1. The Revision Publish Status should be indicated in the compare revision.2. The Name of user made changes to Rule should be visible.3. JS Minification should not be applied for the codes loading in Sync - eg: if the rule is in Page Top or if we provide a custom library in Adobe the code gets minified - for difference checker this is not needed.
Currently, proof decisions are limited to 4 items and we would like to see an enhancement where you can either expand the limit to a greater number or have the ability to apply different sets of decisions by Workfront group or team. I think the latter may be difficult given the current architecture between Workfront and Workfront Proof but still would like to propose it.Since we are limited to just 4 decisions, the challenges are the following:Legal/Compliance have other decisions that are needed but cannot be added due to the limitationUsing proof workflows with these decisions may make sense from a Compliance standpoint, but if we want other groups let's say our Creative team to use proof workflows, the decisions are limited to what we initially created from a Compliance lens, so it makes no use/sense to themReasons can be added to the decisions as some sort of workaround, but this gets challenging to not only manage but require the users to do an extra step rather than one simple click of a decision
Giving Admins the ability to manipulate project overview custom forms. The project overview default form I know that its native but system admins should have the ability to manipulate it and remove fields.
Being able to manipulate the New Project button based on access level, Forcing use to create projects using only templates.
When using the box integration to upload files, the search feature does not allow the ability to search for folders only files. This is not ideal when you have lots of folders in your box account and you need to find a specific one.
Currently Workfront provides only the option to revoke all API keys. The request for revoking a single API key results in revoking all keys and re-issuing them afterwards. This can be a quite complex procedure if Workfront is highly integrated with other business applications. To improve availability of API access and API key management in enterprises and enable granular security actions a better API key management is needed. A first step would be the option to revoke single API keys without impacting other API keys used.
It would be great to be able to have Task deadlines populate in Microsoft Team calendars.
Currently we are unable to add the specific end users planned hours for tasks in the home tab. We can show the tasks planned hours as a whole or the primary assignments hours for the task, not not the specific user who is viewing their home. If the assignments object was available as an object as a drop down option when editing the home tab in the layout templates, it wouldn't be an issue.
When converting a Request to a Task, having the ability to assign, set status, and select dates in the overlay/popup window as is done with converting to a Project.
In Salesforce Lightning, there is the standard object Opportunity Contact Role. Standard fields from this object appear in the Opportunity information in Marketo, but it would be great to be able to sync custom fields as well. Right now there is no way to do this in Marketo, and we're having to sync an entirely custom object to retrieve the relevant information.
It would be no nice and easy if we could get the activity QA URL from API instead of having to log-in to the UI to get it every time.
We load Target through Launch and configured Launch to use different analytics report suites based on which environment it is (Dev/Stg/Prd). For example, all analytics from the Dev environment goes into the Dev report suite. It would be great if we can pass the report suite from Launch to Target so that the analytics can go into the report suite for that particular environment. Right now you manually configure which report suite to use, so we have to change it from environment to environment and is very inconvenient.
Our developers do not like the excessive number of calls required for each regional mbox inside of our SPAs, however they like the added structure of regional mboxes for offers and personalized content. It would be nice to be able to return regional mbox content setup in the Form Composer via the global mbox. For example, a list of mbox names could be passed as parameters to the global mbox for a particular page/route. The global mbox could return the content for each of those mboxes listed in a single response instead of using multiple regional mbox calls. This should be an optional setting for the experience.
It would be beneficial when setting up a smart list subscription that we had an option to select the minimum number of leads required in order to trigger the list send for that day. This would be useful for exception reporting. For example, I created a smart list to catch all records who are missing a Country Value. Now usually in my database, 100% of the records have a country value, so I don't really care to get a subscription report reminding me that there are still only 0 leads in that report. I'd like to only be sent an email via subscription if that number is 1 or greater. is this possible?
I would like to add a frequency or limit on the Experience.So the Experience will stop after x times if there is no interaction on the Experience. So you can offer a new Experience for this person.
provide users the ability to choose if font substitution is okay, or if proof pages should be created as images to retain look/layout of fonts not in the system. Additionally, provide users the ability to add specific font families to their own accounts (to support proprietary fonts our clients might have, that we must work with quite often) Both scenarios above pertain to uploading PowerPoint files specifically. When font substitution occurs, layout gets all out-of-whack, such as words overlapping, line breaks strangely, words over graphics on the slides, etc.
It would be great if the Salesforce.com Campaign Name or ID could be included in the program performance report, or at the very least, in the program reports in the Revenue Explorer. Salesforce.com is our main record of truth, and often we have to reconcile campaign activity with program activity (we sync all of our programs over as SFDC Campaigns). Often, a program name gets changed, updated after the initial sync to Salesforce.com, and there is no way to do an easy match to find the existing Salesforce.com campaign.
Marketo should work on to add feature to compare two similar type of tokens in the smart campaigns as as of now if I have to do the cross token comparison I have to set up a webhook for this and calling the webhook increases the processing time as well as it adds a external dependency on webhook so now we have to work to make our webhook implementation optimised along with marketo implementation. Thanks 🙂
Currently, updates comments made to Documents do not roll up to the Parent Object (Task or Issue). Due to this, updates and comments can be missed.
For more complex segments, I sometimes need to create multiple rows of the same dimension and search criteria. Even when using "contains any of" and pipe delimiters. It would be handy if the workflow for segment creation would allow easy duplication of a dimension. For example, right click, duplicate this criteria. It would be important to preserve all of the settings, much like when duplicating a panel in Workspace. Edit: I know it's possible to click CTRL + drag the dimension, but I've only learned that from a tip given by another user. I'd suggest facilitating this, again, much like as with panels in Workspace.
It would be great if the Program Level contained the Business Case functionality and/or the Optimizer functionality . Many of the Clients I work with will have a budget for their campaign or their program, and it would be valuable to roll up the project information to the program level and complete a business case for the overall campaign. Also, if the optimizer functionality was available at this level, then the user could enter their budget for the program and prioritize the projects underneath more effectively.
It would be great if there was an "undo Proof" function, so that if you accidentally click on generate proof you can quickly undo that function.
When a custom field (Parameter object) is made as a dropdown there could be several hundred possible values (Parameter Option object). Right now the only way to sort the dropdown values is through the UI (see image_001.png). It would be nice to add an API action to the Parameter object that would allow this same sorting to be called through the API like in the same matter approvals can be approved/rejected/callbacked (see image_002.png).
A lot of times we as analyst are asked to calculate an incremental value of a change to a user experience. I know Adobe has Target which is kind of this ideas bread and butter but I think it would be amazing if Workspace could support the following idea for programs that we don't run through Targeta comparison of Actual data to a projected forecast of data based on an inflection point.I'm thinking a comparison tool that would allow an analyst to selected- metric - event or calculated metric- the base period start date --- say Jan 1 for example sake- the start of the campaign or ux change -- say Feb 15 for example- campaign end date --- say March 15th for example or could also be set as 'on going', in which case the tool would use the end date of the panelupon execution the tool would create two segmentsone for Jan 1 to Feb 15 with actual data with a estimated 'forecast' (simply linear) spanning until March 15th&one for Jan 1 to March 15th with actual data& a line chart should display the values of the two segmentsof course the two lines would be the same from Jan 1 to Feb 15 but then would deviate based on the variance between Feb 16th and March 15th.the freeform table should have all the data day by day so the user can also download the csvthe icing on the cake would be to calculate an average daily 'variance' between the actual and the forecasted valueI'm not a statistician but I'm sure this can explode pretty easy if you start going down the road of different types of test and control periods or different forecast solutions. I was just looking for something simply that us non-statisticians could use to help make our day to day lives easier.
its impossible to plan all tasks in a project. why can't you submit requests tied to a project? in addition, you should be able to pull in task custom forms to send data as part of the work requests. otherwise a PM has to know of every task going on and make sure it gets in the project task tree. its impossible for a PM on large projects to know of all work going on but if people could issue requests and indicate it's part of the project, then all work would be captured and visible. Am I missing something?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
