Build better products with our product team
Ability to map Marketo Program Set-up fields and Tags (custom) to SFDC Campaigns in both the SFDC Details and Planning sections with automatic updates including: Start Date End Date Program Members (#) Costs
Description - One of the biggest selling points of Adobe Target to marketers is the ability to greatly reduce IT dependence. One of the most common scenarios I see is marketers who want to limit the number of "impressions" a given offer is displayed to a visitor, aka "suppression logic" such as only show this a maximum of 3 times, but this seems to require writing custom JS in profile scripts, which invites the need for a specialized front-end developer, as most marketers I've seen aren't adept at writing even basic JS.Why is this feature important to you - Because I'm trying to evangelize Adobe Target as best in class to marketers, but it's difficult when even basic asks require JS to set up.How would you like the feature to work - In the experience tab there could be a dropdown to limit the number of impressions a given experience can be presented to the same visitorCurrent Behaviour - You need to write a custom profile script or publish an Analytics segment to the cloud, but there is a limit of just 75 of those allowed, so that's a hard sell to marketers to use that option for each activity running in Target.
We have always had the need to tie expenses to our Workfront projects, but have found the functionality to be lacking. In particular, our organizational and governance structure requires the support of multiple teams throughout the budgeting/invoicing/payment process and no single person or team truly owns the overall process. It is also important to note, that our finance/accounting teams use a different software, so we are looking at integrations between the tools. Until then, we would like the ability to more thoroughly track our invoice process within our work management tool so everything is in one place. Ideally, we would like expenses to be more closely integrated with requests/issues. If an expense could be submitted like an issue, it would allow us to: Provide a space for documents to be attached Attach approval processes and routing rules Associate statuses with the expense/invoice process Convert (if necessary) into an expense line item (like requests being converted to tasks); we don't actually need the conversion, but we would want these issues/requests to appear under the expenses tab like they do currently. Additional features that we would find beneficial, with or without the scenario outlined above: Being able to attach documents to expenses directly Being able to attach approval processes and/or routing rules to expenses directly Please upvote these related ideas in various stages throughout the Workfront community: Attach an approval flow to an Expense on the 'Expe... - Adobe Experience League Community - 526885 Enable expense approval functionality - Adobe Experience League Community - 519532 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 505933 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 505683 Expense Approvals - Adobe Experience League Community - 483233 Please upvote if you haven't already - Adobe Experience League Community - 484457 The only valuable solution I found in my search is to integrate with a tool outside of Adobe Workfront: Recommendation for Expense Report software - Adobe Experience League Community - 497330
Please let us add screenshots to comments or updates, as in JIRA. These images do not need to be revision-controlled, like a document, but we need to be able to easily share images within the team, and would prefer to stop using email or OneNote for this purpose.
Description - Currently, Workfront cancels automatic resource leveling anytime more than one person is assigned to a task. However, all of the information needed to execute this effectively (e.g., allocation percentages/hours, etc.) is present in Workfront. In many cases, automatic resource leveling is a critical feature because it automatically takes care of numerous, very complicated timeline adjustments that are difficult or impossible to do manually. However, it is unusable in the very common scenario where there are multiple assignees. This idea is to request that resource leveling is not canceled with multiple assignees. I would throw in there also that resource leveling be compatible with the Effort Driven duration type and any other features it is currently not compatible with. Why is this feature important to you - In many cases, automatic resource leveling is a critical feature because it automatically takes care of numerous, very complicated timeline adjustments that are difficult or impossible to do manually. However, it is unusable in the very common scenario where there are multiple assignees.How would you like the feature to work -This idea is to request that resource leveling is not canceled with multiple assignees. I would throw in there also that resource leveling be compatible with the Effort Driven duration type and any other features it is currently not compatible with. No UI changes would be necessary as far as I can see.Current Behaviour - Currently, Workfront cancels automatic resource leveling anytime more than one person is assigned to a task. However, all of the information needed to execute this effectively (e.g., allocation percentages/hours, etc.) is present in Workfront.
Hello All,Profile scripts are code snippets defined within Target using a form of server-side JavaScript. Using Profile Script we're targeting Visitors based on their behavioral information/segment filtering. For Our Client we have created many Profile Scripts to target visitors based on visitor behavior across site. Few times i had mistakenly edited/modified the profile script which is in LIVE and it affected many activities which is in LIVE, for resolving this i had contacted Customer service and they provided me the previous version of script by checking the Adobe Target Server Splunk Log and it took very long time to resolve this and also we can't always do the same to resolve this and few times i had developed the code again from the scratch since those are High Priority Activities. For Avoiding this i'm strongly Suggesting/Recommending here to Add/Include Version/Revision feature to Profile Scripts.Thanks,Charles
Would be useful to get a sense of time spent on our proofs by licensed (Work or greater) and for that time to roll up to the project it is attached. This should be in a way simpler than managing the proof plus the separate task. It should also improve the time tracking for proofs and where it is being applied within the job for better insights into this ongoing pain point. Let me know if I need to rewrite this to be clearer.
We'd like to have an option in Workfront Fusion to send repeated notifications when a Scenario is made inactive by Workfront Fusion because a connection is no longer valid. When a Scenario is made inactive through the Workfront Fusion platform at this time we may receive one notification that the scenario was set to inactive by Fusion. We encountered a situation recently where a notification was not sent due to a connection error and caused a Fusion Scenario to be down for an extended amount of time. Having the ability to send repeated notifications would ensure minimal downtime the next time a connection is severed unexpectedly.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This request is about the Content Transfer Tool, which can be improved for insufficient disk cases. Use-case: AMS instance with the S3 Data Store has been prepared for the very first initial extraction. Extraction started with about 400GB asset content. After about 1 hour, it failed. The logs forwarded to the Adobe Support. They noticed the following statement on top of the output.log, see attached zip file : Check Size results: Migration Set size: 381.247 GB Node store size: 2.202 GB Data store size: 379.045 GB Node count: 20,764,479 Free disk space (crx-quickstart dir): 24.398 GB You do not have enough disk space in the crx-quickstart subdirectory of the source AEM instance to perform this extraction. You need to increase disk space by 51.486 GB or reduce the migration set size. Current/Experienced Behavior: CTT tried to run all extraction steps, until a failure occurred for the obvious root cause. Improved/Expected Behavior: The error gets logged with the prefix ERROR and the extraction halts immediately. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AMS Author - 6.5.19. CTT Version : 3.0.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Volkswagen Group Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Ability to notify when an audience activation (dataflow) expires. Why is this feature important to you - Currently when a segment has been activated to a destination there is an end date placed upon the activation. When the end date of the activation dataflow a notification is not present to the CDP system and or user who has setup the activation.How would you like the feature to work - Before the dataflow is end date of the audience is set to expire, please send out a notification via alert and or email notifications.Current Behaviour - An audience can be activated to a batch destination, but an end date is specified. There is not an ability to be notified when an dataflow activation is in range of its end date.
Description - I would love to able to set a name as well as a label for sectionsWhy is this feature important to you - This would help to be able to differentiate between sections used in different contexts. Sometimes the name of a section repeats itself what is technically not possible to set up, as it has to be unique. I would prefer an (internal) name, which acts as the unique "primary key".I know, that I can use sections in multiple custom forms, but as described, would like to be able to have more flexibility here. If I use a label in more than one custom form, I am not able to modify the label later only for one custom form without needing to create a new section with the new label name.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to custom fields, where we have a name, which is used internally and a label, which is the display name.Current Behaviour - Only unique display names possible
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.