Build better products with our product team
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Modify the License checker functionality for Assets since node is granite hidden folder ((granite:InternalArea)) Use-case: Checking license of an asset in the DAM Current/Experienced Behavior: can easily get to required data but can't because it is in a hidden folder Improved/Expected Behavior: change either folder permissions so it is easily accessed or move license checker functionalty to a new, accessible folder. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Assets as a cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Mark Edelstein/Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Other software applications I use (locally or cloud based) have the ability to pop up a notification on my desktop when an action or notification for me is ready. In an effort to reduce my creative team's reliance on email and since they spend most of their time in Adobe software I'm looking for a similar solution for WF. It would be very effective if WF notifications could pop up on their desktop over all applications I have open (in the top right corner of my screen). Similar to how the mobile app notification feature works (it's great by the way). I'm thinking of this in a similar fashion to instant messaging (AOL, gchat, Lync/Skype, etc.). It should be interactive so I can launch in to a WF browser by clicking on it. Thanks for your consideration!
Please add the ability to enter PTO on the mobile app.
After uploading a pdf, be able to generate a proof that captures the comments on the pdf to the proof.
Project owner to receive an email notification or at least a Workfront notification when a new Document version is uploaded to an existing document.
I would like to be able to report on checkbox fields to count and chart selections with the same ease as any of the other field types. There are discussions going back years with this issue and the best solutions have been: Use advanced text mode for each checkbox option (poor report-building experience that, for someone like me, often means needing to hire a consultant).Create a yes/no question for each checkbox option (very poor user experience for both building and filling out the form).If the parsing code is applied at the Workfront system level, this could save administrator time exponentially. It also aligns with system user experience for pretty much any other form-building system out there (Google, Microsoft, SurveyMonkey, etc.).
Description - Adding the feature to throttle the amount per hour.Why is this feature important to you - I fell like this is a base feature that every email provider has out of the box...How would you like the feature to work - Easy, We just want to type in the number of emails that will get sent every hour. Or we just tell you how many hours we want to spread the send out.Current Behaviour - Expressions (Not easy for someone that has never worked with them) and Workflow. Reporting that many email at once is a nightmare.
When logging time in the hours tab or a task or project, it would be helpful to have a searchable calendar to select a date from (like the one that appears when selecting a a Start On/Due On date) instead of have to scroll back week by week,
When you select an existing custom field from the library while creating a custom form, you see the notice: This field is being used on other forms. Changing it here will also change it on those forms. Since we have a request & project copy of nearly every custom form, so we see this message all the time. The problem is that we don't know where the field being used! It would be so helpful if you could find out which forms are using that field without having to save and exit or leave the page. I'd love to see something like "hover to see which forms are also using this field" or even just have the full list of forms using it displayed right there in the message (bonus points if the list is collapsible). We have older forms with fields that are inactive, but we still need to keep them to avoid losing historic data. I'd hate to accidentally change a field being used on another form and lose all that data. Creating new versions of the field can also be cumbersome, since you can't have two fields with the same name. Sometimes there are only so many ways to ask a question, and then we have to get creative with letter cases & the limited punctuation allowed (which is inefficient and doesn't always look professional).
Current functionality is that work that is assigned to a user that does not match the intended job role; the work still appears in the Unassigned work swim lane of the Workload Balancer. It would be great if the system knew the work was assigned and treated as such.
Currently, severities can only be set at the system level. Ideally, Group administrators would be able to set what the default severity should be for their group.
Description - Date Warehouse is the best way to obtain large reports from Adobe Analytics. The lack of presets is quite a restriction to fully utilize this toolWhy is this feature important to you - I want to combine large datasets from Adobe in Power BI. I want this to be automated, but the lack of date presets limits my ability to do so. How would you like the feature to work - Add all the date presets available in Workspace to Data Warehouse- last quarter, last 3 months, this year, etc etc. Current Behaviour - Very few date presets are available.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Optimize "orderable" folders feature Use-case: User orderable folder feature for 700+ folders Current/Experienced Behavior: Right now, we are not using the "orderable" features for folders since we were told that there's going to be performance implications Improved/Expected Behavior: Be able to use the orderable features to a lot of folders in the hierarchy without any performance implications Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description:I would like to be able to limit a users access to a single workspace project and report suite. I would not want this user to be able to see other workspace projects from the menu or create a new one. Why is this feature important to youWe would like to provide access to some of our vendors to be able to use a workspace project. Their permission is limited to a single VRS with only a few dimensions available, but they can do breakdowns, make visualization, edit the time window, etc. The issue is they can go to the workspace project list and see what others have created. We would want to prevent this and just have them see the one workspace we determine. How would you like the feature to workThis should live in the admin section Current BehaviourAll users can see all shared workspace projects
Situation, after applying filters on WB resources are listed simply alphabetically. It would be helpful if I could sort them e.g. based on their remaining availability for today, or some other field of choice.
Some programs were suddenly archived without any reason. None of our users claimed they have performed an archive. Checking in the Audit Trail, I cannot find any trace of such archive action. In fact, there is no action archive in the list of possible actions that can be tracked. The suggestion is to add this type of activity in the Audit Trail.
Timesheets should autosave when users input time into a row. Currently, users who forget to promptly save their timesheet for later have to input time twice if their page times out. An autosave feature would be a huge boost for user convenience. Thank you!
When using custom quarters, reporting is inconsistent. If you filter for a custom quarter, your timeline ends at 12:00am on the last day of the custom quarter - meaning anything dated the last day of the quarter gets missed in the report.If you filter for a longer period of time and group by quarter, the items that are dated the last day of the quarter properly show in the correct quarter. This inconsistency was reported to support but development stated it's not a bug or oversight so it's here in the innovation lab hoping to get some traction to be addressed properly.The correct functionality should be that custom quarters throughout the system all use 11:59 PM as the timestamp for the custom quarter end date instead of 12:00 AM
Jira Workfront Integration Add an option in the add-on configuration to specify an endpoint URL different than the Jira base URL. Workfront would then use the endpoint URL rather than the base URL for communicating to Jira. Current situation:The Jira base URL is used by Workfront to contact the api endpoints for the workfront integration. However, the base URL may follow specific authentication flows which are not supported (e.g.: Azure Application Proxy). Wanted situation:Workfront uses a specific endpoint URL which bypasses the authentication flows completely, which it retrieves from the add-on configuration section in the jira admin console. The URL would also point to the Jira installation, exactly like the Jira base url, but would not pass the authentication methods specific to users.
Can the charts be set to allow both the counts and the % to show up on any chart? It is useful to have both numbers. At a minimum, it would be nice to be able to print both the chart and the summary table on one sheet.
When a project is marked complete it would be automatically removed from favorites
Please allow Issues to be made recurring as is currently possible on tasks.
Dear community,we have a requirement in reporting that would be require us to group after checkbox fields. That is currently not possible and we understand why, but for testing purposes it would be nice if that would be possible. We need that in order to create some key figure like chart based reports.Best regards,Sebastian
We would like to be able to have a notification sent to user/s when a new Company is entered into Workfront. This will notify our director that they need to assign an Account Manager to the account.
We generally send to three groups of recipients in Marketo - clients, prospects and internal contacts. We have our Communication Limits set and they work well for clients and prospects - who we do not want to over send to. However, we have many internal colleagues inside our organization that like to see everything we send out and they are constantly bumping up against the Comm Limits. It would be great if we could exclude emails sent to our Corporate Domain from the Comm Limits and only have them apply to the clients and prospects we send to.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
