Build better products with our product team
Description - Would like for the Awaiting My Approval area to be a scroll list like the legacy home is/was versus clicking through pages to see proofsWhy is this feature important to you - This is a concern that users can only see 5 proofs per page and have to continue to click through the pages to see more proofs. This is concerning as we sometimes have projects that have 10+ proofs at the same time and this could leave the door open for users to miss proofs that went to that same project if they are falling onto the next page.How would you like the feature to work - Would like to have scrolling like Legacy Home offered to remove the clicks from users and possible room for users to miss reviewing proofs for projects when there are more than 5+ proofsCurrent Behaviour - Does not exist
Description - Please add the functionality to MANAGE TAGs just like we currently have the ability to manage any number of other Components: Why is this feature important to you - Tags are spread out over MULTIPLE components and can exist in many different incarnations as they can be created by different people. The purpose of Tags is to make searches easier, but if we have the ability to manage them from a central location, we can then standardize and improve them for easier searches and optimize the use of our components and Workspaces. How would you like the feature to work - Just like we can currently manage other components, we need a page for Tags, but in this case, provide filters for all of the relevant Components off to the side.Example:FIRST provide the ability to see ALL tags, listed in ALPHABETICAL order, and then provide a summary of all components they are associated with.It should be possible for us to click on any Tag to view it individually and see every component associated with that tag.We should be able to edit a tag if we open it. For instance, if a tag has been in existence as ALL CAPS, we can rewrite it as lowercase and save it so that it is updated as lowercase across ALL components with which it is associated.This should be an ADMIN-level only functionality. Current Behavior - There is currently no decent way to edit or manage Tags en masse. The only way I have found that works in any kind of fairly decent manner is to select a number of components, and then choose Component Actions, click Tag, and then I can either Edit or Add tags. from that point. OR
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently the Tags Console (/ui#/aem/libs/cq/tagging/gui/content/tags.html) just provides column view. User can not handle large amounts of tags efficiently. To get information about publication status you have to select each tag - there is no way to get it at one glance for all. An option to switch to a list view would help here. Also, sorting option would be automatically be available. Use-case: As a user I want to have a quick overview about my large number of tags in terms of publication status without checking each item. Also, I want to sort by name to find a certain quicker. Current/Experienced Behavior: Today, with only column view being available, no overview is provided. You need to invest a lot of time to get the information you need. Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide a list view for tagging console similar to the one in Sites console. Also, keep an eye on old CUI which supported the editor much better here providing a super overview list!!! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Data Warehouse 알림 이메일은 아래와 같이 비활성화되어 있습니다. 활성화할 수 있는 방법이 있나요?
We would like to see the Risk section updated to include a Consequence column added. Thus allowing the calculation of a risk score by multiplying the Probability and Consequence. We would like to transition our excel based risk tool into Workfront.
Description - Our organization has a need to be able to customize in-app notification like we can do for emailWhy is this feature important to you - We are beginning to do more team based assignments, and the increased in-app notifications that sends out are overwhelming and unnecessary to us. How would you like the feature to work - An added column to the current notification settings to indicate if the notification are wanted in the notification area of Workfront.Current Behaviour - No ability to customize the in-app notification at all. View and manage in-app notifications | Adobe Workfront
Description -In Workfront Fusion, implementing a break/retry module at the scenario level rather than for individual modules within that scenario offers a cleaner and more efficient approach. By applying this method, errors like the common 503 error can trigger automatic retries for the entire scenario, reducing clutter and simplifying management. This centralized approach streamlines error handling and ensures smoother execution of workflows, enhancing overall productivity.Why is this feature important to you - There are times when executions failed due to 503 and didn't got automatic retries as we do not include break/ retry handler for that moduleHow would you like the feature to work - By Implementing some logic for break/ retry logic occuring at scenario levelCurrent Behaviour - Currently I have to set break/ retry handler for each module and there could be a lot of modules in the scenario and implementing for all of them might not be a feasible approach.
Being able to auto-populate the email ID in emails by making a {{email.id}} system token available, similar to {{program.id}} and {campaign.id}}
In the settings of the Workload Balancer you can currently have it not display hour allocations from completed projects (very useful). We would like the same option for projects that are On Hold and Canceled. This would aid tremendously in planning more accurate management of work resources.
My team wish to be able to delegate any proofs, for any user to another user to cover their PTO or illness.We have 100's of users which means a LOT of PTO - with thousands of very time sensitive proofs moving around the system, production just stops when someone is on PTO or sickWe would like any user to be able to specify another user to take care of business for them, while away by specifying a user in the calendar area exactly as you would for tasks/issues - but this time for proofs.Currently production ceases as proofs get stuck with individuals that need to make a decision, this is neither efficient or good for business or good for the Workfronbt brand as this feature is available in many competitor products.
There is no good way for combining various visualisations in a grid layout. Consider the following example: There are two workarounds that are not ideal:1. Resize the visualisation to align them on height. The issue with this approach is that when the project gets viewed on the screens that are narrower that the screen the author used, the visualisations may get displayed with the vertical scroll bar. This happens when the columns are set up with wrapping and the narrow screens make the column name to be displayed in more lines. This often happens with metrics that names are relatively long.2. Add any visualisation in a collapsed mode as a divider. The issue with this approach is that the visualisation has to be name, it does not look good and the users may tend to expand it. ProposalAdd a new Divider visualisation that will look as a thin horizontal line. Maybe with a configuration setting for choosing the colour (including transparent) of the line.
right now, the only way to modify data from the "Activity Map plugin" is changing the source code. According to a recent incident I was told that there is no way to modify the data within processing rules (even if you select to override the values, it basically does not affect the data.I have several situation where the website changed without notice to me and started to collect PII data (especially email addresses). having the option to overwrite the "Activity Map link" if it contains an @ would be super helpful.I suggest to allow "modify Activity Map data" within processing rules to have more options to check (and overwrite) data in certain situations.
Ability to upload an MS Project (XML or MPP) directly into an existing project...not just a new project
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Request to have a feature to purge AEM cloud OOTB CDN cache using cloud manager. Use-case: Currently, we use CURL to clear cache using the x-aem-purge-key provided by Adobe for each environment. Can we have an interface in cloud manager to purge the OOTB CDN cache of URL's/ entire domain for each environment in AEM cloud. Current/Experienced Behavior: Using CURL to purge the cache Improved/Expected Behavior: To have this feature in Cloud Manager Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - It could be helpful the grey grouping box stay at the top of the list of report as a freeze pane, while you scrolling down no matter how far you scroll down.Why is this feature important to you - We use a lot of reports with more than 200 rows in a report so the option of freeze pane will be helpful in order to see all the time the grouping field instead to insert more columns that difficult navigation in report. How would you like the feature to work - Enable per default freeze pane of groupings fields in report in order you scrolling down the groupings appear all the time. Current Behaviour - When you scrolling down in a report of over more than 200 list the groupings fields (see as gray bar at the top of report) disappear when you scrolling down.
Today, the People tab inside of Workfront is pretty useless. The update all option generates a very small text box without formatting and doesn't allow the ability to create a good update to the project team (AND OTHERS that aren't assigned tasks). To create a real communications register I would like to be able to ADD PEOPLE to this tab and select a role for people that ARE NOT assigned a task. Users in Workfront and people with a simple email address.When you "Add People" you should have the option of adding non-Workfront users (even outside parties with an email address) so you can create a communications register. There are many people that may want to be informed about the project without being assigned a task or as the sponsor. Add User would allow adding a non-assigned user with a general role like; Stakeholder, Key Stakeholder, Interested Party (or use the RACI matrix even).Then, when you have selected user or users and do the Update All button it should be a wide screen & Rich Text box to update the users.Future enhancements could even include linking specific elements from within the project (i.e. the Gantt chart view or open issues list or a built-in dashboard tab (i.e. we have a Status Report tab that is a dashboard within every project.Optimal would be when you do the UPDATE ALL option that you see a list of the users and their role (more like a table vs the way it is today).This creates an in-app process for communicating that cannot be done today.
Currently it seems to be impossible to create a custom rolling date range that stays relative to the Panel Date Range when that range has a variable number of days (eg. when panel date range has fixed start and rolling end, or when users change the panel date range). Without this, you cannot create standard comparison periods such as 'Same period previous year'), meaning you have to create a custom rolling range for every new project, and even then, if the user changes the panel date range to something with a different number of days, the custom range gets out of alignment. The easiest way to fix this is to allow custom date ranges to reference the Panel End Date as well as the Panel Start Date. eg. a 'Same Period previous year' date range could be defined as...Start Date = Panel Start Date -365End Date = Panel End Date - 365
There are various "audit" notes that we need to add to objects, such as on timesheets when using Fusion to validate various aspects.  Currently, if we create a NOTE and attach it to the TSHET, the user/owner of that timesheet gets a notification.  These can become very noisy, leading to the user either missing more critical updates or just ignoring all updates and getting frustrated.What would be nice is to have a "doNotNotify" flag that can be passed in during the note/add API call.  The flag could be "false" by default, leaving the existing behavior working as-is.  But the API user can set to "true" if desired, causing the note to be added to the object but no notifications (in system and/or email) being sent.
Description - Allow ability to determine where standard components are used in AA & CJAWhy is this feature important to you - It's often valuable to have insight where components are used. This information is available for segments/filters and calculated metrics but not for other dimensions such as props, eVars, standard metrics, etc.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to filter/segment search or calculated metric search, have the ability to add a used in column in other views such as props, evars, data view component search, etc.Current Behaviour - Currently not available except for segment/filters or calculated metrics (without building API tool)
Description - I need the possibility to add descriptions to classified variables (dimensions). It would appear in the Data Dictionary, what is very helpful esp. for normal users.Why is this feature important to you - My analytics users need to know what specific dimensions mean. Otherwise, they cannot decide on what to use.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to normal dimensions (variables)Current Behaviour - There is no possibility to add any descriptions to classified variables (the field is greyed-out - see screenshots).
It would be very useful to have a "read only" permission for Processing rules.Currently (according to Customer Care) if someone is given permission for processing rules, that permission includes the ability to add or modify processing rules.We have staff who need to see how a processing rule is written, but should absolutely not have the ability to add or modify rules (intentionally or accidentally). For example, the QA team who may need to follow the data flow (page > tag manager > Adobe call > processing rule > vista rule> data feed > etl, for example) to identify the cause of some data issue. Or the dev person who is writing code dependent on what the processing rule will or has done and needs to understand that rule.
It will be helpful to provide annotations to a specific visualization only as this annotation may be only related to a specific area
The current reporting feature simply uses the system field name for the Y axis. In some cases this causes it to display an incorrect axis title. For example, if I create a report to chart the average duration of an issue, the field I would need to use is Planned Duration in Minutes. The aggregate of this field is automatically displayed as days, yet the Y axis uses the field name and displays minutes. Obviously this is not only confusing, but completely wrong. The values being displayed are simply not in the correct unit of measure. The simple fix for this would be to have the chart obey custom field names entered in either advanced or text mode. Attached is a screen shot example of this in action. I am submitting this as a product improvement request, but I think this might just as easily be called a bug.
Example: Dashboard comprised of many reports that all have a prompt for Project Name. Instead of entering the prompt for all of the reports, have a single prompt.
It would be great if we could track when tasks and issues are added to or removed from an iteration. Use cases: 1. Some tasks are added mid-sprint and it would be nice to know which were committed to in sprint planning and which were added later. 2. When tasks aren't completed in a sprint and they carry-over / move to the next sprint it would be nice to easily see and report off of that. 3. If something is moved out of a sprint to the backlog it would be nice to easily see and report off of that. All of this would be helpful in seeing a team's velocity and knowing what their trends are. It's currently difficult to see the life of a task.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
