Build better products with our product team
Description - The current limit of 250 eVars and 75 props restricts how many custom dimensions can be tracked and analyzed, making it difficult for organizations with complex customer journeys to capture all the necessary data. This limitation hinders the ability to fully customize data collection and tracking for large-scale implementations. I propose removing these caps on custom dimensions and enabling unlimited eVars and props, similar to what is currently offered in Customer Journey Analytics. CJA provides unlimited custom dimensions by leveraging the Adobe Experience Platform’s Experience Data Model (XDM), which allows for flexible, scalable, and cross-channel data tracking without any variable limitations. Why is this feature important to you - This feature is crucial for us because the current limits on eVars and props in Adobe Analytics restrict our ability to capture the full complexity of our customer journeys across multiple channels. As a business handling large datasets, the cap forces us to make compromises on what dimensions we can track, which limits our ability to get a complete picture of user behavior. Having unlimited custom dimensions would allow us to map all customer interactions, including offline and third-party data, enabling more precise segmentation, richer insights, and better personalization. As our business grows, the ability to scale our data tracking without hitting limits would be invaluable for maintaining a competitive edge in data-driven decision-making and optimizing customer experiences. How would you like the feature to work - Instead of being capped at 250 eVars and 75 props, there should be the flexibility to create an unlimited number of both. This will allow users to define custom variables on demand, without needing to worry about reaching a ceiling. Current Behaviour - Adobe Analytics allows for 250 eVars (event variables) and 75 props (custom traffic variables). These limits constrain how many custom dimensions can be created and tracked.
We would like to show the clicks data by region in Adobe Activity Map extension but it is not supported.I believe this feature would provide visual layout for users who may not be data person. This would be a user friendly for them. This would benefit many users who have similar needs. For me, I am a data person. I can pull it from workspace.
Description - I have simply reached critical mass on this one, and I really can't believe no one else has cried uncle yet. So, I will do it. Here is an #AdobePainPoint.Entering a Visualization Title when the component is small: I mean seriously ADOBE!! Why should I have to resize the entire visualization just to enter a title?? Would it not be easier for you make it easier for the dialogue to resize for us so it is readable while we enter text? Why is this feature important to you - As opposed to typing my titles elsewhere, then copying and pasting them in, OR, resizing my visualization just to view the title so I can type in my title. The first requires forethought to either set up titles in a different document. The second often causes the Workspace to recalculate when I change the size and shape of visualizations and move things around. How would you like the feature to work - When I place my cursor in the Title Bar of a visualization, if text already exists, then visibility of the text will extend far enough so I can see the entire value, plus a little more. If no value exists, it should still provide space for at least 10 to 15 characters of visibility by default. Current Behaviour - Current behavior is as pictured above and below. When the cursor is placed in the Title Bar of a smaller visualization, only a single character is displayed, followed by elipses obscuring the rest of the title, along with a mouseover display of the value currently in the title:
DescriptionThe ability to use tags assigned to segments to bring all related segments in a workspace visualizationWhy is this feature important to youWe frequently have to create segments that are just OR groups of other segments, especially for cross-market (eg EMEA region or APAC region) or cross-product (eg Category A or Section X) analysis. This is time-consuming and imperfect since we have to update the grouped segments.How would you like the feature to workWe already have the option to add tags to segments. Ideally, these tags should translate to an OR segment grouping in Workspace so we can quickly pick all relevant segments for a report. For example, I could tag all relevant regional segments as EMEA and then be able to report on individual regions as well as the cumulative view by simply dragging the "EMEA" tag in the report. I could also group segments that are used frequently as panel filters by tag, for example by tagging all segments for excluding internal visitors or potential bots under one tag. This also means that if I create a new segment and tag it accordingly, the report will automatically update. Ideally, I should also be able to choose if I want to use a tag or if I want to display the segment breakdown.Current BehaviourNo current behavior is enabling this. The workaround is manual and involves creating "grouped" segments and/or reusing the same set of segments in similar reports.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We propose a User Activity Dashboard within Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) to track recent user interactions, enabling administrators to view active users and their activity within the AEM Author environment. This feature would display user interactions over defined time intervals (e.g., 1 minute, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 1 day), providing insights into both current and historical usage trends. Use-case: Outage Communication: During system outages or maintenance windows, administrators can quickly identify and proactively inform active users of the disruption. This can reduce the number of support tickets, emails, or inquiries related to unexpected access issues. Performance Monitoring: By understanding the volume of requests by user or group, teams can better anticipate peak usage times and address potential performance issues. This data could help identify when system resources are under strain due to high user activity. Security and Compliance Auditing: Tracking recent activity at a granular level can assist in identifying unusual patterns that might indicate unauthorized access or misuse of the system, supporting security and compliance audits. Usage and Engagement Metrics: This dashboard would offer insights into which users or groups are most engaged, enabling better targeting of communications, training, or enablement efforts. Teams can also gauge the effectiveness of new features or updates by observing changes in interaction patterns. User Behavior Analysis for Content Optimization: By identifying which users frequently access specific content or assets, the dashboard can guide content optimization efforts, ensuring high-value assets are readily accessible and system workflows are aligned with user needs. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM Cloud Service currently lacks a built-in dashboard to monitor real-time user activity within the AEM Author environment. This limitation means administrators cannot view which users are active, track recent interactions, or analyze access patterns over time (e.g., last 1 minute, 5 minutes, etc.). Any tracking of user activity requires external log analysis tools, such as Splunk, to manually generate insights based on access logs. Improved/Expected Behavior: We propose a native AEM Author dashboard to display user activity in real-time, segmented by user, country, and role, with time-based filters (1m, 5m, 15m, 30m, 1h, 1d). This would enable administrators to quickly see which users are active, manage communication during outages, monitor performance, and detect unusual behavior. Interactive visuals like graphs and heat maps could further enhance usability, helping administrators proactively manage system usage and performance. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Dashboard generate by SPLUNK out of access.logs. The AEM Dashbaord should contain something similar. Code package (if applicable):
Hello, at the moment, it is not possible to export Details and Summary tab in one document. It is very inconvenient to have two separate documents that are a part of the same report. Especially when there are multiple reports that need to be exported, this issue is even more inconvenient as clients have to manually combine those exports to send it to their stakeholders. It would be great if this could be implemented. Best regards,Sara
Description - Quick reporting to find out which audiences tie back to specific datasets/schemas Why is this feature important to you - This would be extremely beneficial for reporting purposes, along with any changes to datasets, in order to completely understand which audiences will be affected. How would you like the feature to work - Reporting via Audience Overview tab. Or SQL query that can be adjusted to your liking Current Behaviour - Non existent
It's easy to create some libraries to communicate outside Adobe Campaign with the simplicity of Javascript and the HTTPClientRequest class, but as Kafka is not based on HTTP protocol, it's not possible to consume or produce over topics in Campaign. Apache Kafka needs specific libraries (Java, Python, NodeJS) to be used. It would be great to have a specific API into the Campaign javascript environment.I'm sure that question is not new and the R&D team thought about it, and it's won't be technicaly easy, but this question is comming for several of my customers so I'm suggesting here.ThanksCedric
Description - When viewing event bundles in Fusion, I would like some sort of way to sort by native fields or to pin fields such as name and ID as the first 2 fields on the list of instant event bundles. I would say that 90% of the time I am looking for the ID to physically view the object and only need the ID.Why is this feature important to you - This would save me time of scrolling through projects that have 300+ fields.How would you like the feature to work - Sort by custom/native fields OR have an option to have ID and name be at the top of an event bundle.Current Behavior - Custom fields are on top, native fields are below
It would be great to be able to run the Portfolio Optimizer but in the program view. We have a lot of programs per Portfolio and they have different owners so being able to organize them and prioritize them that way would be great.
Description - Enable the ability to mass / bulk add templates to projects. Why is this feature important to you - This feature is important because we have different template scenarios and right now, we are using an import / kickstart to mass create projects and applying a template that has every possible task available that we may need. The challenge is, we may find out later we don't need all of the extra tasks, or we may need them and deleting what is needed is risky because we calculate commissions on our tasks, but having everything available but possibly not assigned creates some bad user experience in reports. (specifically project reports that reference task data) Having the ability to mass add templates in bulk would allow us to input the project without a template on our import file and then add them later on once we know the assignment scenario without having to go into each project one by one. How would you like the feature to work - The could work just like the approval process which is currently available as a mass update. Current Behaviour -
The description of a Report is not visible when the report is displayed on a Dashboard. Proposed change:Display the description of reports on a dashboard or add the option to the dashboard editing UI, so that the dashboard editor can control, for each of the included reports separately, if the description should be displayed or not. Benefit:Ability to provide details of each report to the dashboard audience.
It would be wonderful if the user notifications system was updated for team assignment on tasks, and issues. It seems rather difficult to have users be notified outside of "Work Assignment" on tasks when a "team" is assigned. Could members of the team be notified when the team is assigned to a task?
Description -I'd like to be be able to search/filter within the report screen for key works.Why is this feature important to you -We have a lot of reports and the ability to search for key words to find a report is important to working more effectively. How would you like the feature to work -Similar to other areas of the system, add a search (magnifying glass) option within the reports screen. Current Behaviour -Currently, you have to screen through the list of reports. The other option to to do a universal search in the header filtering to report records. However, this not ideal.
Description - Look-and-feel updates during the Fourth Quarter 2024 took away the ability to edit the title of a report by clicking on its title. Why is this feature important to you - the ability to rename a report was a time saver, the new method takes considerably longer and has many more steps (6 steps compared to 2).How would you like the feature to work - like it used to. Step count: 1. Click Title, 2. Rename Title.Current Behaviour - You must edit a report title by clicking Report Actions > Edit, then changing the title. For more information about editing reports, see Edit report settings. Step count: 1. Click Report Actions, 2. Click Edit, ...WAIT... 3. Click Report Settings, 4. Rename Report, 5. Click Done, 6. Click Save and Close https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/product-announcements/product-releases/release-24-q4/24-q4-look-and-feel-updates
Description - Currently there is no logic that brings objects from within the same project to top of "Move" document search return listWhy is this feature important to you - We would like to utilize "Move" for a specific process (move from proj to task) but all of our task names are templated so there can be > 100 returned with the key words. In addition the search is pulling from the whole system not just our Group's objects.How would you like the feature to work - When I am at the project level I would like to type in the task name keywords and have the specific task(s) with keywords at the top of the return list.Current Behaviour - The target task could be at top of list, anywhere within the list, or not show up at all if result vol has hit search limit. Also the font for the project name in the return list if very tiny and not in alpha order so there is a definite risk of moving a document to entirely the wrong project which I don't think can be auto-recalled.
Description:We need scheduled exports in our destinations to be unaffected by time-zone changes between winter and summer, as the specific time of day for exports is crucial to our processes. Currently, with each time-zone change, the destination requires manual adjustment, which adds additional management overhead.Why is this feature important to you?Maintaining consistency in export times throughout the year ensures coherence in our processes and avoids the need for manual adjustments.Desired Functionality:When transitioning between winter and summer time, we would like the export time to automatically adjust, preserving consistent export times year-round without the need for manual intervention.Current Behavior:A manual adjustment to the data flow is required to maintain time consistency after each daylight saving change.
Description - Currently the scheduling supports only UTC time scheduling which is not effective for EST time zone based schedulesWhy is this feature important to you - During DST , job do not need to be rescheduledHow would you like the feature to work - We should be able to schedule the job in EST time zone.Current Behaviour - Currently job scheduling donot support EST time based scheduling and causin a manual change in job schedule during DST(daylight saving time) effect.
Description - We would like the My Projects widget to also support our Resource Managers in their work and show them their assigned projects. Why is this feature important to you - To support Resource Managers in reviewing projects they need to help with more easilyHow would you like the feature to work - When someone views the My Projects widget, they can filter/exclude projects where they are assigned as the Resource ManagersCurrent Behavior - The 'My Projects' widget currently filters only to Project Owners, and then Project Team members which effectively excludes people in the Resource Manager role for Projects since they do not get added to the Project Team (People tab).
Description - Need a way to mask PII data for developers for the production environment, for better data protection. Why is this feature important to you - Security of the data! Although there will be limited users on Prod, however, we cannot avoid the support team or developers being added to Prod for various activities. How would you like the feature to work - A user permission mapped with labels/policies to hide or mask the data on the environment. Current Behaviour - PII data can be easily viewed today, so we need a better way to make it even more secure.
Reference - Case #E-001418418 Description -My organization has multiple schemas created for various lines of businesses/domain requirements. There are multiple user groups that use data from each schema for reporting through CJA. We are looking for a feature that allows users to view/edit their assigned schema/dataset only, and restrict viewing/editing other schema/datsets within the same organization. Why is this feature important to you -This feature is important for my organization as we have multiple lines of businesses and we need them to maintain their website tagging individually and also to manage data privacy and governance implementation. How would you like the feature to work -This feature enables each line of business users to manage their Schema, datasets, and launch properties and maintain data privacy from other Adobe users in the organization. Current Behaviour - All Adobe experience platform users have access to all schema in the organization.
Description - there seem to be some undocumented feature(s) on _satellite.cookie.set which comprise setting the domain as well?! https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/tags/client-side/satellite-object _satellite.cookie.set("foo", "bar", { "domain": ".mydomain.com" }) Seems to successfully set the domain as specified. Why is this feature important to you - Allow cookies to be accessible across subdomains How would you like the feature to work - update the documentation please! Current Behaviour - only documented feature is "expires"
While standard KPIs are useful, many marketers know that more granular insights are crucial for understanding what truly impacts performance. Currently, I’m manually compiling additional data into a separate spreadsheet because Marketo’s reporting doesn’t provide certain key details. Here’s (some of) what I’d love to see improved in Marketo reporting:A/B Test Details: Instead of aggregating A/B test results into a single data line, a report option to separate A/B test performance would be incredibly helpful. This would provide a clearer view of what’s working.Email Send Timing: Adding columns to automatically track the exact time, day, and day of the week that emails are sent could reveal timing trends impacting engagement.Email Details: The ability to include specifics like Subject Line, From Name, From Address, and email size or character count would offer valuable context for analyzing performance.Email Type Tagging: If we could tag emails as “Operational,” “Nurture,” “Newsletter,” "Event Invitation," etc., then pull reports based on these categories, it would eliminate the tedious task of inputting each program in a report individually. With these enhancements, I could more easily identify trends, understand audience preferences, and optimize our campaigns—all without the manual data collection.
The capability for non-system admin users to delete ‘Teams’ has been removed, although the 'setting' to enable team deletion still remains in access level settings.In an enterprise solution with ‘Teams’ in the thousands this is not feasible to manage with 2-3 system admins. Especially as the nature of teams is that they are sometimes temporary/project related.We need the reintroduction of at least Group admins to be able to delete teams in order to manage this effectively.
We are currently using the "Microsoft 365 Email" module in Fusion and have observed that it only supports the delegated OAuth flow for add a connection. It is not possible to use the client credential OAuth flow instead, particularly for connecting to a shared mailbox so we don't have a connection that is based on individual credentials.This functionality would be highly beneficial for our integration needs and avoid breaking connection when individual is moving to another team or leave Dell
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
