Build better products with our product team
Description - Currently, there is no way to manage the component curation of multiple Virtual Report Suites at a timeWhy is this feature important to you - If a company has multiple VRS for each geographical market, it is impossible to curate all the VRS in one go hence it is time consuming and cumbersome
Description -We want to have secondary identity to stitch multiple dataset.Exdata set 1 > identity 1, identity 2, identity 3data set 2 > identity 1data set 3 > identity 2use case - we want create segment in CJA where segment created with data set 3 applied in data set 2 should show results.we are looking to integrate data set 2 and data set 3 using dataset 1 as a pivot and get results. Why is this feature important to you -With wasting data engineering teams time we want to accomplish the stitching within the tool How would you like the feature to work -seamlessly Current Behaviour -One identity used to stitch the data
Description - my team and myself have trouble at times telling if something is a subtask or sub-sub task with the single main task caret and then just the simple indent of subtasksWhy is this feature important to you - easier visibility of what is a subtask and what main task it belongs toHow would you like the feature to work - something similar to a bulleted/numbered/lettered list. If it's a main single task, have nothing, when it becomes a main task with sub task(s), have the main task be a caret and bullet and then the subtask be a different kind of bullet/symbolCurrent Behaviour - single caret on the main task and then small spacing that something is indented when a sub task.
Currently the only way to pull any reports on a deactivated user is in the filters. Prompts do not 'see' a deactivated user. This creates a real issue for reassigning work when someone is suddenly gone from the company or when pulling hours reports for time periods where a user previously was at the company. If there were a checkbox that said "Include Deactivated Users" or something along those lines, that would be perfect! If you like this idea, there is a very similar one that could also be voted on: https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360001215374-Predictive-Text-For-Deactivated-Users-in-prompts
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Make button order in Author UI consistent Use-case: Our users want to work quickly in AEM. However, the inconsistent button order of the menu bar slows them down. We got a number of complaints by our authors regarding the Author instance UI: Authors are irritated by the changing order of buttons throughout the DAM and Sites. Current/Experienced Behavior: Each content type (image, video, pdf, webpage, CF) changes the order to some degree. Our authors understand that different asset types may have different options, but the position of the buttons changes too much for them. Improved/Expected Behavior: Our users work mostly with Sites and expect the DAM button to be at the same location, which is hardly the case. See screenshots. We would move the options that are available to all types in front and the specific ones at the end. That should ease their situation. Either this comes by default, or our admins can configure the order of button per content type. However, we would prefer to have it out of the box. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: ÖGB Verlag Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
I attach user custom forms for the user account that have information that they might not want others to see e.g. calculations of efficiency ratings so if we could set it to private that only the user can see forms attached to themselves and only administrators can deal with it on reports.
Description - Currently when editing layout templates, you cannot edit what a user sees when they go to a User page (under the "Customize what users see" drop-down). This feature is important because we collect data about our users (e.g. capacity, skills) and the only way to do that is as a custom form on the user. This data should not be public to all other Workfront users. We need the ability to prevent other users from seeing Custom Forms on User screens. Similarly to how it works for other items in the layout template, admins should be able to select what can appear in the "Left panel" when users go to a User screen, with the option for admins to remove any left panel item (currently what shows is Updates, Details, Org Chart, Time Off, Custom Forms). Admins should be able to remove any or all of those items. Current Behaviour - is not applicable because currently there is no way for us to customize what users see when they look at a User.
Description - Allow update of existing contact record with conditional criteria in Marketo via AEP segment rules. For example, we would like to apply the rule only for contacts in the US. Why is this feature important to you - It is important to the business because it allows direct synchronization of data between AEP and Marketo. How would you like the feature to work - I like it to work seamlessly and quickly without adding extra load to Marketo via API calls. Current Behaviour - The system only allow inserts without complex conditions or criteria.
Description - Allow conditional formatting using more than one column - an AND statement. Why is this feature important to you - This seems like such a basic capability nowadays so I'm baffled as to why this cannot be done. It's important because when you don't include the % complete column it highlights tasks that are complete, which makes no sense. There are tons of other things someone might want to do and without the ability to write this kind of logic the conditional formatting is in my opinion almost useless or close to it. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to create the following conditions and similar conditions: The task planned completion date column is less than today, and the % complete column is less than 100%. Current Behavior - Highlights tasks that are complete, which makes no sense. I may not have worded this in the best manner, but hopefully what I'm suggesting will be understood. I cannot be the first person to ask for this functionality.
Description - Event Expiration based upon eventTypeWhy is this feature important to you - Ability to define an expiration of an event Type will allow for the expansion of dataSet TTL. Only a TTL can be defined at a dataSet level. This creates multiple dataSets with different eventTypes. While this will work for some use cases it not substainable.How would you like the feature to work - Create a TTL for an event Type at a dataSet level and or at the Unified Profile store level.Current Behaviour - Each dataSet can be defined with a TTL which is managed by Data Hygiene or an Adobe Support resource
Description -Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour - Cannot open summary for a task
Description - We would like to be able to set notification settings via layout template. Many of our users do not need to receive all the notifications that they are getting, and are not tech savvy enough to know that they can change their own settings. Why is this feature important to you - Being able to tie this to a layout template would let us mass-set notifications for large groups of users easily.How would you like the feature to work - Layout template builder would have an option to set the notification options (Instant, daily, off) for each type of notification currently active in our instance.Current Behavior - Notifications have to be set for users manually.
When Marketo merge runs, the loser record is deleted. However, the "delete" activity is not registered anywhere. The Rest API endpoint cannot retrieve this "delete" activity.In general, Merge activity and Delete activities stored in different ways in Marketo and cannot be retrieved by one API endpoint. Delete - Rest API, Merge - Bulk activities export.This makes it very inconvenient to track these activities in case when we need to ensure our local database is properly updated.The suggestion is to have every "delete" to be recorded as part of the activity and be able to retrieve by single API even if delete occurred due to the Merge Thank you
Description - We would like to improve the error messages in Workfront when using Enhanced Connector !) Linking when user does not have permission in Author and DAM is not down: Current process: “Null” error is displayed to user.Future process: application will display a Failure message prompting this “You do not have DAM Author permissions to link an asset. Access Help document in the Training and Help folder for more information.” 2) Pushing when user does not have permission in Author and DAM is not down: Current process: “Null” error is displayed to user.Future process: application will display a Failure message prompting this” You do not have DAM Author permissions to push an asset. Access Help document in the Training and Help folder for more information.” 3) If System is down - server errorCurrent process: “Server Error” error is displayed to user.Future process: application will display a Failure message prompting this “Workfront connection to the DAM is currently down, please try again later or contact IT Support. Why is this feature important to you - this will permit for better experience to user and more info to troubleshoot in case of issues
Description - Ability to turn off that Recent Path prompt within the Requests drop-down Whenever we opens a Request, the Recent Paths loads at the top. We would like to be able to turn that feature off as it seems to be confusing some of our users from time to time. (there is no scroll bar either)
We would appreciate the ability to have a task's description appear as a 'pop-up' when you hover over the task name. Similar to how the tooltip functions for custom fields. We realize that we can have a view that includes the description in a column. However, our descriptions can be very long so a view like this makes it hard to see all of the tasks in one go. Having the description appear in a hover state would give us the ability to see task descriptions without it taking up too much space on the page.
Description - The system currently allows anyone with manage access to a project the ability to add a task directly to ANY open Iterations. There isn't any validation on whether the user has access to the Team. This also bypasses the backlog grooming/refining processes for Scrum. The team should be the ones to decide what is added to an Iteration (Sprint)Why is this feature important to you -The current process does not validate if the user has access to the Team. This means anyone can directly add stories to an iteration. This bypasses the formal process of adding a story to a teams backlog and the team determining what stories are added to an Iteration (Sprint). How would you like the feature to work -Ideally, the system would not allow the direct add of stories to an Iteration from a Project view, or at minimum validate that the user has access to that Team and only show iterations for the teams the user has access to. Current Behavior -Currently, the system allows anyone with manage access to a project to add a task(story) to ANY open Iteration.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/agile/scrum/iterations/add-stories-to-existing-iteration.html?lang=en"You can add any task or issue to any iteration if you have Manage access to the project."
Description - Currently, Workfront performs refreshes of the Preview environment from Production in the timeline of "weekend" with no specific timeframe or guidance provided. If Workfront could provide a specific date/time for refreshes to occur, this would help customers who require specific timing to coordinate testing and procedures. For our specific testing purposes, we found that Workfront Preview had not refreshed until later Monday morning despite receiving guidance that it would be refreshed before Monday.Why is this feature important to you - Helps customers plan and execute testing/configuration.How would you like the feature to work - Identify per region or provide options for windows in which Preview will refresh from Production.Current Behaviour - "Weekend" is stated as the timeline but found to not always be accurate.
If you add a space before a link in the link URL field, it turns out Marketo will just leave it there. This can happen accidentally when pasting a link from another source. The resulting code inside the email looks like <a href=" examplelink.com"> with a space between the opening quote and https. If you click the image either in the preview or when the email is sent, it actually works just fine. But when preparing the email for send, Marketo doesn't recognize the link as a link, and therefore doesn't create a tracking link. The effect is the same as if you had included the entire link, http and all, inside a token: the link is functional, but you lose all tracking on it. This ends up being a mistake that's easy to make and hard to catch. The simple solution would be to add a function - like you see in many other input boxes - to automatically remove any leading spaces in that field. This would be a nice little failsafe that would prevent a mistake you would likely only catch when higher-ups are demanding a report from you.
It would be beneficial to add the budgeted hours as another column when viewing by user in the resource planner. Being able to compare available, planned, and budgeted at the user aggregated level offers an easier view for resource managers. Currently, only the available and planned are shown. It would be beneficial to allow the same view as the project utilization report (see planned, actual, and budgeted per month).
Description - New object type 'Audit log' need to introduce in reporting to make reports on Audit log dataWhy is this feature important to you - Management team is required to know how user's were using Workfront. It helps them to forecast and they will invest in WorkfrontHow would you like the feature to work - New object type 'Audit log' need to introduce in reporting to make reports on Audit log dataCurrent Behaviour - There is no way to create reporting on Audit log data. Only Export is available but it is not useful.
Description - Add 'not equal to' operator in a Audit Log Typeahead field or including options similar to a report filter or Export Audit log more than 50,000 recordsWhy is this feature important to you - Audit logs plays major role in Workfront. It helps to get more valuable to clients.How would you like the feature to work - Like other objects type, if we able to create reports on audit log it will be more useful.Current Behaviour - Only export is available.
Description - Workload Balancer is an immensely helpful tool. One concept that might be valuable to various teams is the enhanced control of task start dates and end dates directly in Workload Balancer [Resource Management - Object]. Within one screen, PMs would be able to adjust task dates for all resource pools in order to maximize any lag time for a plethora of projects.Why is this feature important to you - This feature would help increase efficiency for task deliverability.How would you like the feature to work - Users can drag and drop 'late' or 'future' tasks to a specific day, and the scheduled dates would automatically adjust within the project.Current Behaviour - Any 'Planned Start Date' that is not assigned to the User within Workload Balancer must go into the project to manually adjust any start dates. Thank you for listening!
Work Front TEAMs App Card Please change to- "You replied to....."
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Duplicate Image component IDs decrease accessibility score Use-case: Our accessibility tool detected a WCAG AA violation, when the same image is used multiple times on the same page. When the same image is used multiple times on the same page, both instances share the same ID. That should not be like that according to WCAG and W3C. HTML IDs must be unique. There is also a support ticket for that: E-001038208. Our developers recommend this being fixed on a platform level not in custom code to ensure WCAG and W3C compliance for all customers. Current/Experienced Behavior: When the same image is used multiple times on the same page (e.g. hero image is used also in content), both instances share the same ID. Improved/Expected Behavior: All instances of the same image have different IDs by combining the already existing image ID plus the JCR path to make it truly unique. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2023.9.13665.20230927T063259Z Customer-name/Organization name: ÖGB Verlag Screenshot (if applicable): see attachments Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
