Build better products with our product team
Description - With as much as I work with segments used multiple times throughout a Workspace report, it would be very helpful to have the ability to select that Segment and then when I need to replace it with a NEW segment, simply perform a "global search and replace" to find the old segment anywhere it is used throughout all panels in the report and replace it with the new segment.Why is this feature important to you - The amount of time I currently have to spend moving through a large report and replacing every instance of a segment I used is very time consuming, and being able to do this would greatly reduce the amount of time it takes to update the report, particularly because it is one I use on a regular basis.How would you like the feature to work - Select the cog/gear on a segment and provide a link to change the segment. Take the user to an interface to select a different segment and then provide them with the choice to choice one of two checkboxes: replace all instances in the panel, or replace all instances in the entire Workspace report. Current Behavior - Presently, I have to navigate my entire report and drag the new segment over every instance I want to replace. This takes a LOT of time, because I can often have multiple instances where I need to replace that segment or multiples throughout my report in multiple panels. Also, the interface is not always smooth with quickly allowing me to replace a segment. Sometimes Adobe Analytics gets finicky and only wants to provide me the option to Add in the segment as a new one, because the interface likes to be "temperamental." 🙄
Description - Workfront creates a public URL for the DAM assets being uploaded to task/ request/ project.Why is this feature important to you - This is a violation of company's InfoSec policy.How would you like the feature to work - The link should either be private/ protected.Current Behaviour - The link is a public link valid for 60 secs. A short video of the issue is attached.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use locale param to filter the internal SQL query results in order to improve performance Use-case: On any multilanguage project, the same type of content fragments will be potentially created under each language. When a persisted query is executed to retrieve all the content fragments for a specific model, filtering also by dates and locale, the locale is not used on the internal SQL, causing the query to be really slow.Sample internal SQL Query: SELECT main.* FROM [dam:IndexedFragmentData] AS main WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE(main, '/content/dam') AND main.[@string@model] = '/conf/mysite/settings/dam/cfm/models/news' AND (name() = 'master') AND ((main.[calendar@publicationDate] >= cast('2023-07-05T08:30:57.266Z' AS date) AND main.[calendar@publicationDate] <= cast('2023-07-08T08:30:57.266Z' AS date))) ORDER BY main.[jcr:path] OPTION (INDEX TAG[contentFragments], TRAVERSAL FAIL) As a workaround, we have built a new version of the persisted query where we specify the path to the specific language as a filter, then the query only takes a few milliseconds, but this should be part of the internal functionality when a locale is used, the front might know the language but not the content path. Current/Experienced Behavior: Locale is not used in the internal SQL filter Improved/Expected Behavior: Locale should be used as part of the internal SQL filter Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM CS 2023.4 Customer-name/Organization name: Real Madrid Club de Futbol Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently all the product profiles group from all the instances are visible in one particular instance. If we have 3 environments and 2 run modes (author and publish) this means any particular instance like DEV Author will have 6 Product Profile groups displayed for AEM Users and AEM Administrators. Ideally this is usually not required as the Product Administrators are not interested in other groups. So the groups originating from other product profiles should either be hidden or disabled. Also, if you select any other AEM Users Product Profile Group it displays the list of members along with the option to cancel their group membership and allows you to save and proceed. (This is not allowed as if you see the product profile group again the deleted user is still present)Ideally this option to cancel membership for a user for other instance's product profile group should not be displayed. Use-case: Only the users with product profiles to a particular instance are synced. However, all the groups in IMS are synced to all the AEM instances. This leads to a confusion for a product user as one is not able to determine the instance relevant product profile group. Current/Experienced Behavior: All the Product Profile groups are displayed for all the instances in any given instance. The current product profile group should be highlighted to help narrow down your active product profile. The option to delete/cancel a user's membership to other instance's product profile group is misleading. This option should not be shown. Improved/Expected Behavior: Display only those product profile groups which are relevant to the instance. If displaying other product profile groups, remove the option in UI to cancel the group members. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): Below screenshot shows AEM Users Product Profiles from RDE, DEV, Stage and Prod without highlighting which Product Profile group belongs to our current environment (RDE). The user has to take that info from the IMS Admin Console. In RDE Instance, I am able to access AEM Users Product Profile group for Prod Environment and access the members. In UI, I am able to delete this membership for a user account. This is not allowed in backend obviously. When you refresh, the deleted user appears again. The option to cancel/delete the membership should not be shown ideally. Code package (if applicable): @kautuk_sahni
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Request for having a default Adobe SMTP server included by default with product or available as a service on demand which client can purchase and bundle with product.. Use-case: Some of the clients do not want to share their own SMTP for mail notifications and with AEMaaCS are not aware of the proxy host and advance networking port configurations to be done. They want something to be available out of box which they can readily use. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently client specific SMTP needs to be configured. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ready to launch service for clients Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Support for dynamicUrl for video and audio assets in GraphQL query Use-case: To retrieve the dynamicUrl of audio and video assets via GraphQL query Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no field for _dynamicUrl in MultiMediaReference and DocumentRef Improved/Expected Behavior: There should be a _dynamicUrlfield field in MultiMediaReference or DocumentRef Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic offering should provide support for logging, alerting and API integrations. Use-case: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic does not provide support for alerting. This is required in order to identify any issues early on w.r.t the AEM instances and setup APM alerts. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic does not provide support for logging, alerting and API integrations. Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic should provide support for logging, alerting and API integrations. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
If you "clone" a module that has input filters, the input filters are dropped. But if you "copy" and "paste" a module, the input filters are brought over. It's the weirdest little idiosyncrasy. "Clone" doesn't feel like a "clone" if some aspect of it gets missed in the cloning process.(Certainly not a high priority ask.)
Understanding that some documents or elements within a document may not be processed as text, having a built-in spell check would be very helpful.
With the recent move to View, Duplicate and Edit access levels it would be great if users with View access could change and interact with the date range. While they can interact with filters/drop downs this doesn't work as well for dates as often users what to look at specific date ranges after a change, sale, weather, event etc. We can't always have pre-programmed all the options they'd want to look at into a filter. This wouldn't alter the dashboard so would still be a view level of access.Even better would be able to lock or unlock date ranges for view access.
I have a suggestion to improve the new commenting experience by enabling users to add tables, formatting, and add images/files within the 'Updates' box. This enhancement would make it more versatile, similar to Microsoft Outlook, and encourage users to utilize 'Updates' for more comprehensive email-like communication. I know this might be ambitious, but it could significantly enhance the platform's functionality.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Due to employees within our team, we need to move all their work to another user, so no recreation is needed.How would you like the feature to work - I need this to work the same way that Adobe Analytics worked.Current Behaviour - Need to recreate filters and workspaces. Then the old one would be deleted, but we can't delete as it will break other users who are using these filters.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - We utilize custom forms to intake work across our company. However, there are occasions where the original requestor will go in and make changes/updates to their initial request form submission. If they make material changes to their request and save/re-submit, no notification is triggered, so the person assigned to the work does not know about the changes. This can cause us to work on things that then need to be redone/changed to correspond to the updated request.How would you like the feature to work - Expand notifications for users to enable instant notification when a custom form is resubmitted/saved and the user is either on the routing rules for that custom form or subscribed to the issue/request.Current Behaviour -
With the switch over to experience cloud admin console we have lost the ability as an admin to login as other users. This was an incredibly useful function to allow us to problem solve our users issues and test access levels.Please please can you return this functionality.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Need support to add dynamic domain (localized domain, multidomain) to OOB sitemap.xml generator. Use-case: If I hit mydomain.com/country/language1.sitemap.xml I want to see <loc> starting with mydomain.com/..... Similarly, if I hit mydomain.at/country/language2.sitemap.xml, I want to see <loc> starting with mydomain.at/.... Current/Experienced Behavior: Pickes value from externalizer service. Improved/Expected Behavior: Pick dynamically Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.13
My Studio used to use the sync feature to import Outlook Calendar events into a WF calendar and then be able to allocate leftover working hours to certain WF projects by dragging them into the interface around their meeting and appointment times. It was a super effficient, visual way to map out one's design time for a week. This feature is not included in the new WF Home Page, and it used to save a lot of time. It also kept my Team all using one Adobe product to plan and organize themselves. It could literally look and function the same way the old calendar did, where you drag projects from a side column into the interface to block off pieces of time, and if the functionality was there before, I would hope at least the architecture would be there to make it easier to develop the same functionality as a widget in the new home page.
Target should have a built-in Audience that automatically excludes the IAB Bots. This Audience should also provide the ability to add specific user-agents.Similar functionality can be found within Adobe Analytics (see screen shot below). The IAB Bot Filtering can be checked to filter out known bots, and then the ability to add specific user-agents as well is provided.Having Bots in the Tests negatively impacts visitor metrics, such as RPV.
Hi all, We like to change the time at which alerts fire when monitoring traffic for the previous day - i.e. using the daily alert granularity. One of our most extensive uses cases for alerts is for monitoring the integrity of our data. We use classifications extensively and have segments that depend on them so having alerts set up to monitor any issue in classifying a particular eVar would be invaluable. We have set up several alerts like this as a proof of concept but we are having a couple of issues with the current behaviour. Currently, alerts fire at ~ 00:30 for the previous day. This only gives 30 mins after the end of the day for any classification processing to catch-up. This results frequent alerts firing for false positives. We receive the email for the alert at 00:30 but by the time the alert is checked during working hours the classification processing has caught up and the workspace we have set up to monitor these alerts suggests that the alert should not have fired. One way to get around this would be to allow the alerts to fire later the following day. I have suggested making this configurable in the Alert builder. This would allow us to experiment with different times to determine which works best for us. Thanks.
Without a link between Workload Balancer and the reporting function, we currently do not have ability to create forward-looking reports that display the utilization of staff for a given period of time. We need the ability to create advanced reports that display all resourced hours for a specific week/month/quarter. This includes all tasks that start, stop and will be in progress during the designated time. Reporting currently does a great job of looking back, but more help is needed in its ability to look forward.
Description -When making edits to a scenario, we're finding the process of tracking down all usages of a reference to be cumbersome. Our current process is to download the blueprint, open in a separate editor, and Ctrl-F to find the one(s) desired. It would be preferable to stay in the Fusion UI but have a way to "highlight all usages" based on selection of a reference ID. That reference ID could be input using the {{14.something.`foo bar`}} syntax, even, to allow for the case where the reference has already been changed. I would NOT want a find-replace, per se, as sometimes applying the change requires consideration of other changes to go with it, hence why the ask is limited to helping identify the usages. Why is this feature important to you -If I'm a Fusion admin, keep me in Fusion. Switching to an external tool disrupts my workflow. How would you like the feature to work -See above. Current Behaviour -See above.
Hi Marketo team,would be great if we have a report in the Analytics section of Marketo, that will show us overview/view:summary details of the programs in it, such as:- Channel- Created- Last Modified- Salesforce Campaign Sync- Total Members- Acquired By- Socially Acquired- Success- as well as the Members by Program Status detailsBasically, it is the View:Summary details we are interested in to see in a report, where the columns of the report are the details we see on the Summary View of each program.Many thanks,Stilyana
Description -Make it so you can sort search results by last modified date. Why is this feature important to you - More filtering for searching makes things easierHow would you like the feature to work - IN search be able to filter by last modified date for requests and documentsCurrent Behaviour - Not able to do that.
Make the time off Tool Tip more visible in the Resource Planner and the Workload Balancer for manually assigned work. When someone is assigned work during this time, a tool tip appears informing the user you have scheduled time off only when assigning work in bulk assignments. No tool tip appears in the Workload Balancer if a person has scheduled time-off and is assigned work. To the user it looks like work is assigned to a user without regard to having time off.
Description - We use planner for forecasting capacity for our C Suite Execs to help with forecasting projects. Currently with the planner functionality as it is, we have to create our filters, export to excel, and remove zeros, etc. In it's current state the filers just don't work quite right for viewing inside the tool and always needs to be aggregated in excel. With the ultimate goal of Workfront being the one stop shop, this doesn't sit well. If we could filter out old projects that don't fall in the timeline being viewed or somehow alleviate the mass amounts of zero values that show up, it would help us tremendously and would help the overall value of Workfront for our user base. Why is this feature important to you - The amount of time needed to run resourcing reports out of Workfront is too high. We need to find a solution that's faster and doesn't involve so much work outside of Workfront. How would you like the feature to work - Expand the filtering functionality. Current Behaviour - Create basic filters and export to excel.
We suggest integrating a custom date field (e.g., "Show Start date" or "Shipping date") with task start and finish dates in Adobe Workfront. Our projects rely heavily on custom date fields imported from Salesforce via fusion, leading to manual tracking and updates. This integration would automate dependency management, enabling us to create templates that reference the custom field, streamlining project creation. Real-time data synchronization would also ensure project accuracy when Salesforce data changes. This feature would significantly enhance project management efficiency and accuracy for us and other Workfront users facing similar challenges.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
