Adobe Experience Manager

Hi Community, I’m facing an issue with Experience Fragments in Cloud.We are trying to use the same XF across multiple sites. The fragment references are resolving fine on Author, but after publishing, some of the pages show broken references (the XF doesn’t render at all).The XF is published and available in Publish, The content path looks correct, Replication logs don’t show errors.Interestingly, if I republish the XF again, it sometimes works — but not consistently.Has anyone run into this problem where Experience Fragments intermittently fail to render on Publish? Any tips on what could be causing this or what I should check (replication agents, permissions, etc.)? Thanks for your help!

I'm trying to create a property field ("text") inside my block. However, the field did not render as expected. Is there something missing from my json file?{ "definitions": [ { "title": "Credit Cards", "id": "credit-cards", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block", "template": { "name": "Credit Cards", "filter": "credit-cards" } } } } }, { "title": "Credit Card", "id": "credit-card", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block/item", "template": { "name": "Credit Card", "model": "credit-card" } } } } } ], "models": [ { "id": "credit-cards", "fields": [ { "component": "text", "name"

Hello Community,We have encountered an issue with the AEM Target integration, specifically related to saving and syncing activities in Target. We are receiving an error that does not seem valid in our case, as we have already referenced the audience with the offers/experience. Additionally, the same API integration works in other environments.We have also verified the permissions for the target group/service account for the relevant paths. Even after restarting the Test and Target bundle, the issue persists. Can someone advise what might be causing this issue and what fix is required to address it? Our AEM version is 6.5 SP22. We are using the out-of-the-box experience fragment component. We also tried using other components, but still had no luck. Verified the following areas:API integration has approver and editor privileges.Cloud service connectivity is in place.Cloud service configuration is updated in the root page.Able to pull audiences from Target.Test and Target replicatio

We need to support a new language - Montenegrin with the code as - cnr-ME.Can AEM even support it? By checking some of the existing language codes, what I see that aem can support 2 letters like "fr" or 5 letters like "fr-FR" but not 6 letters. I tried adding the language code under - /apps/wcm/core/resources/languages/.content.xml but it is still not getting resolved and we get the null value.Any insight will be helpful.Locale locale = LanguageUtil.getLocale("cnr-ME");System.out.println(locale); // prints null instead of cnr_ME<cnr jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" country="*" defaultCountry="cnr_me" language="Montenegro"/><cnr_me jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" country="Montenegro" language="Montenegrin"/>

Tried to include custom rewrite file in a wknd project dispatcher in two ways including a call to custom rules file in rewrite.rules file and another way is including it using vhost.Both ways gave error in validation step in local.Please advice     Thankyou  

Hi All,  I am trying to use CSV Assets Importer for our UAT environment, and I am getting an error message, and my assets are not being imported.I am using a NAS server that is connected to our UAT environment, where people go inside the folder create their own folders and drop their files inside. I have to get those files and then export them into AEM.   

Hi all, I created an Adaptive form and one of the requirements was to mask the PII information (SSN) on the form as the user types and exits the field. For this I have created a JS function that takes the value and replaces first five characters with * (asterisk) and sets the value back on the text field. This is working fine.  Now as the user clicks back into the field, i wanted to show the original value. For this, i created a hidden field and before calling the mask JS function on the field exit, i also set the value of this hidden field with original value of the SSN. But i am unable to find an event that matches the ENTER event or Click event to trigger this script. I have built this form using Foundation components. Any ideas to implement would be helpful. Thanks,Abhishek

Hi! I am trying to add Adobe AEMDS Core Document Manager Support (adobe-aemds-core-manager), but I don't know where to find it out.  How can I download it to classpath in order to ensure that bundle is present in AEM and it will resolve DocumentSourceHandler class?  Thanks.  Also, do I need to get special authorization from Adobe to install it?

I have a form that is in Landscape orientation in the designer view, it prints as landscape when printing in PDF form from the file storage area. However, when linked through a server to print automatically it prints in portrait mode with all the landscapes settings, so everything looks small in the top half of the page with some information cut off. Same server, same printer, same settings I have on another form, and that ones does print properly in landscape mode. This other one existed first.I already tried saving the one that works with another name and editing there and it still does not print properly.  Any ideas? 

Hello, I'm doing investigation regarding the state of the bundles.  When we performed rolling restart in publishers. We noticed 1 bundle were not proceeded to starting state. But this only happen in rare cases as we are doing a rolling restart multiple times and that bundle was properly start automatically by the AEM with no problem. Checking the Bundle Event written in error.log. I noticed the pattern that all bundle after stopped it will go to resolved state and start again. This is the expected case.Example 1:Example 2:  However, one bundle was not activated. Specifically, cq-dam-cfm-graphql was stopped and tagged with [FelixStartLevel]. After that, it transitioned to the Resolved state, but this time the tag changed to [OsgiInstallerImpl] instead of [FelixStartLevel]. Please disregard the last two lines in the log, as I manually triggered the bundle to start.  Here are the questions that got me stuck for a while:1. Is there any known issue or limi

Hi Everyone Hope all are staying safe and healthy!Has anyone taken the AD0-E117 Architect certification recently. Please let me know. Thanks 

Fellow AEM folks, The pressure to go "Headless" or "Hybrid" is real. Every client and every project seems to be asking for it. But is it always the right answer? The Good: For those who have made the leap, what was the biggest actual benefit you achieved? (e.g., developer freedom, faster site speed) The Bad: What was the most unexpected downside or complexity you faced? (e.g., content preview, author experience, cost) The Verdict: Is Headless AEM a must-have for future-proofing, or is it an overkill solution for most common use cases? When should a traditional AEM setup still be the preferred choice? Let's get past the jargon and talk about what really works (and what doesn't).

Everyone talks about Core Components, Cloud Service, and AI… but what about the hidden gems? Is there a little-known feature you use daily that saves tons of time? A workflow hack? A deployment trick? A authoring shortcut? Something that made you say, “Why didn’t I know about this earlier?!” Share your secret weapons!

Hello,   We often hear about the push to AEM Cloud for its new features and scalability. But what are some real-world situations where sticking with AEM Managed Services (AMS) actually makes more sense? Beyond just 'confidential data,' what are the practical, day-to-day reasons why an organization might choose AMS over Cloud?   I'm curious about those less-obvious advantages.     Since, Cloud or EDS is not best-fit-for-all, shouldn't Adobe plan innovations on AMS too? Any insights if something is already in roadmap?

Hi All,   I am trying to disable cache for HTML responses. I have these rules already in dispatcher config,   <LocationMatch "^/content/.*\.html$">Header always unset Cache-ControlHeader always unset ExpiresHeader always set Cache-Control "no-store, no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate"Header always set Pragma "no-cache"Header always set Surrogate-Control "no-store"</LocationMatch>   However, when I check response headers I still see this: cache-control: no-store, no-cache, max-age=0, must-revalidate,max-age=300   It looks like max-age=300 is being appended somewhere. I want to know from where this default Cache-Control: max-age=300 is getting added? What is the recommended way to override / remove this so my own no-cache rules are effective?   Thanks in advance !

We have a requirement of building functionality to show paginated list of users by the given filter criteria. Some of the filter criteria we have already achived by directly querying users from /home/users. We are facing difficulty in two filter criteria1) Find user by group name2) Find user by directory read access. We are unable to create query or anything that can support this requirement and returns paginated list of users. Following is our code so far. StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder("SELECT * FROM [rep:User] AS u WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE(u, [/home/users])"); if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(criteria.getUserId())) { queryBuilder.append(" AND (u.[rep:principalName] LIKE \"%").append(criteria.getUserId().trim()).append("%\")"); } if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(criteria.getUserMail())) { queryBuilder.append(" AND (u.[profile/email] LIKE \"%").append(criteria.getUserMail().trim()).append("%\")"); } if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(criteria.getCompanyName())) {

Hello everyone, I'm looking to migrate from an old, headful CMS to AEM Headless. The database of our current headful CMS is PostgreSQL 15, and the content is marked up with a proprietary template. We plan to distribute information to multiple devices, such as native apps and IoT devices, and therefore want to use GraphQL.Does anyone have information on how to migrate from a third-party CMS like this? I understand that the Content Transfer Tool (CTT) is for data migration between AEM instances, but what's the best practice for migrating data from another CMS?https://experienceleague.adobe.com/ja/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/migration-journey/cloud-migration/content-transfer-tool/overview-content-transfer-tool Thanks.

I have a requirement to add a custom column to the list view inside a collection in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM). Could anyone guide me on how to achieve this? 

Dear AEM Community, Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with AEM. That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for September 2025, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively. Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to: Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEM. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEM-related problem head-on. Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you? Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – empowering you to provide a truly personalized experience to your customers with AEM. Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS

trying to use Metadata based permissions for show/hide assets Metadata-Driven Permissions in AEM Assets | Adobe Experience Manager this is working fine for assets deny all assets using rep:ntNames="dam:Asset"and then allowing based on metadata property status="Approved "     Now I am trying to do similar for a folder,i.e. I am hiding all folders based on rep:ntNames="sling:Folder"  now how to allow specific folders under this folder based on a property value at folder level or at jcr:content level?? Please advice  Thank you very much  

 We’re running AEM as a Cloud Service with the default Dispatcher setup. For anonymous users, caching works fine. But for logged-in users (after SSO), we don’t want certain pages (like /content/myapp/us/en/dashboard.html) to be cached at all - they should always be fresh from Publish.I tried adding rules like this in dispatcher:/0018 {/type "allow"/glob "/content/myapp/us/en/dashboard.html"/headers {"Cache-Control" "no-store"}}but when I test the page is being cached by Dispatcher  

We are using path-based servlets to handle contact form submissions. These endpoints are accessible via tools like Postman and cURL. Our infrastructure includes AEM as a Cloud Service and Akamai CDN. By default, AEM’s CSRF protection does not block requests originating from Postman or cURL. Although we have CSRF configurations implemented in our codebase, these tools can still bypass the protection. We are looking for a way to block such requests. One option is to configure Akamai to block requests based on the User-Agent header, such as those sent by Postman. Could you please suggest the best approach to effectively block these types of requests? { "filter.enable.safe.user.agents": false, "filter.methods": [ "DELETE", "POST", "PUT" ], "filter.safe.user.agents": [ "Apache-HttpClient/*", "Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/*", "Jakarta-Commons-VFS", "curl/*", "Wget/*", "WebDAVFS/*", "Microsoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir/*", "Ruby", "Adobe-Campaign/*", "Form

In my Publish interface, there is a form where I enter all the required details. Upon submitting the form, the page creation should occur in the Author instance. When the form is hosted on the Author instance, submitting it successfully creates the page in Author. Similarly, when the form is hosted on the local Publish instance, submitting it creates the page in Publish. I need help ensuring that, regardless of where the form is hosted, the page creation always happens in the Author instance.

We have use cases (mainly for print purposes) where we need to be able to have assets rendered out to different file types. For example, we may have a large ful size tiff that the end user needs as a jpg. The current process for creating renditions appears to require those renditions to be created and take up storage in the system at asset processing. And then there is not a way for end users to select the rendition they need when they download the asset(s) or link to them via Asset Link. I'd like to be able to set up what the renders need to do (ex. convert file to jpg) but not have the file rendered out until the end user clicks to download it. I'd like for them to see the render options for the file when they click download and then select the render they want. Is there a way to handle this now in AEM or would this be a feature request?

The videos added in Dynamic media components via experience fragment aretaking too long to render on the page. The lazy loading checkbox is checked.Whereas it works fine when it's added as an individual component.