Build better products with our product team
Hi, we are using data warehouse exports.The Files that we are receiving a quite big -> in avg. 1GB on hourly basis. Our db don't support ZIP format (the same like Athena, Redshift, Snowflake etc.), so we need to convert the files first in GZIP. Since unzip large files consumes a lot of time & ressources, we would like to submit an idea:- add the gzip compression format to the exports- split large files automatically (like in Data Feeds) into smaller chunks of gzip files. It's actually the same way Data Feeds currently exports the data. Cheers,Piotr
DescriptionIn a scatter plot we usually have two metrics and one is usually the independent one and the other dependant. In a line chart we have the ability to add various trend lines. It would be great to have the ability to fit a linear regression line to the scatter plotWhy is this feature important to youThis would provide the ability to spot relationships and trends between two metrics and highlight value that are outliers, either way above or below the line. This data can greatly help drive business decisions. How would you like the feature to workAdd option under the viz configuration "cog" to turn linear regression line on or off
Description - When a "Read Only" viewer accesses a Proof, the system creates a new Stage with "No Deadline." This causes the Proof to be showng as having No Deadline in our Reporting.Why is this feature important to you - We need to be able to accurately track and report out on our Proofing.How would you like the feature to work - We would prefer that the New Stage not wipe out the Proof Deadline in Reporting.Current Behaviour - The current behavior is that the New Stage is listed with "No Deadline" and so then the Proof appears with "No Deadline" in our Reporting.
Workfront offers out-of-the-box integration with cloud storage providers like Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, and SharePoint. However, it does not natively integrate with Egnyte. Many of our clients rely on Egnyte for document management, and having native integration with Egnyte would greatly enhance productivity. Although Workfront supports ‘Custom Integrations,’ integrating with Egnyte currently requires purchasing a license for an Egnyte plugin. We request a feature enhancement to add native integration with Egnyte in Workfront, similar to the existing functionality for the other listed providers.
While being able to list out individual Program cost line items is a useful feature, it's limited by a few things: namely, the ability to only parse certain types of budget information based on information in the note. I would like to build a more robust approach for budget measurement and compliance in Marketo by providing a standardized set of custom fields that could provide more detail in budget analysis. While I would expect to have some of these as fully custom, I think others are widely applicable and may make sense to be in the core product. Some examples of these would include: - Spend Type: Categorizes the primary expense of the campaign (e.g., 'Media Spend', 'Agency Fees', 'Content Creation', 'Sponsorship'). This allows for a more granular analysis of where the budget is going and the ROI on different types of spend.- Budget Source / Team: Tracks which team's budget is funding the campaign (e.g., 'Corporate Marketing', 'Product Marketing', 'Field Marketing'). This is essential for leaders to see how different teams are performing with their allocated spend. - Vendor / Payee: A field to specify the vendor who will receive the payment (e.g., 'Google', 'LinkedIn', 'Gartner', 'Acme Agency'). This allows you to run reports on your total spend by vendor across all campaigns, which is invaluable for negotiating contracts. - Invoice / PO Number: A text field to record the associated invoice or Purchase Order number for the expense. This creates a direct link between your marketing plan and the financial transaction records, making audits and expense verification straightforward. Implementing these sorts of additional fields would turn Program Costs from a legacy piece of information to one that's more central to Marketo setup and ROI; please consider expanding out the feature in this way or with similar functionality.
Description - Include a live link to the Project Level in the Board cardsWhy is this feature important to you - Users organize cards from Tasks in Kanban boards and many times they need information found at the Project Level Custom Form. Currently, the users need to utilize the live connection that takes them to the actual Task and then use the breadcrumbs to go up to the Project. How would you like the feature to work - It'd be great if the cards can be configured to display a live link to the source Project. Current Behavior -Currently, the Project Name or its url can be added but they are not clickable to the object.
The idea is to allow adding updates/comments to tasks through the inline edit functionality. We use a backlog project to manage multiple backlog tasks and need to add grooming notes to each of the tasks every week. We do this using the inline edit function on a task view. While we have been using a custom text field which enables us to edit line, it would be great if we could add a new update/comment using inline edit. Ideally, we would be able to add updates/comments when we are inline edit mode. When saved the newly added update/comment would land in the updates section of the task. When not in edit mode the column should show the last update. Currently, there is no way to edit/add comments using inline edit on a task view.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Cross Program Content Copy in AEM as a Cloud Service Use-case: We are looking to copy content between two environments across different programs, such as from Environment A in Program A to Environment B in Program B. Currently, the content copy tool only supports content transfer within the same program ID, which limits this capability. Current/Experienced Behavior: The AEM Content Copy Tool is designed for content movement within the same Cloud Manager program. Transferring content across different programs is not supported.- Adobe does not provide an out-of-the-box solution for cross-program content migration to maintain content integrity and security. Improved/Expected Behavior: We are looking to copy content between two environments across different programs, such as from Environment A in Program A to Environment B in Program B. Currently, the content copy tool only supports content transfer within the same program ID, which limits this capability. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service - 2024.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Air India Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
As a marketing team who has been using Adobe Sites, Assets, and Guides for several years prior to adopting Workfront we have developed a complex and highly used marketing taxonomy using AEM Tags in the Adobe Experience Manager platform. Instead of rebuilding or migrating our metadata taxonomy framework into another system it would be beneficial from a time and consistency perspective to use that same marketing taxonomy tag structure in Workfront, so that we can manage the marketing taxonomy in one location for multiple Adobe technologies.
Having the descriptive text show in black makes it looks just like the text that exists elsewhere on the form. Often this text is used for instructions and having it the same color as form field answers is confusing and hard to read. A simple option would work here as well. Either black or gray as a selection.
Description - It would be a good idea to publish documentation about the plan mode feature on the project landing page. Why is this feature important to you - Project Managers, when shown this feature, really like what it can do, and they ask for documentation on how it works but there is none. How would you like the feature to work - I would like that there is documentation on this feature available, including - that it exists, how to access it, and an explanation of how it works. Current Behaviour - There is no documentation and support suggested it be raised as an 'idea'
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： There is a Content Tree on the left side of the CF Console. When there are many folders here, I would like to have only the folders that contain Content Fragments displayed by default so that I can access folders that contain Content Fragments quickly. There are many folders with similar names, and since only part of the names are displayed, it is difficult to distinguish which folders contain Content Fragments.Providing a checkbox to toggle the visibility of folders that do not contain Content Fragments could be a good option. @arunpatidar ユースケース： Filtering Content Fragments 現在／体験した動作： I often get lost trying to navigate to the correct path. 改善／期待される動作： Faster path selection reduces unnecessary actions. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM As a Cloud Service 顧客名／組織名 スクリーンショット（ある場合） コードパッケージ（ある場合）
Allow system admins and project owners to MOVE entire comment/update threads to a different task, project, request or program.Issue: Many users plop comments in the wrong location which causes much confusion among team members. Then it is exacerbated by people replying to the comments.Yes, we can copy the thread or copy the text, but this is still not enough because people still go to the old/wrong location.
Description -We have users who do not need to log time based on their job level. For those users, we didn't apply a timesheet profile. Now we have some users were who logging time but due to recent job role changes are now not required to log time. I went to change their timesheet profile to remove it and with the new UI updates, it does not allow me to do so. It only always you to choose another timesheet profile. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the ability to completely remove or clear a timesheet profile from a user’s profile in the UI. Ideally, there should be an option to select “none” or leave the field blank, so that no timesheet is generated for those users who do not need to log time. Current Behaviour -Currently, the new UI does not allow clearing or removing a timesheet profile from a user’s profile. Instead, it requires assigning a different profile, with no option to set it to “none.” Support has confirmed this is a known limitation affecting multiple customers. They provided a workaround below, but it is more time-consuming and less efficient. Allowing administrators to remove timesheet profiles directly in the UI would simplify the process and improve usability. From Support: Best workaround here would be to create a “No Timesheet Required” profile to act as a replacement for these users. You could do this by creating a dummy timesheet profile (e.g., “No Timesheet Required”) with settings that do not generate timesheets or have no approvers/hours types. Then assign this profile to users who should not log time. You will then want to update your “no logged time” reports to exclude users assigned to this profile.
Description - When requests are assigned to a team the requests drop off after a two week planned completion date.Why is this feature important to you - Assigned teams may have a backlog of requests and once the two week timeline they lose sight of the requests.How would you like the feature to work - Create a filter to have team requests display with certain criteria and have the planned completion date be adjustable.Current Behaviour - Team requests disappear after two weeks from planned completion date of request.
Description - when marking your own PTO in Workfront, at that point to also offer the opportunity to create an out of office notification if you are tagged, messaged or sent requests etc within Workfront - a notification to send to the originator that you are not available to process their ask or make comments etc.Why is this feature important to you - we encourage all project related comms to be in the relevant projects. If you are not aware of people not being in the office/at work then assumption is that they are there to receive the message.How would you like the feature to work - as an email out of office notification.Current Behaviour - if you have not heard from someone after a while, need to investigate if they are working by checking email out of office notifications.
Description - Have the date range comparisons update to align with selected dates for current time period regardless of date granularity and without need to go into the settings and adjustment comparison time periods Why is this feature important to you - allows for fewer and more flexible reports to be built for the teamHow would you like the feature to work - the custom time period is based on both the first and last date in the selection and updates automatically as the date range is updatedCurrent Behaviour - locked to the start date and requires going into the time range settings and adjusting the rolling time periods (much too complex for basic business user)
Description - Currently, when an issue is converted to a project, for any screen captures that are added to updates in the issue, only the image data transfers to the created project, and not the image itself. Why is this feature important to you - Users must manually add the image to the project after conversion, which is tedious and can easily be forgotten by the user during conversion. How would you like the feature to work - the images should transfer to the converted project, within the same update, along with the update data and image data. Current Behaviour - Image is not transferred as part of the project conversion process (refer to Adobe Support Ticket #E-001837945)
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to Search pipeline in AEM Cloud Manger Use-case: With growing number of pipelines for Front end with several environments it hard to find and run the pipeline form cloud manger Current/Experienced Behavior: No Search functionality available Improved/Expected Behavior: Search functionality to search pipelines in Cloud manger Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manger Pipeline screen Customer-name/Organization name: Unilever Account Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description:We would like to see update on Trade Desk connector to connect directly on a partner level rather then on advertiser level. It would be great to have both. Why is this feature important for us: We work with several countries and therefore we have a lot of advertisers. As we can not connect on a partner level - it means we have to manually configer destinaiton with mayn different adverticer rather then just configur it once with the partner. How would you like the feature to work:The same as Trade desk connectro works now, but would have possibility to chose between advertiser or partner. Current Behaviour:Only Trade Desk Adverticer ID connections are possible.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content Hub Use-case: Granular Permissions: Introduce granular permissions control in content hub to allow more precise access management at the user, group and asset level Public Sharing Enhancements: Enable public sharing of collections in Content Hub to simplify external access and collaboration through enhanced public sharing link sharing functionality Current/Experienced Behavior: No public sharing for collections available Improved/Expected Behavior: Enabling sharing of collections Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Barclays Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Allow New Microsoft Teams to Integrate with WorkfrontWhy is this feature important to you - Classic Microsoft Teams is being retired on the 30th June 2025 and we have uses who spend a lot of time in teams and find the functionality very useful.How would you like the feature to work - Transfer the functionality of Classic Teams onto New Teams which will allows you to interact with notifications / approvals from WF and add new requests into WF.Current Behaviour - It connects but no interactions to or from WF are possible. WF support confirm there is no current plan to get this working.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: lease enable support for modern package managers in the Frontend Deployment Pipeline. Currently the pipeline only supports NPM, which although widely adopted is also generally known as the slowest solution for package management within the nodejs ecosystem. Consider support for yarn or pnpm, both of which outperform NPM from a CI/CD perspective. Use-case: We currently use Yarn on Managed Services to deploy full stack code. However, when migrating to Cloud Services and wanting to take advantage of the Front End (FED) pipeline, NPM is assumed and only the version can be altered via pipeline variables. We use Yarn as it has additional features and builds/deploys faster than NPM. Similarly, pnmp and Yarn PnP deploy about twice as fast as npm in our benchmark tests. Current/Experienced Behavior: Customers must use NPM and package-lock.json as the deployment package manager Improved/Expected Behavior: Customers can customize the FED deployment pipline to usee the package manager of their choice. This could be either an explicit selection, a pipeline variable, or the pipeline could lockfile detection (npm uses package-lock.json, yarn uses yarn.lock, pnpm uses pnpm-lock.yaml) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): This request is for AEM Cloud Service, current version. Customer-name/Organization name: Toyota Motors North America (TMNA) Screenshot (if applicable) Code package (if applicable):
Description - While creating a new audience by combining existing audiences, we can only add upto 20 segments and add upto 2 containers one with in another.Why is this feature important to you - In some cases we want to add more than 20 segments and create complex audiences making use of profile scripts and add 3 or more containersHow would you like the feature to work - Just as the regular segment creation, with updated max limits.
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： I would like ease the technical requirements for AEM 6.5 LTS to be support "Java 11" and "Linux kernel 4" be added. ユースケース： I am considering AEM 6.5 LTS(On Premise). 現在／体験した動作： AEM 6.5 LTS support Java17 and Linux kernel 5. If AEM6.5LTS were to be applied at this time, the customer environment would require an update to the Linux OS and Java version.As there are currently no customer environments that have Java 17 and Linux kernel 5 installed,it is expected that application and approval will take time. In the worst case scenario, business could be lost when support for the AEM6.5 ends. 改善／期待される動作： Because, we would like to avoid the worst case scenario by supporting Java11 Linux kernel4 in AEM6.5 LTS, just like AEM6.5. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM 6.5 SP19 and AEM 6.5 LTS 顧客名／組織名 スクリーンショット（ある場合） コードパッケージ（ある場合）
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
