Build better products with our product team
DescriptionAs a user of Workfront, I want the ability to schedule my work on a calendar widget on the home screen so that I can time block efficiently. Why is this feature important to youtime blocking is an important part of my work process and the inability to mirror or complete that in Workfront is limiting.How would you like the feature to workUtilize the durations/planned dates for tasks/issues assigned to me and prompt them to show on a calendar view that connects with outlook to book time around existing meetings. Reference https://www.usemotion.com/ as general interface of widget... another ai connection for us too!Current Behaviorcalendar was removed from the New Home screen
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: There should be a UI accessible to authors that will allow them to manage dictionaries Use-case: Translation management Current/Experienced Behavior: The current UI is not accessible to authors (and probably not available in Cloud) which means, updating this will require authors to be dependent on admins or developers to make changes https://<hostname>:<port-number>/libs/cq/i18n/translator.html Improved/Expected Behavior: A UI within the Authoring console is available AEnvironment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Proquire Screenshot (if applicable): N/A Code package (if applicable): N/A
Currently, the project's Planned Completion Date is auto-calculated by the planned completion date of the latest task. We'd like the project's planned start date to have the same sort of functionality. We are using cross-project predecessors more and more but when things are pushed, the project's start date doesn't move in the Portfolio's Gantt Chart.
I would like to be able to use the Portfolio Optimizer to prioritize new requests that have not been converted to a project yet. If we have 20 new ideas (requests) submitted for review, it would be great if we could have WF prioritize them like we do for projects.
Description - The email notification to go to a proof could use improvement. The CTA to go to proof is too small and we have had several users click the Proof Link because it is more prominent.Why is this feature important to you - When users do not use the CTA, they are making comments on the proof, not in the proof. This can be done through this email and also by clicking the Open Summary icon on the proof in the document section. In some instances, the url can provide instructions to add an account, resulting in the comments ending up in the native file (Figma, Word)How would you like the feature to work - The CTA to go to the proof should be more prominent and remove the proof link from the email notification. If it's being shared out, we want the proof shared, not the link. This will mitigate opportunities for Reviewers to make comments outside the proof. Current Behavior -Proof comments can be added through the document section/Open Summary icon or by clicking the proof link in the email notification.
We would like the ability to customize the terminology of the project status label, within the Layout Template settings (Terminology tab).Example: a team in our organization would like to use the term 'Phase' instead of Status on projects. On tasks, we would keep the term 'Status', so it would need to be an object-specific terminology customization.
Would love to have a report for bounced emails or emails on Workfront block list.Why is this feature important to you - We recently ran into an issue where about 50 users stopped getting email notifications for any items in Workfront. It was due to a glitch in the matrix, causing the emails to bounce, putting them on the block list. It took several days for the issue to surface and it would be great to get in front of this proactively so work doesn't get delayed.How would you like the feature to work - Report option to pull the informationCurrent Behaviour - Currently, only Workfront can provide this information to you if you ask for it. Some users questioned the lack of notifications in a few days....others it took 7-10 days. Deadlines were missed. You can see the notification in the Workfront record, but if someone has chosen to use their notifications as their means to work, it can take a while for it to be noticed.
Change the value "Others" to "Desktop" for the "Mobile Device Type" dimension.
In Workload Balancer (WLB), we need to filter down the displayed items on Issues/Requests only, using a specific value in a custom field. This can be done easily in the 'Assigned Work' section, but in the "Unassigned Work" section, the option to filter on 'Issue' fields is not available.I have had it confirmed this is by design but seems odd it is in one area and not the other.(doc attached with screenshots)
We are currently weighing whether to enable the IAB bot filtering functionality in Analytics (this is a communication challenge internally - as a B2B media company, we often quote traffic numbers in sales materials, and these numbers will obviously be impacted). Some of the primary downsides of enabling IAB filtering functionality include: no solid estimate of how enabling filter will impact traffic numbersloss of the ability to accurately measure year-over-year growthIf a segment were available in Analytics that allowed us to either exclude or isolate bots, we'd be able to address both of the above concerns. The segment would obviously need to be regularly updated to keep up to date with the IAB list.
The process of analyzing email clicks is very manual involving a lot of data manipulation in Excel. For example, if we want an email performance report that excludes footer clicks (to remove social media icons, preference center, unsub, etc.) we have to pull a link performance report, get that number, and update it on the email performance report. We can't use the green filters in Marketo since it would filter people out across all metrics instead of just clicks. I know we can include the MktoNoTrack tag in the HTML, but there are times we'd like to see that click traffic, so it would be helpful to have the data available to us.
Currently the reporting on program updates isn't possible. For us as a company we use programs extensively and need to be able to report on a program update. This field should be added along with other program information to standard reporting.
Description - Currently, when you go into a document in your Documents section, the breadcrumb is not complete. The breadcrumb takes you to the project, but not the folder you may have for a document in the Document SectionWhy is this feature important to you - For larger projects, this folder can contain a lot of files. The only way to manage comments is from a notification and if you need to find something specific or confirm the correct document, you can't easily go backward from the Document breadcrumbHow would you like the feature to work - Breadcrumb to show the full path to the document, including folders within the document sectionCurrent Behaviour - In the document, breadcrumb will show Portfolio>Program>Project
Description - Would like to be able to set a time frame to a new event with the new calendar. Why is this feature important to you - Would like to be able to set a window for a new event. For example, 4/2/25 9 - 11am on the calendar. How would you like the feature to work - When setting up the day(s) for the new event, allow setting to pick the time frame of a new event that is for a few hours. It would be wonderful if this could operate like the Outlook calendar calendar settings. Current Behavior - Can only set daily events on the calendar without a specific time frame Idea to add in time: Outlook Calendar Example:
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: suggest a product enhancement folder download size limit to 10GB Use-case: the maximum size for folder downloads set to 10 GB. Any downloads exceeding this limit would prompt a message instructing users to contact their assigned Asset Manager. Current/Experienced Behavior: issue with downloading large directories from a cloud service. When clients try to download project folders exceeding a certain size (e.g., 10GB), the process fails despite the feature being available. Improved/Expected Behavior: maximum size for folder downloads set to 10 GB. Any downloads exceeding this limit would prompt a message instructing users to contact their assigned Asset Manager. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Introduction to HTML: Understanding the Basics of Web Development is a beginner-friendly tutorial designed to help you grasp the core concepts of HTML. This tutorial covers essential topics such as HTML structure, elements, attributes, and best practices. Whether you're starting your web development journey or need a refresher, this guide will provide you with a strong foundation to build and structure web pages effectively. By the end of this tutorial, you'll be confident in creating basic web pages and understanding how HTML interacts with other web technologies.Why is this feature important to you - This feature is essential because HTML is the backbone of web development, and understanding it helps in creating structured and accessible web pages.How would you like the feature to work - The tutorial should provide step-by-step explanations, real-world examples, and interactive exercises to reinforce learning.Current Behavior - Beginners often struggle with understanding HTML structure, so the tutorial should simplify concepts and offer clear, practical guidance.
Right now, the links in subscription emails to automated reports are only active for 24 hours. In some cases, to allow for vacation time, or other team commitments, the link may need to be extended for more than 24 hours to avoid having to resend the email manually to refresh the link. Is it possible to set this in the same way we set the link expiration for marketing emails to contacts?
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Show version for out of the box Workflow "manage publications" Use-case: When using the AEMaaCS Workflow "manage publications", there currently is no version published in the timeline. It is also not possible to add a custom parameter "enableVersion=true", as this is an out of the box Workflow, which is not editable. Versioning is needed to keep track of the published content and do proper version control. This is problematic when there is a need to revert to an older version, as it is not possible to access the new versions through the timeline. Also it is inconsistent with Page editor and Quick publish versioning who do show up in the timeline. Current/Experienced Behavior: No version is shown in the timeline for content published via the out of the box Workflow "manage publications" Improved/Expected Behavior: Add a version to show up in the timeline for content published via the of the box Workflow "manage publications" Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS feature release 2025.2.0, maintenance release 19823 Customer-name/Organization name: APG Groep N.V. Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
In Adobe Analysis Workspace we found a little nuisance with the description of one of the default Date Ranges (Last Week) - it says "By default, this refers to the time period that starts on Sunday and ends on Saturday prior to the current week.", but our users don't know that our defaults are set differently in Europe (week starts on Monday). Can Adobe please update this description to something like "This is set accordingly to the respective Report Suite configuration" (in Report Suite Manager > General > Calendar Settings)?
We need a better way to auto sort 'bucketed' values in CJA.Current Method: Value bucketing is a great feature, but the current sort method uses either alphabetical sorting or population based sorting. Neither of them are useful. Current Workaround: To get values in the right order I either need to make manual segments and drop them in a particular order OR use table builder to pre-determine the order. This is a tedious process, and there is a risk of everything resetting should I choose to change the bucket values. Feature Request: We need a more intelligent way to sort dimension values - for example, ordering in descending order should put values in following order...less than 2525 to 5050 to 75so on... Supporting images:
Currently, Typeahead Field does have the option to reference the "Task" and "Request" Object. It would be great if we could have "Task" and "Request" Objects available in a Typeahead Field.
Description - Add a field that captures the date a user was last reactivatedWhy is this feature important to you - My company requires a new user reconciliation to be completed with each access review. For each activation, we need to ensure we have a proper access request form with proper approvals. I need a way to be able to filter users that were activated since the last review.How would you like the feature to work - Add an Activation Date field to each user that captures the last date a user was activated. In the case of a new user, the date would be the same as Entry Date. In case of a user that was reactivated, the Entry Date would be unchanged, but the Activated Date field would reflect the latest activation date.Current Behaviour - The data is currently not captured.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content fragments created using custom CFM show size as 0B Use-case: Authors create CFs and they see the size of the CF is 0B as opposed to having some numeric value since the CF is not empty Current/Experienced Behavior: Create a Content fragment model in Tools->Assets->Content Fragment Models. Go to Navigation->Assets, click create, select content fragment from the drop-down. Select the content fragment model you created. Enter data into CF and click save. Change the view in Assets folder to List view, the size column for this content fragment shows 0B. When you create a content fragment which uses an OOB AEM CFM, the size is calculated correctly Improved/Expected Behavior: The size of the content fragment refering any CFM (custom or OOB) should show the actual size. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.21.0 Customer-name/Organization name: Fidelity Investments Canada Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description -We many times have a need to propose updates to project plans (tasks) that may impact the timeline. However, the overall impact is not known until we update the dates on the tasks and the system calculates an overall project end date. In some of these instances, we need to seek stakeholder approval on the proposed plan updates before committing the changes. Workfront has the Manual Save option that lets you make project plan updates without auto saving. This helps see what the impact of the changes will be on the overall project plan without saving it. However, there isn't a way to either:Save the proposed changes as a draftExport the proposed changes to PDF or Excel Why is this feature important to you -We'd Ideally like to present the proposed changes to the stakeholders in a PDF or excel and highlight the changes. We cannot do this without making the changed in a live session using the Manual Save option. If the proposed timeline changes have a lot of updates, this leads to double entry. First to determine the impact, and second to actually commit the changes once we have stakeholder approval. How would you like the feature to work -We'd like the ability to save a draft of the proposed project plan that can be saved/committed once we have stakeholder approval.In addition, we'd like to be able to export the proposed project plan to share with stakeholders.
Dear Adobe Team,I hope this message finds you well. I would like to propose an enhancement for Adobe Acrobat Reader that I believe would significantly improve user experience and efficiency.Currently, when users open a PDF document, they need to reselect their frequently used tools each time. This can be time-consuming and disrupts the workflow, especially for users who rely on specific tools for their tasks.I suggest implementing a feature that retains the recently used tools when a user reopens a PDF. This would allow users to quickly access their preferred tools without having to navigate through the menu each time.Such a feature would not only enhance productivity but also provide a more personalized experience for users, making Adobe Acrobat Reader even more user-friendly.Thank you for considering this suggestion. I believe it could greatly benefit many users and improve their overall experience with your software.Best regards, Gabriel Eilhardt
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
