Build better products with our product team
In Workload Balancer (WLB), we need to filter down the displayed items on Issues/Requests only, using a specific value in a custom field. This can be done easily in the 'Assigned Work' section, but in the "Unassigned Work" section, the option to filter on 'Issue' fields is not available.I have had it confirmed this is by design but seems odd it is in one area and not the other.(doc attached with screenshots)
We are currently weighing whether to enable the IAB bot filtering functionality in Analytics (this is a communication challenge internally - as a B2B media company, we often quote traffic numbers in sales materials, and these numbers will obviously be impacted). Some of the primary downsides of enabling IAB filtering functionality include: no solid estimate of how enabling filter will impact traffic numbersloss of the ability to accurately measure year-over-year growthIf a segment were available in Analytics that allowed us to either exclude or isolate bots, we'd be able to address both of the above concerns. The segment would obviously need to be regularly updated to keep up to date with the IAB list.
The process of analyzing email clicks is very manual involving a lot of data manipulation in Excel. For example, if we want an email performance report that excludes footer clicks (to remove social media icons, preference center, unsub, etc.) we have to pull a link performance report, get that number, and update it on the email performance report. We can't use the green filters in Marketo since it would filter people out across all metrics instead of just clicks. I know we can include the MktoNoTrack tag in the HTML, but there are times we'd like to see that click traffic, so it would be helpful to have the data available to us.
Currently the reporting on program updates isn't possible. For us as a company we use programs extensively and need to be able to report on a program update. This field should be added along with other program information to standard reporting.
Description - Currently, when you go into a document in your Documents section, the breadcrumb is not complete. The breadcrumb takes you to the project, but not the folder you may have for a document in the Document SectionWhy is this feature important to you - For larger projects, this folder can contain a lot of files. The only way to manage comments is from a notification and if you need to find something specific or confirm the correct document, you can't easily go backward from the Document breadcrumbHow would you like the feature to work - Breadcrumb to show the full path to the document, including folders within the document sectionCurrent Behaviour - In the document, breadcrumb will show Portfolio>Program>Project
Description - Would like to be able to set a time frame to a new event with the new calendar. Why is this feature important to you - Would like to be able to set a window for a new event. For example, 4/2/25 9 - 11am on the calendar. How would you like the feature to work - When setting up the day(s) for the new event, allow setting to pick the time frame of a new event that is for a few hours. It would be wonderful if this could operate like the Outlook calendar calendar settings. Current Behavior - Can only set daily events on the calendar without a specific time frame Idea to add in time: Outlook Calendar Example:
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: suggest a product enhancement folder download size limit to 10GB Use-case: the maximum size for folder downloads set to 10 GB. Any downloads exceeding this limit would prompt a message instructing users to contact their assigned Asset Manager. Current/Experienced Behavior: issue with downloading large directories from a cloud service. When clients try to download project folders exceeding a certain size (e.g., 10GB), the process fails despite the feature being available. Improved/Expected Behavior: maximum size for folder downloads set to 10 GB. Any downloads exceeding this limit would prompt a message instructing users to contact their assigned Asset Manager. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Introduction to HTML: Understanding the Basics of Web Development is a beginner-friendly tutorial designed to help you grasp the core concepts of HTML. This tutorial covers essential topics such as HTML structure, elements, attributes, and best practices. Whether you're starting your web development journey or need a refresher, this guide will provide you with a strong foundation to build and structure web pages effectively. By the end of this tutorial, you'll be confident in creating basic web pages and understanding how HTML interacts with other web technologies.Why is this feature important to you - This feature is essential because HTML is the backbone of web development, and understanding it helps in creating structured and accessible web pages.How would you like the feature to work - The tutorial should provide step-by-step explanations, real-world examples, and interactive exercises to reinforce learning.Current Behavior - Beginners often struggle with understanding HTML structure, so the tutorial should simplify concepts and offer clear, practical guidance.
Right now, the links in subscription emails to automated reports are only active for 24 hours. In some cases, to allow for vacation time, or other team commitments, the link may need to be extended for more than 24 hours to avoid having to resend the email manually to refresh the link. Is it possible to set this in the same way we set the link expiration for marketing emails to contacts?
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Show version for out of the box Workflow "manage publications" Use-case: When using the AEMaaCS Workflow "manage publications", there currently is no version published in the timeline. It is also not possible to add a custom parameter "enableVersion=true", as this is an out of the box Workflow, which is not editable. Versioning is needed to keep track of the published content and do proper version control. This is problematic when there is a need to revert to an older version, as it is not possible to access the new versions through the timeline. Also it is inconsistent with Page editor and Quick publish versioning who do show up in the timeline. Current/Experienced Behavior: No version is shown in the timeline for content published via the out of the box Workflow "manage publications" Improved/Expected Behavior: Add a version to show up in the timeline for content published via the of the box Workflow "manage publications" Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS feature release 2025.2.0, maintenance release 19823 Customer-name/Organization name: APG Groep N.V. Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
In Adobe Analysis Workspace we found a little nuisance with the description of one of the default Date Ranges (Last Week) - it says "By default, this refers to the time period that starts on Sunday and ends on Saturday prior to the current week.", but our users don't know that our defaults are set differently in Europe (week starts on Monday). Can Adobe please update this description to something like "This is set accordingly to the respective Report Suite configuration" (in Report Suite Manager > General > Calendar Settings)?
We need a better way to auto sort 'bucketed' values in CJA.Current Method: Value bucketing is a great feature, but the current sort method uses either alphabetical sorting or population based sorting. Neither of them are useful. Current Workaround: To get values in the right order I either need to make manual segments and drop them in a particular order OR use table builder to pre-determine the order. This is a tedious process, and there is a risk of everything resetting should I choose to change the bucket values. Feature Request: We need a more intelligent way to sort dimension values - for example, ordering in descending order should put values in following order...less than 2525 to 5050 to 75so on... Supporting images:
Currently, Typeahead Field does have the option to reference the "Task" and "Request" Object. It would be great if we could have "Task" and "Request" Objects available in a Typeahead Field.
Description - Add a field that captures the date a user was last reactivatedWhy is this feature important to you - My company requires a new user reconciliation to be completed with each access review. For each activation, we need to ensure we have a proper access request form with proper approvals. I need a way to be able to filter users that were activated since the last review.How would you like the feature to work - Add an Activation Date field to each user that captures the last date a user was activated. In the case of a new user, the date would be the same as Entry Date. In case of a user that was reactivated, the Entry Date would be unchanged, but the Activated Date field would reflect the latest activation date.Current Behaviour - The data is currently not captured.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content fragments created using custom CFM show size as 0B Use-case: Authors create CFs and they see the size of the CF is 0B as opposed to having some numeric value since the CF is not empty Current/Experienced Behavior: Create a Content fragment model in Tools->Assets->Content Fragment Models. Go to Navigation->Assets, click create, select content fragment from the drop-down. Select the content fragment model you created. Enter data into CF and click save. Change the view in Assets folder to List view, the size column for this content fragment shows 0B. When you create a content fragment which uses an OOB AEM CFM, the size is calculated correctly Improved/Expected Behavior: The size of the content fragment refering any CFM (custom or OOB) should show the actual size. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.21.0 Customer-name/Organization name: Fidelity Investments Canada Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description -We many times have a need to propose updates to project plans (tasks) that may impact the timeline. However, the overall impact is not known until we update the dates on the tasks and the system calculates an overall project end date. In some of these instances, we need to seek stakeholder approval on the proposed plan updates before committing the changes. Workfront has the Manual Save option that lets you make project plan updates without auto saving. This helps see what the impact of the changes will be on the overall project plan without saving it. However, there isn't a way to either:Save the proposed changes as a draftExport the proposed changes to PDF or Excel Why is this feature important to you -We'd Ideally like to present the proposed changes to the stakeholders in a PDF or excel and highlight the changes. We cannot do this without making the changed in a live session using the Manual Save option. If the proposed timeline changes have a lot of updates, this leads to double entry. First to determine the impact, and second to actually commit the changes once we have stakeholder approval. How would you like the feature to work -We'd like the ability to save a draft of the proposed project plan that can be saved/committed once we have stakeholder approval.In addition, we'd like to be able to export the proposed project plan to share with stakeholders.
Dear Adobe Team,I hope this message finds you well. I would like to propose an enhancement for Adobe Acrobat Reader that I believe would significantly improve user experience and efficiency.Currently, when users open a PDF document, they need to reselect their frequently used tools each time. This can be time-consuming and disrupts the workflow, especially for users who rely on specific tools for their tasks.I suggest implementing a feature that retains the recently used tools when a user reopens a PDF. This would allow users to quickly access their preferred tools without having to navigate through the menu each time.Such a feature would not only enhance productivity but also provide a more personalized experience for users, making Adobe Acrobat Reader even more user-friendly.Thank you for considering this suggestion. I believe it could greatly benefit many users and improve their overall experience with your software.Best regards, Gabriel Eilhardt
Why is this feature important to you:This feature is essential because it improves data organization and management within Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform (RT-CDP) when activating datasets to Amazon S3. By allowing separate paths for each dataset, we can ensure more precise data handling. How would you like the feature to work:I envision this feature working by enabling users to define unique paths for each dataset within a connection. When setting up a connect for S3 dataset activation, users should have the option to specify a distinct path for each dataset, allowing for more granular control over data flow and storage. This could be implemented through an intuitive interface where users can easily assign paths during the connect configuration process. Current Behaviour:Currently, RT-CDP does not support separate paths for each dataset under a connect for S3 dataset activation. All datasets are managed under a single path, which can lead to challenges in data organization and management. This limitation makes it difficult to isolate issues and manage datasets independently, impacting overall data governance and operational efficiency. Resulting in creating new connection for a separate path
Description - The challenge lies in the inability to move scenarios in bulk from one folder or team to another within Adobe Fusion. This limitation complicates scenario management, making it difficult to organize and re-structure workflows efficiently. Where we have to either move one by one or by using blueprint. Why is this feature important to you -It will enhances efficiency in managing multiple scenarios. It allows for better organization, quicker restructuring of projects, and easier collaboration across different teams. As teams grow and projects evolve, the ability to easily manage scenarios ensures that resources are optimally aligned and workflows are kept seamless.How would you like the feature to work?Bulk Selection: Users should be able to select multiple scenarios at once using checkboxes or a "Select All" feature within a given folder or team. Then move it to the desitined folder.Current Behaviour - Currently, Adobe Fusion does not allow the bulk movement of scenarios between folders or teams. Each scenario must be moved individually, which is time-consuming and inefficient. This limitation affects workflow organization and complicates the process of aligning scenarios with project or organizational changes.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently, Smart Tagging in AEM leverages AI to generate metadata for assets automatically. While this increases efficiency, it can lead to irrelevant or inconsistent tagging. Introducing an allow-list would complement the existing block-tags functionality, providing both restrictive (block) and permissive (allow) controls over tag generation.The ask is the Implementation of an Allow-List Functionality for AEM Smart Tagging based on a Dictionary/JSON File. This feature will ensure that only business-relevant tags, as defined by the organization, are applied to assets, enhancing tagging accuracy and consistency. Use-case: Organizations require precise control over the metadata applied to their digital assets to maintain brand integrity, regulatory compliance, and content relevance. For example, a fashion brand may only want tags related to specific product lines, materials, or styles. An allow-list would enable them to define a set of pre-approved tags, ensuring that only relevant tags are applied, avoiding irrelevant or misleading metadata. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, AEM Smart Tagging supports blocking specific tags using the block-tags functionality. However, it does not support the enforcement of a strict set of allowed tags. This leads to inconsistent tagging where irrelevant or non-business-related tags may be applied, requiring additional manual cleanup and review.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/assets/advanced/blocked-tags Improved/Expected Behavior: With the allow-list functionality, Smart Tagging will reference a pre-configured list (in JSON or dictionary format) to determine which tags are permissible. Only tags included in this list will be applied to assets. This will ensure business relevance and compliance with organizational tagging standards. Additionally, a reporting mechanism will track and log the blocked tags and the frequency of their occurrence, providing valuable insights for content governance. Configuration: Admins can upload a JSON file or define a dictionary in the AEM configuration console. Validation: Smart Tagging compares AI-generated tags against the allow-list before applying them. Fallback Logic: If no tags match the allow-list, the system can be configured to either apply no tags or notify the user/admin for manual review. Compatibility: Works seamlessly with existing block-tags for dual-layer tag management. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Applicable to AEM as a Cloud Service with Enhanced Smart Tagging enabled. This feature should also be compatible with other AEM versions that support Smart Tagging through Content Intelligence APIs, ensuring flexibility across different AEM environments. Customer-name/Organization name: need to check with customer if the name can be mentioned. Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Our department works with hundreds of companies on projects, shows, and events throughout the year. We create or handle hundreds of videos, graphics, designs, and other files for each event. These files must be shared with various approval teams for each area we are involved in. Our design and production teams operate in both Frame IO and Workfront Proof due to the distinct advantages of each product. Our customers would like a single location, similar to a Frame IO dashboard, where they can preview, see what needs approval, mark up as necessary, and download the finished product from a central location. They want to quickly view the proofing status and action items through a hover feature or side panel. This needs to be consolidated to at least a program level of documents and videos. It must allow for multiple permissions, sharing, and dashboards, enabling the overall project owner to get a high-level overview while allowing individual presentation or activation owners to focus on their specific areas. It should also enable keywords or smart filtering so that the customer can view just a particular format, monitor, or screen content from their dashboard. Security is crucial so other licensed users or clients cannot access it. It should be easy for editors and creatives and non-creatives to upload files to the individual locations, and it would be beneficial if it could integrate with either Workfront Documents, Adobe DAM, or a third-party storage provider to house the files.
It would be great to have the ability to limit the Custom Fields to users (including Group Admin) to use / access by Groups. This will improve the user's experience and allow them to only see Custom Fields that are shared with them and what they see when building reports as well. Similar to not being able to deactivate custom fields as we get more groups report creation is becoming frustrating for users.
The label "Subject" is confusing for the users who are already typing it in a custom form. I want to be able to rename it to better reflect its purpose.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We have a requirement, where the authors want by default the folder structure in an alphabetical order while the user is performing any operations such as the "move" operation on files or folders. The current display is not helpful to them to find locations. They also want to default their different views to list in alphabetical order as an option. Use-case: 1. As an author, I want to have the option to view my files and folders in alphabetical order by default, so that I can easily locate areas and not have to change the display to alphabetical each time. 2. As an author, I want to have the option to view my files and folders in alphabetical order by default when performing any operations such as move for example, so that I can easily locate areas. Current/Experienced Behavior: 1. The first time you load the sites or assets experience; you must change to list view and then sort on the column you desire to view in alphabetical order. 2. Anytime you load the sites or assets experience and perform an operation such as move on any folder(s) and/or file(s), you can only view locations in one way (whatever the default list view is here) and there is no way to change it. Improved/Expected Behavior: 1. Once a user sets their view and sort, it remembers the next time. I can set these options somewhere to toggle on/off and select which column to sort by. 2. By default, the locations are sorted by title or name. There should be options to set this or change it here as well while performing any operations on files/folders. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.20 Customer-name/Organization name: TMNA Code package (if applicable):
We are able to upload an attachment to a comment in the "Updates" section on an issue. When we convert this issue to a project, the comment transfers over. However, the attachment does not. The attachment should be transferred over to the project, as well. It is an inconvenience to our users to have to upload this attachment to two comments.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
