Build better products with our product team
The ability to select more than 1 value (e.g. project) in a custom typehead field.For example, if I create a new typehead field called Associated Projects, which references the project object, as an end user, I would like to be able to select more than 1 project within that field.
The flow for deleting changes in Launch feels a bit overly complicated, especially for changes that only currently exist in one dev library.First, I get this prompt:But if I say yes, I then get this prompt:Then I have to go to the library, find that specific change/revision, and unselect it.At bare minimum, it'd be nice to not get the first prompt asking if I want to delete it if, in fact, I can't delete it. Or, if I get the "delete failed prompt" instead of sending me along to the library to find the change, it gave me the option to disable and delete it right there.But generally, if I am trying to delete something, it's because I want it to be disabled and removed. I know it's in use by a library, that's what I'm trying to solve for. It would be great if the deletion flow more closely resembled DTM- a deletion counts as a change that needs approval, etc, just like addition/editing changes.
It'd be great if when _satellite.setDebug(true) were enabled, you would get additional information about the _satellite.track functions and Custom Events that are firing. I described an external workaround/fix in a blog post (Enhanced logging for Direct Call Rules and Custom Events for Launch/DTM - 33 Sticks ) but basically, right now for a Direct Call Rule I can either know it fired, or its string wasn't found as a Direct Call Rule trigger:But now that folks can send extra params with more information, it'd be great to see more details- something like this:Something like this would also be wonderful for Custom Events, though I understand that would be trickier because Custom Events are far more, well, custom- I'm not sure how you would listen to them if they can have any name and be bound to any DOM object- but that would be very helpful.
In addition to the need for an "OR" operator (Allow for "OR" conditions in rules ), being able to nest conditions would be very powerful. For instance, I just did this custom code condition for a client:This would allow us to move out of custom code conditions, and possibly reduce redundant rules folks might resort to make.
It'd be wonderful to have a console code snippet (similar to DTM's "localStorage.setItem('sdsat_stagingLibrary', true)") or even have it added to the Launch Switcher plugin (which currently requires the user navigate to Launch's Environments page).Use case: if we want a third party to be able to test their tag is firing correctly before we publish it.... they don't have access to our launch, nor to our lower environments. in DTM I could just tell them "use this snippet and reload the page", but for Launch, the best I can do is get them to install the Experience Cloud debugger extension (Adobe Experience Cloud Debugger - Chrome Web Store ), tell them to go to "Tools", and manually insert the full embed code I provide them.I understand the thing that makes this tricky is that folks can have multiple dev environments so the code/extension doesn't always know where to pull dev libraries from... if we'd need to make one as our permanent "for external testing" environment or something (so it'd look more like it did in dtm... launch-ENXXX12345.min.js for prod, launch-ENXXX12345-staging.min.js for staging, and launch-ENXXX12345-dev.min.js as my permanently-easily-accessible-by-console-or-extension dev library), I could work with that. Or if the snippet/extension made me manually input my library ID or something, kinda similar to the Adobe Experience Cloud debugger currently does (but without all the extra bloat of that tool):Or if I could generate a testing link (kinda like how GTM does it) so that if a tester went to www.domain.com?adobeTest=true&adobeLibrary=ENXXX12345-staging it would use that library and maybe even have _satellite debugging turned on automatically...At bare minimum, if there was a snippet/extension to switch from prod to staging (since that IS a more static link than dev)- even that would help.Really at this point though, I just need ONE option to use for these situations, short of me telling them to install switcheroo.
Hello, related to Case 01785541, we here at Dropbox have been experiencing occasional intermittent delays with list uploads and campaign sends. Unfortunately, we are not alerted to these issues, and can only work with Marketo support to help with the fix until they are reported by business users. We have been informed the following from Support, via separate requests: "Unfortunately, there is not a way to alert or be notified when there is a delay on processing campaigns or list uploads. I suggest if you have not already, to submit an idea to our product management team for a feature enhancement for the product to be able to be alerted when these issues occur, perhaps even in the notification section of Marketo." Is this something you could investigate and let us know your thoughts? thanks!
Please improve the library search to be able to look for the library based on the keywords mentioned in the Notes.
Please add an item into the context menu to copy dimension values without metrics (columns) to clipboard.
So here is an example of what is being asked: Requestor submits Issue with 9 out of 10 chapters of a publication. Layout start cannot wait for the missing chapter. Draft of the layout has been approved. In the meantime, the missing chapter is also finished and can be plugged in. Requestor need to upload the missing chapter but can only do this at the Issue level of Documents. The only way the document can be added at the Task or Project level is through down- and uploads and then, of course, not from the individual who is submitting it.This is not an ask that Requestors gain access to the entire Documents area of Projects and Tasks but that at least an upload is possible post-submission of an Issue.
570/5000 Hello,I have two points that really annoy me in the long run.1. Why does the paste not work after the start? After starting Photoshop, why do I have to copy the original again and a second time so that I can then paste it into Photoshop?2. Is it necessary that the sliders are so insensitive. If you change a slider quickly, you usually haven't hit the right spot. You always have to hit the controller very carefully to make a change. That always pulls you out of your workflow.
Currently when you complete an approval in the new experience your taken back to the documents tab, can we have an option to return back to the task page. This will reduce the extra clicks to get to the task tab to post an update for the task.
When task are due WF randomly sets a time for task due. For example when we state a task due on 10/25/2020 WF will pace a random time base on the predecessor completion. We need the time to be the end of the day. This issue effect reporting that shows task an bringing completed late when the are actually done on the task due date. Can there be a global setting to set due time to 11:59 p.m. or to a custom time set by the planner of system admin.
Hello Workfront Community - When a user utilizes the Time Off Calendar within their profile and selects a calendar day to have the entire or part of a day off, that time should automatically be reflected in their Timesheet. Timesheet profiles do allow other General Overhead categories such as Vacation time or PTO, but neither field is populated automatically on a timesheet for a day or dates where a user has identified they will be on PTO within their Time Off calendar. If the resource planner has functionality built in where Time Off entered in the users time off calendar contributes to the available hours the user has in the resource planner, why can't this also be the same for Timesheets? I've scoured the site and tested in our Sandbox environment, but have been unable to identify if this functionality exists. If this functionality does exist, please advise accordingly.
In the Project, there is a Portfolio section in the project build.In the Request, there is no Portfolio option. We added a text fields to supplement in the Request form.This is an ask of WF to see how we can bring the Portfolio option from Projects into Request.
Our PM team would collapse a stage once it's done but when we open that schedule again, all the tasks will show up. It would be great if the stage would stay collapsed; makes it easier to review schedules with lots of stages & tasks. Thanks.
Some suggestions for improving the referenced workspace: ability to use custom metrics (doesn't appear to be the case as of now)ability to select more than 3 (appears to be the current limit), whether or not the confidence calculations adjust for multiple comparisons for tests with multiple challengers
When adding sub-tasks to a User Story in an Agile Team using the Scrum Methodology, the sub-tasks are also captured in Story Points instead of hours. It is fine that we are using 1 Story Point = 8 hours in as our Scrum setting, but sub-tasks should not be also captured in story points, all other Agile tools I have used (Jira, Rally, Azure Dev Ops) allow tasks to be captured in hours. Can this be a future enhancement for Workfront?
When I create an email performance report, whenever I click on the report in the program I get taken (after a page load) to the control panel for the report, where 80% of the screen is taken by a message saying "Adobe Flash Player is blocked". I need to click on the report tab to see the actual report. Would it be possible to get taken directly to the report tab instead of the control panel tab when accessing a report?
When converting an issue to a task, there should be a place to assign the task right away. Right now, you have to completely convert the issue to a task and then assign as a second step.
Users are reporting challenges when entering time on their timesheets.Where there are multiple rows for a specific project or a number of General Hour Types it can be a challenge to see which row you're on when entering time into the grid. This is due to the General Hour Types being on the left hand side of the screen and time grid on the right hand side.A hover state when the user scrolls over a target area in the timesheet would help users massively to pinpoint in a short space of time which project or general category (Y-Axis) corresponds with a specific day of the week (X-Axis).
It would be nice if we could favorite rules and data elements to make them quicker to access.Further functionality that would be useful:Pin favorites to the top of the listFilter the view by favorited items (similar to how views can be filtered by enabled/disabled)
In both classic and new experience if every other row on the timesheet could be shaded for ease of view for users would be great.
It would be extremely helpful to have the ability to add rich text formatting within a proof comment. So, for example, if I want to indicate that a sentence of copy needs to be inserted with one underlined word, that formatting can be clearly indicated within the comment.
We're not able to use the new Resource Planning tool in an efficient way because of how you first need to set project planned hours as budgeted and then set users planned hours as budgeted. For our organization, it doesn't make sense to not have the two be equal in the beginning of a project set up. If we have to change the budgeted hours, we could do so after. But, it's pretty rare that planned and budgeted aren't equal. I'd like to see the option at a system level to be able to turn on/off setting the budgeted to the planned hours so that it doesn't need to be a manual process each time a project/resource manager sets up their projects. I believe this will also eliminate "human error." For example, I like to look at resource availability on a weekly basis to see where someone might be overallocated, but if a project manager didn't set their planned to budget on a couple projects, then I may not see an accurate picture.
I created a new field for program member data field since that’s a new feature. The activity log data doesn't say what program this field is being changed on. Weird right! How are we supposed to tell what program the field was changed on? Instead, it shows the program that the campaign lives in that is changing this field. That does us no good. The activity log just shows the program/campaign that changed the action, but not showing the program that the action was done for. I read all the documents about it and I thought it was program specific, not person specific. If it’s program specific, shouldn’t the program name be there?https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Program+Member+Custom+Fields
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
