Build better products with our product team
Description - Allow conditional formatting using more than one column - an AND statement. Why is this feature important to you - This seems like such a basic capability nowadays so I'm baffled as to why this cannot be done. It's important because when you don't include the % complete column it highlights tasks that are complete, which makes no sense. There are tons of other things someone might want to do and without the ability to write this kind of logic the conditional formatting is in my opinion almost useless or close to it. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to create the following conditions and similar conditions: The task planned completion date column is less than today, and the % complete column is less than 100%. Current Behavior - Highlights tasks that are complete, which makes no sense. I may not have worded this in the best manner, but hopefully what I'm suggesting will be understood. I cannot be the first person to ask for this functionality.
Description - Event Expiration based upon eventTypeWhy is this feature important to you - Ability to define an expiration of an event Type will allow for the expansion of dataSet TTL. Only a TTL can be defined at a dataSet level. This creates multiple dataSets with different eventTypes. While this will work for some use cases it not substainable.How would you like the feature to work - Create a TTL for an event Type at a dataSet level and or at the Unified Profile store level.Current Behaviour - Each dataSet can be defined with a TTL which is managed by Data Hygiene or an Adobe Support resource
Description -Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour - Cannot open summary for a task
Description - We would like to be able to set notification settings via layout template. Many of our users do not need to receive all the notifications that they are getting, and are not tech savvy enough to know that they can change their own settings. Why is this feature important to you - Being able to tie this to a layout template would let us mass-set notifications for large groups of users easily.How would you like the feature to work - Layout template builder would have an option to set the notification options (Instant, daily, off) for each type of notification currently active in our instance.Current Behavior - Notifications have to be set for users manually.
When Marketo merge runs, the loser record is deleted. However, the "delete" activity is not registered anywhere. The Rest API endpoint cannot retrieve this "delete" activity.In general, Merge activity and Delete activities stored in different ways in Marketo and cannot be retrieved by one API endpoint. Delete - Rest API, Merge - Bulk activities export.This makes it very inconvenient to track these activities in case when we need to ensure our local database is properly updated.The suggestion is to have every "delete" to be recorded as part of the activity and be able to retrieve by single API even if delete occurred due to the Merge Thank you
Description - We would like to improve the error messages in Workfront when using Enhanced Connector !) Linking when user does not have permission in Author and DAM is not down: Current process: “Null” error is displayed to user.Future process: application will display a Failure message prompting this “You do not have DAM Author permissions to link an asset. Access Help document in the Training and Help folder for more information.” 2) Pushing when user does not have permission in Author and DAM is not down: Current process: “Null” error is displayed to user.Future process: application will display a Failure message prompting this” You do not have DAM Author permissions to push an asset. Access Help document in the Training and Help folder for more information.” 3) If System is down - server errorCurrent process: “Server Error” error is displayed to user.Future process: application will display a Failure message prompting this “Workfront connection to the DAM is currently down, please try again later or contact IT Support. Why is this feature important to you - this will permit for better experience to user and more info to troubleshoot in case of issues
Description - Ability to turn off that Recent Path prompt within the Requests drop-down Whenever we opens a Request, the Recent Paths loads at the top. We would like to be able to turn that feature off as it seems to be confusing some of our users from time to time. (there is no scroll bar either)
We would appreciate the ability to have a task's description appear as a 'pop-up' when you hover over the task name. Similar to how the tooltip functions for custom fields. We realize that we can have a view that includes the description in a column. However, our descriptions can be very long so a view like this makes it hard to see all of the tasks in one go. Having the description appear in a hover state would give us the ability to see task descriptions without it taking up too much space on the page.
Description - The system currently allows anyone with manage access to a project the ability to add a task directly to ANY open Iterations. There isn't any validation on whether the user has access to the Team. This also bypasses the backlog grooming/refining processes for Scrum. The team should be the ones to decide what is added to an Iteration (Sprint)Why is this feature important to you -The current process does not validate if the user has access to the Team. This means anyone can directly add stories to an iteration. This bypasses the formal process of adding a story to a teams backlog and the team determining what stories are added to an Iteration (Sprint). How would you like the feature to work -Ideally, the system would not allow the direct add of stories to an Iteration from a Project view, or at minimum validate that the user has access to that Team and only show iterations for the teams the user has access to. Current Behavior -Currently, the system allows anyone with manage access to a project to add a task(story) to ANY open Iteration.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/agile/scrum/iterations/add-stories-to-existing-iteration.html?lang=en"You can add any task or issue to any iteration if you have Manage access to the project."
Description - Currently, Workfront performs refreshes of the Preview environment from Production in the timeline of "weekend" with no specific timeframe or guidance provided. If Workfront could provide a specific date/time for refreshes to occur, this would help customers who require specific timing to coordinate testing and procedures. For our specific testing purposes, we found that Workfront Preview had not refreshed until later Monday morning despite receiving guidance that it would be refreshed before Monday.Why is this feature important to you - Helps customers plan and execute testing/configuration.How would you like the feature to work - Identify per region or provide options for windows in which Preview will refresh from Production.Current Behaviour - "Weekend" is stated as the timeline but found to not always be accurate.
If you add a space before a link in the link URL field, it turns out Marketo will just leave it there. This can happen accidentally when pasting a link from another source. The resulting code inside the email looks like <a href=" examplelink.com"> with a space between the opening quote and https. If you click the image either in the preview or when the email is sent, it actually works just fine. But when preparing the email for send, Marketo doesn't recognize the link as a link, and therefore doesn't create a tracking link. The effect is the same as if you had included the entire link, http and all, inside a token: the link is functional, but you lose all tracking on it. This ends up being a mistake that's easy to make and hard to catch. The simple solution would be to add a function - like you see in many other input boxes - to automatically remove any leading spaces in that field. This would be a nice little failsafe that would prevent a mistake you would likely only catch when higher-ups are demanding a report from you.
It would be beneficial to add the budgeted hours as another column when viewing by user in the resource planner. Being able to compare available, planned, and budgeted at the user aggregated level offers an easier view for resource managers. Currently, only the available and planned are shown. It would be beneficial to allow the same view as the project utilization report (see planned, actual, and budgeted per month).
Description - New object type 'Audit log' need to introduce in reporting to make reports on Audit log dataWhy is this feature important to you - Management team is required to know how user's were using Workfront. It helps them to forecast and they will invest in WorkfrontHow would you like the feature to work - New object type 'Audit log' need to introduce in reporting to make reports on Audit log dataCurrent Behaviour - There is no way to create reporting on Audit log data. Only Export is available but it is not useful.
Description - Add 'not equal to' operator in a Audit Log Typeahead field or including options similar to a report filter or Export Audit log more than 50,000 recordsWhy is this feature important to you - Audit logs plays major role in Workfront. It helps to get more valuable to clients.How would you like the feature to work - Like other objects type, if we able to create reports on audit log it will be more useful.Current Behaviour - Only export is available.
Description - Workload Balancer is an immensely helpful tool. One concept that might be valuable to various teams is the enhanced control of task start dates and end dates directly in Workload Balancer [Resource Management - Object]. Within one screen, PMs would be able to adjust task dates for all resource pools in order to maximize any lag time for a plethora of projects.Why is this feature important to you - This feature would help increase efficiency for task deliverability.How would you like the feature to work - Users can drag and drop 'late' or 'future' tasks to a specific day, and the scheduled dates would automatically adjust within the project.Current Behaviour - Any 'Planned Start Date' that is not assigned to the User within Workload Balancer must go into the project to manually adjust any start dates. Thank you for listening!
Work Front TEAMs App Card Please change to- "You replied to....."
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Duplicate Image component IDs decrease accessibility score Use-case: Our accessibility tool detected a WCAG AA violation, when the same image is used multiple times on the same page. When the same image is used multiple times on the same page, both instances share the same ID. That should not be like that according to WCAG and W3C. HTML IDs must be unique. There is also a support ticket for that: E-001038208. Our developers recommend this being fixed on a platform level not in custom code to ensure WCAG and W3C compliance for all customers. Current/Experienced Behavior: When the same image is used multiple times on the same page (e.g. hero image is used also in content), both instances share the same ID. Improved/Expected Behavior: All instances of the same image have different IDs by combining the already existing image ID plus the JCR path to make it truly unique. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2023.9.13665.20230927T063259Z Customer-name/Organization name: ÖGB Verlag Screenshot (if applicable): see attachments Code package (if applicable):
The previous home page flagged late tasks as red. This was super helpful for my team because it showed them front and center in red that things were late. It would be extremely helpful if this behavior could replicated and offered on the new home experience or at least in a filter so that users could choose if they wanted the late tasks to show as red.
Description - Provide the option to show description of items defined under Priority on the custom forms. Why is this feature important to you - The users who fill the custom forms need to have some guidance on which priority to select. How would you like the feature to work - It would be helpful if that "?" that shows next to custom fields to show next to system default fields as well, such as Priority, and have the option to customize it to provide direction about how to use the field to users. Current Behaviour - There seems to be no way to direct users on how to use the system default fields in their process, such as priority, when they are filling out the information on the forms.
Description - the Analytics extension's action to set event variables is quite limited, assuming you know the events to set, requiring writing custom code. It would be amazing if an to-be-evaluated Analytics event can be added as a result of a Data Element evaluation. Example: I have a lookup table the generates a string "eventX,eventY" for me that has to be set on the extension. In order to do so, I must write custom code which is tedious and error prone, since I must append these to s.events, append them to s.linkTrackVars and s.linkTrackEvents. Assuming in most cases events are counters and have a value of 1, why not have a possibility to add one or more dynamic events through an input field in the setVariables action, additionally to the standard functionality? Why is this feature important to you - for many clients I have worked around this issue with custom code that is potentially error prone whereas the built-in event-add functionality is quite convenient if you know which events you are supposed to always fire. However, often I want to add additional events which are only determined by the context of the passed data. Having something that saves time and reduces room for errors would be amazing. How would you like the feature to work - have an additional text field where a Data Element can be used. This can either be a single event or a list of events which will implicitly set all required fields on the AppMeasurement library. The same way the standard functionality works. Current Behaviour - I can only set predefined events, no flexibility to set other events ad hoc based on the evaluation of a Data Element. Hope I am not alone on this. CheersBjörn
Description - Add ability to Navigate to any field on the convertedOpTask in calcuolated fieldsWhy is this feature important to you - Can create View Only custom forms that link from a Project to a converted issue to the original projectHow would you like the feature to work - Add ability through API to link to the object and thereby access its related objects. Current Behaviour - Works in reporting but not on Custom Fields
Description - Allow for Groupings to be sorted in custom ways reports. Why is this feature important to you - It is important to present the report in a way that makes sense to the users; sometimes the way data is grouped is not even alphabetic reliant; there may be some business logic to show a group of data before another one in a report. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to have the option to select the order of the groups in the Groupings section of the report when creating it. Current Behaviour - There seems to be no way to select in what order the groupings apply in a report.
Improvement Description - A new feature allowing attachments to in-app comments and updates was included with the 24.1 release; this feature was initially designed to be in-app only. Our users would like to see the image attachments carried through to the related external emails associated with these updates.Problem - Restricting the attachments to only in-app creates a confusing user experience. For example, suppose a message was to ask someone to respond quickly to a referenced attachment. In that case, the email they receive does not contain the mentioned attachment, and the recipient must log into Workfront, navigate to the in-app message, and click on the attachment to view it. This seems like a lot of effort to view something that is expected to already be attached to the email they receive.
We would like the ability to tag an update (on any object) as "High Importance". This would help bring notice to the recipients that the update needs a higher level of priority. Additionally, we would like the text "High Importance" (or something similar) to appear in the Subject Line of the email notification so it stands out in the recipients email In Box. For reference I found a few similar requests:2020 - Ability to mark updates as critical announcements - Adobe Experience League Community - 5286852019 - Ability to mark project/task updates as high prior... - Adobe Experience League Community - 5290972018 - Mark certain updates as IMPORANT or STICKY - Adobe Experience League Community - 526324
Currently you can only add certain fields to reports with ID against them instead of Name, which results in a string of text. Whilst you can fix this in text mode in most situations, this doesn't always work for groupings based on the ID field where you want Name instead. Any manual fix also breaks the accompanied chart: https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/articles/217982367-How-to-change-ID-to-Name-value-in-Reports-via-TextMode
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
