Build better products with our product team
If you "clone" a module that has input filters, the input filters are dropped. But if you "copy" and "paste" a module, the input filters are brought over. It's the weirdest little idiosyncrasy. "Clone" doesn't feel like a "clone" if some aspect of it gets missed in the cloning process.(Certainly not a high priority ask.)
Understanding that some documents or elements within a document may not be processed as text, having a built-in spell check would be very helpful.
With the recent move to View, Duplicate and Edit access levels it would be great if users with View access could change and interact with the date range. While they can interact with filters/drop downs this doesn't work as well for dates as often users what to look at specific date ranges after a change, sale, weather, event etc. We can't always have pre-programmed all the options they'd want to look at into a filter. This wouldn't alter the dashboard so would still be a view level of access.Even better would be able to lock or unlock date ranges for view access.
I have a suggestion to improve the new commenting experience by enabling users to add tables, formatting, and add images/files within the 'Updates' box. This enhancement would make it more versatile, similar to Microsoft Outlook, and encourage users to utilize 'Updates' for more comprehensive email-like communication. I know this might be ambitious, but it could significantly enhance the platform's functionality.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Due to employees within our team, we need to move all their work to another user, so no recreation is needed.How would you like the feature to work - I need this to work the same way that Adobe Analytics worked.Current Behaviour - Need to recreate filters and workspaces. Then the old one would be deleted, but we can't delete as it will break other users who are using these filters.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - We utilize custom forms to intake work across our company. However, there are occasions where the original requestor will go in and make changes/updates to their initial request form submission. If they make material changes to their request and save/re-submit, no notification is triggered, so the person assigned to the work does not know about the changes. This can cause us to work on things that then need to be redone/changed to correspond to the updated request.How would you like the feature to work - Expand notifications for users to enable instant notification when a custom form is resubmitted/saved and the user is either on the routing rules for that custom form or subscribed to the issue/request.Current Behaviour -
With the switch over to experience cloud admin console we have lost the ability as an admin to login as other users. This was an incredibly useful function to allow us to problem solve our users issues and test access levels.Please please can you return this functionality.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Need support to add dynamic domain (localized domain, multidomain) to OOB sitemap.xml generator. Use-case: If I hit mydomain.com/country/language1.sitemap.xml I want to see <loc> starting with mydomain.com/..... Similarly, if I hit mydomain.at/country/language2.sitemap.xml, I want to see <loc> starting with mydomain.at/.... Current/Experienced Behavior: Pickes value from externalizer service. Improved/Expected Behavior: Pick dynamically Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.13
My Studio used to use the sync feature to import Outlook Calendar events into a WF calendar and then be able to allocate leftover working hours to certain WF projects by dragging them into the interface around their meeting and appointment times. It was a super effficient, visual way to map out one's design time for a week. This feature is not included in the new WF Home Page, and it used to save a lot of time. It also kept my Team all using one Adobe product to plan and organize themselves. It could literally look and function the same way the old calendar did, where you drag projects from a side column into the interface to block off pieces of time, and if the functionality was there before, I would hope at least the architecture would be there to make it easier to develop the same functionality as a widget in the new home page.
Target should have a built-in Audience that automatically excludes the IAB Bots. This Audience should also provide the ability to add specific user-agents.Similar functionality can be found within Adobe Analytics (see screen shot below). The IAB Bot Filtering can be checked to filter out known bots, and then the ability to add specific user-agents as well is provided.Having Bots in the Tests negatively impacts visitor metrics, such as RPV.
Hi all, We like to change the time at which alerts fire when monitoring traffic for the previous day - i.e. using the daily alert granularity. One of our most extensive uses cases for alerts is for monitoring the integrity of our data. We use classifications extensively and have segments that depend on them so having alerts set up to monitor any issue in classifying a particular eVar would be invaluable. We have set up several alerts like this as a proof of concept but we are having a couple of issues with the current behaviour. Currently, alerts fire at ~ 00:30 for the previous day. This only gives 30 mins after the end of the day for any classification processing to catch-up. This results frequent alerts firing for false positives. We receive the email for the alert at 00:30 but by the time the alert is checked during working hours the classification processing has caught up and the workspace we have set up to monitor these alerts suggests that the alert should not have fired. One way to get around this would be to allow the alerts to fire later the following day. I have suggested making this configurable in the Alert builder. This would allow us to experiment with different times to determine which works best for us. Thanks.
Without a link between Workload Balancer and the reporting function, we currently do not have ability to create forward-looking reports that display the utilization of staff for a given period of time. We need the ability to create advanced reports that display all resourced hours for a specific week/month/quarter. This includes all tasks that start, stop and will be in progress during the designated time. Reporting currently does a great job of looking back, but more help is needed in its ability to look forward.
Description -When making edits to a scenario, we're finding the process of tracking down all usages of a reference to be cumbersome. Our current process is to download the blueprint, open in a separate editor, and Ctrl-F to find the one(s) desired. It would be preferable to stay in the Fusion UI but have a way to "highlight all usages" based on selection of a reference ID. That reference ID could be input using the {{14.something.`foo bar`}} syntax, even, to allow for the case where the reference has already been changed. I would NOT want a find-replace, per se, as sometimes applying the change requires consideration of other changes to go with it, hence why the ask is limited to helping identify the usages. Why is this feature important to you -If I'm a Fusion admin, keep me in Fusion. Switching to an external tool disrupts my workflow. How would you like the feature to work -See above. Current Behaviour -See above.
Hi Marketo team,would be great if we have a report in the Analytics section of Marketo, that will show us overview/view:summary details of the programs in it, such as:- Channel- Created- Last Modified- Salesforce Campaign Sync- Total Members- Acquired By- Socially Acquired- Success- as well as the Members by Program Status detailsBasically, it is the View:Summary details we are interested in to see in a report, where the columns of the report are the details we see on the Summary View of each program.Many thanks,Stilyana
Description -Make it so you can sort search results by last modified date. Why is this feature important to you - More filtering for searching makes things easierHow would you like the feature to work - IN search be able to filter by last modified date for requests and documentsCurrent Behaviour - Not able to do that.
Make the time off Tool Tip more visible in the Resource Planner and the Workload Balancer for manually assigned work. When someone is assigned work during this time, a tool tip appears informing the user you have scheduled time off only when assigning work in bulk assignments. No tool tip appears in the Workload Balancer if a person has scheduled time-off and is assigned work. To the user it looks like work is assigned to a user without regard to having time off.
Description - We use planner for forecasting capacity for our C Suite Execs to help with forecasting projects. Currently with the planner functionality as it is, we have to create our filters, export to excel, and remove zeros, etc. In it's current state the filers just don't work quite right for viewing inside the tool and always needs to be aggregated in excel. With the ultimate goal of Workfront being the one stop shop, this doesn't sit well. If we could filter out old projects that don't fall in the timeline being viewed or somehow alleviate the mass amounts of zero values that show up, it would help us tremendously and would help the overall value of Workfront for our user base. Why is this feature important to you - The amount of time needed to run resourcing reports out of Workfront is too high. We need to find a solution that's faster and doesn't involve so much work outside of Workfront. How would you like the feature to work - Expand the filtering functionality. Current Behaviour - Create basic filters and export to excel.
We suggest integrating a custom date field (e.g., "Show Start date" or "Shipping date") with task start and finish dates in Adobe Workfront. Our projects rely heavily on custom date fields imported from Salesforce via fusion, leading to manual tracking and updates. This integration would automate dependency management, enabling us to create templates that reference the custom field, streamlining project creation. Real-time data synchronization would also ensure project accuracy when Salesforce data changes. This feature would significantly enhance project management efficiency and accuracy for us and other Workfront users facing similar challenges.
Replace the current "Only Before Sequence" and "Only After Sequence" options with these options:"Apply to [First/Last] sequence match (Required)"Currently this is not configurable. "Only Before Sequence" setting is applied to (and includes) the first hit of the last matching sequence and everything before. "Only After Sequence" setting is applied to (and includes) the last hit of the first matching sequence and everything after.Presenting this option would also help users understand how "match first/last sequence" is necessary part of how sequential segments work when there are multiple sequence matches within a visit/visitor. "Include data from [All/First/Last] hit(s) within the matched sequence in the results (Optional)""I only want my sequential segment to return just the first/last hit from the sequence." has got to be a common desire among analytics users, as others have requested this in other idea submissions. The "Include First/Last hit in the sequence" option would enable that use case, and the "Include All hits" and No selection (unused) options enable many other use cases.Currently this is not configurable. As previously mentioned, the "Only Before Sequence" setting includes the first hit of the last matching sequence, and the "Only After Sequence" setting includes the last hit of the first matching sequence."Include [All/<number of>] hits of data from [Before/After] the sequence match (Optional) in the results""I want my sequential segment to show me what the user encountered just before/after they encountered <desired sequence>" also has got to be a common desire among analytics users.Currently this is not configurable. The "Only Before/After Sequence" options return everything before/after the sequence from the visit or visitor, plus the first/last within the sequence (as previously mentioned).I think these options would dramatically improve the capability and value of sequential segments, and make it easier for users to understand exactly what data is potentially included in their segment results.
Description - Planner experiences a row limit when the filter isn't narrow enough. While there's a warning message when you hit that limit, it's presented in a hidden spot.Why is this feature important to you - Planner's limitations are vast and hidden. If we don't know what those limitations are, we can only conclude that the feature is broken. It's debilitating to our resourcing work.How would you like the feature to work - Present the row limit warning at the top of the window like you do other warnings or errors.Current Behaviour - The warning that you've hit a row limit in Planner is presented at the very bottom of the list of hits. You have to scroll to find the warning, so if you don't know where to look, you'll just be frustrated that you're not getting all the data you're looking for.
Current Behaviour - In the current set-up, it's easy for Kanban story and issue cards to easily fall-off/disappear from board (if they are changed to the wrong status or if someone accidently removes the team assignment). I'm hoping this can be updated with a more fool-proof method so that cards don't go missing. Why is this feature important to you - It would allow users to have more confidence in the board and not worry about their story/issue cards disappearing and then needing to search to find them. How would you like the feature to work - Some sort of indicator (other than just the assignment or card status) that would indicate it belongs on a Kanban board. Once it is on the board, it's not possible to remove unless completed, cancelled or deleted.
Description - Allow for more flexibility of saving combined audiences to the Audience Library. These should include: audiences that include a previously saved Audience Library audience combined with an AAM audience. Also, an AAM audience, or previously saved Audience Library audience, that is excluded from 'all visitors'. Why is this feature important to you - We reuse several audiences repeatedly and it would save time and minimize error if these combined audiences could be saved to the Audience Library and just referenced as one audience rather than having to rebuild it each time. How would you like the feature to work - Should work the same as creating audiences and saving them to the Audience Library today. Current Behaviour - Currently, there is no option to save a combined audience to the Audience Library. The radio button is grayed out. Those audiences can only be saved to Activity-Only
Description - we would like Workfront reports to be developed further, especially the "Charts" area to enable more than 3 groupings to be pulled into it.Why is this feature important to you - We would like to combine data cuts across 3 different parameters (Count of Projects - across Programs, with different statuses & Dates (planned completion date as calendar Week))How would you like the feature to work - Charts should allow the end user to be able to add more than 2 groupings, be able to pull collection object information, custom GroupingsCurrent Behaviour - Only 2 groupings are allowed in charts
Description - Would like to be able pull a kanban board into a report and create a dashboard using that info.Why is this feature important to you - To more easily show what's going on with projects and tasks in the different flows.How would you like the feature to work - Select a board to pull report info from and then drill down info from there.Current Behaviour - Having to create by user and pulling that information, but that could pull in additional info from other boards.
I would like to be able to condense forms by section headers in the editor. This feature is important because editing large forms in time consuming and being able to condense sections that are not being currently edited reduces errors. In a instance that has been live for almost ten years Names and Labels of fields can be very different, not having to scroll as much in a form will help to find the field that is needed, especially when setting up logic. This feature would be similar to how Custom Forms are displayed in project details where you can condense a one or all the forms. The current behavior is you need to scroll through the form or use a find option on your web browser to find a field or section.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
