Build better products with our product team
Use script token in campaign flows, webhooks, etc. Now, we can use script token in mail ONLY. If it happens, there's more we can do.
I want to output in a different format!!
At the moment, there is no capability to graph Baseline Planned Duration. This needs to be rectified as soon as possible.
We use an "add a line" function throughout our campaign management to accurately document execution details. It would be nice to have the ability to add tables/grids to custom forms in Workfront so that you could delete a row in the middle of your content if no longer applicable.
It would be great to be able to update the Planned Hours as the Resource Manager directly in the Resource Scheduler or Balancer without having to navigate away from that screen. Currently, in the Beta Balancer, you have to open up the Summary panel for a task which shows all details of that task except for the planned hours. Clicking on "See All" takes you to the Project Details page and away from the Balancer.We have weekly Resourcing Meetings where the Resourcing Manager will review the resourcing w/ all of the PMs. If updates need to be made, the Resource Manager needs to be able to update Planned hours on tasks quickly and on the fly without having to click around to multiple screens.
Currently when you create a team, you are set as the team owner. My company only allows admins to create teams (ensuring consistency and reducing bloat) so creating a team is always a multi-step process: navigate to teams are, open new team, set members and options, search for the team you just made, edit owner. Being able to edit the owner as you're making the team would be a simple but very useful fix.
Description -In the Launch part of the debugger. There's the Console Logging checkbox. That's the subject of this suggestion. 1. Stop reloading the page on that checkbox change. You don't need to. Just execute _satellite.setDebug(1) and set the local storage value. 2. Have it on by default whenever a library substitution/setting is done. The cases when it's not needed by default are... edge cases.Why is this feature important to you - 1. Stops wasting my time on needless pageloads.2. Stops wasting my time on enabling it when it's obviously the intention.
Like many other users, we don't add documents to Workfront, but add the link to the source file. In our case this may be Sharepoint, Teams, Shared Drives and occasionally Google Docs. There is currently no central place to store document links so we put them in the updates, which means having to route back through the list to find them. It would be really useful to have a 'document links' section in the left hand panel to hold the links for all documents relating to that project or task for quick reference.
We've seen leads come into Marketo from SFDC and/or list uploads where vowels with umlauts or accent marks are all converted to this character: � While we track these closely and a correction can often be made by going back to the list and making sure it is saved/uploaded as UTF-8, sometimes, there are leads where the fix has to be made manually because the same � character replaces all vowels + umlauts or accent marks. It would be great if different/unique special characters could be assigned by Marketo for each combination of vowels and accent marks so that a find a replace smart campaign could be used to restore the correct values.
We have two use cases for this request. First, if an existing document on one object should be on a different object, we would like functionality to be able to simply relink to a different object.If we have a document at the project object level, and would like to add an issue or task to the project with that specific document, we would like the ability to simply relink it to that object at the lower level.
Currently we have 2 options to set the system to either using the user's FTE or their Schedule.We would use both in our organization.FTE for their availablility hours dependent on their rolesSchedule for the Exception days for independent province holidaysHaving to choose one or the other wouldn't provide us with accurate Resource availability hours.
Our agency has a lot of pipeline work in Planning Mode. It would be great if the daily summary could show a split of hours. All and Planned side-by-side. Also, if we can have some way to see the tasks that come from planned projects, that would be very helpful. Many times we have to bump planned work for new, booked work. Right now, we have to click on every task so we can see if the project is planned or not.
Problem: Utilization Chart is only able to be generated for a WEEK or MONTH. Users are not able to view utilization charts for a custom date range. This make it impossible to see how the project is progressing over the entire life cycle of the project or during a specific data range. Solution: Provide users to select custom date ranges and generate the Utilization Graph from those dates.
Hello, We are beginning our journey with Workfront and would really like to get some stronger and more detailed insights from the resource planner. What we would like to see is a 18 month window (6 months historical, 12 months forecast) of our demand (what is planned out for our particular team) showing where that time is being spent, maybe a program, portfolio and project level grouping. [Area Chart] Combined with this is the actual hours submitted for the last 6 months again grouped in the same way. [Bar Chart] Over the top, we would like to see how many hours we have available for FTE's [Red Line] and Contractors [Blue Line] This then maps out as per the example: With that chart being dynamic, and us using a project template, we can then get a strong view for the demand that we are being asked to deliver and the capacity to actually deliver this. In the new resource planner you do have a majority of the items required to build this report. and I think this chart should take place above the table view, like the agile burn down charts. Thanks
Currently, the Resource Planner allows us to group data by week, month and quarter. We would like the ability to group data by year as well, so we can easily track resourcing trends year over year.
Currently there is only a Month and Week view for Utilization under Resource Management. It would be very helpful for planning to see this in a Quarterly View.
We (resource managers) should be able to update a user's budgeted hours by project when viewing the resource planner by user. Currently, the resource planner only shows available and planned hours. If we have the ability to see the total number of hours budgeted to a user for any date range, we could forecast more accurately and without having to export the data and reformat in excel. The system should be able to handle user restrictions (whether they are a designated resource manager on projects or not) and allow others to just view the budgeted hours.
It would be extremely valuable to be able to access the data in Workload Balancer either via report or API for custom reports in order to forecast project profitability and department revenues for firms with more dynamic resource planning. With this access, future planned hours of both active projects and future proposals could be combine with past actual hours to get an accurate forecast of revenue earned over time (by month, by quarter, etc) as well as a more accurate forecasted profitability for fixed fee projects.
We sell multiple product categories on our site. For example: Toys, Baby, Grocery. A user may place an order that has a product from each category. For example:Order Revenue = 500Toys = 100Baby = 300Grocery = 100If want to see Revenue by Category, I would run a product report against our revenue metric. Lets say I wanted to create a calculated metric for 'Grocery Revenue'. My most granular option is this:Segment Container: HitSegment Variable: Products = GroceryMetric = RevenueThe problem with this is that the 'hit' container would include all revenue in this order. So the value would be 500 instead of 100 (unless I broke it down by products). It would be great to add an additional container that would allow us to 'filter' on the variable in the container depending on the report I am viewing. This would give us (Visitor, Visit, Hit, Filter) containers and would increase flexibility when creating reports/dashboards etc.Let me know your thoughts.Thanks!
Please include a choice to permanently make adobe stock searches "subscription content". I can't count the number of times I have found an image that my client and I both like only to find out that it's a premium image. I never plan on purchasing a premium image so I would love to never see them. I frequently check the box in search but have noticed that it does not stay checked. If this happens too many times I will go looking for another service ... I know there are other places to get the same images. Thank you! -Why is this feature important to you - I have a couple of times been buying several images at a time and accidentally purchased a premium image. I cannot afford to purchase premium images and neither can my clients.How would you like the feature to work - A box is checked in your account to show only subscription content. Premium content would never been seen until you ask for it.Current Behaviour - You can check "subscription content" in the search field but it never stays checked. You don't know it's premium when downloading previews. You only find out when purchasing.
Hi there,We are missing the ability to select a resource pool filter in the scheduling tool, so we can see and schedule to only that resource pool.Thanks!
Using filters in scheduling view is hard, because they are using OR function when inputing more than 1 "role", "team", "user". Especially when filtering by "role" I want to use AND function. That's simply how filters should work. If I'm looking for a resource who has role X, Y and Z, and I input roles X, Y, Z into filter I don't get the result I want, I don't find person who combines all 3 roles. Instead I get 3 lists of people who have each role, but I still don't know who has all 3.If not by default. I would love to have an option to customize if I'm using AND vs OR function
i've only recently been made aware that in the scheduling, all users receive tasks from projects that are not only current but on hold, in planning etc. i would recommend that a filter been created so that those tasks do not show up in people's schedule if the project is not active.
Our organization is very matrix. Our resource managers user filter to filter out his/her teams and jobs roles to reduce the number of entries in the resource scheduling to assign work to projects. He/her don't really have right to assign users/job roles that not belong to them. However, We notice in the "action" to mass assign or swap user, if i have existing filter set in the view, I still get all the jobs roles and users in the projects. This is not ideal. This increase accidental mistakes to assign the wrong job role to the wrong group of users. Can this filter function be apply to Action drop down list?
When using the scheduling tool or staffing tab to reassign resources, our Project managers will very rarely give individual projects to different team members.They will assign a whole campaign to a new project manager so will be easier for them to reassign resources by picking a whole campaign rather than all projects that sit within it.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
