Build better products with our product team
Description - Currently you can apply. date range to all panels. However, you cannot apply your drop-downs and segment filters to all panels. Additionally, if you want to rearrange your filters (ex: move one to the front to keel things in order, you have to delete items in from of them and reapply them again. Why is this feature important to you -Ease of use How would you like the feature to work -Allow a "apply to all" button to apply all filters and drop-downs on a specific panel to ALL panels in a Workspace project. Allow a user to reorganize the positioning of filters and drop-downs within a panel without first having to remove filters/drop-downs. Current Behavior - You have to remove filters/drop-downs to move filters from the end to the beginning.
Description -Currently you can place annotations on line displays to provide an understanding when events have happened in time. However, for other trend views like Area and combo, you cannot apply annotations. It would be great to be able to do so. Why is this feature important to you -It makes annotating events easier to adopt across multiple views. It doesn't force the analyst to use only one display method. How would you like the feature to work - Allow annotation for area, bar, and combo displays. Current Behavior - only line charts allow for annotations.
In our instance, we have some projects that require specific default fields, views, filters and terminologies that are different than other projects. It would be helpful if we could assign project layout templates to portfolios or programs or individual projects instead of users.Example:Agile Portfolio:-Projects= Epics-Tasks=Features-Issues=Defects-Project Custom dashboard= Epic PI Dashboard Marketing Campaign Portfolio:-Projects = Campaigns-Tasks=Activities-Issues=Digital Content-Project Custom Dashboard=Campaign Performance Dashboard
Description -Currently, you can only use dimension items in the flow display. This limits visibility into pathing in and out of a "group" (example: if you had a URL dimension, you may want to see pathing into all URL's that contain /products/ instead of just /products/widget-a/ ) Allowing users to use segments in addition to dimension items would allow the user to have visibility into an overarching pattern of behavior into like items. Why is this feature important to you -There have been many frequent cases where this would be useful in my personal analysis. As a web analyst, I want to see flow displays in and out of a hit-based segment to see the bigger picture for journeys in and out of all similar pages all at once. How would you like the feature to work -Using the segment as the start, the middle or end of the flow display would work. But not with multiple segments. Pathing in and out of the segment would be dimensional values. Current Behavior -You cannot use segments in flow displays.
Description - An App that leverages the target admin API to streamline the monitoring of all activities available on a website. With this App, marketing managers gain the ability to effortlessly bulk delete activities, audiences, and offers, thus enabling them to effectively manage the dynamic nature of their website.Why is this feature important to you - This feature holds tremendous significance for marketing managers, as it provides them with a centralized view of all activities, allowing them to conveniently delete multiple activities based on their status. This streamlined approach not only facilitates moderation but also enhances the overall performance of the target UI.How would you like the feature to work - Ideally, this feature could be seamlessly integrated into the Adobe Target UI dashboard. Alternatively, it can be showcased on a visually appealing landing page, offering customers a comprehensive overview of live, inactive, archived, or ended activities.Current Behavior - Currently, the application I developed exists as a separate entity. However, the ideal future scenario involves integrating it into Adobe Target, granting Adobe Target users greater capabilities and control when it comes to personalization efforts.
Description - Use chi-squared to see if actual Adobe Analytics split is stat-sig different than expected from Adobe Target traffic allocation.Why is this feature important to you -The Sample Ratio Mismatch (SRM) test can be used to detect a wide variety of data quality issues that may affect online experiments (aka A/B tests). See https://www.lukasvermeer.nl/srm/microsite/How would you like the feature to work - Pull-in the expected split from Adobe Target. Use chi-squared test to see if actual Adobe Analytics split is stat-sig different than expected from Adobe Target traffic allocation. If confidence is 99% = yellow warning, 99.9% conf = red alert. Because visitors in Adobe Target (profiles) are different than in Adobe Analytics (devices), it might also be helpful to compare the number of treated visitors in Adobe Target reporting to the number of visitors in Adobe Analytics also to help debug when there is an SRM error.Current Behaviour - Create an A4T panel and if the gap "looks" big enough I copy the traffic data into an online calculator. Post-test, I have an Excel spreadsheet template that does this for me.
Description - bring back the ability to clear lazy loaded mboxes and hosts in the UI. This used to exist in the classic interface. We have many inactive mbox and when using the form editor, it's easy to select the wrong mbox. Why is this feature important to you - It will make the interface easier to use and less likely to for new users to target from using the wrong mbox.How would you like the feature to work - add 2 buttons "clear hosts" and "clear mboxes". Clicking the buttons would clear the current lists and we would need to wait for lazy loading to fill the lists again.Current Behaviour - this feature doesn't exist
Description - 1) Add the ability archive audiences and profile scripts in Adobe Target. 2) Add the ability to filter achieved, inactive and active audiences and profile scriptsWhy is this feature important to you - We have hundreds of audiences and profile scripts from both Adobe Target and Adobe Target Classic. We cannot delete Profile Scripts because they are used by in-editable Audiences and Audience can't be deleted because they are used in in-editable campaigns. It makes it hard to find the right profile script, especially if debugging an emergency. How would you like the feature to work:Edit Profile script: Add an archive/unarchive button with a confirmationProfile Script list: add filter button next to the "Search profile scripts". Clicking the filter button would show the ability to filter on status with 3 checkboxes for active, inactive and archived. Active and inactive would be checked by default and inactive uncheckedFix the STATUS sort: when you click on the header, it should sort by status not name.Edit Audience: For Adobe Target and Adobe Target Classic Audience Only, add an archive/unarchive button with a confirmation Add to Audience Library filters the ability to filter by status: active and archived. Active would be checked by default and archived unchecked.Current Behaviour: Audience search only allows you a simple contains search with the ability to filter by source (Adobe Target, AEP, etc).Profile Scripts only allows a simple contains search. The order by "STATUS" doesn't order by status, but by "NAME"No ability to filter by status for either
Description - move multiple reports to a folder at onceWhy is this feature important to you - I have hundreds of reports I need to organize and currently you can move 1 at a time and then it automatically moves you to that new folder vs keeping you where you were in the report list. How would you like the feature to work - Even if I can only drag one report at a time, PLEASE stop it from taking me to the folder I just moved something to. Then I have to navigate back to the my reports page and find the place I was at and it's just so unnecessary and time consuming. I don't need to see the report in the new folder to know that it's there. Ideally, I would love to be able to select multiple reports and move them all to a folder at one time (and then stay on the page I was originally on).Current Behaviour - can only move 1 report at a time and then it navigates you to the new folder and you have to constantly go back, drag report, wait for page to load, go back, wait for page to load, find where I was in the list, repeat. Huge time suck for something so small.
Description - Currently, Workfront utilizes the time zone on the user's computer to determine the times and dates for tasks versus the setup time zone within Workfront for the user. It also ignores the time zone schedule of the project. We are finding issues with this in a few locations within Workfront. For example, in the Time Off section, if the user's setup time zone within Workfront is not set to the same time zone as their computer, it will select 2 days when trying to select 1. Another example, if a user is located on the West coast and their computer is set to PST, but their Workfront time zone is set to CST, it will override the CST and use the computer's time zone. This is especially difficult for Planners that are setting up due dates and times for tasks within a project. We'd like Workfront to stop referencing the "computer" time of users and set all users to CST, regardless of where are they are located in the world. Configuring user accounts with their actual time zone doesn't work, either. Our default schedule in Workfront is set to CST so when a Planner goes to schedule tasks and their time zone is set to something other than CST, the planner hours fall over different days, messing up the Workload Balancer. Why is this feature important to you - Times are showing up different for users depending on their physical time zone which is causing a great deal of confusion across our global company. How would you like the feature to work - The system should display times in the time zone schedule assigned to the project, or, Workfront should not reference the time zone of the user's computer and refer only to the time zone configured in their user account. Also, time entered in PTO should be entered as CST so that the PTO doesn't incorrectly affect the workload balancer or planner. Current Behaviour - Our default system schedule and projects schedules is CST. If a person in another time zone enters a full day of PTO for a single day, it places the time off over two days in time off calendar and adversely affects the workload balancer. All of this refers to original support ticket E-001557318, which was rejected by Adobe Workfront Support, that it is "not feasible within the current scope of our work".
Summary:Expand the capabilities of Adobe Launch Data Elements by enabling them to return JavaScript Promises. This feature will allow asynchronous data retrieval and processing directly within Data Element configurations, enhancing flexibility and power for dynamic data handling.Problem Statement:Currently, Adobe Launch Data Elements are limited to storing static or computed values within the confines of Rules. While they are invaluable for capturing and managing data on web pages, their functionality is constrained by synchronous operations. Asynchronous tasks, such as API calls or event-driven data retrieval, require external code, limiting the tool's potential for multisolution integration and Extension Development. Proposed Solution:Introduce exiting functionality with Rules where Data Elements can return JavaScript Promises. This will enable asynchronous operations directly within Data Element configurations, allowing users to handle dynamic and async data retrieval without leaving Adobe Launch's interface. Key Features: Promise Return Option:Add the ability or an option in the Data Element configuration to specify whether it returns a synchronous value or a Promise.Asynchronous Functionality:Allow users to define asynchronous functions within Data Elements, enabling tasks like API calls or event handling directly from the Data Element setup.Code Snippet Support:Provide fields for embedding code that defines how the Promise is created, making it easier to handle complex async operations.User Experience Enhancements:Include templates and examples for setting up Promises within Data Elements, ensuring a smooth transition for users familiar with asynchronous programming. Benefits:Enhanced Capabilities:Users can perform advanced tasks like API data fetching or waiting for events directly within Data Elements, making tag management more dynamic.Extension Development:Give the Developer the ability to leverage Browser APIs in their Custom Extension Development. (Shoutout to @yuhuisg)Simplified Workflows:Reduce the need for external code by handling async operations natively in Adobe Launch, streamlining the development process.Backward Compatibility:Existing users will see no changes unless they opt-in to use Promises, ensuring a seamless transition and minimal disruption.
Currently we have to manual block off the weekends in order for our templates to not account for them. We would like to have this as an automatic feature or have something that can rolled out across multiple years
Fusion currently does have the feature to clone an existing data structure from one team to another but the same feature is not available for data stores. This forces users to either manually create the data store or create Fusion scenarios to achieve it. While we feel this feature will be a good to have in the product
It would be great if schedule exceptions could be added to calendars in the same way as time off. This would eliminate one more manual process on our shared calendars.
Description - Adobe recently modified the Fusion API so that it only returns save-events, and not the actual execution logs. Instead, Adobe have implemented a different API that is not accessible to Customers. Why is this feature important to you - This breaks current scenarios that collect eg Warning/Error executions (eg to create a ticket in another tool or alert the support team). This was done without communications to customers and partners. How would you like the feature to work - I want to be able to search and retrieve execution logs like we used to be able to. In general, removing functionality without announcement and workaround reflects quite negatively on the Product and how change is being implemented.
Description Currently, the search in Launch is barely useful, since it returns a very fluffy set of results, that quite often do not help finding what you are looking for. Quite often, the results just show a "... more" in the results list, but without actually giving you a chance to find what you are looking for. This leads to developers rather not changing any DE names once in use to not break anything. It would be awesome to be able to have more search features like "exact match" "regex match" case sensitive yes/no etc. Also, a optional dedicated search detail page that lists all the other results would be great! Ideally with a preview of the match. Out of this need, external tools like the "Perpetua Digital Launch Assistant" are being developed, just addressing these shortcomings. Why is this feature important to you Everybody knows you cannot just rename data element in Launch without potentially breaking things. Hence, whenever I want to rename a DE, I open the website first and search for any occurrenced of the DE in the rendered Launch library, to get a clearer picture where to start digging go back to Launch and rename there based on my findings Essentially, I never use the Launch search feature. How would you like the feature to work more search options as described above a dedicated search page that lists all results Current Behaviour it is hard to find what you are looking for depending on the search term, many "other..." results fluffy search, returning false positives that do return results that do not match the search term
Description -see any Thumbnails for PDFs when you upload as Documents Why is this feature important to you -all of our Print output will require a PDF for approval, so having the thumbnails and previews available is imperative for our processes. How would you like the feature to work -By default, PDF is a supported file type for proofing so when you create a proof from PDF files, it will show a preview thumbnail. But you won't see a thumbnail for PDF files within the document lists/ PreviewThumbnails are show for for png, jpeg etc, but not PDF when you upload as Documents to Workfrontuploading a PDF as a “Document” by default doesn’t generate any in-browser preview. Current Behaviour -If you choose “Document Only” when uploading, Workfront just stores the file—no interactive viewer is generated
Description - It would be nice to be able to see a frame preview on the timeline of a video proof when scrubbing through the video.Why is this feature important to you - It would make it easier for the approvers who are previewing the video to be able to scrub to a certain part of a video. If you could see the frame on the timeline, it would be much easier to click through the video and stop at the point where you need to be.How would you like the feature to work - A simple frame preview that pops up on the timeline when scrubbing through.
Description - the new bottom-center green and red notification popups do not disappear automatically and instead have to be manually closed via the "X" button on the notification. It would be great if these notifications could disappear after a specified amount of time automatically.Why is this feature important to you - adding too many unnecessary clicks, and the popups end up stacking on top of each other if you neglect to "X" them out. This is especially noticeable when working on a complex report where you have to save and view the report, go back and make another small change, save and view the report again, etc. You can accumulate a lot of notifications in a very short timeframe.How would you like the feature to work - either give us an option in Setup to specify how long the notification should be visible, or set the time limit for us. Current Behaviour - notifications have to be manually closed each time they appear.
Description - Due to Adobe's limitations on custom schema creation, we need the ability to generate audiences directly from a GCP bucket, similar to CSV import, as automating the CSV process is not possible.Why is this feature important to you - This is essential because we cannot automate the CSV process.How would you like the feature to work - We need the ability to create audiences directly from a GCP bucket, similar to CSV import.Current Behaviour -
過去にLPにYouTube動画埋め込み機能がありましたが、2025年2月1日（PT）をもって、ソーシャルアセット機能を廃止されました。しかし、当該機能は再開させてほしいです。
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Option to easily replicate content on the Prod author and publisher to Stage or Dev Use-case: We want Stage or Dev environment to be in sync with Prod content, to be in more or less same state. Current/Experienced Behavior: At the moment we can use copy content sets, but that is only possible to author instance, and when we copy content set, copied pages or assets dont have the publications status. Improved/Expected Behavior: Copy content sets on author and publish instance, and assets and pages to have the same data from Prod to other stages Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: CSS KRANKEN-VERSICHERUNG AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Would like the ability to create templated email sends for automated workflows in proofWhy is this feature important to you - When routing assets to a handful of different companies, we would like the ability to send personalized emails to each company that can be templated and attached to the automated workflow they are on. Currently, you can customize an email when setting up a proof, but this adds a lot of manual work to our team that is setting up the proof to copy and paste a message in, when it could be templated out and drive efficiencies for our team. How would you like the feature to work - For each unique automated workflow, create a section that allows you to tailor email communications that can be saved and are always on when creating a proof with a specific automated workflow.Current Behavior - Does not exist, but you can customize an email upon proof creation.
Description - Would like the ability to target different on load messages in Proof and be able to attach them to specific automated workflows.Why is this feature important to you - We would love to be able to have this feature enabled for some users and not all users when viewing a proof. For example, we have external users that need the message and the internal company users do not need the message. Since we are unable to target a specific workflow, all users unfortunately have to see and click to remove this message, which adds another step for the end user and they have found this to be an annoyance since we turned this on recently. Lastly, we have a few different businesses in our instance and it would allow flexibility for different units to control their own messaging.How would you like the feature to work - Be able to create personalized on load messages that you are then able to target to specific proof automated workflows.Current Behavior - Currently you are able to turn on the pop up message, but the same message is tied to all proofs and all users internally/externally will see the message.
Description - We would like the ability to limit commenting to only those tied to the Proof workflow. Currently you can add ANY proof user to a comment. Why is this feature important to you - As a marketing agency, we work with competitor clients and some users work across clients. We need the ability to protect proprietary information and protect from inadvertently emailing someone with a similar name at the wrong client. Our art directors work with many groups and the external emails are only used in Proof. External clients do have not access to our platform. So changes to user access would not be an option for us. Also, the Share setting within Proof itself isn't feasible because Partner accounts only seems to work with organizations that also have WF Proof. How would you like the feature to work - It would be good to have an option within the proof workflow details that restricted users from tagging anyone but the people who are members of the workflow. Current Behaviour - It's a free-for-all and it's just a matter of time before someone tags the wrong person in a proof and we run into client issues.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
