Build better products with our product team
Description - Implement a storage view/tab inside "License usage" tab. Why is this feature important to you - We would like to know not only the percentage we are using, but, how this storage is distributed. For example, how much data does a dataset have. So we can know where we should optimise more. How would you like the feature to work - A dashboard that shows how much data does a dataset have. May be an average event weight would be appreciated. Current Behaviour - Currently we can only see the percentage and the estimation of last month for a dataset, not it's entire weight. Description:Currently, the "License Usage" tab only displays the overall storage percentage. This lacks detailed insights into actual storage distribution.Desired Feature:Implement a dedicated storage view/tab within "License Usage" that provides granular storage information.Specifically:A dashboard or a table displaying the total storage used by each dataset.(Optional) Include an average event or atribute weight metric for each dataset.Benefit:This feature would enable us to:Understand the storage footprint of individual datasets.Identify areas for storage optimization based on actual data volume.Make informed decisions about data management and resource allocation.
Description - When creating a new report suite by copying an existing one, certain settings are not carried over. Currently, users must manually review and compare each setting between the original and copied report suite, which is a tedious and time-consuming process. Why is this feature important to you -Many clients frequently create copies of original report suites to track regional or country-specific site traffic. Manually verifying each setting is inefficient and requires significant effort, leading to delays and potential inconsistencies. How would you like the feature to work -An interface should be available to compare the settings of two report suites side by side. This would minimize manual effort, streamline the process, and provide a clear view of which settings are not copied over during duplication. Current Behaviour -There is no existing interface to facilitate report suite settings comparison.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I would like to be able to dehibernate my sandbox environments in a script using the Cloudmanger API (and CLI plugin). Use-case: My sandbox environments go down into hibernation daily, and once I get to development, I need to start the first, eating away 10 minutes every day.I would like to send the de-hibernation signals once i open my laptop in the morning - through a script using the Cloudmanager API or the aio cloudmanager plugin. I have tried to use the Call using from the CM-UI, but I did not get a positive response: Request URL: https://dev-console-ns-team-aem-cm-prd-n108153.ethos14-prod-deu6.dev.adobeaemcloud.com/api/releases/ns-team-aem-cm-prd-n108153/dehibernate/cm-p127553-e1403927 Path: /api/releases/ns-team-aem-cm-prd-n108153/dehibernate/cm-p127553-e1403927 Current/Experienced Behavior: Sanboxes are all hybernated, I have to spin them all up one-by-one manually. (this is very time-consuming ... and annoying!) Improved/Expected Behavior: When I open/start my laptop, the Sandboxes get dehybernated automatically through scripted calls. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM CloudSerices Cloudmanager (API) Customer-name/Organization name: CDA11DC661266AB70A495F8B@AdobeOrg Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
It would be nice to disable the auto-save feature or at least have an undo. The issue is 2 fold.1. It makes the process of updating much longer. For instance, when updating the settings section in an email. After clicking operational email it saves, then clicking include webpage link it saves, after updating the email address it saves, after updating send name it saves. Thus, making a 5 second task 45+ seconds. 2. The real issue arises when updating emails, forms etc. Recently our collateral designer created an email. He unknowingly had two windows open to the same email. After completing the email in one window, it saved. Later, he was going through his open windows and came across the second window he had opened to the previously completed email. The blank email then auto saved when he clicked on it. His completed email was over written by the blank email. Since, the email had never been approved all work was lost.
Description - When filtering on Milestone Path values, the current implementation shows all available values for all Paths. This creates confusion if 2 or more Milestone Paths define the same value. This can happen if there are different path values for different groups, with overlapping values. Since the Milestone Paths have a group selection to limit access, this same group selection should limit which path values are visible in filters. Why is this feature important to you - Milestone Path access is controlled by groups, but the values visible to end users for filtering are not. This can create confusion if the same value exists across Milestone Path definitions. How would you like the feature to work - Filtering on milestone ID or Milestone Name should be limited to the values in Milestone Paths the user has permission to see. Current Behaviour - Milestone Id filter is not restricting which values show up, which can show multiple values with the same name with no differentiation or indicator of the path it is on.
We made a report that uses the Stacked Bar chart feature to try and layout how long each project mile stone takes in comparison with all of the other milestones (Picture attached). These are stacked by MileStones, but the milestones are not in the order that we want them to be and there's no way to change the order. The milestones should be in the same order as the MileStone path that is setup. The easiest fix that we can think of is that the chart should allow us to choose a sort order for the chart fields. Workaround (we think), make a custom field that Concatenates Mile Stone Sequence with the name of the Mile Stone. It'd be "1"+" Mile Stone Name One"
Currently we use a type-ahead field for our users to locate an existing Campaign. We renamed the object Program to Campaign. If you look in the Overview section of a project, you can only search for those programs that are associated to a particular portfolio. Unfortunately, that logic is not carried through for other searching. When a requestor makes a request, we ask if there is an existing campaign and if there is we ask them to use a type ahead search to locate the campaign. Since there is no logic within the request process to filter only on those campaigns associated to a specific portfolio there is a higher possibility for the user to select the wrong campaign. We would also like a way to limit the search of a type-ahead on only active campaigns, today you can pick a campaign that was created 5 years ago. Please reference support case 00426130.
I've come across a number of people with experience in other products (most often MS Project) that just want a reference list of how the in-built calculated fields are calculated. If it could also include the rules for fields that default but can be over written (e.g. Actual Start) and explicitly listing fields that are only manually input (% complete) that would be great. A one-stop reference for working through how Workfront calculates what it does.
When working with conditional content in emails, there is no advanced mode - you cant see the logic as code and you cant edit it like you can in expressions. It would be nice if this conditional "editor" should have a advanced mode where you could see the code and manually wright/change it like you can do with expressions. No we can just drag and drop attributes from the menu, and when that is done you cant to so much about it, not even see how the code is if you need or want to. If you want to change a condition it is not very intuitive how to do that, since you cant access the library of conditions easily.
Description - Enable the update of the user profile to show an assigned LO template whether it is applied direct to the user profile or is shared to a team or group direct in the LO template. Why is this feature important to you - Unless you specifically remember that a LO template is applied by a Team/Group, you run the risk of applying a different profile. This request would make it absolutely clear that a user has a LO template when looking at a report or a users profile How would you like the feature to work - When a LO template is shared with a team or a group, that LO template would show in the users profile as the default unless it is overridden by adding a different LO template in the users profile Current Behavior - When a LO template is shared with a team or a group there is no LO template shown on the users profile or reporting.
We'd like to have the ability to report on the percent complete at the end of each iteration (before incomplete tasks are moved), so that we can see this data for all iterations in a given time period on one page. Currently, the only way to see this data is to click through each iteration on the Story Board page. If you report on Percent Complete in an iteration report, it shows the current percent complete (based on the tasks still in the sprint at the time of viewing the report) rather than the percent complete on the end date of each sprint (which is what we'd like to see).
Analysis workspace does a great job showing you the value of a bar or a line data point when you hover over them. However when you export the project to a PDF, that information gets lost to the scale on the side of the graph.it would be great if we could display the data points on top of the bars or next to the link data points. having the option to display all data points or just the min/max so the user's don't have to hover them and so they get printed to the PDF would be enourmously helpful as we (analyst) tend to share information via email and slack in a more informal situations.these labels should change based on the scale so if I want to display % vs numbers, I just need to change the scale of my graph and the data labels will update automatically
This may be accomplished with OneDrive integration, but modifying documents in Workfront is too cumbersome. Asking business owners to download the document, make their edits, and remember to reupload the document is too difficult. Create functionality similar to OneDrive or Google docs.
Description - It would be amazing that if someone was listed as a resource manager who was deactivated or reduced to a free license would be auto removed from all projects (even templates). Why is this feature important to you - We have so many people in the system, and so many templates for different stakeholders. It is impossible to remember who is listed where all of the time to manually remove these users. This automation would reduce manual efforts and errors! How would you like the feature to work - I would like it once someone is deactivated or reduced license they should be auto-removed as a resource manager on templates at the least, but on projects would be nice too. OR, they should be removed from templates but allowed to stay on the projects and not get errors. Current Behavior - Currently what happens is that the users stay on the project and templates, so when someone goes to add a new template to a project or copy a project (and other similar actions) the person trying to do this gets an error. Many times the project owners are not in the know of all of the people who were removed in a large organization like ours. This function seems to be built for smaller companies where everyone has more insight into where users are. But a company like ours, it is impossible for many project owners to know. THEN, many project owners do not know how and shouldn't have to fix this one by one. It seems to be such a silly flaw where the system should recognize this and auto remove these resource managers.
Hi there,An idea that would be really useful for us is metric filters/criteria in workspace.At the moment if you drop an Evar on a free form table you can filter based on values.What I would love to see is the ability to do this on metrics (greater than / less than) as currently we have to do these reports in report builder / excel.An (very crude) example of what I am after is below.ThanksDave
Updating the Project ‘plan’ in its current size is extremely painful and information you can see at any one time is limited.I think it would be highly beneficial if the Project Plan could open up as a full page in a pop out window and would make managing the plan an easier task.Thanks!
Comcast is typically running and developing something like twenty campaigns a month right now. It would be helpful if the "Collisions" tab in Target Activity setup had a filter feature to sort by live/inactive campaigns, campaigns live on a particular page, etc, especially now that they use the Target Global mbox. As far as I can tell, if a campaign is setup on the Target Global mbox - the collisions tab shows every other campaign, live and inactive, QA and production, that is live on the Target global mbox - on any page. This is my first time submitting an idea - so please let me know if this is not the appropriate way to go about this.Thanks!Matt Lowden
Hello community! I've been trying to create some logic on one of my intake forms. My idea is to have a complete list of values on one field, but that it should display only a few of them depending on what I have chosen on a previous question.For example: in a field called Color I will have the options Blue, Yellow and Red, but I only want to display the options Blue and red if in previous Field I chose the option "Pencil" and only Yellow and blue if I chose "Pen".Is that possible? hope I made myself clear
Links in the My Approvals widget could previously be opened in a new tab by right-clicking and selecting "Open Link in New Tab". However, the functionality recently changed and a different menu appears when you right-click these links. I was informed that this was due to "changes made on the website's backend to ensure unified functionality and better overall performance". However, this is not ideal from a user experience standpoint. Users with multiple approvals pending need the option to open these links in a new tab so that they can quickly navigate back-and-forth to and from the Home page. Allowing these links to be opened in a new tab would also be consistent with the functionality of the other links on the page.
I would like to be able to have two items on the left axis because their scale is similar and have rate on the right axis because its scale is different.
Description - Need to have ability to restrict certain features on Boards for users. Right now, anyone with Board access can do any type of configuration (Add/Remove columns, update Custom Fields on Cards, configure card settings, *ADD SUBTASKS - even though their access level will not allow adding/deleting tasks!, etc). This is a big concern with clients as most users will just need access to move cards through columns/status's. Why is this feature important to you - This will allow teams to be able to utilize a proper agile board experience without fear of users completely messing up how they are set up and functioning How would you like the feature to work - This would be a setting at the access level (or the board itself) to restrict permission to "Editing/Configure". There would almost be another access level to just allow users to move cards through status, update fields, make comments, etc, but NOT allow them to configure columns, card configurations, ADDING SUBTASKS. Current Behavior - Anyone who the board is shared with has ALL Access to configure anything on the board.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - This feature is required for security requirements for client organization.How would you like the feature to work - Support to MTLS in HTTPs mode for Workfront and Fusion integrationCurrent Behaviour - currently MTLS is only available in our HTTP mode and not HTTPS Thanks, Prasanna Nagarajan
When working with conditional content in emails it hard to find and change your existing conditions. You need to go into a email and use the conditional content feature to be able to see the list over all conditions been created. This list/library of conditions could have been accessible through the menu. Then you could se all, and you could open and change them directly without going trough a existing email that only can be accessed in a Journey. Selecting a condition to use in a variant of a ex a email module is intuitive and works fine, it is the overview over what you have already created before, and how to make changes to them that is hard, and little intuitive.
My team has to copy about 100 projects each quarter. Could you create the ability to copy the projects all at once?
DescriptionThe current search functionality in Adobe Workfront can be improved to enhance efficiency when searching for past projects, especially when looking for work done by other team members. Users who frequently need to locate previous projects based on specific owners or project types often face limitations that slow down their workflow.This enhancement proposal focuses on two key improvements:Expand the search functionality to display all potential project owners when searching by name, rather than restricting the results to only the top 10 suggestions. This is especially critical when dealing with common names, as it limits visibility and makes it difficult to locate the correct project owner.Allow users to filter by both "Project Type" and "Project Owner" simultaneously. Currently, selecting a project type disables the ability to also search by a person’s name. Enabling both filters at once would streamline the search process and significantly reduce the time spent manually sifting through results.By addressing these limitations, users will be able to locate past projects faster and with greater accuracy, improving productivity and efficiency.Why is this feature important to you?The ability to quickly and accurately locate past projects is crucial for productivity and knowledge-sharing within teams. Many users, including myself, frequently search for past work done by other team members to reference best practices, locate assets, or gather insights for new projects. However, the current search constraints make this process cumbersome and time-consuming.For users dealing with common names, it is frustrating to be limited to the top 10 results, as it often excludes the actual person they need. This results in extra steps, like manually scrolling through project lists or reaching out to colleagues to track down information.For users who need to filter by both project type and owner, the inability to do so forces them to either search by project type alone (which results in too many projects to sort through) or by owner alone (which doesn’t always narrow down the search enough).These inefficiencies contribute to unnecessary delays, impacting overall productivity and collaboration across teams. By implementing these search enhancements, Workfront can provide a more seamless and intuitive experience for users handling large volumes of projects.How would you like the feature to work?To improve Workfront’s search functionality, I propose the following enhancements:Expand Name Search Capabilities:Instead of limiting search results to the top 10 project owners, Workfront should allow users to type in any name and display all matching results.A potential solution could be an "expand results" button that reveals additional names beyond the top 10.Alternatively, Workfront could enable a scrolling list of names or allow users to enter a full name (first + last) for more precise filtering.Enable Dual Filtering for Project Type and Project Owner:Users should be able to select both a "Project Type" and a "Project Owner" simultaneously in the search function.This would allow users to refine their search criteria efficiently, leading to more accurate and faster results.A dropdown or multi-select filter for project type, combined with the improved name search functionality, would optimize the experience.With these enhancements, users would be able to locate past projects more effectively, reducing the manual effort currently required to find relevant information.Current BehaviorCurrently, Workfront’s search function has the following limitations:Limited Name Search:When searching for a project owner with a common name, Workfront only displays the top 10 matches.Users cannot type a full name to refine their search or see all possible matches.Restrictive Filtering Options:If a user selects a "Project Type" filter, they cannot also filter by a specific project owner at the same time.This forces users to choose one filter or the other, resulting in longer search times and difficulty in pinpointing the correct projects.By addressing these challenges, Adobe Workfront can significantly improve its usability and help teams work more efficiently. Enhancing Workfront’s search functionality with expanded name search capabilities and the ability to filter by both project type and owner will have a meaningful impact on user productivity. These changes will enable users to quickly locate past projects, improving workflow efficiency and collaboration across teams. This feature aligns with Adobe’s commitment to providing an intuitive and powerful project management platform that evolves to meet the needs of its users.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
