Hi There, Issue happens based on below criteria:Let's say you're having 6-7 panels (reports) inside single Analysis - Workspace project.You're changing the report suite id in Panel 1 and using the option' Apply to All Other Panels' to change the data in all the panels.As you know, data will be changed from report suite id A to report suite id B in all the panels expect under 'Page Flow' report you will notice (existing) data ie Page URL from report suite id A.We have lots of portals available and gaining access to other report suite id data causes data privacy issue with our clients.A ticket is already raised and its under investigation [Incident: 200429-000137] but I've been advised by client care to raise it under Adobe Ideas.Please reproduc the issue and let me know how to handle this situation. Thanks,PV
Our pages have always showed up on Reports with the intended characters themselves, but in Workspace we get the raw code instead of special characters in things like page name / page title, so the display is ugly. Logically we'd fix this by changing the data source or processing, but the reality is that we have tens of thousands of site pages and years of data. Changing our data source or rule process to clean up the many pipes, dashes, ampersands and other special characters would lead a bunch of overhead and 2 years of transition time between old and new pages and titles (our long tail is... long). The activities around this would require major, sustained effort in order to:Get reasonable data on most popular content where top page views aren’t splitting counts of the same page between old and new titlesDo analysis like year over year comparisonsMaintain internal enterprise training and communications reminding stakeholders to use whatever workaround we put in place while doing analysis for those 2 years:probably a SAINT classification name value for all name sand titles work rather than the usual ‘page name’ or ‘page title’ variable requiring setting up daily automation for adding dozens of new titles to the classification, just swapping characters where code appears. The inability of Workspace to render characters instead of presenting the raw code in the display seems like a product issue, since it is out of step with the way content was presented in other Adobe interfaces (Reports). Since Workspace has way outstripped Reports in sophistication and has been made the go-to tool for data democratization and direct stakeholder use, would it be feasible and reasonable to ensure that Workspace displays actual characters rather than code versions, the way Reports does? Thanks for considering.
I would like to create sub panels to better organize information. Collapsing panels is an important feature to me to allow a clear overview of the reports available. Creating a sub-panel under a main panel would also help in better structuring reports.
Look at this screenshot: Did you know that you can edit the schedule's time by clicking the "2:53 PM" time? I bet you didn't. Because the "2:53 PM" black text looks just like the "Feb 11 2020" black text, just as it looks like the black text every where else. So your first reaction was "that is static text, not a link". Adobe, for a creative company, this UI design is really backwards! Stop hiding user-actionable links/buttons behind a "beautiful" design. A design fails if the user doesn't understand how it is supposed to be used. That is Design 101. Make links look like links, and static text look like static text.
NTT Data would greatly benefit from the Legacy Resource Pool field being made either a required field when setting up project or have the ability to set a default option for this field. This helps with our forecasting reporting. When setting up a project if this field is not selected it is not included in the forecasting and resource allocation.
Update the time of day the Advertising Analytics data refreshes every night to update at 1a so the data is available for the prior day when we come into the office. Instead it refreshes at 8am and it doesn't finish until the afternoon. During high demand times it's critical for people to make faster decisions which this feature doesn't allow.
Workfront favicon that appears on your browser's tab is not customizable.
We're recently started using the Adobe integrations to streamline uploading of documents from the creative team. One thing that would be good would be a way to see comments on proofs natively in the adobe programme, or to have a link to the proof from within the widget. It allows the designer to stay in the same interface and increase productivity.
There appears to be a huge gap in the data returned in the cohort table.If the inclusion criteria differs from the return criteria, there is no way in the cohort table to find out how many completed the return criteria in less that one period (e.g. 0+ days, 0+ month etc.)It would be incredibly useful to get at this information. Please can you consider adding a +0 column?NOTE: the 'Included' column does not represent what I am asking for, as the the include criteria is often different the return criteria.ExampleP.S. the Jan 2019 changes to the cohort table are awesome! - It could be even better if you sorted this out :-)
It would significantly improve the user workflow when working with AAM models if we were able to edit an existing model once it has been created to change the included data sources or to change the excluded traits/segments. Whilst data sources are slowly changing, if we made changes to data sources or add/remove data sources, we need to recreate every existing model and then the algo traits in order to allow the change to flow through, which is a significant number of manual steps and also requires several days of waiting for new models to run and new algo traits to populate. With the excluded traits/segments, this is a very significant feature to ensure that biasing traits/segments do not impact the effectiveness and accuracy of the model, however traits and segments are very frequently being created, and we regularly need to review and amend the traits/segments being excluded and update them. Today we cannot amend the excluded traits/segments without recreating the model and going through the model lifecycle again, and further when we clone a model the excluded traits/segments are not cloned / pre-populated, which makes it a painful task to clone a model where traits/segments are being excluded. This simple change would significantly improve the usability and adoption of models in AAM.
Currently, I can design a custom form to say 'Make this field required' or 'Let this field be optional'.I would like the ability to say 'This field is required, ONLY if this other field is option X or Y.'Example: An order form for a laptop purchase, where the user can:Buy a basic laptop (dropdown) and order one of three optional accessories (3 text fields)Buy a fancy laptop (dropdown), and be required to specify the brand name for the same accessories since they're now included (3 text fields)I realize I could work around this by having two identical sets of fields, then displaying each one differently depending on the Basic vs Fancy choice, but this leads to incredible duplication of fields for any kind of lengthy set of choices.
Currently, there are 4 issue types that you can edit the names of as you see fit. My company categorizes things a bit differently than the system does, and we have more than 4 issue types that we use. I'd like to be able to create our own issue types instead of just editing the ones we have.
In Workfront, when inline adding a task, the default duration is 8 hrsWhen you click the "New Task" or create a task via the API, the default duration is 0 hrs as the functionality requires you to set the planned hours.The idea is that there would be a system setting that would allow each organization to set a default duration when tasks are created via the New Task button or the API, aligning the functionality with the current inline adding task functionality.
It would be nice to be able to have the choices for the Drop Down field to have the option to be in multiple lines. For example, if the choices were addresses it would be more presentable if they weren't under one line.
@jenla5 has a great method for visualizing Adobe Analytics usage within Workspace, see instructions here.Despite how cool/useful the report suite would be, it is still a partially manual process to generate.My team would like to try fully automating its creation using a combination of export/import API and common ETL tools, but the only step that doesn't appear to be available is the ability to automatically export user logs. Could the feature to use v2.0 API to export user logs be added to the Adobe I/O Console?Alternatively, could such a report suite be developed on Adobe's side to transform the user log data into Workspace dimensions/metrics?
Hi Team - It's an IDEA to have below field on the Programs with Opportunity Analysis. 1. Opportunity Closed Week This field is visible on “Opportunity Analysis” alreadyBut it is not on Program with opportunity analysis report.It's an idea, We should have this field on Programs with Opportunity report as well to have the time-frame wise reporting purpose.Thanks, Vinay
Currently, the same drop list of tags appear when adding Segments and Calculated Metrics. Once you create a tag, it will always appear within the drop down list of available tags to choose from. I would like the ability to edit/delete tags from appearing in the drop down list of available options. This would alleviate confusion from analysts about which tags are proper to use and would provide greater flexibility when grouping segments and calculated metrics. I understand you can add/edit/delete tags from segments and calculated metrics at any time, but there is currently no availability to edit/delete the drop down list of available tags. So, all spelling errors, improper tags, etc. once created will always appear in the drop down list and could be used by any users with access to segments and calculated metrics, which could lead to problems when assigning tags. Please let me know if I should explain anything further. Thank you!
Select a Color Palette on project level is a nice thing.However, it would be even better if one could select a different (custom) color per Panel. Now, that it's possible to have multiple report suites in a single workspace, it would make even more sense.
When you're in the milestones view of a report, it shows an elaborate breakdown of tasks, milestones, and completion %'s (along with the start and end dates) - shown in first screenshot. But when you send out the report as PDF (or any other method), it only shows the project name, owner, start on/due on, and completion %) - shown in 2nd screenshot. We use milestones for every project and being able to share a report showing these would be very effective.
The hourly rate used is currently only available by back-calculating from Resource Revenue (Resource Revenue / Hours). However, this does not make it easy to tell which rate sheet the hourly rate was pulled from.Ideally, the numbers and rate location behind Resource Revenue should be exposed as fields available for reporting:Is it the Default, Company, or Project rate?If Company, which one?The hourly rate directly cited that is being used by that hour record.This is something that bothers our finance people from a surety-of-data perspective, especially as convoluted as we feel the financial aspect of Workfront is.
It would be great to be able to add a due date to a new task using the Slack integration. To me, it defeats the purpose of adding a task in Slack, assigned someone, but then having to actually go into Workfront any way to add the correct due date. Right now, the due date defaults to the start date of the project, which very rarely the true due date.Thanks!
In my previous job, we used Asana and I used their functionality of being able to use a direct link of the project name to send to team members via chat when I needed something quickly. I found I used it all the time, and now needing the same functionality with WF. Using the URL with a long url address is not ideal. We use the reference number and job description in our project name. Would love to select the project number/short project name and have it as a link to send someone.
Can we have a feature to auto update the Client console with the latest version compatible to the installed server?If someone do not ant to auto update it, then they can uncheck the option to auto update in the console properties.
We are currently implementing Workfront to a large user group in China and are disappointed to understand the Workfront App is not available in Traditional Chinese. As Workfront has a number of global clients, including the Chinese market, I believe this would be a very beneficial enhancement. Does anyone else work with Chinese markets and can you let me know how you get round this?
Within our Adobe Analytics, we're afforded a number of Analysis Workspace templates, some which are beneficial to us, and some that are not. From a "less beneficial" standpoint, it is VERY confusing to users that we have access to reporting templates for product features that we do not have available. For example, because we utilize Ad Cloud, we were told that the "Paid Search Engines" template will not work for our company, and the template itself will not load. However, there is no way for us to remove that report template within our company admin settings, thus creating confusion with users about under-utilized features. Would it be possible for a future Adobe product release to allow for admin customization of the available Analysis Workspace report templates? And, even better, could admins customize those Adobe "out of the box" templates themselves to better align with our instance?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
