Build better products with our product team
Description - VEC's Custom code sections allows Adobe Target users to add HTML code to amend the web experiences. However, it lacks integration with Offers library which means users have to copy-paste similar code multiple times. Why is this feature important to you - This feature brings reusability and reduces chances of error while copy-pasting the code. Seasoned JavaScript developers may provide the templatised code and marketers may refer to it to save time and avoid errors. We use many templates and having this feature will help in accelerating adoption of personalisation. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to Form based composer, there should be an option to select existing offers from the Offers library Current Behaviour - There's no option to use existing Offers library in the VEC unless we copy-paste. However similar functionality is available in Form based composer. Regards Rajneesh
Description - Customize labels of the report prompts and charts Why is this feature important to you - Currently the prompts and chart fields are showing labels that are defined by the system and do not mean anything to the user seeing them on the reports. Having the ability to add custom labels (like they are defined in the view of the reports) would make reports more meaningful to the users viewing them. How would you like the feature to work - It would be great to have the option to define custom labels for the prompts and fields that show on charts (some of which are already customized through View in the report). Current Behaviour - Currently the prompts and charts are showing labels that are defined by the system and do not mean anything to the user seeing them on the reports.
How would you like the feature to work - Ability to get announcement screenshots/files attached to the email as people don’t realise they are there as they see no attachments in the announcement email they receive.Current Behaviour - Currently, the email announcement does not attach the attachment in the email and users are required to navigate the Workfront Announcement page to view the attachment.
Description & Why is this feature important to you - We are currently unable to standardise and manage the user's email event Daily and Instant notifications correctly. (Example: we do not require Daily Digest notification for all users as it is repetitive, we do not have an option to manage these unless manually update users to disable it). Even if we enable the Event Notification at the Global (setup) or group level, it still does not enable/disable the email Daily or Instant notifications correctly. As Workfront mentioned they have preset these Daily and Instant notifications to the Most Desirable User Experience. How would you like the feature to work - As part of an Enterprise Solution, we would expect it to be allowed to: Option to Manage (Enable or Disable) users' Daily Digest Notification and Instant Notification at the Global Preference (Setup) area or Group Level. Current Behaviour - Currently, we can only manage the instant and daily notifications by editing the user's account. We have 10000+ users in our instance and wouldn't want to manually every time as Bulk updating users (manual intervention) is not a proper way to manage these as always human errors. FYI: Event if we enable the Event Notification at the Global (setup) or group level, it does not automatically enable the instant or daily notification! Workfront mentioned they have defined this notification "Based on user feedback previously, we found that having these defaulted the way they are generated the most desirable user experience." As per the product team feedback."
Description - Currently if a user sorts the task list by something other than task number, the tools for indenting/outdenting and adding tasks above/below the line become inaccessible. Instead of making them inaccessible, show those tools and pop up error messages telling the user the task list needs to be sorted by task number to use this feature and give them a button to immediately resort their task list by task number to proceed. Why is this feature important to you - Users are constantly sorting their list by another column, not realizing this, and then getting extremely frustrated when they cannot find the indent/outdent and add task above/below tools. I have users run into this issue pretty consistently. How would you like the feature to work - It would be a more user friendly approach to instead show the user the tools and tell them that they can't use them without re-sorting their task list by task number. It would be even better if you could also give them the option to do that re-sort in the error pop up so they can proceed. Current Behaviour - The tools for indent/outdent and adding task above/below just disappear and cannot be found. They do not indicate why they disappeared or what step needs to be taken to fix the issue.
Template Layouts and creating Request Queues are not in Workfront audit log actions.How about providing an UI in workfront where system admins can add new audit log actions as per business requirements.
Description - Our team would like the ability to relate/link/associate issue/request to another request/issue. We currently have requests in our queues which are assigned to teams, but as some come through as issues and others requests, the teams are finding it difficult to see all requests in one view. Our team have a requirement to link requests so that ad-hoc work coming into our work queues can be grouped together, without creating a project.Why is this feature important to you - We had this feature with our previous in-house tool and it was a simple way of connecting queue requests so that teammates had visibility to related tasks/activity so it could be assigned to one person to action at the same time, makng the workflow more efficient.How would you like the feature to work - Requests process: create an additional field that enables a user to input a request ID that is associated with the new request. Ability to add at the point a request is raised or add in once submitted. Tickets could be related by ID's or tags. I have attached a screenshot as an example. Current Behaviour - There isn't currently a way to relate/link requests in this way.
Description - when right clicking on a table we're able to compare time periods. A percent change is provided. We'd like to see a volume change # in addition to % change. Why is this feature important to you - just percentages doesn't tell the whole storyHow would you like the feature to work - right click and when the period over period trend pops in, give us a number in the result in addition to %Current Behaviour - right click on table and when the trend pops in, we only see %
Is it possible to open the file formats supported in the comments / updates within Workfront so team members are also able to share excel, pdf, etc directly in a comment for reference? I am aware a current workaround would be to attach at the project or task level, but that takes the user out of the comment view adding on additional and unnecessary clicks.
Description – Have the ability to create sub status’s on requests and tasks.Why is this feature important to you – Currently you can create a status’s but we don’t want to create hundreds of status’s so if we could have a editable sub status. For example if we cancel a request we would like to be able to have a sub status of why it was cancelled ( Not a high priority, User no longer needs, etc) As then we can run reports off the status and sub status. As of now if we cancel a request, then six months from now we run a report the end users are like why was this request cancelled.Current Behavior – We can set up custom status’s, but then have to add a custom form with a custom field and the users have to go into the custom form and update that field.
Description - When a resource is scheduled off in the WF Calendar, but has a shared task , the Workload Balancer ignores the time off and allocates hours over PTO, showing overageWhy is this feature important to you - It looks as if work is being left unassigned and neglected while a resource is outHow would you like the feature to work - Would like the resource who's hours are allocating over time off to ignore those days and calculate the duration without their hours on those days.Current Behaviour - Allocates those hours over the entire duration, ignoring PTO, but only on SHARED tasks.
Description - I am totally thrilled about the new feature of being able to add external lookup fields to custom forms to call external APIs.I would love to be able to differ between the shown option, which comes from one JSON path (like $.data[*].name) and the value which is finally saved (like from $.data[*].id) as this is also possible using general dropdown fields.Why is this feature important to you - There often is a difference between the shown option and the value in behind on dropdown fields.How would you like the feature to work - similar to general dropdown fieldsCurrent Behaviour - only one JSON path possible
Description - As it stands, Adobe Data Feeds dropped their data as zipped TSV files. Header information is located in a separate location and must be joined to Hit Data files in order to get the column to header mapping. Why is this feature important to you - In the space of "big-data", Parquet is becoming universal format. Additionally, it seems unnecessary to have the "schema" abstracted from hit data files. How would you like the feature to work - In the option when creating a new data feed in the UI, Parquet should be an option. Even JSON format is acceptable. Current Behaviour - Only TSV is offered and columnar information is stored in a different file
As a larger share of internet traffic shifts towards IPv6 addresses it is crucial that Adobe supports modern data collection methods.This issue was raised nearly three years ago and in that time it appears the documentation has consistently referenced "Adobe plans to support IPv6 addresses in the future. However, a target date has not been released yet".https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/anyone-know-when-ipv6-will-be-supported-in-adobe-analytics/qaq-p/284903One specific use case is that many analytics customers integrate with mParticle. mParticle forwards the users IP address to Adobe Analytics, and as many as 60% of site visitors end up being allocated to mParticle's AWS server locations as the users forwarded IP address is a v6 format rather than v4.
Description - it would be great to have a row at the bottom of the Expenses page that totals up the costs.Why is this feature important to you - So I dont have to go to the Project summary to look at the totals.How would you like the feature to work - sum up the expenses and show at the bottom of the page or put a field at the top that sums up the totals.Current Behaviour - No total available on the Expenses Page
Scheduling option to activate triggers (can schedule expiration but not activation!) 'Fills out form' filter - badly need a 'time' constraint e.g fills out form between these time parameters For event channels we don't have 'recipient time zone' option but we do for email campaigns eg newsletters! its more important for events! Additional calendar file options than just ICS. Send all assets in one go to your email for testing. Rather than having to send individually!
General thought/feedback for Adobe Workfront-for L&C/proofing queues, I wish there was a box we could check that stated "make the same proof due at the same time and date for all steps" and automatically applied for each group Right now you have to manually set the dates instead of allowing them to all be the same. Tedious and time consuming.
It would be nice if I could set up different “levels” of aggregator functions / expressions. I have run into this problem a couple of times but especially when trying to get correct percentages but my example will be simple. I am trying to create a report to look at Users and their hours. User YTD Hours is a set number that will be the same in base row. (non grouping row)In the 1st grouping, I need the aggregator to MAX so I can see the correct number of hours for the Owner.In the 2nd grouping, I need the aggregator to SUM so I can see the correct number of hours that total for two of the Owners.In the 3rd grouping, I need to the aggregator to SUM again so I can see the total number of hours on a company level. My Idea: Set them up like the groupings. Make the last aggregator function the same for the next groupings if no more is needed or written in.Example:aggregator.0.function=MAXaggregator.0.valuefield=aggregator.0.valueformat=aggregator.1.function=SUMaggregator.1.valuefield=aggregator.1.valueformat=aggregator.2.function=SUMaggregator.2.valuefield= (Since this would be the same as previous aggregator function, it would not need to be written)aggregator.2.valueformat=
Description - Would like to be able to identify the Task Status (e.g. In-Progress) via the Workload Balancer.Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes it looks like someone has spare capacity, but if we could identify the scheduled task(s) that have not yet been started ,this would give us a better idea if the spare capacity was still available.How would you like the feature to work - Either an icon, flag or colour on the task within the WLB would indicate the status.Current Behaviour - You can't see the task status, only the project status colour via settings (as shown below).
Request that project managers could move time to correct task instead of rejecting and pushing back on the user. Can we move this process to a one-click approval instead of having to go back in and delete, reenter elsewhere Currently it is multiple screens and clicks
When a user refreshes the schedule or recalculates the timeline, would like the refresh to go back to the row the user was looking at rather than refresh to the top of the page.
Ability to map Marketo Program Set-up fields and Tags (custom) to SFDC Campaigns in both the SFDC Details and Planning sections with automatic updates including: Start Date End Date Program Members (#) Costs
As of now, I am only able to select 1 Variable at a time to edit Privacy Labels. Since Adobe Analytics is set out to have multiple eVars, props and success events. Changing every Data Label for every Variable is going to take me alot of time. I would either like to see a simple upload option - since there is already a download csv option. Or just make it possible to select multiple Variables in the UI.
Description - One of the biggest selling points of Adobe Target to marketers is the ability to greatly reduce IT dependence. One of the most common scenarios I see is marketers who want to limit the number of "impressions" a given offer is displayed to a visitor, aka "suppression logic" such as only show this a maximum of 3 times, but this seems to require writing custom JS in profile scripts, which invites the need for a specialized front-end developer, as most marketers I've seen aren't adept at writing even basic JS.Why is this feature important to you - Because I'm trying to evangelize Adobe Target as best in class to marketers, but it's difficult when even basic asks require JS to set up.How would you like the feature to work - In the experience tab there could be a dropdown to limit the number of impressions a given experience can be presented to the same visitorCurrent Behaviour - You need to write a custom profile script or publish an Analytics segment to the cloud, but there is a limit of just 75 of those allowed, so that's a hard sell to marketers to use that option for each activity running in Target.
We have always had the need to tie expenses to our Workfront projects, but have found the functionality to be lacking. In particular, our organizational and governance structure requires the support of multiple teams throughout the budgeting/invoicing/payment process and no single person or team truly owns the overall process. It is also important to note, that our finance/accounting teams use a different software, so we are looking at integrations between the tools. Until then, we would like the ability to more thoroughly track our invoice process within our work management tool so everything is in one place. Ideally, we would like expenses to be more closely integrated with requests/issues. If an expense could be submitted like an issue, it would allow us to: Provide a space for documents to be attached Attach approval processes and routing rules Associate statuses with the expense/invoice process Convert (if necessary) into an expense line item (like requests being converted to tasks); we don't actually need the conversion, but we would want these issues/requests to appear under the expenses tab like they do currently. Additional features that we would find beneficial, with or without the scenario outlined above: Being able to attach documents to expenses directly Being able to attach approval processes and/or routing rules to expenses directly Please upvote these related ideas in various stages throughout the Workfront community: Attach an approval flow to an Expense on the 'Expe... - Adobe Experience League Community - 526885 Enable expense approval functionality - Adobe Experience League Community - 519532 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 505933 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 505683 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 483233 Please upvote if you haven't already - Adobe Experience League Community - 484457 The only valuable solution I found in my search is to integrate with a tool outside of Adobe Workfront: Recommendation for Expense Report software - Adobe Experience League Community - 497330
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
