Build better products with our product team
Please let us add screenshots to comments or updates, as in JIRA. These images do not need to be revision-controlled, like a document, but we need to be able to easily share images within the team, and would prefer to stop using email or OneNote for this purpose.
Description - Would like a better selection of information that can be added to project headers. Specifically, would be very helpful to add "Priority" to the headerWhy is this feature important to you - This is a key piece of information while working on projects, and currently it is very burried in the project details. Having this in the header would make work much more efficient and easier for all our usersHow would you like the feature to work - Ability to add via layout templatesCurrent Behaviour - No ability to add "Priority" to project headers. Information that can be added is very limited.
I'd like the ability to simply set a flag light "inlinediting=no" when I want to turn-off inline editing on a specific column of information.We had to work-around some limitations in Workfront that tied the value of one field to another field so closely that I want to make sure that dependency kicks-off any time someone changes data in the first field (such as doing mock cascading fields). Since this dependency doesn't carry over into to reports I want to force users back to the custom form to make changes. To do THAT I need to be able to disable inline editing for that field.Doing it by leaping into text mode and doing some calculation on the value to stop it from being editable is very kludgy and non-intuitive.
Description - Currently, Workfront cancels automatic resource leveling anytime more than one person is assigned to a task. However, all of the information needed to execute this effectively (e.g., allocation percentages/hours, etc.) is present in Workfront. In many cases, automatic resource leveling is a critical feature because it automatically takes care of numerous, very complicated timeline adjustments that are difficult or impossible to do manually. However, it is unusable in the very common scenario where there are multiple assignees. This idea is to request that resource leveling is not canceled with multiple assignees. I would throw in there also that resource leveling be compatible with the Effort Driven duration type and any other features it is currently not compatible with. Why is this feature important to you - In many cases, automatic resource leveling is a critical feature because it automatically takes care of numerous, very complicated timeline adjustments that are difficult or impossible to do manually. However, it is unusable in the very common scenario where there are multiple assignees.How would you like the feature to work -This idea is to request that resource leveling is not canceled with multiple assignees. I would throw in there also that resource leveling be compatible with the Effort Driven duration type and any other features it is currently not compatible with. No UI changes would be necessary as far as I can see.Current Behaviour - Currently, Workfront cancels automatic resource leveling anytime more than one person is assigned to a task. However, all of the information needed to execute this effectively (e.g., allocation percentages/hours, etc.) is present in Workfront.
Hello All,Profile scripts are code snippets defined within Target using a form of server-side JavaScript. Using Profile Script we're targeting Visitors based on their behavioral information/segment filtering. For Our Client we have created many Profile Scripts to target visitors based on visitor behavior across site. Few times i had mistakenly edited/modified the profile script which is in LIVE and it affected many activities which is in LIVE, for resolving this i had contacted Customer service and they provided me the previous version of script by checking the Adobe Target Server Splunk Log and it took very long time to resolve this and also we can't always do the same to resolve this and few times i had developed the code again from the scratch since those are High Priority Activities. For Avoiding this i'm strongly Suggesting/Recommending here to Add/Include Version/Revision feature to Profile Scripts.Thanks,Charles
Would be useful to get a sense of time spent on our proofs by licensed (Work or greater) and for that time to roll up to the project it is attached. This should be in a way simpler than managing the proof plus the separate task. It should also improve the time tracking for proofs and where it is being applied within the job for better insights into this ongoing pain point. Let me know if I need to rewrite this to be clearer.
Description -In the financial services industry access management has become a critical issue. It would be great to have an easy way to restrict our users from sharing Proofs with non-recognized users. We think we can restrict this somewhat, but once anyone is in the Proof, they can go to the share icon and type in anyone's email address and send a link to the Proof.Current Behaviour - Today anyone tagged in a Proof can share it with anyone, anywhere. That presents a problem when you're trying to control access.
We'd like to have an option in Workfront Fusion to send repeated notifications when a Scenario is made inactive by Workfront Fusion because a connection is no longer valid. When a Scenario is made inactive through the Workfront Fusion platform at this time we may receive one notification that the scenario was set to inactive by Fusion. We encountered a situation recently where a notification was not sent due to a connection error and caused a Fusion Scenario to be down for an extended amount of time. Having the ability to send repeated notifications would ensure minimal downtime the next time a connection is severed unexpectedly.
Hello,Our client is wondering if it is possible to make a snapshot/backup of the configuration within Adobe Analytics overall. Let's say, for example, they change something in the configuration of a report suite. They would like to know if it's possible to revert to a previous state of the configuration.I know that it is not possible for the moment, this is a suggestion for a new feature in future! It will be very helpful.Thank you!
For purposes of coverage, as well as on agency projects and corporate wide initiatives, to have co-(or more) project owners. We would like the ability to add multiple owners, either within the project owner field or as a separate field for additional owners.This would also help us in onboarding our agencies into workfront, since we use the sponsor section to add them to the projects.
Description -For projects that include an approval process, there is no way to create a report that groups projects by the approval stage they currently reside in (stage 1,2,3...etc) or by the user/team assigned as an approver. My users need to have clear visibility only on the projects they need to action/approve. Right now, they only see that on their home page via the "Awaiting my approval" widget- which is not efficient. As someone who intends to leverage the approval process feature in projects, there needs to be a way to create refined reports that can pull the specific data that we need. Why is this feature important to you - Needed for enhanced reportingHow would you like the feature to work - As described aboveCurrent Behaviour - Under the current setup, a report can be created to pull all projects that are "Pending Approval" with a column "Approvers & Status" that shows the approval stage and which team needs to action it. However there is no way to sort or group projects by approval stages or assigned approvers.
DescriptionWhen entering time via a timesheet view, I have the ability to add Notes to the hour entry by clicking the "+ Comment" that appears below the hour. The same mechanism doesn't exist in the "Log Time" view attached to the Tasks Update screen.Timesheet view:Log Time view:Why is this feature important to youFirst, consistency in how the UI works for similar things across the various UI elements/areas. Second, the need to input comments can be required by business processes (and we enforce this via Fusion, for example).How would you like the feature to workJust use the same input component that allows the comment input in both places.Current BehaviorThe Log Time mechanism doesn't take in notes.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This request is about the Content Transfer Tool, which can be improved for insufficient disk cases. Use-case: AMS instance with the S3 Data Store has been prepared for the very first initial extraction. Extraction started with about 400GB asset content. After about 1 hour, it failed. The logs forwarded to the Adobe Support. They noticed the following statement on top of the output.log, see attached zip file : Check Size results: Migration Set size: 381.247 GB Node store size: 2.202 GB Data store size: 379.045 GB Node count: 20,764,479 Free disk space (crx-quickstart dir): 24.398 GB You do not have enough disk space in the crx-quickstart subdirectory of the source AEM instance to perform this extraction. You need to increase disk space by 51.486 GB or reduce the migration set size. Current/Experienced Behavior: CTT tried to run all extraction steps, until a failure occurred for the obvious root cause. Improved/Expected Behavior: The error gets logged with the prefix ERROR and the extraction halts immediately. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AMS Author - 6.5.19. CTT Version : 3.0.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Volkswagen Group Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Ability to notify when an audience activation (dataflow) expires. Why is this feature important to you - Currently when a segment has been activated to a destination there is an end date placed upon the activation. When the end date of the activation dataflow a notification is not present to the CDP system and or user who has setup the activation.How would you like the feature to work - Before the dataflow is end date of the audience is set to expire, please send out a notification via alert and or email notifications.Current Behaviour - An audience can be activated to a batch destination, but an end date is specified. There is not an ability to be notified when an dataflow activation is in range of its end date.
Need to have the ability to print summary of all comments that appear in the Updates tab on a project.
Description - I would love to able to set a name as well as a label for sectionsWhy is this feature important to you - This would help to be able to differentiate between sections used in different contexts. Sometimes the name of a section repeats itself what is technically not possible to set up, as it has to be unique. I would prefer an (internal) name, which acts as the unique "primary key".I know, that I can use sections in multiple custom forms, but as described, would like to be able to have more flexibility here. If I use a label in more than one custom form, I am not able to modify the label later only for one custom form without needing to create a new section with the new label name.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to custom fields, where we have a name, which is used internally and a label, which is the display name.Current Behaviour - Only unique display names possible
I am looking for a way to create a View Only permission for Analysis Workspace. Don't want users to be able to create any new Projects, just to view the Projects shared with them.If all users can access Adobe Workspace and create their own Projects, it appears that all data within Adobe is easily accessible to all users with an account. Let say that there are specific reports and information that the company only want to share with a limited group of people. If all users are able to create their own projects and reports, there is a risk that they will replicate reports and view information that is not intended for them. It is very important that I can make a clear separation within the workspace between users who can create projects/reports and users who only have read rights to projects and therefore cannot create their own projects/reports.There are workarounds available at the project level: "share with anyone" method or share and schedule project”. This will prevent users from editing or making updates to the project while allowing them to view its contents. For this, they do not even need access to the product.But these methods, unfortunately posed a significant security risk, as it made company reports accessible to all individuals inside and outside the company. This is too risky for sensitive data.In conclusion, can you take into consideration the development of a new feature for Adobe Analytics, that allow the client to be able to give view only rights to a specific user/group of users?Thank you in advance.
Description - Currently, Web SDK does not support customizing the activity map data getting collected.Why is this feature important to you - The HTML elements being collected may not always be useful for making business decisions. It would be good to have some support for customizing the data being collected just like for implementations based on appMeasurement.js
Description - Would like for the Awaiting My Approval area to be a scroll list like the legacy home is/was versus clicking through pages to see proofsWhy is this feature important to you - This is a concern that users can only see 5 proofs per page and have to continue to click through the pages to see more proofs. This is concerning as we sometimes have projects that have 10+ proofs at the same time and this could leave the door open for users to miss proofs that went to that same project if they are falling onto the next page.How would you like the feature to work - Would like to have scrolling like Legacy Home offered to remove the clicks from users and possible room for users to miss reviewing proofs for projects when there are more than 5+ proofsCurrent Behaviour - Does not exist
Description - Please add the functionality to MANAGE TAGs just like we currently have the ability to manage any number of other Components: Why is this feature important to you - Tags are spread out over MULTIPLE components and can exist in many different incarnations as they can be created by different people. The purpose of Tags is to make searches easier, but if we have the ability to manage them from a central location, we can then standardize and improve them for easier searches and optimize the use of our components and Workspaces. How would you like the feature to work - Just like we can currently manage other components, we need a page for Tags, but in this case, provide filters for all of the relevant Components off to the side.Example:FIRST provide the ability to see ALL tags, listed in ALPHABETICAL order, and then provide a summary of all components they are associated with.It should be possible for us to click on any Tag to view it individually and see every component associated with that tag.We should be able to edit a tag if we open it. For instance, if a tag has been in existence as ALL CAPS, we can rewrite it as lowercase and save it so that it is updated as lowercase across ALL components with which it is associated.This should be an ADMIN-level only functionality. Current Behavior - There is currently no decent way to edit or manage Tags en masse. The only way I have found that works in any kind of fairly decent manner is to select a number of components, and then choose Component Actions, click Tag, and then I can either Edit or Add tags. from that point. OR
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently the Tags Console (/ui#/aem/libs/cq/tagging/gui/content/tags.html) just provides column view. User can not handle large amounts of tags efficiently. To get information about publication status you have to select each tag - there is no way to get it at one glance for all. An option to switch to a list view would help here. Also, sorting option would be automatically be available. Use-case: As a user I want to have a quick overview about my large number of tags in terms of publication status without checking each item. Also, I want to sort by name to find a certain quicker. Current/Experienced Behavior: Today, with only column view being available, no overview is provided. You need to invest a lot of time to get the information you need. Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide a list view for tagging console similar to the one in Sites console. Also, keep an eye on old CUI which supported the editor much better here providing a super overview list!!! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Data Warehouse 알림 이메일은 아래와 같이 비활성화되어 있습니다. 활성화할 수 있는 방법이 있나요?
We would like to see the Risk section updated to include a Consequence column added. Thus allowing the calculation of a risk score by multiplying the Probability and Consequence. We would like to transition our excel based risk tool into Workfront.
Description - Our organization has a need to be able to customize in-app notification like we can do for emailWhy is this feature important to you - We are beginning to do more team based assignments, and the increased in-app notifications that sends out are overwhelming and unnecessary to us. How would you like the feature to work - An added column to the current notification settings to indicate if the notification are wanted in the notification area of Workfront.Current Behaviour - No ability to customize the in-app notification at all. View and manage in-app notifications | Adobe Workfront
Description -In Workfront Fusion, implementing a break/retry module at the scenario level rather than for individual modules within that scenario offers a cleaner and more efficient approach. By applying this method, errors like the common 503 error can trigger automatic retries for the entire scenario, reducing clutter and simplifying management. This centralized approach streamlines error handling and ensures smoother execution of workflows, enhancing overall productivity.Why is this feature important to you - There are times when executions failed due to 503 and didn't got automatic retries as we do not include break/ retry handler for that moduleHow would you like the feature to work - By Implementing some logic for break/ retry logic occuring at scenario levelCurrent Behaviour - Currently I have to set break/ retry handler for each module and there could be a lot of modules in the scenario and implementing for all of them might not be a feasible approach.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
