Build better products with our product team
I've only seen this suggested as a comment on another post, so I thought I'd make a dedicated post about it. I would like to see a "Log In As" button available from a user's profile page. So when you're done adjusting access/layout template/teams/groups, you can quickly check how things look from that user's profile without having to navigate around Setup to check your work.
Currently there is no way to have an And/Or relationship between column or row rules. This makes some of the rules we want to apply useless if 2 rules cannot work together. For example, I want issues red that are not complete AND over 2 weeks old. Since I can't add the AND, it's making rows red that fall into either category, not both, and therefore useless.
We would love to have the capability to use the same field on multiple custom forms but be able to configure it differently on each form. For example, we have a Brands field that contains a dropdown with all of our brands. We'd like to use this on a custom form where the user selects 1 brand from the dropdown, but we'd like to use this field on another custom form for a completely separate report, but be able to select multiple brands. We do not want to have to maintain 2 fields with the same data since that would cause extra work.
Marketo allows any value as send from address (example: MickeyMouse@Mycompany.com) There should be a way to restrict this to avoid impersonation in big organizations. Maybe only user emails are allowed as send from emails.
When you log time on an Issue, Task, or Project, you used to click the Log Time button and the mouse focus would be on the today box. This has recently changed, and from a UI usability standpoint, it doesn't really make sense. I know about 95% of my logged time is done that day, so I am constantly clicking on today's date when I log my hours. It used to have this functionality, but has recently changed. The support specialist I just spoke with on the phone told me he has received a handful of calls within the past week with this same concern. I would be willing to bet that over 50% of users log time for the current day. Taking this focus off makes us have one extra click. It seems that it should have the focus, and if you need to log time for a previous day, then you select that. "Something" should have the focus to eliminate extra mouse clicks for users.
When creating a calendar, it would be great if we could choose custom colors (CMYK values) to match client/product branding and more easily identify items in the calendar.
When you log into workfront and look at your projects, this would give a very handy quick overview of where all projects tasks are at, at a glance. You could at a glance see where each projects tasks are at without having to open them all one by one. You could then target the projects which have an orange tick which would indicate that a task has not been completed.For example:In the following there is 1 small project with 1 task completed which then also has the green tick on the project as there are no more task to completeNow in the ‚Äòblue’ project there is no indicator at all if I have completed any tasks, this can be the same for multiple projects, so what I have to do is now expand a lot or all my project just to double check if ive completed all the task.Now when expanded:Just focusing on the ‚Äòblue’ project, you can see 1 task is complete, this is where I think it would come is very handy to have a green tick on the ‚Äòproject lines’ (dark blue) area for that task, so without expanding you can see that task is complete.And if there was more than 1 task on that same day then an orange tick would indicate that you have multiple tasks with at least 1 or more uncompleted.
Today, when viewing Campaign Inspector's details, the Timed Smart Campaign, pending execution icon is used for Smart Campaigns that were set on a timer but have already run inside Campaign Inspector. This can lead to confusion on whether the campaign has been run or not. Can either the default batch campaign has run icon or a special "Timed, has run" icon be used instead?
Description - As called out by user @gflare in this idea: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-platform-launch/add-the-ability-to-revert-extension-versions/idi-p/333149, a lot of releases don't contain release notes other than as an addition to one of the existing sections inside the Exchange, such as being added underneath "Installation" or "Support". When more recent hotfixes are made to address issues some users are experiencing, but haven't had a release note provided on the docs section of Experience League (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-platform/tags/extensions/adobe/target-v2/release-notes.html?lang=en), we are in a limbo of wanting to address an update to get on a newer version that has a fix / upgrade, but not wanting to upgrade too far into a new version that might potentially impact our library without having to duplicate a whole library and test. Why is this feature important to you - Either idea would allow us to have a better approach that would allow us to upgrade our extensions more quickly. Adding release notes about versions added to the Exchange will allow us to see what other changes have been made and evaluate risk for our business stakeholders. Allowing to select releases to upgrade to, while being a heavier lift development wise, would be the most ideal solution and allow us to mitigate the risk entirely of upgrading too far without having adequate testing completed. How would you like the feature to work - One or both of the below ideas:Have an additional column in Exchange where there is a tab for "Release Notes" or "Changelog" that shows the differences between versions submittedHave an ability when selecting to "Upgrade" to show a list or picklist of versions you can upgrade toCurrent Behavior - No format to where release notes are placed inside the Exchange listings for extensions (can be in "installation", "support", or completely omitted)When upgrading, you are automatically prompted if you want to "upgrade to latest version" with the standard warning that you cannot downgrade.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow users the ability to remove metadata values from multiple assets when selected via multselect Use-case: We can select multiple assets today and then click Properties, to add metadata to all those assets. DAM librarians are wanting to do the same steps, but to Remove certain pieces of metadata. For example, if we needed to remove a Tag field we originally selected on a set of assets, we’d have to access each asset, one at a time, to do that. This is especially difficult when the selection was just user error, and now hundreds of assets must be selected, one at a time, to remove that selection. Current/Experienced Behavior: Not able to remove metadata from multiple assets at once Improved/Expected Behavior: Add the ability to remove metadata values from assets, when multiple assets are selected at once. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.9+ Customer-name/Organization name: Humana Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When the instance has OAuth enabled for the SFDC sync (which is all new instances by default), the Salesforce admin page still shows a "login with Salesforce" button after the sync user is logged in and while the sync is still active. This may be confusing to an admin user who may believe that the sync user is no longer logged in, or there is otherwise an issue with the sync. It appears that the Disable Sync and Edit Sync Options in the gray bar at the top may indicate that the sync is set up. However, it could be helpful/clearer to include a message such as "Currently logged in as [user sync name]" and/or changing the button to "log in with different SFDC user" or otherwise showing a different experience in the admin page between when the sync is not yet set up and when the sync is active.
in WF classic I could command+F search a long report to look up specific information... or any long page. Now, in the New Experience, command+F will only search what is visible within my browser. There could be 100+ entries in my search query but if its not visible where I am in the page, 0/0 results. Why did we lose this functionality? Can this be turned back on?random example of why i'd use this: I have a task report that list out ALL tasks assigned out to users that are due in the next 10 days. If i see a few projects are running behind, i'll [command+F - {search employee name} and tap enter a few times - this helps me see if they are just running behind on one project or behind on everything.... In the new experience, am I supposed to create a custom prompt report where i type in each user, or whatever other specific information I'm looking for? Other example: I may need to create a new user, i'll go to my list of all users, command+F a similar user, then copy their profile settings to the new users. I didn't realize how heavily I relied on command+F but I use it all day to navigate WF.
Description - Campaign data not surfacing data available Why is this feature important to you -Our users are asking for the Campaign Analytics to include the Sent date event just the Sent for the first sent for a Campaign. Our users need this date to analyze engagement from days when the Campaign was sent. How would you like the feature to work -Sent date data would be available for inclusion in Adobe Campaign analyics. Current Behaviour -This data point is not available.
Description - When I search in Launch, I'd like to be able to know what rule a rule component belongs to.Why is this feature important to you - Right now, if I need to find the rule where prop17 is set to "resources", or I need to make a change to every rule that references the Criteo marketing pixel, I have to resort to digging through code, because the current search functionality is so limited. It's not exaggerating to say even some slight improvements to Launch's search would give me back many hours of my life.How would you like the feature to work - When I enter a search term, like "prop17", and get results int he search drop down, each rule component would have the rule name either along side the component name, under it, on the same line as it, or available as a tooltip sort of thing when I hover over it. Better yet, if I could click "...more" to get to a search results page that has a complete list of matches (and information about the rule it is in). Current Behavior - For actions that match the search term, you only see the action names, which in most implementations are not very useful, and would be difficult to make useful (do I include every analytics variable I set in the action in the action name?). In many cases, you'll see the same component name over and over, with no way of differentiating them. Also, clicking the "...more" part of the drop-down does nothing.
Customer has project managers and resource managers that are required to have manage access to projects in order to do their job, but this access allows them to potentially approve the business case for these projects. The customer wants to know if there is a way to limit access to the business case.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Move the manage tags button to be on the top menu bar on the More details screen, so users can quickly manage tags when viewing an asset from a workflow. Note: When you click on Payload from a workflow, you are landed on the More Details screen. Use-case: Move the manage tags button to be on the top menu bar on the More details screen, so users can quickly manage tags when viewing an asset from a workflow. Note: When you click on Payload from a workflow, you are landed on the More Details screen. Current/Experienced Behavior: No Manage Tags Option Present Improved/Expected Behavior: Add Manage Tags Option Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.9+ Customer-name/Organization name: Humana Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As a user, I’d like to see a red notification pop up that lets me know I’m missing values in the *Rights Managed Asset field so that it will display the same way as other required data fields. Use-case: adding metadata to an asset Current/Experienced Behavior: Rights Managed Asset field and other required fields using a dropdown picker do not show up in red when asset is first opened and only displays a red outline but no triangle after an attempt is made to save the asset. Improved/Expected Behavior: Those dropdown fields will look like free text required metadata fields and display a red outline and triangle when asset is first opened. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Mark Edelstein/Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Need the ability to add images to Dashboards that is intuitive and easy. There is no need for an image to have a title like it does now if you add an image via the Add External Page. Images should be able to be added and then the image should size accordingly based on screen and resolution size. I have 1000 of users that use this system and there is a 100% turnover rate (retail)I need ways to include instructions within the system so that new users coming on can quickly and at a glance know what reports mean and simple navigation. The ability to add images cleanly would allow for easy imagery and text available on dashboards to help the users utilize the system thus prompting higher adoption rate.
There is no way in WF right now to find objects that were shared with a team/group/company. For example: A previous admin set up something that somehow shared ALL our requests in all our queues with the entire Company (3k people). So anyone, regardless of user access, can go to Requests > Submitted and see all requests ever submitted. This is obviously a security risk.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: An Author should be able to set some preferences in the Action bar, such as sort alphabetically, always display in column view, alwas open the references sidebar... Use-case: When an Author opens a section, AEM will load them base on creation date and in Card view. An Author can click on the action bar to sort them alphabetically or to display them in column view; or any other configuration which help the author find the necessary resources. But when an author then navigates to another section or returns later during his day, the author always has to repeat the same task of clicking sort alphabetically, display in column view... If an an author could set his preferred sort of view, then he would not have to repeat these tasks every time. Current/Experienced Behavior: Repeated manual task of setting the view configuration in the action bar Improved/Expected Behavior: A saved preference so the author does not have to repeatedly set the view configuration in the action bar Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: National Lottery Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - App on phone that mutes any music played during a phone call (mute of music playing while on hold)Why is this feature important to you - I won't have to only speak with customer support through text and chat messagingHow would you like the feature to work - As describedCurrent Behaviour - There isn't an app which performs this.
In the Slack integration that enables posting an update to a project, issue or task - include details about the original post. This should include:original author namedate/time of post (in Slack)ideally a link to the original postCurrently this only shows info for the WF user who added it as an update - and makes it look like they wrote the update which is inaccurate.
Currently in Workload Balancer the only option is to see the task name or project name when reviewing work and assignments. We propose adding the functionality to support additional data elements to the view.This could be accomplished through:allowing configuration of additional columns (like most other views in WF)standard option to select data elements like: program, portfolio, and companyallowing display of a custom fieldenable the current field to be a calculated value (that could reference multiple layers of objects similar to what can be done in value expressions elsewhere - like grouping headers)In our organization it's not unusual to have multiple projects of similar (and even the same name) between customers. We leverage fields like program, company and custom fields to distinguish between them. In the Workload Balancer seeing that information is not possible. This requires jumping between screens to know what is being assigned and worked on.Furthermore, showing an additional custom field could enable us to show the calculated field that displays priority of a project - bringing the information needed to prioritize staffing assignments in our backlog.
Enable a configuration option at the system level to support setting how many weeks are in a month. Currently Workfront assumes this is always 4 weeks = 1 month.This behavior means that 12 months in Workfront = 11 calendar months. It also means that every quarter is a week short on views.We propose an instance level configuration option that would enable us to set workfront to use a 4.3 weeks = 1 month to mirror other non-Workfront reports and configurations.
I think the pinned menu concept is very nice, but the current interface allows for modifying/removing the pinned items too easy. A user can accidentally remove a pinned page or drag it to a different position because those options are always available.It would be better if the pinned items are in "read-only" mode after pinning (can't remove or drag). An "Edit" option would allow the pinned items to be dragged or removed. This way, the user has to explicitly go into edit mode to change the pinned menu items and thus avoid accidental manipulation.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
