I completely agree with this. When we implemented, Marketo told us it was very important to get a naming structure down. We didn't fully realize how really important it was, so it would be very nice to go back now and rename campaigns and programs.
A
Anonymous
February 7, 2012
I would really like to the ability to rename programs. This is crucial to our ever changing shedule.
A
Anonymous
January 13, 2012
Yes, this is an absolute MUST-have, not a nice to have.
A
Anonymous
January 4, 2012
100% agree that this would a smart move..
A
Anonymous
December 7, 2011
subscribing, really must-have feature.
A
Anonymous
November 21, 2011
Another renaming issue just came up around Programs. When a Program is cloned, you cannot rename the campaign names or change the campaign descriptions. Attempting to modify a cloned campaign description gives the error of "campaign name already exists". This is another a little but big impediment to adopting the program/event features.
A
Anonymous
November 3, 2011
Oh my god, yes please - agree withg everything already said - just had to throw my vote in for this one! Particularly with the addition of events/programs as mentioned by @Niru R
A
Anonymous
October 31, 2011
When I clone an existing program (event), all the assets in the cloned event retain the name of the original event, including the landing page name and url, and I cannot change it. It would be fantastic if I could change the name and url of landing page to be what I want it to be, not the system default. The way its set up right now, even though I clone existing programs and localized assets, without being to rename the assets, I don't get much use from the Program feature itself, which is a pity. So yes, I am voting to say- we should be able to rename the Program and all assets within the program when we clone it.
A
Anonymous
October 26, 2011
It's shocking that you can't do this already. I have moved things into programs, which essentially changed the name by appending the program name to it... and have seen this break existing fucntionality in major ways... so maybe it's less trivial then we imagine.
A
Anonymous
October 26, 2011
I totally agree with all of this...we are just getting going using the tool and thought it was a bug as well. This should definitely be on a list for development. Hopefully you guys can take a break from Spark and work on this much needed enhancement. Thanks