Build better products with our product team
Description - Please add the Workfront Project "securityAncestorsDisabled" field to the "Project Endpoint" in the public API!! It's shocking that this is not in the public api and part of the internal-only api. Why is this feature important to you - it would be good for us to have this type of information to better align data over fusion updates and also have the ability to better know which projects are intentionally isolated from permissions. Going through the internal API is harder. How would you like the feature to work - add the "securityAncestorsDisabled" field to the Project Endpoint in the "public api". Current Behaviour - the field "securityAncestorsDisabled" is only available in the private/internal-only api. Thank you,DD
Description - Do not allow time to be entered on a project or task before the Start Date (planned or actual) Why is this feature important to you - better compliance when it comes to entering time/timesheets and in the end give more accurate reporting. Currently our team is using Workfront for time/timesheets so it is important to be as accurate as possible. How would you like the feature to work - When a user goes to enter time on a project or task, the days before the start date of the object are greyed out, not allowing them to enter time in the past or before the object was created. Helpful if this could be an option in the Setup menu. Current Behavior - The user can enter time in the past for a project or task that was just created, giving inaccurate data on Timesheets and in reporting.
When a user is deactivated, they should be removed everywhere. I keep finding little easter eggs of old users and can't even begin to find all the places they need to be removed. Examples, assignments on templates, sharing on projects created from templates, custom views sharing. The only thing that should remain, is a history of what they did. They should not still have views and such shared with them or newly created projects shared/assigned.
Description Sorting for bucketed dimensions in CJA should default to logical sorting by the dimension's numerical value, rather than it's label. Buckets should be displayed more clearly (Less than 30, 30 to 59, 60 to 119, 120 or more) Why is this feature important to you Bucketed dimensions are intuitively understood when sorted in logical order by the value of the dimension. For example, shortest to longest time. It's confusing when two buckets are ambiguously defined and contain the same value (example: 30 to 60, 60 to 120). How would you like the feature to work Bucketed dimensions should default to logical sorting by the dimensions numerical value. At a minimum, users should have the option to sort by logical order. Example: If I have a bucketed dimension for time in seconds (Less than 30, 30-60, 60-120, 120 or more), I'd like the option to sort them logically as either: Less than 30, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, 120 or more, or 120 or more, 60 to 120, 30 to 60, Less than 30 Bucket ranges should be clearly displayed (without any overlap) Current Behavior Sorting by the bucketed dimension sorts by non-intuitive, alpha-numeric orders either: Less than 30, 60 to 120, 30 to 60, 120 or more, or 120 or more, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, Less than 30 Bucket ranges overlap (30 to 60, 60 to 120, 120 or more), causing confusion.
Why is this feature important to you - Everyone has done it: Deleted a report when they didn't mean to or know better. This moves cheese for our users and creates more admin work. How would you like the feature to work - Like other objects, send deleted reports to the recycle bin and therefore allow admins to restore them. Current Behaviour - We cannot restore reports. They're gone forever upon delete.
If you delete a project it is permanent. Adobe should implement a 30 day recycle bin where you can restore your deleted projects.
Description: When we create a filter in CJA, the size is default and we are not allowed to resize it. It limits the information displayed for the user, as seen in the image attatched to this idea.Why is this feature important to you: There are no workaround to solve this to us because the filter with this information is important to our reports, so only allowing to change the size would solve our problem.How would you like the feature to work: Similar at it is implemented in Workfront.Current Behaviour: Each filter has a default size and it is not posible to edit this.
Workfront advertisments for LEAP are listed on our main user login page. We'd like to be able to remove them. We do understand and appreciate your position as a SaaS company. Please try to understand that we are using WorkFront as a portal to working with our customers. So, by having the LEAP Conference splash page, or any other advertisement on the login screen, you are promoting to our customers - not just to us. We're a small company, but that is 400 customers with over 2,000 contacts who think they are logging in to work on a Level Data project. We've been having to explain away the LEAP Conference. My request is that you treat the splash page the same as how Salesforce treats theirs - it is up to the subscribing customer to set how they want to use it. Enabled to Salesforce default with whatever they want, Disabled completely, or set to what the subscribing customer wants.
With two or more report prompts, it's not possible to reorder them without deleting and re-adding them in the new order. It would save administrators time when they want to reorder the prompts.
Would be nice to have the ability to hide the fields that are being used in an archived asset.
It would be great if we can have a bulk upload or excel import/upload options in the Projects/Tasks/Issues pages for saving time when the user enter multiple items at a time.Everytime its not easy and time taking to reach the admins to upload via Kickstarts as it would take more time to prepare the import excel and getting the object IDs in the acceptable format and so on.
Must have - import projects and templates from EXCEL files, not only MS project. why can we export as excel but not import??? it will save hours hours of unecessary work for templates adjustments.
DescriptionCurrently in Workfront, logging hours on a task requires Contribute permission, which also grants the ability to edit certain task details (such as the task name). This creates a governance challenge for organizations that need accurate time tracking but also want to maintain strict control over task data.Why is this feature important to youAccurate time tracking is essential for reporting, resource planning, and performance analysis. However, allowing users to edit task details just to log hours introduces risks of unintentional or unauthorized changes. For organizations with strict process compliance, separating time entry from task editing is crucial to maintain data integrity and governance.How would you like the feature to workIntroduce a standalone “Log Hours” permission that can be assigned independently of Contribute access. This permission should allow users with View rights on a task to enter time without being able to modify any other task attributes. It should be configurable both in access levels and in sharing settings to provide flexibility across different teams and roles.Current BehaviourCurrently, users have Contribute access to log hours on a task. This access also allows them to edit key task details, which creates a risk of accidental or unauthorized changes. There is no way to enable time entry without also granting broader editing capabilities.
Description - It would be great if we had the ability to to pin views, filters, and groupings in individual projects. Why is this feature important to you - It would allow us to already have the preferred view, filter, and grouping set when navigating to a project. This is especially helpful when navigating between normal projects (where assets are created) and request queues (where we typically have unique views, filters, and groupings set). How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how you can pins items to the top of your screen, we could have a way to pin (or remove pin) for the view, filter, or grouping within a project (where the information is selected from). Current Behaviour - Inability to keep preferred view, filter, and grouping within a specific project. It must be manually changed each time you navigate between them.
Ideas to really improve the user experience, increase efficiency and reduce risk: Allow for custom fields to be displayed in header section (e.g. project, task)Allow for a few additional header fields (e.g. up to 7-10)Allow for fields to display the object level field or higher to be displayed - e.g. if on a task, allow a view of a project field (e.g. Display project "Launch Date" as custom defined on a project)
Goodmorning, See an excellent enhancement possibility.Description - Enhancement to attach document with Expense (image, pdf and others) from local drive in project.Why is this feature important to you - Because the required document to be followed with details.How would you like the feature to work - Add a tab of upload document when adding an expense, check attachment.Current Behaviour - No such possibility at the moment. Mvh@2572788 kumar
Currently, to recalculate a custom object with fields from another object requires either 1) manually edit each form on which the custom object resides or 2) using the Recalculate Custom Expressions, after selecting Edit, Custom Forms. The results are: 1) neither of these options are user friendly; 2) this is also a potential risk, as data may be out of synch without the user being aware; and 3) this method is also not 'real time'. If this design option is due to potential performance considerations, perhaps one solution could be to provide options that would allow the user to prioritize which fields to auto-recalculate? This functionality would be really useful to have. It would also help the PR in the client base for as you know, a lot of goodwill from other functionality is quickly wiped out with "I have to keep track of my changes? Isn't the system supposed to be able to do that?" Thanks
It would make for less clicks for users, if a report creator could set default values for report prompts.With default values, in most situations, the end user viewing the report can just click the 'Run Report' button, and the defaults will be used. Currently the default value is '--any--', but for something like a date field, it would be very useful to be able to default it to 'Past Year' or some other value other than '--any--'
Please add the ability to export/download email samples as PDFs. It's helpful for internal sharing of campaigns. Downloading HTMLs are difficult to save somewhere others can access/remains a link and there's no way to convert it.
Description - Why is this feature important to you -My PMO manages projects for a Creative Studio Resource. At any given time there are more than 100 projects open. When we are looking at that teams Workload Balancer we can't tell easily which projects are running ahead or behind as there is no way to see the Priority. The Priority is a field in the Overview section on a Project under Basic Information that is an out of the box field. Today we utilize Flexible and Firm Deadline to know if the Creative Studio has more time or not for their task. They appear in green (Flexible) and red (Firm Deadline). How would you like the feature to work - If Priority was added as one of the Color Theme, then it would color code the projects on the Workload Balancer - green (Flexible) and red (Firm Deadline). Benefits - Team members can see which projects are most critical (green and red), fostering alignment and urgency. Color-coded priorities help visualize workload distribution and plan for capacity more effectively.Reduced PM time going back and forth between opening up every single project to see what the Priority is.Current Behaviour - Under Select Color theme, there are 3 options today:Default: The bars for all projects and their work items display in blue.Project: The bars associated with each project and its tasks change according to the name of the project. All tasks that belong to the project display in bars that match the color of the project. The project bars display in a lighter shade to distinguish them from the tasks. The project bars also include a project icon when choosing not to display allocations.Project Status: The bars associated with each project and its work items change to the color of the status of the project.The project status is that associated with the Group of the project. If the Group does not have group-specific statuses, the color of the work item bars is that of the system-level project status. Both system as well as custom statuses display. For information about group statuses, see Create or edit a group status.However, my team is asking for the Priority field to be added to this Color Theme options.
Current Behaviour - Currently users do not receive a notification when they are tagged on a comment from a Kanban board. I would think this would be available, but was told by Workfront Support that it is not. Why is this feature important to you - users need to know what they are being tagged on just like with anything else in Workfront.How would you like the feature to work - same as how it works for all notifications in Workfront.
Description:I'd like the ability to have a little bit of control over the look and feel of custom forms, particularly how they are displayed when used as a request queue. Ideally we'd be able to adjust font size, font weight, color, bolding, etc. Even if we could apply a default font-size for the form, and selectively bold some text, that would be a huge improvement. Additionally, a complaint I've received multiple times is that the font size for a question is smaller than the font size for an option within that question. If we could change the font size we could fix this ourselves. Or, if it's easier, make the question font-size match that of the options below it. Example: Why is this feature important to you -There are new rules that go into effect in April 2026 around accessibility of internal and external documents for Government agencies. All documents must be WCAG 2.1 AA complaint. Depending on your reading of the guidelines the current request queue forms may not be in compliance. More information here: https://www.ada.gov/resources/2024-03-08-web-rule/How would you like the feature to work -I can think of a few different ways to address this:1.) Allow admins to set a default font size for request queue forms and be able to selectively bold descriptive text in forms.2.) Give us complete control over the font size, color, etc, on a per-question basis.3.) As a stopgap, increase the font-size of the question label to match that of the options below it, and ensure request queue forms meet all other WCAG 2.1 AA guidelines. Current Behaviour:We have no control over the design of custom form/request queue design, and current request queue forms may not be WCAG 2.1 AA compliant.
Description:When you create a checkbox group in a custom form, an 'All' option is added when the form is displayed to your users. There is no way (that I know of) to disable this option. It also doesn't appear in the form editor, so it was a surprise to see it on the published form. There are cases where I don't want to encourage the user to select all options, and by putting 'All' first in the list, Workfront is making it look like that's what I want people to select.You should give us the option to disable the 'All' option for checkbox groups. Why is this feature important to you:The current implementation encourages users to select all available options, which is not what we want. We can get around this by making each item it's own checkbox, but this is very messy. How would you like the feature to work:In the options for the 'checkbox group' field, have an option to 'Disable 'All' option'.Current Behaviour:'All' option is added at the top of all checkbox groups when custom forms are displayed to the user when making a new request.
We relly heavily in Proofing and the proofing custom form.We have multiple automated templates and fields that we capture. When we need to add new proofing fields, automated templates or make updates or changes to existing ones, having only Preview to test and demo those changes makes it very difficult for us as one week is not enough time to have demo and uat for all the required stakeholders.Some of our automated templates can have up to 20 stages so recreating this every week in Preview is very cumbersome and inefficient. We would like to have Proofing available in the Sandbox environments.
Description - In my role, I often create projects, leave them in Planning and then mark as Complete just so there's a record, but I also, do the normal project workflow of Planning, Current, and Complete. It would be helpful if there was an option to prevent email notifications from being sent on a specific project, i.e., the ones that go from Planning to Complete. Why is this feature important to you - It would prevent an emails being sent where there are no tasks for anyone and it's not necessary to know the project is Complete since it was for documentation purposes only. How would you like the feature to work - When a Project goes from Planning to Complete, have a popup that asks "Should email notifications to be sent?" Have checkboxes for Yes or No. Current Behaviour - Email notifications can be changed under User Settings or Globally which we wouldn't want to change because they would be changed on all projects. Thanks,Kenny
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
