Build better products with our product team
Description - We would love to be able to nest projects/initiatives in the scenario planner and see high level, annual Important Dates to plan against. Secondly it would be great to be able to add dates that don't align to the beginning or end of a month. Nesting, like a project would allow us to see where phases of a project can occur in the timeline and not just start and end dates. Our workflows are more fluid than just start and end. It would behave similar to task nesting. When we are planning from a high level we look at important dates through the year and see what projects can align with those as release dates. Why is this feature important to you - It would allow more tool adoption by people who currently work across sheets and workfront and it would let us high level plan more fluidly (without having to input requests which require more information to be figured out) How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how tasks are nested to a project or parent task. The Important Dates feature would just show as milestones on the scenario planner timeline Current Behaviour - Doesn't currently exist.
Description - Requesting some form of client notification when background automated processes are run that could materially impact workspace reporting data. Specific example would be the cleanup of 'badIDs', as defined as IDs that have X% of activity against them (clearly well beyond normal customer behavior levels) and need to be removed from workspace to avoid performance degradation. Notification allows the client to assess potential impact on insights/analytics reporting and notify appropriate stakeholders as needed that data may not be directionally accurate in representing customer behavior.
When a user removes a custom form from an issue or any other object, the system updates area does not keep an audit trail letting us know that a custom form was removed. Need a way to know when a custom form was removed from a record and by whom regardless of the object.Thank you!
Description - When a custom form field is a defaulted value and contains display logic, the defaulted value is pulled in reports as if, it were true metadata on the record- review of the record shows the field is actually hidden and not a part of the record. Why is this feature important to you - Reporting accuracy. We should be able to pull precise data and not have it tarnished by custom form field logic. How would you like the feature to work - If a domain of value is hidden, due to display logic, the report should pull accurately Current Behaviour - today a report with a column pulling in a field with display logic, will pull in the value selected as the defaulted value.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adobe's own Payment gateway for seamless integartion with applications via simple API calls. Use-case: Payments in any payment related applications. Current/Experienced Behavior: 3rd party integartion, white label payment gateway Improved/Expected Behavior: Use of APIs provided by Adobe to directly connect to payment gateways and get response seemslessly without redirecting to 3rd party pages within AEM. Create own payment experience. Additional add-on to AEM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Some of our bar charts are used for reporting into senior meetings. The formatting of the bar charts becomes inconsistent when nearing the top of the chart box and drops the legend of one bar to within the bar. It would be better to allow the chart box to be extended slightly to ensure that the formatting is consistent within the chart and all legends can sit above the bar. Why is this feature important to you - Lack of consistency looks messy when used for reporting. How would you like the feature to work - The legend on bar charts should be consistently above the bar they relate to. Current Behaviour - When a bar chart gets towards the top of the formatted chart box the legend moves to within the bar while others sit above.
Description Ability to transform redirects based on the session and visitors attributes. Why is this feature important to you Sometimes we need to write javascript to customize redirects beyond what is availability in the redirect offer. E.g. converting a querystring into path or changing a querystring attribute name. Javascript based redirects are not officially supported, they are slower and can cause SRM errors How would you like the feature to work Take the incoming URL as an input string write JavaScript and/or Velocity to make transformations to the the string, including inserting session and profile attribute values Output the transformation as the output string Validate the output string is a valid URL Apply standard Adobe Target redirect offer transformation (i.e., add referrer, session id, etc) Send output string as redirect back to the browser Current Behaviour Static URLs with option to pass the original querystring and mbox session ID
DescriptionInclude Target Type and Experience ID on the Overview tab of the Activity details page Why is this feature important to youEasier access to this information when we analyzing experiments in our data warehouse or via an API How would you like the feature to work In the "Info" section include Target Type In the "Experiences" section, include helper text with the Experience ID. Current Behaviour Only Activity ID is displayed in the "Info" section
Description Create a third offer type "GitHub Offers" within the Offers library. I'm mostly describing offers here, but a similar method would work for profile scripts. Why is this feature important to you This would help us to follow development best practices and automate some of the work flow. How would you like the feature to work GitHub would automatically pull folders, .html, .json documents into the Adobe Target library. Ideally, it would be great of it would support multiple branches with the option for that brand to behavior differently with Adobe Target, e.g.: Prod Branch: .html and .json documents would act life Remote Cached offers. Normal cached offers rules would apply Staging Branch: .html and .json documents would act life Remote Dynamic offers. Dev Branch: etc.... In an activity, you could note the branch and offer name so you could easily switch between branches. You could also fix to a version of the code, so that unexpected updates don't disrupt production or use the latest (default). Current Behaviour - N/A
Given Target's capability is similar to that of a TMS such as Adobe Launch (i.e. the ability to inject code into a website) I have always been surprised by the comparative lack of control over workflow/roles/permissions.Given Adobe has recognized the need to up it's game in this space from an Adobe Launch perspective, please can you consider mirroring this approach for Target?As it stands it is difficult to separate out responsibilities in a meaningful way given the limit roles and comparative lack of workflow. Our organisation is risk averse and although we have put other controls in place I fear this may have the potential to limit our ability to use Adobe Target in the future if this is not addressed.
Description - An Adobe Target role where users can view activities, but cannot create or edit them. However, the unlike the Publisher role, this one would only have the additional permission to deactivate/pause/stop activities.Why is this feature important to you - I work with many brands that are not often Adobe Target savvy but should still have control over their own websites if they hear about a major change to a marketing campaign before I do, I'd like to have them be able to deactivate/pause/stop that activity. I do not want them to be able to edit live activities or push new activities live as they won't QA and may break things.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to assign users the permission to only deactivate/pause/stop activities within the admin console.Current Behaviour - If a user has the power to deactivate/pause/stop an activity, they also have the power to activate an activity which can be much more harmful than the former.
Description - Looking for the system to allow "copy and submit" items to be saved as drafts. Why is this feature important to you - As a company that produces a lot of content on a regular cadence, we use the copy and submit function but would like the ability to save the items as drafts so that I can prepare the submissions and once I have my final marked up pdf I can then upload to my submission and submit. How would you like the feature to work - same as above Current Behaviour - The content owner either has to fill in our submission form completely and save as draft while they wait for marked up edits/data, etc., or wait until quarter-end and use the copy and submit button for anywhere between 5-15 pieces/content owner and upload/submit all at once.
There are many cases where I would like to report on the number of people added to a program over time, and have those results shared with me on a regular cadence. For example: I would like to report on the number of people that became a campaign member for an automated email campaign per month. Jan = 100 Feb = 200 March = 30 Today the only way to see these results is by creating individual smart lists.
Description - In the Documents area, when linking to a folder via SharePoint, count the files so they show next to the Document menu like individually linked or uploaded files. Why is this feature important to you - Without representing the files in the linked SharePoint folder, it appears as if there are no (or fewer) documents than there are, which can be confusing. How would you like the feature to work - The Documents menu title would have a number next to it that includes items within the linked SharePoint folder. Current Behaviour - When linking to a SharePoint folder, the Documents menu title reflect the number of files in the linked SharePoint folder. If that folder is the only source of documents, it appears as if there are no documents.
Description - currently, in Workload Balancer, you can change the assigned hours per user per project per task. You can increase or decrease hours and that will be reflected in Workfront, however, there is no such information in API. The only field in API there is, is workPerDayList which splits hours per some default calculations (equally across capacity). Why is this feature important to you - to be able to get data of assigned user per day per task from Workload Balancer. How would you like the feature to work - there should be a field that would return an object or array that will show user's hours per task (from Workload Balancer). Current Behaviour - does not exists. There is no API endpoint to get data from Workload Balancer.
Description - We'd like to introduce a feature where frequently tagged users or groups display higher in your dropdown list when typing '@'. Why is this feature important to you - We have lots of end users on Workfront, and in turn lots of these users have the same first name, there can be a huge list of names to scroll through, when you tag one of those people each day. How would you like the feature to work - Dropdown menu when typing '@' works similarly to Microsoft office where frequently tagged or recent users are displayed higher. Current Behaviour - Dropdown menu when typing '@' will display all users in order according to the letter you type. There is no algorithm it seems.
How would you like the feature to work - Make the new issue window experience consistent for better user experience because it looks out-dated. See below for comparison.New Issue Window: New Task Window:
It would be great to have "select all" accounts feature in TAM where all the accounts need to be marked as named accounts if needed. Currently, we have to select accounts manually.
Hello, Allow to set a number in the Random Sample filter instead of a percentage is key when we have batch sending to be done by hour. This is key when we want to deliver in China, creating multiple campaigns is too heavy and too manual. e.g., I have to deliver a newsletter to 80K Chinese contacts and the rhythm is 200 emails/hourCurrently there is no choice than creating multiple campaigns and this is taking ages and is not humanly sustainable.With the Random Sample set to 200 as limit we can set a limited number of campaigns working with recurrence and excluding the ones who already received the email.Allowing a by hour recurrence would be awesome too 🙂
Description - In large projects, if any edits are made other than in-line (bulk-editing of tasks), the page refreshes and the scroll position of the task list is reset to top. This can be quite frustrating and time consuming having to re-find the task sets being edited or worked on. Why is this feature important to you - It's time consuming and frustrating having to re-find the tasks. Using the list search helps, but list search filters the task set, rather than locating the position of the task that matches and showing all of the other tasks. How would you like the feature to work - After using task edit function, refresh the updated tasks without losing the scroll position of the task list. Current Behaviour - Page refreshes and the scroll position is reset to top.
Issue: Marketo is able to create a marketing list in CRM. That list is created with a standard naming convention based on the last 12 digits of the campaign ID the list is being related to: Mkto-Leads-Last12DigitOfCampCrmID Mkto-Contacts-Last12DigitOfCampCrmID Unfortunately, this is causing confusion because the list names are being duplicated, even though they are attached to different campaigns. There are a lot of instances where the last 12 digits (or more) of a campaign ID are identical between several different campaign. I'd love to see this improved to allow custom names when creating a CRM Marketing list.
Within Workspace, could we get another download option (or maybe even two more?) to enable csv download to include a) collapsed panels/tables and b) hidden tables? Once you get to a certain size with Workspaces view they can get very laggy, at which point defaulting panels into a collapsed view can be a good way to assist navigation across the report. However for stakeholders that may also want to download the Workspace data it can become a time consuming, and off-putting, task to manipulate the view as they need it for download. Its a similar point for the hidden tables where a user may want to extract hidden data to re-use elsewhere.
The newer Timesheet improvements on the 22.1 release allowed for when a user has a current timesheet, it will open to the current timesheet. This only happens when they click on the link in the main menu. If they pin the Timesheets area, it takes them to the All/My Timesheet area instead.It should be consistent where pinned Timesheet areas take you to the Current Timesheet as well.
I've run into a situation a few times where there are UI complications because of smaller resolutions or people utilizing web Browser Zoom or System Scaling to improve readability on smaller displays. I think improved support for resolutions that you would find on a laptop screen or on older devices would be a huge improvement for usability.
This issue arose because I wanted to update the project templates where Lisa is assigned a task directly and add Lindsay to Lisa's tasks. They will divvy up the web content tasks between themselves. I don’t want to use the “web content team” here, because Charde receives her assignments using that tag, and they don’t want to pull her into Lisa's items. They want to keep using the tag to retain visibility into Charde's tasks. My idea is that "Assignments" will be include to project template Filters or Views, so that you can see who or that team is assigned to a project.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
