Build better products with our product team
Would be nice to have the ability to hide the fields that are being used in an archived asset.
It would be great if we can have a bulk upload or excel import/upload options in the Projects/Tasks/Issues pages for saving time when the user enter multiple items at a time.Everytime its not easy and time taking to reach the admins to upload via Kickstarts as it would take more time to prepare the import excel and getting the object IDs in the acceptable format and so on.
Must have - import projects and templates from EXCEL files, not only MS project. why can we export as excel but not import??? it will save hours hours of unecessary work for templates adjustments.
DescriptionCurrently in Workfront, logging hours on a task requires Contribute permission, which also grants the ability to edit certain task details (such as the task name). This creates a governance challenge for organizations that need accurate time tracking but also want to maintain strict control over task data.Why is this feature important to youAccurate time tracking is essential for reporting, resource planning, and performance analysis. However, allowing users to edit task details just to log hours introduces risks of unintentional or unauthorized changes. For organizations with strict process compliance, separating time entry from task editing is crucial to maintain data integrity and governance.How would you like the feature to workIntroduce a standalone “Log Hours” permission that can be assigned independently of Contribute access. This permission should allow users with View rights on a task to enter time without being able to modify any other task attributes. It should be configurable both in access levels and in sharing settings to provide flexibility across different teams and roles.Current BehaviourCurrently, users have Contribute access to log hours on a task. This access also allows them to edit key task details, which creates a risk of accidental or unauthorized changes. There is no way to enable time entry without also granting broader editing capabilities.
Description - It would be great if we had the ability to to pin views, filters, and groupings in individual projects. Why is this feature important to you - It would allow us to already have the preferred view, filter, and grouping set when navigating to a project. This is especially helpful when navigating between normal projects (where assets are created) and request queues (where we typically have unique views, filters, and groupings set). How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how you can pins items to the top of your screen, we could have a way to pin (or remove pin) for the view, filter, or grouping within a project (where the information is selected from). Current Behaviour - Inability to keep preferred view, filter, and grouping within a specific project. It must be manually changed each time you navigate between them.
Ideas to really improve the user experience, increase efficiency and reduce risk: Allow for custom fields to be displayed in header section (e.g. project, task)Allow for a few additional header fields (e.g. up to 7-10)Allow for fields to display the object level field or higher to be displayed - e.g. if on a task, allow a view of a project field (e.g. Display project "Launch Date" as custom defined on a project)
Goodmorning, See an excellent enhancement possibility.Description - Enhancement to attach document with Expense (image, pdf and others) from local drive in project.Why is this feature important to you - Because the required document to be followed with details.How would you like the feature to work - Add a tab of upload document when adding an expense, check attachment.Current Behaviour - No such possibility at the moment. Mvh@2572788 kumar
Currently, to recalculate a custom object with fields from another object requires either 1) manually edit each form on which the custom object resides or 2) using the Recalculate Custom Expressions, after selecting Edit, Custom Forms. The results are: 1) neither of these options are user friendly; 2) this is also a potential risk, as data may be out of synch without the user being aware; and 3) this method is also not 'real time'. If this design option is due to potential performance considerations, perhaps one solution could be to provide options that would allow the user to prioritize which fields to auto-recalculate? This functionality would be really useful to have. It would also help the PR in the client base for as you know, a lot of goodwill from other functionality is quickly wiped out with "I have to keep track of my changes? Isn't the system supposed to be able to do that?" Thanks
It would make for less clicks for users, if a report creator could set default values for report prompts.With default values, in most situations, the end user viewing the report can just click the 'Run Report' button, and the defaults will be used. Currently the default value is '--any--', but for something like a date field, it would be very useful to be able to default it to 'Past Year' or some other value other than '--any--'
Please add the ability to export/download email samples as PDFs. It's helpful for internal sharing of campaigns. Downloading HTMLs are difficult to save somewhere others can access/remains a link and there's no way to convert it.
Description - Why is this feature important to you -My PMO manages projects for a Creative Studio Resource. At any given time there are more than 100 projects open. When we are looking at that teams Workload Balancer we can't tell easily which projects are running ahead or behind as there is no way to see the Priority. The Priority is a field in the Overview section on a Project under Basic Information that is an out of the box field. Today we utilize Flexible and Firm Deadline to know if the Creative Studio has more time or not for their task. They appear in green (Flexible) and red (Firm Deadline). How would you like the feature to work - If Priority was added as one of the Color Theme, then it would color code the projects on the Workload Balancer - green (Flexible) and red (Firm Deadline). Benefits - Team members can see which projects are most critical (green and red), fostering alignment and urgency. Color-coded priorities help visualize workload distribution and plan for capacity more effectively.Reduced PM time going back and forth between opening up every single project to see what the Priority is.Current Behaviour - Under Select Color theme, there are 3 options today:Default: The bars for all projects and their work items display in blue.Project: The bars associated with each project and its tasks change according to the name of the project. All tasks that belong to the project display in bars that match the color of the project. The project bars display in a lighter shade to distinguish them from the tasks. The project bars also include a project icon when choosing not to display allocations.Project Status: The bars associated with each project and its work items change to the color of the status of the project.The project status is that associated with the Group of the project. If the Group does not have group-specific statuses, the color of the work item bars is that of the system-level project status. Both system as well as custom statuses display. For information about group statuses, see Create or edit a group status.However, my team is asking for the Priority field to be added to this Color Theme options.
Current Behaviour - Currently users do not receive a notification when they are tagged on a comment from a Kanban board. I would think this would be available, but was told by Workfront Support that it is not. Why is this feature important to you - users need to know what they are being tagged on just like with anything else in Workfront.How would you like the feature to work - same as how it works for all notifications in Workfront.
Description:I'd like the ability to have a little bit of control over the look and feel of custom forms, particularly how they are displayed when used as a request queue. Ideally we'd be able to adjust font size, font weight, color, bolding, etc. Even if we could apply a default font-size for the form, and selectively bold some text, that would be a huge improvement. Additionally, a complaint I've received multiple times is that the font size for a question is smaller than the font size for an option within that question. If we could change the font size we could fix this ourselves. Or, if it's easier, make the question font-size match that of the options below it. Example: Why is this feature important to you -There are new rules that go into effect in April 2026 around accessibility of internal and external documents for Government agencies. All documents must be WCAG 2.1 AA complaint. Depending on your reading of the guidelines the current request queue forms may not be in compliance. More information here: https://www.ada.gov/resources/2024-03-08-web-rule/How would you like the feature to work -I can think of a few different ways to address this:1.) Allow admins to set a default font size for request queue forms and be able to selectively bold descriptive text in forms.2.) Give us complete control over the font size, color, etc, on a per-question basis.3.) As a stopgap, increase the font-size of the question label to match that of the options below it, and ensure request queue forms meet all other WCAG 2.1 AA guidelines. Current Behaviour:We have no control over the design of custom form/request queue design, and current request queue forms may not be WCAG 2.1 AA compliant.
Description:When you create a checkbox group in a custom form, an 'All' option is added when the form is displayed to your users. There is no way (that I know of) to disable this option. It also doesn't appear in the form editor, so it was a surprise to see it on the published form. There are cases where I don't want to encourage the user to select all options, and by putting 'All' first in the list, Workfront is making it look like that's what I want people to select.You should give us the option to disable the 'All' option for checkbox groups. Why is this feature important to you:The current implementation encourages users to select all available options, which is not what we want. We can get around this by making each item it's own checkbox, but this is very messy. How would you like the feature to work:In the options for the 'checkbox group' field, have an option to 'Disable 'All' option'.Current Behaviour:'All' option is added at the top of all checkbox groups when custom forms are displayed to the user when making a new request.
We relly heavily in Proofing and the proofing custom form.We have multiple automated templates and fields that we capture. When we need to add new proofing fields, automated templates or make updates or changes to existing ones, having only Preview to test and demo those changes makes it very difficult for us as one week is not enough time to have demo and uat for all the required stakeholders.Some of our automated templates can have up to 20 stages so recreating this every week in Preview is very cumbersome and inefficient. We would like to have Proofing available in the Sandbox environments.
Description - In my role, I often create projects, leave them in Planning and then mark as Complete just so there's a record, but I also, do the normal project workflow of Planning, Current, and Complete. It would be helpful if there was an option to prevent email notifications from being sent on a specific project, i.e., the ones that go from Planning to Complete. Why is this feature important to you - It would prevent an emails being sent where there are no tasks for anyone and it's not necessary to know the project is Complete since it was for documentation purposes only. How would you like the feature to work - When a Project goes from Planning to Complete, have a popup that asks "Should email notifications to be sent?" Have checkboxes for Yes or No. Current Behaviour - Email notifications can be changed under User Settings or Globally which we wouldn't want to change because they would be changed on all projects. Thanks,Kenny
From an enterprise management perspective, controlling and regulating custom form updates and simply the identification becomes very difficult due to limited ability to identify who owns a certain form. Currently, the only way to really differentiate the different forms between groups is by adding in an abbreviated identifier in the name of the form or description such as "ABC Group - Intake Request" (both are a not optimal). There does not appear to be a way to even change the group name that is associated with the forms today which at the very least would be extremely helpful. Request: Add in some simple identification features within custom forms such as an Owner and/or customizable Group identifier Benefits: Ability to filter custom forms based on ownership which creates administrative efficiency and reduces risk of incorrect form updatesIncreases user experience by not having to have group identifiers within the name of the form (more aesthetic to user) Experience the same challenge? Add a thumbs up "like" to this idea!
Description - Remember my Phone Number and Time ZoneWhy is this feature important to you - So I don't have to enter it every time. How would you like the feature to work - Prepopulate from my account. Current Behaviour - I have to enter it every time. While it's easy to enter my phone number, I have to scroll through to find my time zone which is already selected on my account settings. Having it prepopulate with the information will reduce errors and speed up the process. Thanks
Description -Currently, when printing or exporting a dashboard from the platform, color formatting (such as conditional formatting, status indicators) is not retained in the final output. This can make printed reports harder to interpret, especially when visual cues are critical for understanding project or task status. The exported version often appears in grayscale or with muted visuals, even when the dashboard is fully colored on-screen.While we understand some UI-specific elements are removed by design, color is a critical aspect of dashboard readability. Request -We would like to request the ability for printed and exported dashboards to retain their original color formatting. This includes conditional formatting (e.g., status indicators), and any other meaningful color-based visual cues. Ensuring color consistency between the on-screen view and the printed/exported version would improve clarity and data interpretation.Why is this feature important to you - Prevents misinterpretation of status or performance data that relies on color codingImproves the professionalism and readability of exported reportsReduces the need for manual workarounds or explanations about what colors were “supposed to be”
Description - CJA/Derived Fields: Internal URL Filter for Marketing Channels, new feature requestWhy is this feature important to you - I'm setting up our Marketing Channels on CJA using Derived Fields, as part of our migration from Adobe Analytics to CJA. While in the process, I noticed that there is no option to set up Internal URL Filter in the derived fields. We have many internal sites in the company, and we need to be able to categorize them as "internal traffic" in our marketing channels, so that it doesn't mess up our marketing channels reporting.How would you like the feature to work - exactly as it is currently working in Adobe Analytics: the possibility to add internal URLs, and to later use them in the marketing channels processing rule builder (screenshots attached). Current Behaviour - there is currently no behavior on the derived fields.
DescriptionImprove Timesheet Behavior for Manually Pinned TasksWhy is this feature important to youCurrently, manually pinned tasks remain on a user's timesheet even after being marked as Completed or Cancelled. This can lead to confusion, as users may continue logging hours on tasks that are no longer active. It also affects data accuracy and time tracking consistency.How would you like the feature to workWe suggest enhancing the timesheet functionality to better handle manually pinned tasks by:Automatically removing pinned tasks from the timesheet once they are marked as Completed or CancelledPreventing time entry on tasks that are no longer active, regardless of manual pinningIntroducing configuration options to restrict manual pinning based on task statusAllowing system administrators to disable the manual pinning feature (Alt+P) for specific user profiles or globallyCurrent BehaviourUsers can manually pin tasks to their timesheet using Alt+P or the pin iconPinned tasks remain visible on the timesheet even after being marked as Completed or CancelledUsers can continue logging hours on these tasksThe existing setting “Pre-populate timesheets with completed or cancelled tasks” does not affect manually pinned tasks
Description:Our users need a way to categorize comments in proofs. Reviews often include duplicate or similar feedback, and grouping them would make it easier to compare related or conflicting comments and speed up implementing edits. Why is this feature important to you:Grouping similar comments would save time, keep reviews organized, and improve accuracy when resolving conflicts. How would you like the feature to work:Allow users to tag or categorize comments (e.g., “Duplicate,” “Design Change,” “Content Edit”) and filter by those tags. This would let them view all related feedback together for faster, more organized reviews. Current Behaviour:Comments can only be reviewed individually.
Description - Currently, when printing a dashboard directly from the platform, the print view does not automatically adjust to align properly. Although manual adjustments are available on our end to ensure proper alignment in the print preview, the process is not dynamic and requires user intervention.Request: We would like to request the ability for the print view of dashboards to dynamically adjust to ensure proper alignment, without requiring any manual adjustments from the user. This would provide a smoother, more seamless experience for users who frequently print dashboards and improve overall usability. Why is this feature important to you - Eliminates the need for manual intervention each time a dashboard is printed.Enhances user experience by ensuring that all elements on the dashboard are properly aligned in the print preview, making it more efficient for users.Streamlines the process for those who rely on printed reports for presentations or documentation.
Description:There is a critical inconsistency between the activity records in the Adobe Admin Console and the logs shown in Workfront. When users make changes — such as editing profiles or managing access — via the Admin Console, these actions are not properly attributed in Workfront logs.Why is this feature important to you:Accurate traceability is essential for our security, audit, and compliance processes. Without clear identification of the user who performed a change, we face risks in governance and accountability. This is especially critical during permission reviews, account deactivations, or investigations.How would you like the feature to work:Workfront should reflect the actual user who performed the action in the Admin Console, both in the system logs and in Journal reports. Instead of showing “System” or generic labels, the logs should capture and display the authenticated user responsible for the change.Current Behaviour:Changes made in the Admin Console appear in Workfront logs as performed by “System” and in Journal reports as “RPA ” without any link to the actual user. This makes it impossible to track who made the change, creating gaps in auditability and compliance.
Description - Support WebP image file format for document upload and sharing (Not needed for proofing purposes) Why is this feature important to you - My team manages our corporate websites - those sites primarily use WebP file formatted images for page load speed and other reasons as supported by industry best practices. As an enterprise we use Workfront for request and project intake - so someone from another group within the enterprise can send a Workfront request to my team to update/create a web page - this included updating images - those individuals need to have the ability to upload and share WebP files with my team via Workfront for us to load to our DAM and websites. We would not need the ability to create WF proofs of these images. How would you like the feature to work - simply upload WebP file formatted images to documents within Projects and/or intake requests - again, for sharing purposes, not needed for proofing. Current Behavior - WebP images not supported for uploading.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
