Build better products with our product team
Description - I am the TAM for Honeywell, initiating a feature enhancement request on behalf of my customer, Honeywell.On the "Audit Events" page in the "Adobe Experience Platform Launch" console interface, there is currently no way to apply filters to the data displayed.In Honeywell's instance, they have over 5,000 rows of Audit Event data that are returned.It would be helpful if the rows can be filtered using the header rows.Can a JIRA ticket please be raised with this request?Why is this feature important to you - It's cumbersome to locate records with no way to filter or searchHow would you like the feature to work - Add (1) filters to the column header row (Sort A to Z, Z to A, etc.) and (2) add a basic search features to query the displayed data set. Current Behaviour - No Current way to filter or manipulate data rows
I would like to see the custom segmentation variable types combined so everything is an eVar, but with Pathing optional. sProps would simply be eVars with Pathing enabled and an expiration of “Page View.” This would also include the combining of Correlations and Subrelations.
As of now I don't see any report where we can pull the list of assets used by an email or landing page. It would be great to have thi feature..
I want to be able to type the reference number in any field whether custom or not and be it a Link to the record that reference number belongs to. It would make it very efficient just to click on a link rather than copy and paste in a search bar a reference number.
While designing cq:dialog we generally use CRXDE or we update the _cq_dialog/.content.xml file. But there is no feature like designing metadata schema or CF model for cq:dialog. There should be a feature called Design Component Dialog using drag n drop.
Description -The Authors would like to apply colors to the content/text that is added to a web page.Currently an out of box option does not exist.Why is this feature important to you - It will make all our Author lives easy, While applying colors to the context/text.How would you like the feature to work - The Authors should able to select the colors to the context/text.Current Behaviour - Currently we are using 3rd party color-picker plugin and it is not working as expected.
Hi guys,Can we please have release notes for extension upgrades? All we currently have is a single Upgrade button with an "are you sure?" blurb, with no info on what the update will actually do;This gives me zero confidence in upgrading any of the extensions, as if they break something I don't think I can revert the change.If I have release notes, then i could at least make an informed decision on whether to proceed with the update.A direct feedback link to the team that owns the extension would also be an added bonus, as I could then ask questions.Cheers, Jez
Hi all... I would like to propose two potential improvements to the use of filters in Workspace. 1. Allow filters to be used/set at a report level.- At present if you have multiple panels which you want to have all the same filters on you need to add them each manually. It is a pain. It would be easier if you could set the filters you want on a report (or on one panel and select apply to all panels - the same way dates currently work potentially). 2. Allow you to control width of filter diplay text/content- At present you cant adjust the width of text that displays for a filter. As such you either need very short filter names or need to hover over each filter just to see what the actual filter is you would be selecting. It would be great if you could adjust the display width of a filter (the same way you can with the column widths).
Rather than getting a notification that a predecessor task is complete and showing the dependent tasks, it would be great to get a notification that clearly tells a person that their task is ready for them. Maybe it's just changing the notification text in the body of the email from "Here are the dependent tasks:" to something like "Your task is ready to begin:" ? That might be enough to clear it up.
Would love to be able to choose what the user views on the top heading of a project. Currently it is Percent Complete, Job Owner, Planned Completion, Condition and Status. For our purposes, users would prefer to see the Reference # and have Condition removed. Add attachments isn't working. Will try to add screenshot after posting.
We would like the ability to see who and when changes are made to system wide settings within our instance.
Description: Undo latest changes to a defined "snapshot"I would love to have a new feature which allows me to go back in "property history" to a defined point. maybe it is like working with a git branch: at any point I can create a git branch, try some changes. if it doesn't work as expected, I can delete the branch and revert everything to the master (last snapshot)Why is this feature important to youEspecially when new requirements arrive, there are multiple solutions on how to implement it within Adobe Launch. Or it is just a test if an idea would work as expected. But if something failes or it doesn't work as expected, the "redo" can be a huge effort since we need to edit each single item (extensions, rules, data elements) and set it to the last published state.How would you like the feature to workThe new feature would consist of two action:"Create a property snapshot" which makes a backup of everything within a property"Revert to snapshot" which would delete everything and load latest snapshop (basically revert all changes since the last snapshot)Current BehaviourCurrently a "undo" would mean to edit each single item to the last "live" version, as well as deleting everything that has been created and is not needed anymore. if you have a property with lot of items or if you had a lot of changes, this can be a lot of work.One could think about "copying the whole property" and test it on the new property - but if it works, I need to redo everything in the orginal property and test again. for bigger changes this would just mean "double work"... But happy to hear if there are other solutions or if somebody has found an easy solution to deal with similar situations.
Similar to the Used By tab, I propose adding another tab for Forms that list all the fields that are currently being used in a specific form. It's very frustrating to have to open a form in order to see what fields are included, which then creates a draft of both the form and the landing page. Looking at the preview isn't helpful because we use hidden fields and change the labels on many of the fields. This extra tab would save time and be a better user experience.
If a resource has a 20-hour task that must completed in two weeks, the Resource Planner splits the hours across the days of the two weeks. But what if the person can get more work done and completes 90% of his work in the first week? At this time the Resource planner continues to show 10 hours of pending work for the following week when it should only be 2 hours (10% of 20 hours). Showing 10 hours instead of 2, distorts the actual workload that a resource has for the next week and can show work that has already been done as pending.
Other Workgroups' users who need to have access to the Custom Form field data in our Projects use the System Wide Search on their teams, which allows them to use a bit of a back door to access the Tasks and Documents on our Projects - which is problematic. We are having meetings with those users to define a different procedure for that, but as additional teams/users get into the system it is going to be hard to manage.It would be great if Admins could customize the accessibility of the System Wide search if needed. Some limiting options like what they are allowed to access and how deep they can go, whether as global settings or per Workgroup.
Hello Workfront Users! We would love to limit the amount of characters in a custom field in Workfront. We have certain fields that link to other systems, where in the other systems there is a requirement to not exceed a certain amount of characters. We cannot think of a good work around at this time! Thanks for your votes!
I noticed if you change a task status to Cancelled or On Hold, the Planned hours still remain in the Resource Planner, (as do the Projected Costs) which I feel is an unexpected and undesired behaviour. If you simply delete the task then all reference to it is lost which I don't think is always ideal.The problem with Cancelled or On Hold tasks Planned hours remaining in the Resource Planner is it gives a false reading of the work remaining for a team or person.You can't seem to add a Task level filter either to the Resource Planner to exclude Cancelled or On Hold tasks from calculations which is a bit annoying. I feel you should be able to Cancel or put a task On Hold, and leave the tasks planned hours and assignments so you have reference of what was originally planned for the task (helpful for reporting and in case they are required again later), but have the ability to remove this information from resource planning and cost calculations later on, at minimum be able to filter it out.
We want to report on the hours of assigned and unassigned tasks by job role for a defined period of time (week, month, quarter, etc.). Right now, we can see total hours assigned by job role OR total hours assigned to team members, but there's no consolidated view of the two views.
There should be a notification setting that sends an email to a requester when their request has been converted to an issue or project.
It would be very helpful if administrators could move updates/threads from one project to another. I've had a few clients, one especially, who adds updates to the wrong project (they're just not paying attention. I would love to be able to take that update it and move it (thread and all) to the appropriate project. Right now I have to copy and paste the entire thread and create a new update in the correct project which seems very inefficient. Also, I don't remove the original thread in case someone is referencing it which means it lives in the wrong project.Thank you!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Order of menu bar options should be unique in all scenarios , please find example below. "When you select from a folder, they are ordered CREATE - SHARE LINK - DOWNLOAD - CHECKOUT - PROPERTIES - TO COLLECTION - etc. In a search selection, they are ordered PROPERTIES - SHARE LINK - TO COLLECTION - DOWNLOAD - CHECKOUT - etc." Having to constantly search for options that are in a different location makes for inefficient navigation. Use-case: Visibility of menu bar option in fix order in all scenarios / views. Current/Experienced Behavior: Options are not in order if we consider scenario of select searched assets vs navigate to folder and select asset, if you compare menu bar option order , it's not the same. Improved/Expected Behavior: Options should be in one unique order. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.7 Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Screenshot (if applicable): Search "Running" in vanilla instance (6.5.7) - selected one 1 and got below order of menu bar options. Navigate to the folder i.e. /content/dam/we-retail/en/activities/running - and select the 1 asset - see order of menu bar options. Code package (if applicable):
Allow replacing of Workfront logos with client company logos fin the notification emails
I don't know if anyone else is experiencing this, but every time I go to any help article, I have to change it from the default "Classic" to "New Experience" to see the newest info. Is it possible for those to default to the New Experience as Classic is being phased out so we don't have to choose it every time? Or have it know which you are using and default to that.It's the little things :)
To avoid activating a program too quickly and send to the wrong audience (eg, I update the smartlist but then quickly go to the control panel and activate the program before checking that the size of the audience seems correct), the activate button should be disabled until the calculation of the audience is completed. This safeguard goes in line with the other suggestion made here: https://nation.marketo.com/t5/ideas/pop-up-alert-with-confirm-button-on-email-send-out/idi-p/312189
We NEED the ability to drag and drop events or dimension values into a visualization, and have workspace generate a visitor retention graph based on those different dimension values, with the visitor's first instance of that dimension counting as day 0 or the "inclusion metric".This would be especially helpful for evaluating tests, where visitor's are served different experiences, and we want to see which experience results in more visitors returning to the site in the n-th day/week/month.I know that workspace currently allows us to use dimensions in cohort tables, but this fails for the purposes of evaluating tests or feature based retention. If the visitor came to the site in the 1st week, but wasn't exposed to the test or feature until the 4th week, the cohort table will still include the visitor in the "included" group as if they had seen the test in the 1st week. Sometimes this results in the cohort table displaying higher than 100% retention values for a test or feature.We can get to these retention numbers in workspace by building multiple complex sequential segments for each dimension we want to evaluate, but this complex manual segment building is preventing our non power-users from being able to evaluate our most important metric.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
