Build better products with our product team
It would be nice if I could set up different “levels” of aggregator functions / expressions. I have run into this problem a couple of times but especially when trying to get correct percentages but my example will be simple. I am trying to create a report to look at Users and their hours. User YTD Hours is a set number that will be the same in base row. (non grouping row)In the 1st grouping, I need the aggregator to MAX so I can see the correct number of hours for the Owner.In the 2nd grouping, I need the aggregator to SUM so I can see the correct number of hours that total for two of the Owners.In the 3rd grouping, I need to the aggregator to SUM again so I can see the total number of hours on a company level. My Idea: Set them up like the groupings. Make the last aggregator function the same for the next groupings if no more is needed or written in.Example:aggregator.0.function=MAXaggregator.0.valuefield=aggregator.0.valueformat=aggregator.1.function=SUMaggregator.1.valuefield=aggregator.1.valueformat=aggregator.2.function=SUMaggregator.2.valuefield= (Since this would be the same as previous aggregator function, it would not need to be written)aggregator.2.valueformat=
Description - Would like to be able to identify the Task Status (e.g. In-Progress) via the Workload Balancer.Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes it looks like someone has spare capacity, but if we could identify the scheduled task(s) that have not yet been started ,this would give us a better idea if the spare capacity was still available.How would you like the feature to work - Either an icon, flag or colour on the task within the WLB would indicate the status.Current Behaviour - You can't see the task status, only the project status colour via settings (as shown below).
Request that project managers could move time to correct task instead of rejecting and pushing back on the user. Can we move this process to a one-click approval instead of having to go back in and delete, reenter elsewhere Currently it is multiple screens and clicks
When a user refreshes the schedule or recalculates the timeline, would like the refresh to go back to the row the user was looking at rather than refresh to the top of the page.
Ability to map Marketo Program Set-up fields and Tags (custom) to SFDC Campaigns in both the SFDC Details and Planning sections with automatic updates including: Start Date End Date Program Members (#) Costs
As of now, I am only able to select 1 Variable at a time to edit Privacy Labels. Since Adobe Analytics is set out to have multiple eVars, props and success events. Changing every Data Label for every Variable is going to take me alot of time. I would either like to see a simple upload option - since there is already a download csv option. Or just make it possible to select multiple Variables in the UI.
Description - One of the biggest selling points of Adobe Target to marketers is the ability to greatly reduce IT dependence. One of the most common scenarios I see is marketers who want to limit the number of "impressions" a given offer is displayed to a visitor, aka "suppression logic" such as only show this a maximum of 3 times, but this seems to require writing custom JS in profile scripts, which invites the need for a specialized front-end developer, as most marketers I've seen aren't adept at writing even basic JS.Why is this feature important to you - Because I'm trying to evangelize Adobe Target as best in class to marketers, but it's difficult when even basic asks require JS to set up.How would you like the feature to work - In the experience tab there could be a dropdown to limit the number of impressions a given experience can be presented to the same visitorCurrent Behaviour - You need to write a custom profile script or publish an Analytics segment to the cloud, but there is a limit of just 75 of those allowed, so that's a hard sell to marketers to use that option for each activity running in Target.
We have always had the need to tie expenses to our Workfront projects, but have found the functionality to be lacking. In particular, our organizational and governance structure requires the support of multiple teams throughout the budgeting/invoicing/payment process and no single person or team truly owns the overall process. It is also important to note, that our finance/accounting teams use a different software, so we are looking at integrations between the tools. Until then, we would like the ability to more thoroughly track our invoice process within our work management tool so everything is in one place. Ideally, we would like expenses to be more closely integrated with requests/issues. If an expense could be submitted like an issue, it would allow us to: Provide a space for documents to be attached Attach approval processes and routing rules Associate statuses with the expense/invoice process Convert (if necessary) into an expense line item (like requests being converted to tasks); we don't actually need the conversion, but we would want these issues/requests to appear under the expenses tab like they do currently. Additional features that we would find beneficial, with or without the scenario outlined above: Being able to attach documents to expenses directly Being able to attach approval processes and/or routing rules to expenses directly Please upvote these related ideas in various stages throughout the Workfront community: Attach an approval flow to an Expense on the 'Expe... - Adobe Experience League Community - 526885 Enable expense approval functionality - Adobe Experience League Community - 519532 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 505933 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 505683 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 483233 Please upvote if you haven't already - Adobe Experience League Community - 484457 The only valuable solution I found in my search is to integrate with a tool outside of Adobe Workfront: Recommendation for Expense Report software - Adobe Experience League Community - 497330
Please let us add screenshots to comments or updates, as in JIRA. These images do not need to be revision-controlled, like a document, but we need to be able to easily share images within the team, and would prefer to stop using email or OneNote for this purpose.
Description - Would like a better selection of information that can be added to project headers. Specifically, would be very helpful to add "Priority" to the headerWhy is this feature important to you - This is a key piece of information while working on projects, and currently it is very burried in the project details. Having this in the header would make work much more efficient and easier for all our usersHow would you like the feature to work - Ability to add via layout templatesCurrent Behaviour - No ability to add "Priority" to project headers. Information that can be added is very limited.
I'd like the ability to simply set a flag light "inlinediting=no" when I want to turn-off inline editing on a specific column of information.We had to work-around some limitations in Workfront that tied the value of one field to another field so closely that I want to make sure that dependency kicks-off any time someone changes data in the first field (such as doing mock cascading fields). Since this dependency doesn't carry over into to reports I want to force users back to the custom form to make changes. To do THAT I need to be able to disable inline editing for that field.Doing it by leaping into text mode and doing some calculation on the value to stop it from being editable is very kludgy and non-intuitive.
Description - Currently, Workfront cancels automatic resource leveling anytime more than one person is assigned to a task. However, all of the information needed to execute this effectively (e.g., allocation percentages/hours, etc.) is present in Workfront. In many cases, automatic resource leveling is a critical feature because it automatically takes care of numerous, very complicated timeline adjustments that are difficult or impossible to do manually. However, it is unusable in the very common scenario where there are multiple assignees. This idea is to request that resource leveling is not canceled with multiple assignees. I would throw in there also that resource leveling be compatible with the Effort Driven duration type and any other features it is currently not compatible with. Why is this feature important to you - In many cases, automatic resource leveling is a critical feature because it automatically takes care of numerous, very complicated timeline adjustments that are difficult or impossible to do manually. However, it is unusable in the very common scenario where there are multiple assignees.How would you like the feature to work -This idea is to request that resource leveling is not canceled with multiple assignees. I would throw in there also that resource leveling be compatible with the Effort Driven duration type and any other features it is currently not compatible with. No UI changes would be necessary as far as I can see.Current Behaviour - Currently, Workfront cancels automatic resource leveling anytime more than one person is assigned to a task. However, all of the information needed to execute this effectively (e.g., allocation percentages/hours, etc.) is present in Workfront.
Hello All,Profile scripts are code snippets defined within Target using a form of server-side JavaScript. Using Profile Script we're targeting Visitors based on their behavioral information/segment filtering. For Our Client we have created many Profile Scripts to target visitors based on visitor behavior across site. Few times i had mistakenly edited/modified the profile script which is in LIVE and it affected many activities which is in LIVE, for resolving this i had contacted Customer service and they provided me the previous version of script by checking the Adobe Target Server Splunk Log and it took very long time to resolve this and also we can't always do the same to resolve this and few times i had developed the code again from the scratch since those are High Priority Activities. For Avoiding this i'm strongly Suggesting/Recommending here to Add/Include Version/Revision feature to Profile Scripts.Thanks,Charles
Would be useful to get a sense of time spent on our proofs by licensed (Work or greater) and for that time to roll up to the project it is attached. This should be in a way simpler than managing the proof plus the separate task. It should also improve the time tracking for proofs and where it is being applied within the job for better insights into this ongoing pain point. Let me know if I need to rewrite this to be clearer.
Description -In the financial services industry access management has become a critical issue. It would be great to have an easy way to restrict our users from sharing Proofs with non-recognized users. We think we can restrict this somewhat, but once anyone is in the Proof, they can go to the share icon and type in anyone's email address and send a link to the Proof.Current Behaviour - Today anyone tagged in a Proof can share it with anyone, anywhere. That presents a problem when you're trying to control access.
We'd like to have an option in Workfront Fusion to send repeated notifications when a Scenario is made inactive by Workfront Fusion because a connection is no longer valid. When a Scenario is made inactive through the Workfront Fusion platform at this time we may receive one notification that the scenario was set to inactive by Fusion. We encountered a situation recently where a notification was not sent due to a connection error and caused a Fusion Scenario to be down for an extended amount of time. Having the ability to send repeated notifications would ensure minimal downtime the next time a connection is severed unexpectedly.
Hello,Our client is wondering if it is possible to make a snapshot/backup of the configuration within Adobe Analytics overall. Let's say, for example, they change something in the configuration of a report suite. They would like to know if it's possible to revert to a previous state of the configuration.I know that it is not possible for the moment, this is a suggestion for a new feature in future! It will be very helpful.Thank you!
For purposes of coverage, as well as on agency projects and corporate wide initiatives, to have co-(or more) project owners. We would like the ability to add multiple owners, either within the project owner field or as a separate field for additional owners.This would also help us in onboarding our agencies into workfront, since we use the sponsor section to add them to the projects.
Description -For projects that include an approval process, there is no way to create a report that groups projects by the approval stage they currently reside in (stage 1,2,3...etc) or by the user/team assigned as an approver. My users need to have clear visibility only on the projects they need to action/approve. Right now, they only see that on their home page via the "Awaiting my approval" widget- which is not efficient. As someone who intends to leverage the approval process feature in projects, there needs to be a way to create refined reports that can pull the specific data that we need. Why is this feature important to you - Needed for enhanced reportingHow would you like the feature to work - As described aboveCurrent Behaviour - Under the current setup, a report can be created to pull all projects that are "Pending Approval" with a column "Approvers & Status" that shows the approval stage and which team needs to action it. However there is no way to sort or group projects by approval stages or assigned approvers.
DescriptionWhen entering time via a timesheet view, I have the ability to add Notes to the hour entry by clicking the "+ Comment" that appears below the hour. The same mechanism doesn't exist in the "Log Time" view attached to the Tasks Update screen.Timesheet view:Log Time view:Why is this feature important to youFirst, consistency in how the UI works for similar things across the various UI elements/areas. Second, the need to input comments can be required by business processes (and we enforce this via Fusion, for example).How would you like the feature to workJust use the same input component that allows the comment input in both places.Current BehaviorThe Log Time mechanism doesn't take in notes.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This request is about the Content Transfer Tool, which can be improved for insufficient disk cases. Use-case: AMS instance with the S3 Data Store has been prepared for the very first initial extraction. Extraction started with about 400GB asset content. After about 1 hour, it failed. The logs forwarded to the Adobe Support. They noticed the following statement on top of the output.log, see attached zip file : Check Size results: Migration Set size: 381.247 GB Node store size: 2.202 GB Data store size: 379.045 GB Node count: 20,764,479 Free disk space (crx-quickstart dir): 24.398 GB You do not have enough disk space in the crx-quickstart subdirectory of the source AEM instance to perform this extraction. You need to increase disk space by 51.486 GB or reduce the migration set size. Current/Experienced Behavior: CTT tried to run all extraction steps, until a failure occurred for the obvious root cause. Improved/Expected Behavior: The error gets logged with the prefix ERROR and the extraction halts immediately. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AMS Author - 6.5.19. CTT Version : 3.0.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Volkswagen Group Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Ability to notify when an audience activation (dataflow) expires. Why is this feature important to you - Currently when a segment has been activated to a destination there is an end date placed upon the activation. When the end date of the activation dataflow a notification is not present to the CDP system and or user who has setup the activation.How would you like the feature to work - Before the dataflow is end date of the audience is set to expire, please send out a notification via alert and or email notifications.Current Behaviour - An audience can be activated to a batch destination, but an end date is specified. There is not an ability to be notified when an dataflow activation is in range of its end date.
Need to have the ability to print summary of all comments that appear in the Updates tab on a project.
Description - I would love to able to set a name as well as a label for sectionsWhy is this feature important to you - This would help to be able to differentiate between sections used in different contexts. Sometimes the name of a section repeats itself what is technically not possible to set up, as it has to be unique. I would prefer an (internal) name, which acts as the unique "primary key".I know, that I can use sections in multiple custom forms, but as described, would like to be able to have more flexibility here. If I use a label in more than one custom form, I am not able to modify the label later only for one custom form without needing to create a new section with the new label name.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to custom fields, where we have a name, which is used internally and a label, which is the display name.Current Behaviour - Only unique display names possible
I am looking for a way to create a View Only permission for Analysis Workspace. Don't want users to be able to create any new Projects, just to view the Projects shared with them.If all users can access Adobe Workspace and create their own Projects, it appears that all data within Adobe is easily accessible to all users with an account. Let say that there are specific reports and information that the company only want to share with a limited group of people. If all users are able to create their own projects and reports, there is a risk that they will replicate reports and view information that is not intended for them. It is very important that I can make a clear separation within the workspace between users who can create projects/reports and users who only have read rights to projects and therefore cannot create their own projects/reports.There are workarounds available at the project level: "share with anyone" method or share and schedule project”. This will prevent users from editing or making updates to the project while allowing them to view its contents. For this, they do not even need access to the product.But these methods, unfortunately posed a significant security risk, as it made company reports accessible to all individuals inside and outside the company. This is too risky for sensitive data.In conclusion, can you take into consideration the development of a new feature for Adobe Analytics, that allow the client to be able to give view only rights to a specific user/group of users?Thank you in advance.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
