Build better products with our product team
Description - Hover over task name in timesheet and see task description.Why is this feature important to you - to help users report time accurately. How would you like the feature to work - Hover over task name in timesheet and see task description.Current Behaviour - Users would have to click on the task name, which brings up a new window, navigate to where the task descrption is, which they may not know how to do.
Description - Ability to add links to action items/bugs/issues/risks description area Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes the informaiton in the description is directing to a link; right now it is not possible to inset a link if the system default risk/issue/bug/action item queue topics are in use. Although it is possible to attach custom forms that provide the capability, it seems to be somewhat redundant to create the same fields to just provide formatting options. How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if formatting options , particularly adding a link to the Description field is possible. Current Behaviour - Right now the Description field accepts only plain text.
Description - On the layout templates Admins are able to set defaults for users to allow them to see the widget filters as we would want them to us them on the home screen.Why is this feature important to you - to keep confusion to a minimum for those users that are not in WF all the time but need the most simple screen displayed.How would you like the feature to work - However, on the Layout templates for Home Workspace, the term "Widget Settings" don't seem to be just for the Widgets as the title suggests. This functionality seems to carry on into the project itself and those filters and views inside the project should be different by default.Current Behavior - If I set the Widget Settings to Can Start on the filter it carries over to the tasks inside the project and I would prefer the Project tasks filter be set to All tasks not Can Start as we want the user to be able to see the entire flow of the project while inside of the project. But on the Home Page "My Tasks Widget" we only want them to see tasks when "their task" is ready to start. We feel this will keep the confusion down on the main home screen but inside the project give them more flexibility. I have encountered this because we just onboarded 70 users and we were setting their defaults prior to training.
A suggestion from a user: Width adjustments in text mode do not work as wished It would be great if we the option of defining fixed column width that can be applied to all Views where those columns appear, and also scaled to a different monitor sizes (for example, laptop and desktop) without losing their predefined width.
Hi Team, Can we please add different colors to panels so that we can differentiate them? Best Regards, Neha
Description - This idea is requesting to add the ability to add and decide on the placement of custom dashboards to a project template. Sometimes layout templates are unified but different types of projects offer information specific to those projects to the users who use the unified template but not all project types (belonging to different portfolios/programs) apply to them. Certain dashboards need to appear for certain projects, independent of layout template designs. Why is this feature important to you - My users who use the same layout templates would like to have access to certain informaiton specific to the type of project they are a part of. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the system provide the ability to add and define the order of custom dashboards at the project template level. Current Behaviour - The addition (for a no. of users) and order of the custom dashboards and other project items are only defined through layout templates.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - to ensure the recipient knows who sent the message so that it doesn't cause confusionHow would you like the feature to work - When I comment on behalf of someone else, when the email goes through to the tagged recipient, it would mention that "I" made entered the comment and not the account owner.Current Behaviour - In app - the system highlights "On behalf of", but not on the email as shown in the screenshots below.
Description—It would be ideal if we could Upload and Host an Image to be used in our Custom Forms. Currently, we only have the option to add images by adding the URL of an image hosted somewhere else. The images/documents inside Workfront do not work, as they expire after a few minutes. Why is this feature important to you - This would make the feature easier to use, and located all in one place (Workfront) How would you like the feature to work? If I choose to add an Image in the Custom Form, it would be helpful if I had the option to Upload a File to be used. That file will stay in Workfront and be connected to that Custom Form. Any User with access to the Custom form would also have access to the file. Current Behaviour—Currently, there is no option to upload an Image. We can only enter a URL. Images and documents hosted in Workfront can be added as part of the URL, but because those URLs expire after a few minutes, they generate an Error or broken link and a bad experience.
Description - allow the ability to edit the story order number (priority) through in-line editing of the field. Why is this feature important to you - this will allow for a more efficient way of updating story order number when working with long backlog lists. How would you like the feature to work - double click on the story order number field, change the order number, click our of it, story gets moved to the defined story number. all stories with a number greater get shifted down. Current Behaviour - currently, the only way to change the story order number is to drag and drop the story to the correct position. This is difficult to do when working with long lists of stories. Story usually needs to get shift up or down multiple times to get it tot he right order.
Our teams would like to be able to use Board Views on the Agile Backlog screen with the ability to move cards up and down for order/prioritization.
Hi, I look the the figures linked to a specific page and I'm surprised to see that the bounce rate on this page is 100%. So I understand that clients that see this page always left. When I clicked in the info bubble of the metric, I see this definition about Bounce Rate : If I look for the calculation of the formula on the Adobe Website (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics/technotes/ga-to-aa/processing-differences#:~:text=In%20Adobe%20Analytics%2C%20Bounce%20Rate,formula%20Bounces%20divided%20by%20Entries.): So regarding to this last formula, the Bounce rate is ok but the definition of the metric in the tool is confusing for the end users because it's different (Bounces/Visits vs Bounces/Entries). So may I suggest you to adapt it. Thanks
I know this one is a hard one. Yet, take into account that, in order to comply with GDPR, we are all implementing Double-Opt-In processes on our Marketo instances, the second step of which is based on email clicks.The number of people that see links scanner triggering false clicks on emails is clearly increasing since @Devraj Grewal post 2 years ago (Email was clicked before it was delivered? It's a link scanner ), down to @Courtney Grimes's blog article . And so far, no really satisfactory solution has been found, despite all the creativity and research from community members (look at @Dan Stevens's 45 minutes wait step here or @Sanford Whiteman multiple contributions on this)This means that we are going to confirm opt-in based on link scanner clicks... Sounds bad, don't you think?So, we really need Marketo to invest into Link Scanner-Proof email click detection. Maybe combining clicks with user agent detection, rapidity/multiplicity of the clicks, email address domains and a little of AI/deep learning (leveraging the trillions of email click events registered in Marketo systems) could lead to a much better reliability-Greg
Pardot recently announced they are putting several things in place to get rid of bot clicks. One of the simplest ones being IP-based filtering. We have asked Marketo if they could forward the IP address with click data so we could do something about it. Marketo already has this information. Why can't they filter clicks based on IP addresses that many of these security appliances publicise?Rejecting clicks before the email was even delivered, would be helpful too.There are some obvious patterns Marketo to look for - like clicks on every single link or multiple links in a very short timespan.Or clicks that didn't result in a web pageview. We don't have a simple mechanism to link the two, since Marketo doesn't send the clickId to the web pageview. But Marketo has that info.This is becoming a big problem, since we can't do any lead nurturing or other campaigns due to bots clicking.Thanks.Swapna
Description - Add the ability to set a default status on the Queue TopicWhy is this feature important to you - By default all new requests, unless you allow the user to choose the status of a request, get created as "New". It would allow better triage and management to allow statuses to defaulted. Different topics could then have different initial valuesHow would you like the feature to work - Add the status field to the Queue Topic form. If no value selected then the current behavior is kept. Added option could be that it is also added to Routing Current Behaviour - Only NEW is available. Existing Queue Topics should be defaulted.
Description - Would it be possible to allow Default Views applied to Widgets to be configured/selected in Layout Template?Why is this feature important to you - We have a lot of custom fields and being able to apply custom views as Default Views to Widgets would make the Widgets much more useful to us especially My projects Widget.How would you like the feature to work - I think it would make the most sense to have the requested feature added to Home Workspace\Widget Settings in Layout Template and allow the same type of options as Filters in 24.4 release (April 11, 2024)Current Behaviour - There is no way to configure/select Default Views applied to Widgets.
Description - It would be helpful to be able to send regular updates about a project that is added as a custom dashboard to particular projects. Why is this feature important to you - The report is added on a custom dashboard within user's projects that are added from a particular template (the report/dashboard of reports do not show up for all users but only for ones added to certain projects). End users who receive the report in email on regular basis need information that is relevant to their project and not everything in the report. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to send/schedule send of reports or dashboard of reports (automatically, without having to add users manualy)) to team members of particular projects. Current Behaviour - Currently it is not possible to automatically send a dashboard of reports to users; it is also not possible to send a report/dashboard or reports added to particular projects to only members of those projects.
Description -> Can we make a Workfront Desktop Application.Why is this feature important to you -> This would help as we could set Workfront to launch on startup which would increase usage and be helpful when it comes to change management and adoption.How would you like the feature to work -> The same way it works in the web browser but via an app.Current Behaviour -> Workfront is currently web browser based.
Description - Workfront consistently has problems with returning results in searchs and filters for deactivated users. Users who are deactivated won't show up in search prompts and in filter options in reporting (like user name equals). From discussions with support and product people, it sounds like the reason is because we don't want deactivated users to show up when dealing with task assignments. I agree, we don't want that. But you should be able to figure out how to program for this problem so they won't show up for task assignments but WILL show up in other areas where you're filtering and searching. Why is this feature important to you - User management is more cumbersome because of this all or nothing approach that is currently in place. We regularly have to do checks that require finding deactivated users and not being able to search them normally just increases the admin burden to find them - and train everyone else who needs to find them how to workaroudn the issue. How would you like the feature to work - Fix the programming of how your search works so that you cannot pull a deactivated user for task assigments but can search them normally or add them to filters normally. The "deactivated" tag that appears by their names in reports is incredibly helpful and utilizing that should help users understand who is deactivated if they're searching for a user or if they're filtering into a report. Current Behaviour - You cannot pull deactivated users into filters using "equals" prompts. The site search also now (as of 7/14/23) doesn't let you search for deactivated users. That site search seems to change periodically between allowing the search of deactivated users and not allowing it. Seems like changes are getting made to that, probably without someone understanding what happens.
We'd like to have the option to make modifications to a task that is pending approval. For example, we'd like to be able to change the task dates or move the task to a different project. This is important because we frequently find that we are having to temporarily change the task status back to make these modifications, which is not an ideal experience.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Our design team works with these file types and isn't able to run them through proof anymore causing extra work.
Description - The current functionality for routing rules is very limited. We are only able to configure routing rules for specific queue topics. Allowing us to assign specific user/teams to a specific queue topic. The following is functionality that is possible through Fusion, but want to be available without Fusion: 1. Automatically Convert Requests/Issue into a Project If a request is submitted through a specific queue topic, then automatically convert the request into a project using a specific project template. Ideally, we would also have the ability to configure this at the custom form level. e.g. If the requester selects XYZ on the request form, then convert into a project using XYZ template. If the requester selects ABC on the request form, then convert into a project using ABC template. 2. Dynamic Request Routing Based on how the Form was CompletedSimilar to #1, allow us to set routing rules based on how the request form was completed. If certain custom fields options are selected, then we are able to configure routing options such as a) assign the request to a specific user(s), b) convert the request into a project using a specified template, c) send a customized notification to specific users/roles d) automatically set the status of the request to a specific status, e) remove specified tasks from the converted project, etc. Why is this feature important to you -Ultimately, we're looking for more out-of-the-box functionality to configure dynamic routing based on how the request form was completed. Requiring Fusion to meet these needs places extra cost and time on the customer to build missing functionality that we believe should already be included. This functionality would reduce the amount of work/steps for our teams. These are repeatable and predictable steps that can be automated. This functionality is currently available on competitor systems (Asana, ClickUp, etc.).
Description -For projects that include an approval process, there currently is no option available to setup automated reminder notification email to notify users that their approval is still pending. This is a huge obstacle for anyone who intends to leverage approval processes as part of their projects. Why is this feature important to you - Needed for projects developments How would you like the feature to work - To be able to customize a timeframe for users to respond to a pending approval and have the system send out an automated reminder notification once that time frame has lapsed. Current Behaviour - None.
Description - Be able to forecast projects without having to actually add the project and add users to it and then possibly having to delete everythingWhy is this feature important to you – Want to be able to add projects or requests, assign them to users and then see how that would affect the resource balancing and affect other projects they are working on.How would you like the feature to work – The ability to add project and assign resources without it automatically saving. We could do some forecasting on resources and see how a new high priority project would affect other projects without having emails sent to users and then once we get our data we can decide to either save it or not.Current Behavior – The ability to enter in a project and assign users to tasks/requests without having it save automatically and not send out notifications to the assigned users as we just want to see how this new project would affect resources and affect other projects. We have to add the project, assign resources, look at resource balancing, planner. Get all the reports and then go in and delete the project as we just need to do this to get information to the stakeholder so they can decide if they want to move forward or not.
I'm conducting A4T Auto Target testing and I'd like to be able to set an alert (trigger an alert email) when one of my tests begins trending negative beyond a threshold. I want to ease the daily workload burden of checking each of my workspaces in Analytics workspace. The current functionality of Alerts requires the user to ID specific metrics and filter in the Alert builder. With Auto Target (A4T), Lift is not a field within the table, so I am unable to select it to create an alert. I'm also unable to build my lift calculation in the Alert builder. It would be ideal if I could click on my summary change visualization and create an alert from it. If its value met some criteria, then send email alert.
Description - There should be an option to remove/hide document approvals in layouts Why is this feature important to you - This would allow admins to control the usage of document approvals and it would eliminate the need to search for approvals in multiple places (document/proof) How would you like the feature to work - In setup> interface>layout templates the 'Customize what users see' dropdown would have a drop down for documents Current Behaviour - Documents do not appear as an option
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
