Build better products with our product team
Description -Exclude Today in Rolling Date Range, ie 'This month' that excludes today. Could be 'as simple' as a checkbox much like how 'include unspecified' is for a breakdown via Filtering.Why is this feature important to you -Always looking at Campaign to date performance and 'today's performance is negatively performing typically because conversion propensity is higher in the evenings.How would you like the feature to work -In the date range selector as a cta box, could be in the advanced settings with the 'rolling dates' feature.Current Behaviour -Today's performance is always incuded when looking at 'Q3' date range when in the middle of it (say aug 30th)
We only use Advanced and Automated for our Proofs. Our users often get confused and pick the wrong ones and they have to start the proofing all over. Perhaps the options can be set in the system settings - to toggle which type of "create proof" you want to offer the users?
As a company we've undergone a lot of structural change over the past two years. We need to be able to reflect this in our organisational stricture in Workfront. Workfront has recently allowed admins to disable Teams. We need to be able to disable Groups as well.We could just delete the group which would mean shifting all active users to another group, even disabled ones. This makes the exercise pointless. You cant leave users without an assigned group either. We have many users belonging to departments that no longer exist in the company and only ever belonged to one group. From an admin perspective it would be great if we were able to keep things tidy by having the ability to disable groups.
Description - There is no Metadata captured when adding anew key in Control panel SFTP-Key Management.Why is this feature important to you - In a bog project if you need to remove or amend any of the keys in the list it is almost impossible to fig out out. How would you like the feature to work - if there can be few more columns added like Date added(readonly), Modified(readonly), Modified By(readonly) and description it will be easy to manage.Current Behaviour - It has only two columns user name and Fingerprint.
The calendar reports really need to have a quarterly and year view.
With business needs, work needs to be redistributed from one resource to another. Between the Team Working On Calendar and the Swap tool (or Actions in the staffing tab, with new option to turn off role restriction), we are very close. Just want to tweak the job role restriction. Currently, the PM has to go through the tasks manually to update Jr. Copywriter to Sr. Copywriter. Can’t bulk edit because the hours are different on each task. So they’ve been just adding Jr. Copywriter to the new person but that messes up billing and cost once actuals are on the project. Solution Idea: It would be great to swap a user for any other user in the system but then a pop-up box comes up and lets you know they have a different job role. PM/RM can then decide if the user AND the role change on those tasks or if they need to find someone with the same role. Example: Bob is junior copywriter. He is out on paternity leave and we need to move his project over to Sally. The PM gets a pop-up that says that Sally is a Senior Copywriter, do they want to swap Bob for Sally and move all the planned hours to a Senior Copywriter or do they want to cancel and find someone who is a junior copywriter?
Add a possibility to copy an Expense to a new Expense after having selected an Expense in the Expenses overview. Many Expenses are recurring either monthly or quarterly, with the same data. Copying would save quite some data entry time, with less mistakes.
The system currently does not provide a warning of when your system storage capacity is in danger of being reached and when deleting items, you have to wait 30 days for them to clear the recycle bin. There is no option to immediately delete anything. This causes a disruption in your organization's workflow and ability to upload any new items to the system. The system should give an automated warning AT LEAST 45 days in advance (ideally multiple alerts starting well before then) that you are in danger of exceeding your storage limit in order to give proper time to delete items and have them clear the bin. Also - there should be an option to immediately delete files from the recycle bin as needed by an admin.
We need the ability to share filters in the Workload Balancer area to ensure that resource managers are looking at the same data when making business decisions. If one person forgets a project status or is pulling by a different data point then we are looking at 2 different sets of data. In the Scheduling area or the Planner, we can build filters and share out to managers to ensure data is being reviewed accurately. The only solution today is for the Admin to log in as the users and build the filters in each instance which is not efficient.
Following the re-structure of groups, there are a lot of options available to Group Admins.We would like to add an option in the New Experience Layout Template to customise what Group Admins can access in the Setup Left Hand Menu and the Group Left Hand Menu.This is an important requirement as it helps us build different levels of Group Admin and focus the training more specifically on each Group Admins needs.
If I use sharecol=true merging a calculated field and a free text field is there a way to eliminate one of the responses the merged field will give if it is duplicated? Here is an example: Division Field (cal) sharecol=true Client Name Field (text)Recreation Recreation Result = Recreation Recreation Is there a way for it to show the most recently updated field or remove the duplication?
Description - When a recipient clicks on an expired tracked link, the resulting page is a 404 Error page. This is not a good user experience. It would be "nice to have" a branded page with a useful error message.Why is this feature important to you - To provide the recipient with a not-so-ugly user experience.How would you like the feature to work - Each external account could have a default expired link URL parameter. The Adobe user would populate the value with a nice looking landing page URL. When the recipient clicks on the expired tracked link, they would be taken to this page.Current Behaviour - An ugly 404 page is rendered.
I've had two users struggle to find project statuses that fall below the scroll line in the status dropdown. They don't realize they need to scroll to find more statuses. Indeed, it looks like there's plenty of real estate to let the dropdown extend as needed.
Description - I have some new team members who I would like to add to hundreds of alerts we have set up (we have one for each Adode variable and event).Would like a way to add them to multiple alerts at once, so we don’t have to individually edit hundreds of alerts.Why is this feature important to you - Without it, I have to click on hundreds of alerts 1-by-1 to add new team members. And will have to do it again anytime someone new needs to be added.How would you like the feature to work - Would like to be able to edit multiple alerts at once by clicking on the check box next to them, or selecting "All" at the top. Would like there to be an option at the top for "add user" or "share" like there is for segments and calculated metrics. Current Behaviour - Have to click on each alert individually and add new user. Very time consuming.
Currently, my team is notifying me of issues with Workfront BEFORE Workfront does. I'd really appreciate it if there are any sort of issues or disruptions, the Workfront Status [https://status.workfront.com/] is immediately updated and an email is sent to everyone. As of right now, we are only getting notified of issues hours later. The way that incidences are flagged and announced really needs an evaluation in addition to how they are resolved as we rely on Workfront for ALL project management and when it's down, our productivity is disrupted 100%. I'd appreciate a little bit more transparency and maybe fewer major cluster issues?
I would like the ability to set a project custom form as a default on every project. This would allow us to ensure that EVERY project included our main project form and cut down on the need to fix projects after the fact.
The new ability to view which fields are being used in Custom Forms is great. It would be nice to expand on this ability to enable identification of which Views are also impacted by Custom Fields. There can tend to be hundreds of Views in an instance that has been used for years, and users may be overwhelmed by all of the Views, thus making their User experience a bit challenging. As an admin it is difficult to identify all of the Views as well. If admins had the ability to see what Custom Fields are used in what Views, along with the last date viewed and who viewed it, then they can attempt to hep clean up views that were "shared" and not used. As Custom Fields are removed, then being able to easily identify the Views that are impacted by this change would be easy to manage.
It would be beneficial be able to automate the completion of a program and change the status to 'inactive' or Is Active=false, once all the associated projects have been completed. The same functionality that is used to complete a project when all tasks are completed. This would make it easier to manage the number of programs that are available in the pick-list when selecting a portfolio. Right now it is a manual process for deactivating programs. Ex: Project Completion Mode
Similar to the team page where we can now use Kanban, can we have a Kanban view for a single persons workload with work requests going into the backlog and then the various statuses running along the top allowing them to drag and drop tasks. Also can we set the % complete for each status so we can get a more accurate reading on progress? Thanks
Managing custom forms and fields is a custom report is no longer possible in NWE as it is in Classic. NWE:Classic:Classic: (clickable link opens form directly)
Support unicode emojis in all user input fields to keep pace with other chat and communication platforms. This support should carry over to report/form exporting.Possibly configure whether these characters could be entered or not based on group settings. (what works for a creative agency may not be appropriate for a more "formal" business, for example).Example:https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-emoji-list.html
Description - The ability to create custom index(es) on AEP datasets for better query service performance. Not sure if Azure Data Lake Service accomodates the encoding, but it looks like there could be serious performance gains by defining a ColumnIndex and OffsetIndex, reference.Why is this feature important to you - Many users are interested in using Query Service, but the current UI can't conveniently handle larger requests, and even directly using ODBCs can be time consuming for larger datasets. Though there is native partition elimination and other benefits of using column-oriented storage, it would be extremely useful if clients could define a custom index improving performance. Even if only a single index per dataset, it could be a very helpful feature.How would you like the feature to work - It could be added to the UI of the data set with a simple checkbox/numbering selection for composite indexes with a specific order. Maybe a dialogue pop-up warning of any extra storage-related costs to hosting an index and an etimated time for building the index.Current Behaviour - There is only partition elimination, but no indexing.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As a general user, I'd like to be able to set a tagging profile to assets with common tags/consistent tag list rather than adding tags to each individual asset Use-case: User is adding a number of different assets to the same project or folder Current/Experienced Behavior: User has to apply each tag manually Improved/Expected Behavior: A set of tags can be saved and recalled so that all of the tags will be applied at once rather than applying them individually. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Mark Edelstein/Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable DRM feature on DAM Shared links Use-case: Sales and engineers have access to assets only from Brand Portal: they share licensed assets, or not licensed assets with external users without any issue (exernal users have to access licenses when downloading licensed assets) Brand manager and marketing people are working daily in the DAM. They prepare the assets, manage their publishing to the Brand Portal They aslo share assets with external users like journalists, vendors or other potential assets consumers These external users do not have access to BP nor DAM cause their need is very limited in time (once or twice a year maybe) Brand Manager are working all day long in the DAM and they never or almost never go onto the Brand Portal (they might not even have an account) They use the Share link feature with these external users to provide them assets collections, assets and/or folders directly. Some categories of assets that they share are under license agreement and external users must not use the assets without confirming they accepted the licence agreement text. This missing feature forces power dam user to have a Brand Portal access, switch between two platforms depending on certain tasks they have to do daily which is clearly not efficient nor productive. Current/Experienced Behavior: Current issue (bug or missing feature) is that license feature (DRM - https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-65/assets/administer/drm.html?lang=en#downloading-drm-assets) works perfectly when downloading assets directly from the DAM and the Brand Portal and also from a Share link created from Brand Portal. Improved/Expected Behavior: We expect the Share link feature from DAM would benefit from the same license/DRM feature as the Brand Portal Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
It would be great to customize the statuses for Risks/Issues/Scope Changes.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
