Build better products with our product team
Most of our primary metrics are engagement (non-discrete). Unfortunately they are not available to be used as a primary metric in Target. Therefore, you can not use auto allocate (or auto-target) based on an optimizing things like pages views or visits.
When looking at the workload balancer, I would love to see (when hover over available hours of given user on a given day) on what schedule he/she is running. in a similar fashion as the information about What is more, it would be wonderful if users could ad hoc modify the working hours using "time-off" area in personal profile. For me, at the moment this is counterintuitive.When prompt says “working hours” and I see my usual working hours, my intuition says I’m modifying my schedule for today when I change both start/end time. To be honest that would be expected behaviour from our perspective to define in time-off are schedule exceptions, e.g. my schedule is 9am-5pm, but this Friday, I have doctors appointment in the morning, and will work 11am-7pm. If I want to input that information to the system, there is no way of doing this without modifying the schedule. And most users do not have access to system area where you modify schedule, because usually schedules are set up on e.g. team level/ office level etc. (that’s how I understand it) and what is more it cannot be modified for single day.Therefore it would seem like ideal solution if individual users where able to modify their schedules from time-off area as described above.
I guess, this is a bug where I always need Marketo Support: If I clone a program with tokens and I delete some tokens in the mailing, because I don`t need them here, I am not able to delete the same tokens in the tokens tab. It still says, that they are used, although the do not exist anymore in my mailing (hmtl & text version). It only works in that way: 1. unlink my mailing from all campaigns 2. unapproving mailing 3. deleting mailing 4. deleting tokens 5. cloning the mailing from another program 6. updating the mailing 7. linking the mailing to my campaigns that is very time consuming. Maybe Marketo can solve that bug.
Often times, we play around with Smart List Filters to check potential results. We build a Smart List, add filters and then check how many and/or which records are being returned. There's some trial and error here, such as "What if I removed the filter for language - does it even make a difference?" And sometimes just one filter might be pretty complex if you have some constraints on it. Now, if you want to test things by adding or removing filters, you have to remove them completely, and then re-build them if you decided you need to keep them. Wouldn't it be awesome if you could just toggle them on and off? Here's an example from the video game "Path of Exile" and its trade filters: See the toggle on the left hand side. Three of six filters are active for the current query.
Please create the ability to have project phases as well as milestoneThis will allow for roll up of all tasks in that phase ID, rather than using the WBS or task indent
This isn't something I'd normally think about, but I was doing some basic explanation on how Marketo works to someone and they encountered some frustration around how deleting assets work. As a general rule, if there is an approved version (for emails and landing pages) or if an asset is referenced elsewhere (such as for forms, smart lists, social assets and so on), the asset can't be deleted. That makes total sense from a development point of view, but it's disorienting for new users to not be able to understand why they can't remove the asset—they must click on delete, get the error message (that isn't clear for beginners) and then understand that they must either: a. Go to Used By, find the asset references, remove them, and then delete and/or b. Must unapprove the asset first, then are able to delete The messaging shown in response to an invalid attempt to delete today works but also assumes you understand the meaning behind it. Most new users just don't have that understanding yet. What I'm suggesting is a better user experience for this: either don't show the delete option until the asset can truly be deleted, or ideally create contextual options. For example, two separate changes that could happen in the drop down are: "Unapprove and delete" (if no asset references--perform this task on behalf of the user in one go) "Prep for deletion" (show the Used By panel contents and explain that references must be removed) However, I'm not a UX designer by trade; I'm just suggesting looking at more user-friendly ways to approach removing assets.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK