Build better products with our product team
Description - I would like to request a way to create a custom pop-up message for different requests that come in through the request queue.Why is this feature important to you - We have a few different request queues with different timelines. We would love for a custom pop-up message to notify the requester of the timeline for that specific request form.How would you like the feature to work - Once the requested presses the submit button and pop-up message would appear with a customized message for that specific custom form. It could possibly mirror the pop up messages for proof that exists today.Current Behaviour - Currently there is no pop-up message for requests.
Description The new Data Warehouse experience allows us to save re-usable accounts and locations, this is nice rather than having to manually add where to send our files and re-enter all the authentication, etc... but there is a huge oversight here.... there is no way to delete or edit those items once added (as far as I can tell anyway). Old emails, migrated FTP servers, changes to cloud servers where files need to be sent will need to be updated... We don't want irrelevant items to be clogging up the selection screen... even "one time emails" need to be saved as an Account and a Location, but we may not want that to stay in the system as a permanent option... Why is this feature important to you We need to be able to keep our systems clean so that reports don't fail due to using old, irrelevant locations... particularly if names are like "Company FTP"... what happens when that moves, "Company FTP New"? "Company FTP New 2"... not being able to remove and clean up the accounts is ridiculous... this should be a standard feature without needing to request it. How would you like the feature to work I think there should be multiple places to access... first, there should be an "edit" button within the Data Warehouse UI for the account / location selected (so it can be reviewed and edited right there, with the option to delete if needed). However, there should also be an area in the Admin area that allows us to manage items in bulk (like for when doing a yearly cleanup). Current Behaviour This is non-existent currently... we can add but not review the details, edit, or delete.
Description - After the Corona Home Office, a lot of people are still working part time in the Home Office. It would be a great extension of the Resource Management, when the user are able to set in Workfront if they are in the Office or in the Home Office and that even for the future weeks. For example the users are able to set from where they are working in the next four (4) weeks. So that in the end we can report on the entries and the users get an overview which of the colleagues are in the office or not. Why is this feature important to you - To get a better visibility in the planning of projects it would help to know upfront if the colleagues are in the office or in Home Office. How would you like the feature to work - It would be the best when we can include such a functionality in the timesheets. Because every user is using the timesheets and knows how to work with it. The difference to the other entries is that there is not impact on the hours in the timesheet. The user only enters for a day Home Office or Office and then to the Tasks, Projects, etc. the actual worked hours. Current Behaviour - We have created a project where we enter the users at each day with a Custom Field where each user can set if he is in the Office or in the Home Office. To have a better visualization we created a report and dashboard for it. So that we are able to pin it to the upper Navigation.
アナリティクスメニューの「ウェブページアクティビティ」のレポートに関して２点改善を求めます。1. 通常のローカルレポートアセットと同様に表示する項目を選択できるようにしてほしい。例えば、メールアドレスやカスタム項目（SalesCloudの商談数）を表示できるようにしてほしい。理由：レポートデータをエクスポートして２次利用する際にメールアドレスがキーになることが多いため。例えば、SalesCloudの活動記録とメールアドレスをキーに突合するなど。また、カスタム項目（SalesCloudの商談数）が表示できるとウェブページアクティビティ上位者で商談の有無が一目瞭然に分かる。 2.レポートをエクスポートした際、ExcelのA列「顧客」に顧客の姓、名、会社名が一つのセルにまとめられているのをやめてほしい。姓、名、会社名の３つはセルを分けてエクスポートしてほしい。理由：エクスポートデータの2次利用の際、扱い難いため。 当社としては、業務上、すぐにでも改善していただけると助かります。
Please add the ability to Insert HTML Offers. Right now the VEC allows Text, HTML, Experience Fragments and Recommendations to be Inserted, but not HTML Offers from the Adobe Target offer library.
We would like the ability to track and report on email read rates: https://www.litmus.com/blog/email-read-rates.
Description - We would like to add global custom forms to all projects by default. This would be a setting in the admin project setup section. By adding this capability, I can add company-wide custom forms when a user creates a project. Why is this feature important to you - There is no way to add a mandatory custom form to projects. We use custom forms at the project level to categorize export compliance classification and non-standard identifiers. How would you like the feature to work - Add a Project Setting in the admin setup area where admins can specify default custom forms on project creation and on existing projects. It would also make sense to add this to individual Group's settings, where groups can have default custom forms associated with projects they create instead of having to define templates just to add custom forms to their projects, which would not work if a user does not create a project from a template. Current Behaviour - Must have project creators manually add custom forms and if they do not, the project does not have those custom fields.
Description/Current Behaviour - In Single Line Custom Fields from type number, Workfront is only allowing the decimal separator dot (25.5). If a user enters the number in the European format with a comma as separator (25,5), Workfront is erasing/deleting the comma from the Value. Why is this feature important to you - When you include such a field in your calculations, your result could be wrong because of a deleted decimal separator. Depending of how many decimal numbers you have entered your result could be 100 or 1000 times higher. How would you like the feature to work - There are a few possible ways to solve this. The first possibility is already in place, but in a different area of Workfront. In the Timesheet you can enter the hours with a comma separated and Workfront changes automatically to a value with a dot as separator. So the existing rule of deleting the comma should be upgraded, that the comma is not deleted but rather be changed to a dot. An other option would be that the user how creates the field can set the needed format and that the format is displayed in the field to guide the user in which format he needs to enter the value. A third option would be that the Field is allowing to have both separators in the field and in the background Workfront is standardising the value for further use.
If it was possible to alert on calculated metrics the alerts would be much more useful. Application volumes go up and down depending on so many factors, so it's difficult to set a threshold. Application conversion is pretty consistant on our site, so a drop in conversion gives a much better indication of an issue.
We often require setting and getting variables in Fusion Scenarios, especially with complicated flow controls. However, it seems if you set a variable it's scope is for ALL operations. So when processing 10 projects, they will all have the same value if you aren't careful. We would like to have the option to set the lifecycle scope to "Operation" to ensure it only applies to a specific operation.
Description - We use A4T and create a report in Adobe Analytics for every A/B test we run. Once concluded we tend to archive activities in order to keep Adobe Target clean and simple to manage, however any report that references the archived test then breaks because the test name changes once archived. Why is this feature important to you - Often we want to look back at reports, only to find that they have broken and we need to rebuild them with the new (archived) test namesHow would you like the feature to work - Tests can be archived without their names changing or for Analytics reports to automatically update to accommodate the new test name
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adjust the unlock of pages so that also member of administrators group can unlock Use-case: An editor locks a page. Then he is not available due to e.g. sickness or vacation but the page needs to be updated urgently. Editor contacts AEM administrators of his company and requests the unlock. But, they are not able to help quickly as they have to contact SME or CSME or even have to raise a support ticket in order that someone who has access to admin account can do the unlock! Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently only with the admin account your are able to unlock a locked page. So, even I'm member of the administrators group I can't do that. Instead I have to contact my CSME or even raise a support ticket. That takes too much time! And, it raises unneccessary efforts. I don't see the point why the administrators of the system are not allowed to do that! Improved/Expected Behavior: Also members of the administrators group should be able to unlock every lock page independent who have locked it! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We want to publish XF with the on-time function. Please add the necessary items to the XF publishing screen. （Example） On-time/off-time items , etc. Use-case: We want to publish XF with the on-time/off-time function, but the current XF publishing screen does not have the necessary items. Example: An item to specify on-time/off-time, etc. Please add the necessary items to the XF publishing screen. Background -When publishing many products at the same time on the same date and time, many approval flows occur at the same time, processing is queued and there are cases where it is not possible to publish at the specified time. -As a countermeasure, We want to use the on-time function to perform pre-processing. Current/Experienced Behavior: The current XF publishing screen does not have the items required for the on-time/off-time function. Improved/Expected Behavior: Please add the items required for the on-time/off-time function to the XF public screen. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Release 2024.4.16145.20240430T082417Z Customer-name/Organization name: Panasonic Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add support for translation of i18n dictionary again to translation framework in order to send out those to translation agencies in an automatic manner like for page content. Use-case: We want to sent out i18n values not manually but automatically using the integrated translation framework. Current/Experienced Behavior: In AEMaaCS the option to add i18n dictionary is not available anymore. This is obviously not possible as /apps path is immutable content now. This means we have to translate values manually which is not efficient. Improved/Expected Behavior: We used to send out i18n dictionaries on Adobe AMS using the integrated translation framework to have an automatic and efficient way like for pages. Please bring back this option to make the process as efficient as possible. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide Composite fields in multifield Use-case: As an CF editor, I want to add different type of values as a combination and I would prefer to use a field like composite multifield (same as we have in component dialogs) Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently no composite field is available for CF Improved/Expected Behavior: Composite multifield allowed for CF Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: On Modification of page needs amber colour flag display in sites console when page is selected Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: It just displays page modification date , last published date etc, no colour flags to display which cold help alerting page is in modified stage. Improved/Expected Behavior: On Modification of page needs amber colour flag display in sites console when page is selected . <meta charset="utf-8" /> It makes life easy for authors to avoid any draft page publication as modified date displayed might not get attention as amber color flag does. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM SaaS Customer-name/Organization name: Unilever Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
If subscription events go down, it would be useful to be able to identify all the events that have taken place in Workfront during that period and process them in Fusion. It would avoid manual effort to identify the events and reprocess them in Fusion to ensure they were captured. Ideally, customers would like the ability to identify all the events that occurred in Workfront during a defined timeframe (in which event subscriptions were down); then to click a button to process them via the Fusion scenarios they were missed from.
Hi, Some of the reports on our dashboards can get long and create an irritating scrolling issue on the dashboard. I know that I can set it to only show so many lines, etc., but that is not what I am looking to do. In such reports, I like to auto-collapse the groupings to make the dashboard more neat and orderly. However, some of the dashboard reports are so important I am afraid to auto collapse the grouping. For example, a report named "My Upcoming and Late Tasks", grouped by project and filtered to late tasks and tasks due within the next week that are assigned to the logged in user. I'm afraid to auto collapse this grouping in fear that an important task will be missed by an assignee who did not bother to open the grouping. Murphy's Law. This is the same reason I do not want to limit the number of lines that show up on the report, forcing them to click a button to see the remaining tasks. It would be very nice if I could turn the grouping text red, and/or bold, and/or make text appear in the grouping header to notify that the grouping contains tasks that are late, or urgent/high priority, etc. Then there would be a visual cue to let the assignees know there is something important and they need to open that grouping. Then the dashboards would be shorter in length, easier to scroll, and more user friendly. Thanks
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Search on the same page DAM and Adobe Stock Assets using filters (DAM path, asset type, etc) Use-case: On the one page in AEM we can search for Adobe Stock. On the other page in AEM we can search DAM assets. Is it possible to search on the same page DAM and Adobe Stock Assets? Current/Experienced Behavior: it is not possible to search on the same page DAM and Adobe Stock Assets using filters (DAM path, asset type, etc) Improved/Expected Behavior: it is possible to search on the same page DAM and Adobe Stock Assets using filters (DAM path, asset type, etc) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): https://author-p131706-e1282790.adobeaemcloud.com/ Customer-name/Organization name: Legrand Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - I LOVE (yes, that's uppercase!) the Web SDK "Data Variable" Data Element Type in conjunction with the "Update variable" action. Especially with the new UI, it looks almost exactly like AppMeasurement, even better. What I am missing is a way to initialize the DE in a similar way an "XDM object" can be defined directly in the Data Element section, to set an initial state, and which you can build upon in your rules to temporarily enhance it. After the rules have completed, the initial state is reset. In my current setup with the ACDL (Adobe Client Data Layer), I need a standalone rule that is listening to "all events" and runs before any other ACDL triggered rule that further updates the variable, just to achieve this functionality. Or am I missing a step / functionality? As a workaround, I could likely also create a "custom code" DE instead, that defines the core data structure as JS object, and can then be merged with the variable part and the result used instead. This would remove the need for an additional rule, but would also require you to be savvy enough to write that code yourself. Why is this feature important to you? - It creates the need for unnecessary workarounds to set the globally applied pieces on the DE. How would you like the feature to work? - The XDM object can also be defined in the Data Elements section, why not the variable data element as well?In the DE definition, why not already display the same UI that is presented in the update variable step? Current Behaviour - Cumbersome additional step/rule needed to set commonly used parts on the data element e.g., through a custom rule that runs before the actual page view or interaction rule
Hey all, I think it would be very helpful if filters in Smart Lists could link out to what's being referenced, instead of having to search to find what you're looking for. Basically, just link up what's highlighted in the screenshot. I know this would make my life easier on occasion. 😁 Also, if this has already been proposed, feel free to point me in the direction of that post. I wasn't able to find anything via search! Have a good one!
When templates are deactivated, they still show for non-admin users who the template was shared with. This is very confusing for our users and allows them to choose a deactivated template when creating a project. To prevent this, when I deactivate a template I also have to un-share it will all non-admin users, and this is an extra step that I don't think should happen. If a template is deactivated, I think it shouldn't show up for users.
There is a long-standing frustration with proofs that oftentimes approvers will make a comment in a proof but not make a decision. It would help to not let the person close a proof after making a comment without marking a decision IF they are an approver or reviewer/approver on the proof and are not in a proof where only 1 decision is required and has already been made.
Description - Currently, Launch/Tags does not support a tagging nor folder functionality, especially in big projects leaving it to the implementer to use naming conventions to keep things tidy Why is this feature important to you - especially big projects easily get messy How would you like the feature to work - add a tagging + filtering and/or folder creation possibility, similar to what GTM provides Current Behaviour - nothing similar
Description - Allow Workload Balancer's "Sort Project By" be sorted in reverse. For example, Priorities sort low to high. Allow it to sort from high to low, with high on top. Why is this feature important to you - The team is getting confused by having "low priority" on top of the list and "high priority" on the bottom. It would be more intuitive to sort the other way. How would you like the feature to work - An up/down arrow next to the Sort By field to dictate which direction it should go. Current Behaviour - There is no such feature at this time.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
