Build better products with our product team
Description - It may seem simple and maybe even nitpicky, but I would like for the very basic formatting and alignment of the text in the #Description section of my scheduled project to, in turn, be directly reflected in the body of the emails received by the end users when they receive their scheduled emails instead of an incoherent, congealed blob of text. Why is this feature important to you - I already have a difficult time getting my end users to read the emails they receive without #Adobe making my job and my data storytelling more difficult. How would you like the feature to work - At the very least, I would like the body of the emails to reflect the formatting and spacing the way it is laid out in the Description section to schedule my project, whether I'm scheduling a new project or editing an existing project. In fact, it would even be better if we had simple HTML editing capabilities to allow for richer content, and I know this should be possible. Current Behavior - Today, any text appearing in the Description is single-spaced together and placed in the body of the recipient's email with no formatting, minus one exception. That exception allows for any hyperlinks appearing in the text are made active and usable. These messages provide so much opportunity and potential for engagement with our data end-users, and this is one place where we are really dropping the ball, folks!
Description - pretty much every other dashboarding solution allows uploading images in a dashboard whereas in Analysis Workspace, you must provide an image URL which is a major issue for many of my clients. Why is this feature important to you - it is a standard feature in pretty much all other dashboarding solutions, even the free ones like Looker Studio. How would you like the feature to work - have a drop zone or dedicated image upload button to upload the image on Adobe servers where they stay connected to the current dashboard and get removed once the dashboard is deleted. Current Behaviour - you must have your own image hosting, worst case use internet service like imgur to get an image URL that can be used Side note: I would add a screenshot here but the functionality currently seems broken.
We would like the ability to add another decision at the task/document level to streamline our process. We use automated workflows for decisions. Having only two decision options: approval or rejection, causes the team to have additional conversations (and delays) which a button for Approved with Changes would solve.
Description - Imagine you're working on a project and everyone needs to okay the work at different steps. But once a step is done, it'd be great if there was a way for either the person in charge or the users to decide, "Hey, we don't need to get this person's okay for the next steps." This would make things a lot smoother and faster. Why is this feature important to you - We want to quickly see who's approved the proof at different stages without the need for all approvers to approve again if there's a new version. How would you like the feature to work - Often new versions are only needed by current proofs stage participants. Example: content teams has looked over a proof and decided it's fine. We only need design input after that. After design input, we need leadership approval, but we don't want to both content/design at this stage. I propose a stage setting that says, "Approvals not needed for this stage after current version is fully approved" or something like that. Current Behaviour - I know there's a work around to remove close stages after they're complete, knowing that previous versions will capture their decisions. But it's be nice to have an easier way to see those approvals without having to sift through multiple versions.
We would like the ability to post Figma URLs as an interactive review. We can do this somewhat as an interactive review, but would love to see added functionality:Stay connected through SSO to Figma (via the WF viewer) so you don't have to log to Figma in every time you open an interactive proof.Push the annotations from WF to the Figma page so the designer can reference them directly in Figma when working on the changes. Likewise, push resolved status back into WF so that comments show as resolved in WF.Export PDFs directly from Figma into WF to kick off a review (as opposed to downloading from Figma and uploading back into WF).
Description - Current Target APIs for List Offers and Creating Offers - do not return folders that offers belong to - allow creating Offer-folders - pushing new offers created using APIs into existing folders. Why is this feature important to you - We use APIs extensively to manage and create offers. Folders provide a very clean way to organise offers, especially for accounts with hundreds of offers. Having above capabilities will reduce a lot of manual work thats currently required to move API-created-offers to Offer-folders. How would you like the feature to work - 1. Extend the current Offer-list API (https://developers.adobetarget.com/api/#list-offers) to return the Offer-folder name/id an offer belongs to 2. Extend the current Create-Offer API (https://developers.adobetarget.com/api/#create-offer) to allow referring to the Offer-folder 3. Create a set of new APIs to fetch the list of Offer-folders and create new folders Current Behaviour - Offer-folders are available just under the Target UI.
How would you like the feature to work - It would be good to add the custom code only when the activity/experience is displayed.Current Behaviour - At the moment custom code is running even when the activity is not displayed due to lower priority. Here are some related threads.https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/adobe-target-custom-code-is-running-for-hidden-activity-due-to/td-p/661650
Description -Introducing logs that enable the validation of the status and invocation times of Target APIs. With regards to batchUpdate, these logs not only provide insight into the status and timing of the service invocation, but also furnish additional details concerning the completion (or error) of updating profiles and attributes. Why is this feature important to you -It would enhance visibility into response times and the status of all Target calls, thereby facilitating better management and analysis of them.
Most of our mobile pages are AMP pages. It would be of vital importance for us, if we want to continue using Adobe Target, to implement it on these pages.We have thought about some possibilities: rawbox or make an Adobe Target Server Side implementation and encapsulate it to follow this pattern https://amp.dev/documentation/guides-and-tutorials/develop/interactivity/remote-dataBut the implementation, on our side, is very complex. If there was a simple way like in App, it would be very useful. This is our comment in the community: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/adobe-target-implementation-on-amp-accelerated-mobile-pages/m-p/652735#M10237
In order to effectively link email marketing campaigns to website KPIs such as visits, pageviews, etc., the one parameter that makes this analysis possible is a "Sent Date" field for the email campaigns. Case in point, if one launches an email campaign on a particular day and there is a corresponding peak in web activity that same day such as an increase in visits, then we can attribute that increased web activity to the email.However, I wish when I exported email performance reports from Marketo, that a "Sent Date" field could be associated with emails that are sent 1 time such as those you see with programs and streams. I am not too concerned about automatic email notifications that result from form fill outs for example but just those emails that are indeed campaigns. Through analysis done either through spreadsheets or business intelligence tools such as Tableau, one can link all of the information together to show campaign-specific impact on website analytics just by having the email sent date and the Google Analytics activity date. Without the email sent date though, there is no chance to link the data, aside from manually creating a column in your spreadsheet and entering the date yourself.
Description - Display document version to the attachments section on the board and include the document activity log to the general issue activity log Why is this feature important to you - user experience, this feature would increase the visibility to the updates that happened on the documents and will significantly reduce the time spent on trying to find the updatesHow would you like the feature to work1. Document version (V1, V2, etc) displayed in the attachment section 2. List contributors of the document3. Include the document activity log to the overall issue/task activity log that is grabbed and displayed on the boardCurrent Behaviour - There is no way of identifying whether the document has more than one version
One area that I find very difficult to manage is following up on Comments I have made to make sure I receive a response. I would like a way to set my Comments with a Status and set a follow-up date, so I could create a report that would show me Comments that I want to watch to make sure someone replies and receive a notification that my Comment is set to follow-up. This feature would allow me to stop using a different tool, such as Outlook, to monitor project updates.
We would like to see the Proof Approval report have a filter for Project Status. This would make it easier for users to sort through their proofs because, in our case, we would set the project status equal to "current" so that our users are only seeing proofs associated with projects with the "current" status. Without this filter, our reports are displaying all of the proofs that a user has submitted and for some users it is an extensive amount of proofs to sort through.
Description - I would like to have all Alerts viewable to everyone with the ability to share them in the same way as Workspaces (Edit and Copy).Why is this feature important to you - Prevents duplication, management of alerts across the team rather than a single POC, allows for everyone to see what is being monitoredHow would you like the feature to work - I would allow all alerts to be visible by all analysts with the ability to have them be shared in an Edit, Copy, View format like workspaces.Current Behaviour - Alerts are not visible to anyone but the owner even if the analyst has the alert sent to them.
Right now, if you click "Timesheet" in the navigation menu, you will enter your current timesheet by default, but it is not obvious where the rest of the previous timesheets live. "Back to Timesheets" is not obvious, and the extra step doesn't make a lot of sense if you are a timesheet approver or plan on submitting last week's timesheet on Monday. Please revamp the interface for the Timesheet area to be more navigable and user friendly.
Description - In the Sequential Segment option (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/analytics/components/segmentation/segmentation-workflow/seg-sequential-build.html?lang=en#build-time-within-and-time-after-segments) there is the ability to have the segment include data that happened before or happened after. Could another option be added to only include data from hits that happen DURING the sequence. For example, if we wanted to see a "add item to cart" event that happens after someone clicks on the "sale" custom link, we could set the sequence and say "after sequence" and it would capture the "add item" event from clicking on the link but then include all "add item to cart" events after that sequence as well. If we wanted to see only the item that was added after that custom link click, we would not be able to. Why is this feature important to you - We test a lot of updates to the app that is supposed to increase engagement but we don't have the ability to just see the events from someone who used the new feature. How would you like the feature to work - A fourth option in the dropdown that is for "only during sequence". Current Behaviour - This option is not available.
When downloading a Template from classification importer, it would be nice if a blank row was inserted in line 4, as is expected when you upload back into Adobe.Something like##SC Header####SC Header Two##Key Column1 Column2 Key1 Col1Data1 Col2Data2Key2 Col1Data2 Col2Data2It might help new users from having to hunt for the "Troubleshooting classifications" article which mentions the issue 3/4 down the page
Description - WF widget installed in Salesforce Lightning is having issues while doing selections in custom form Why is this feature important to you - Freeman has 1500 + users who use WF widget in Salesfroce. This issue is resulting in bad user experience since they have to scroll through the entire widget whenever they make any selection in custom form.How would you like the feature to work - The selection in custom form within the WF widget should stick and remain in same place within UI.Current Behaviour - Freeman utilizes WF widget which is installed in Salesforce Lightning. This widget is extensively used to submit resource request ( there are various custom forms for the same) User has an option to select various check boxes / radio button / enter text etc. On each such selection, Widget UI rolls upto to the top of the screen and user needs to scroll down again to continue working where he left off. This results in break in flow of work and bad user experience. Also attaching short video for everyones reference.
Some of our reports need to be filtered to only show data from members who belong to a certain Team. Only Home Team is available as a filter in reporting, so, in order for a person's data to display on a report, we have to make sure we remember to make their Home Team match the filter on the Report. This works OK, but it means that if a person belongs to more than 1 team, they can only show up on 1 report that is filtered by Home Team. If we could select Other Teams as a filter on a report, then we wouldn't have to remember to make the report filter match their home team, and we could also have the person appear on all of the reports that are filtered by Team.
Our project managers would benefit if they could have a calendar view of the approved documents, with the preview of the material based on a publish date and time. The user could easily view what material should be published on which date and time planned.
Description - It's great that Microsoft documents like Word, PPT, etc. are supported by Workfront's Proofing tool. We have used this tool with MS products for roughly 10 years. However, Google Documents like Docs and Slides are not supported with the proofing tool. What this means is when someone includes a Google Doc in their Workfront request/issue, it cannot be converted to a proof by Workfront. This allows for the document to continually be revised without knowledge from those using Workfront or going back to review a document later. Why is this feature important - As a financial institution using Workfront as a marketing request queue and compliance approval workflow, it's extremely important that the Google Document being added to Workfront does not change while the various teams are reviewing and providing their approvals. Often our reviewing teams will reject and/or provide edits to a client using the proofing tool which allows marketing the opportunity to completely overhaul the document or simply make small edits. It depends on the feedback given from the reviewing team. Once approved, we need the proofing tool to freeze that document in time so that regardless of what the document owner is doing in Google Docs, it is clearly documented what was approved by compliance. This matters when government regulators come in to audit various marketing campaigns and assets. Up until this point, we have used Microsoft products which are all supported by the proofing tool. Google is not, and our entire organization has transitioned to using the Google suite of products.Current Behaviour and workaround - What this means is that we have to institute a cumbersome work around until this is working for Google Docs. Our teams will have to download their Google document as a pdf then upload it to Workfront so that the proofing tool can function as intended. This is not sustainable over time.We need Workfront's proofing tool to support Google documents.
the pre-defined date ranges as well as own date ranges are always relative to the current date. scenarioi want a table with visits for each month with to cols: first is value of visitors of current month, 2nd is the change to the previous month.solutioni need a date range which is truly "last month" compared to the month item in a table. this way i could just add two cols to the table, 1st only visits, 2nd visits and time range
When I'm running a report in Analysis Workspace (dimensions as rows and metrics as columns), is it possible to copy ONLY the dimension of a table, and not the entire row? It seems I can select individual metric values, but not individual dimension values.I'm constantly having to delete the tab and metric values when pasting into other contexts. For example:Copying URLs into the browser's address bar - I always end up pulling the trigger before "cleaning up" my paste and generating 404s this wayCopying campaign IDs and pasting into a third party toolCopying individual values and pasting into a dimension filter to narrow in on some data..and so on. I don't JUST copy to paste into Excel, since I do a lot of integration work, investigation into outlier data, and bespoke analysis.
I'm new to Adobe Analytics, currently migrating from Webtrends.Only very few things work better in Webtrends than in Adobe.But the one feature that have surprised me most, not being available in Adobe is the option to Create a Dimension.In Workspace i can create a metric, a segment and a date range. But not a dimension - something i would see as one of the most essential thing.My idea is to add a feature where i can create a dimension, in the same way as i would create a segment or a Metric.It would work in the exact same way as when i'm creating a segment.I select "+ New" and select "Create Dimension".I then select a other Dimension, as the basic for the new one, and add it to the definitionA new Dimension will in most cases be a subset of a existing Dimension.So in the most simple solution i would do a condition on the dimension it self, and that it.But it can also be a case where i want to define the sub-set on the relation to a other dimension or metric,A basic example below - it's essential a segment on a dimension, but where i can use it as a new dimension, and see the values form the original dimension. This is something i have been used to do in Webtrends. I know the same can be done with Dimensions and Segments, but it would be better with a option to create Dimensions.I't seems like the entire UI is in place for this, so i assume it is a technical limitations that prevent this from being made.But i hope it's on the roadmap.
Description - Enable a module that can call another scenario directlyWhy is this feature important to you - This would enable a more modular design of our workflow by having common functionality in one scenario that can be called by other scenarios without having to duplicate the functionality across all of the scenarios.How would you like the feature to work - A simple module that provides the input of the scenario name to call and the inputs to pass.Current Behaviour - Have to code custom webhooks to call scenarios
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
