customize the shortcut button and apply it with our custom filter.
When you attach multiple templates to a project allow users to change the template listed under project association in project overview. Currently, it defaults to the first template attached to a project and this can be confusing when creating a report based on the project template.
It would be helpful to have a "No End Date" option when setting recurring tasks like Outlook. Currently, there's a 100 occurrence max, so I have to create a task in Outlook to remind me to recreate it in Workfront after the 100. (Updated 06.22.203)Aside from the "No End Date" feature, it would be beneficial to add an option that prevents the creation of recurring tasks until the current one is complete. For example, having the August 2023 Update task not be generated until the July 2023 Update task is finished would help keep the Work List uncluttered. It would be helpful to have a visual indication, such as a tick mark in the corner of the task name, to show that a task recurs. It would be beneficial to include Year as a selectable option. At present, only Day, Working Day, Week, and Month are available choices. Thanks!
"Metrics view on Programs" - Enhancing program view. How about having a dynamic "Program Metrics" like the one we have for "Project Metrics". This view would be helpful, as program owners get full visibility without having a chart dashboard built, which would not be as dynamic as project metrics view. thank you.
Starting a new thread since the previous one here fizzled out.Fellow Adobe users and adobe product team. Here is a suggestion that stemmed from an embarrassing situation that cropped up today! For context - we have broad Adobe instrumentation in at Chegg - however we are still in the process of driving adoption of Analysis Workspace - since for so many things it is a really quick tool and avoid the need for complex data processes and things like Tableau dashboards - which end up being a source of technical debt. My team have been working hard with business partners to move them over to a new Analysis Workspace report from a legacy Tableau report that runs off legacy web logs. I cannot understate how the adoption of this report would have been a huge step forward as we try and drive deeper adoption of Adobe in my organization. So what happened? Well unfortunately they were tripped up on a very minor detail - that seems like a huge gap in the Analysis Workspace tool and make me have serious doubts as to whether it is really a tool that other organizations are actually using for web analytics. My team needed to include in the report a Year on Year comparison – so that they can show the %Year on Year change. So, as an example, in the report below they would like to compare the values in the two columns and display it as a % change on the chart. Sounds so simple – but they cannot do it and have told me that there is no known workaround. We have since verified this with Adobe Analysis Workspace Engineering management who said " We disallow right-click > compare time period when the rows are time". The problem this causes is it creates the impression that we cannot use Adobe Analysis Workspace as a fully functioning tool – this undermines our effort to drive adoption – and I have already had senior execs stop me in the hallways saying “oh Matt – it turns out we cannot use Adobe since it does not do YoY reporting”.Given the advanced features in Analysis Workspace I find it very surprising that this is not possible. We are now faced with an ugly decision to use Excel Report Builder to get this and email out reports - or to use Tableau or Domo our BI tools. This is like one step forward (adoption and trust of Adobe) only to take two steps back (to a world of Excel and BI tools that our partners cannot adjust).For me this is a P0 issue affecting Adobe Adoption / Perception / NPS in my organization. Would love you to upvote this if you are also affected by this product gap.
Marketo landing pages are often seen by enterprises as one part of a larger web presence, and one that needs to have a unified user experience and interface regardless of where a web property is served. In order to accommodate this, a common solution is to implement the use of Web Components for their brand. This provides a consistent look and feel across multiple tech platforms, including AEM and Marketo. However, while AEM can support web components, Marketo cannot support the custom element structure needed to work with web components. This results in a major pain point where Web Component-generated templates must be rendered back into flat HTML/CSS/JS—which is not always possible to do. To use Adobe's own web components system as an example: if someone were to generate a landing page template using the <sp-button> tag, the markup would be stripped to just <sp>. This renders the custom web component elements unusable. Would it be possible to update TinyMCE and the landing page template syntax validator to no longer strip web component custom elements? The standard uses hyphenation to determine custom elements to prevent rendering issues in older browsers.
In NWE, user can see maximum of 3 rows at any given point of time under Master Job Tracking Report. Please expand the grid vertically to see maximum number of entries / rows similar to Classic UI.
Add explainatory text after the "Filter View Group" dropdown list items to help users know what exactly the Filter, View or Group is doing and differciate the Workfront standard/built-in dropdown list and the 'customized' one. Our users felt that there're too overwhelming selections, but not sure which ones is trustworthy.it would be great If we could have something like in the dropdown list: "Standard - Workfront Built In View, list the most common used fields like xxx, xxx, xxx and xxx.".
It would be great if issues, tasks, projects could be accessed via friendly URLs. This would allow users to quickly pull up a record if the reference number is mentioned on a call, for example. Would bypass the need to share a URL or run a search then decipher which result is the right one to select. People could quickly edit a current page URL, swap out the task reference number, and instantly be where they need to be.Enhancement example:A group is on a call reviewing an intake queue. Not all attendees access the intake report or dashboard. 5 people on the call have follow up work on the task which is currently presented. The presenter verbally shares the task ID and moves to the next issue without interruption. The 5 users can quickly hit the task while the call flows on.Seems petty but accumulatively has impact. The presenter didn't take time to copy and share the URL and the 5 users didn't access the chat session to copy the URL or search by ID.Current example:https://xxxxxx.my.workfront.com/project/abcdefghijklmnopqrztuv01234567890/overviewProposed examples:https://xxxxxx.my.workfront.com/project/projectID/overviewhttps://xxxxxx.my.workfront.com/project/projectID/taskshttps://xxxxxx.my.workfront.com/project/projectID/documentshttps://xxxxxx.my.workfront.com/issue/issueID/overviewhttps://xxxxxx.my.workfront.com/task/taskID/overview
With close to 1,000 custom form fields we need a way to automate changes/management of large form list choices. Like some of our form fields with over 80 choices each. Automated exports and updates all the list values and multiple choice fields by syncing with an external source like google sheets, MS Excel document in Sharepoint, OneDrive, or something similar. If Fusion could have a new module for form fields and option values that allows us to search, update, add/remove, etc. that would be a huge help!
For Adobe Campaign Standard (ACS), we have a client that is interested in including attachments within their email deliveries. We have been told that this functionality is not currently available in ACS, but is available in ACC. The use cases for our client would be: 1. Client would like to give the customers the option to receive paperless invoices via .PDF attachment sent via email2. Client would like to include an .ical file on appointment reminder emails to give the customer the option to save to their personal calendar
Many times on one project there can be several Proofs that need to be approved by the same people. It makes sense to keep these are separate files because they do function as separate things and the approval of file A means the team can proceed while file B is still under review and iterations.Ideally, I would like for the PM or Creative to be able to upload each of these documents, generate proofs and then bulk select and adjust the approvals needed. So, if the Art Director and Account Manager both need to be on all proofs as a reviewer & approver this can be set once instead of opening each at a time..This functionality exists when it comes to sharing documents and granting access so it should be able to be replicated when setting approvers.
We'd like the ability to make specifc system-level project fields in the Overview.For example, for us, it is key that the planner fills out Company, Portfolio, and Studio (among other things).
Many of our marketers constantly ask our team "why can't we drill down into the basic reports in Marketo to view the leads behind the individual metrics?" I realize you can create a smart list for this additional level of insight, but it requires extra effort (and many are used to having this capability in other platforms). Also, many of our marketers aren't that familiar with Marketo - so providing our field marketers the ability to access Marketo to quickly view the high-level data and detail are key here. An alternate solution would be having the ability to include a one-time report send as a flow step within a smart campaign, but that doesn't appear to be on Marketo's product roadmap ( ).We already know that the Email Performance and Email Link Performance reports don't have this capability. So the alternative was to use the Email Analysis reports in RCE - with "cell drill-through" enabled - or so we thought.Common drill-down functionality in many other platforms gives you the ability to click on any of the numbers/charts in a specific report - like an email report with opens, clicks, bounces, etc. - and view WHO is behind that data. For example, if one of my email reports contains 7 unique clicks, clicking on that "7" would show me just those 7 leads that clicked in the email. Same thing for the "29" that opened it. That's not how it's implemented in RCE. The idea here is to "fix" this in RCE so that it works like typical drill-down functionality. The good news is that it's partially here already, so I wouldn't think it would be a huge undertaking to tweak it so that it works as expected, since we're not talking about adding a completely new feature for RCE.Here's how it works today in RCE. First, you enable "cell drill-through" in report options:You then select the attributes that you want to appear in the drill-through view:You can now see each metric turns into a clickable link:Here's where the problem lies. When clicking on the number "7" under "unique clicks" for the first email, for example, this is the underlying data (notice there are 75 records displayed, not 7):I learned from Support that the drill-down capabilities in RCE aren't built to work like traditional drill-down reports (e.g., click on the metric/number under the CLICKS column and you'll just see those leads that clicked; click on the metric/number under the OPENS column and you'll see just those leads that opened, etc.). According to Support:"The Drill down report will show you all the columns that you selected in the cell drill through selection screen. So if you picked 3 columns when you click any column it will generate a report for the columns you selected. For example, if I selected Opens, Delivered and Clicked as your columns and then clicked on the number for "Clicked" the Drill down will show me all three columns not just the number for Clicked. If you only wanted to see clicked on the drill down report you would only select Clicked for the columns in the Cell Drill Through selection screen."So what this is saying is clicking on any metric within a row will show the exact same data/results (based on the drill-down columns - in our case name, title, company) for all columns in the report - not specific to each metric (like "opens", "unique clicks", etc.). And it will always show the complete set of leads that was sent the email, regardless if they are included in that metric. Definitely not the expectation of a proper drill-down feature.To demonstrate what happens here - when modifying the report columns to include the measurable metrics - all it does is add those additional columns and populates those rows where the activity/metric took place (with some arbitrary number):This is what we would expect to see when you click on the "unique clicks" metric:Again, the expectation here is that EACH metric should produce a different view - containing just those leads that opened, clicked, etc - not the same view for EVERY metric.
Currently due to the limitation of email asset endpoints - email that is part of a program that is using Email Testing (A/B Test, or Champion/Challenger Test) is not available for querying using Get Email by Id, Get Email by Name, Get Emails - to overcome this users tend to use the activities endpoint to get the test email details. Emails with A/B tests have an ".Whole Emails Test"/".Subject Line Test" appended to their name in the activities API endpoint response but there is little info supplied for the test variants - it would be great if response includes few more attributes with the additional details for the test variants (like subject lines, from name, send times, etc.). The test variant id currently supplied in the attributes parameter helps little in identifying what and how actually the test variant was configured (subject lines, from name, send times, etc.).
Currently if you use at.js 2.0, the tracking server for a4t (analytics for target) is automatically set by the ECID Extension. But if you use a first party proxy configuration where your trackingserver is not your CNAME but your first party domain, the data is not flowing into adobe analytics. So it would great to set the tracking server in the Adobe Target v2 Extension UI, in case you use a proxy configuration on your analytics and ECID. In that case the trackingserver for a4t should be the CNAME and not the firstparty proxy domain, because even with a redirect on the firstparty domain, data will not flow into analytics.
Based on the Help article: https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=the-new-workfront-experience&topicId=Content%2FAdministration_and_Setup%2FSet_up_Workfront%2FSystem-Tracked_Update_Feeds%2Fconfigure-system-updates.html&_LANG=enit says "You cannot customize the system update for templates, documents or timesheets, but Workfront does record system updates for these objects." However, a user cannot see any tracking on a template where changes to (deleting tasks as example).WF Support confirmed that the 'Show System Updates' feature is not directly visible to end users on Templates and are not directly recorded in the UI under the 'Updates' section.Making this visible would allow for tracking of any template changes especially unwarranted or authorized changes to a template without providing notes to changes.
Today if a field in a custom form is a text field and you'd like to be formatted, the only way to do so is to create a new field that is formatted. It would be great to be able to adjust fields from unformatted to the ability to add formatting.Same goes for calculated fields. Today if you select a format for calculated fields (e.g. currency) and you need to change it, the only way is to make a new field. It would be really nice to be able to adjust formatting on calculated fieldsBecause there isn't a way to port data from one field to another, creating new fields when formatting needs adjusted ether means transferring data manually, with a tool outside WorkFront, or just putting the 'old' field at the bottom of the form and leaving it there until it's completely deprecated. These solutions are very inelegant
Requesting for admins to have the ability to delete projects, documents, tasks, issues from the recycle bin. Instead of waiting 30 days for items to drop off recycle bin, enable admin to delete permanently from the recycle bin.
Marketo's effect measurement report is regularly notified by email using the delivery registration function and checked. I delivered it every Monday, but the email was not delivered on March 21st.The reason why the email was not delivered was because the delivery registration was suspended. From here, it's a guess at the moment.Reports delivered by email have an unsubscribe link in the email, and if you press this, it will be unsubscribed without a confirmation step. Therefore, it seems that you accidentally clicked and stopped. Would you please take measures to avoid erroneous operations, such as not placing the stop link in the email or displaying a confirmation dialog when the stop link is clicked?
It would be nice if there was a way to break the proofing link after the project is completed. We had an instance where a reviewer went into Workfront added comments and change their decision after a project was completed. We are wondering if we could break the proofing link once the artwork is completed out, and if they want to make updates, they will have to create a new project. I know we can lock the proof, but to remember to do this each time would be a hassle.
In order expand the use of Workfront to unrelated groups within an organization, it would be very helpful to have job roles separated by group and company within the organization. Then only the users who are assign to a group and company would have visibility to use those job roles.
it would be helpful if we could restore anything that is deleted, i.e., custom forms, groups, teams, dashboards, views, etc., and not just Projects, Tasks, Requests, Documents, Templates.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
