Build better products with our product team
Any reports that are set up within a program of course are meant to report on that program specifically. When cloning a program, reports that are set up directly under the program itself are updated automatically. However, when you apply some housekeeping on more complex programs and put reports into a subfolder, the updating of this reference to the cloned program no longer happens. It would save a lot of manual work if this would also be updated automatically.
It's great that so many people helped with the re-ordering of Progressive Profiling fields though Javascript. But why is not possible to just drag & drop the whole section on the form editor? Nobody wants their ProgPro fields underneath an opt in box.
Description - Need a way to ingest data at profile level from Edge Server API Why is this feature important to you - next best action, edge segmentation How would you like the feature to work - Be able to update the profile attributes in AEP so that segment conditions can be simplified so that it can qualify for Edge Behavior. Alternatively, support sequence events conditions for Edge. Current Behaviour - It's supported only for Events.
Would allow the viewer to quickly reference where in the timeline the task is. Especially when there are multiples of the same task. This would be most helpful to be shown somewhere in the header/chrome.
Due to my company's cloud structure, the IT team isn't able to install the encrypted Workfront InDesign Plugin that is available in the Creative Cloud, they need an unencrypted version to be able to install that plugin on our sessions. I don't know if other companies face this same issue, but we would love to be able to utilize this plugin in an effort to create more efficiencies, we just can't with the file that is currently available on the Creative Cloud.
To extend the idea provided at "Add additional usage data for bulk API queries", handling bulk API data should be adjusted to understand datacenter locales as well. As an example, if you were looking to set up API extractions after a daily API limit is passed, knowing where the datacenter is helps integration providers understand when, exactly, an API limit will reset. Would it be possible to get AB, SJ, E, NL, SN, etc. passed as a result to calls like usage.json, or could we get a generic instance metadata call to provide information like this?
Note: this isn't limited to Analytics, but Adobe's Documentation Infrastructure as a whole. Description - While this may be hard to go back in time to achieve, I have seen a number of complaints and felt the pain myself... Either bookmarking something I would use frequently, like the Raw Data Column Reference (which has been moved about 4 times), or finding old links in Experience League... Many of the old posts still offer a wealth of information; but they are lessened by the fact that half the reference links are broken. Why is this feature important to you - We all rely on documentation, and being able to find that documentation quickly and easily is of utmost importance. Adobe being such a long running company, it's understandable that the documentation would move from place to place... what is not understandable is why basic functionality like using 301 redirects to keep all the varied in-links functional was skipped. How would you like the feature to work - When moving documents, ensure that proper 301 redirects are in place to make sure users end up in the correct location. Review all your 404 pages and make sure that old documentation links have 301 directs created for them to try and fix all the lost value that exists in the Experience League and other resources aimed at supporting the Adobe Community as a whole. Current Behaviour - So much history has been lost over the years due to document migrations that didn't include proper 301 redirects...
- This feature should be consider important and it should be created inside Adobe Analytics - Server calls usage. - We need to track Video calls, Starts or Media Streams. At the moment it seems that Adobe has not added this feature yet into the platform or future Roadmaps. - This feature gives more usage visibility to all users of Analytics in order to improve their adoption, usage, strategy for the future and avoid any over usage invoices
Description - Show the overall percent complete a portfolio is based on how far along the projects within that portfolio are. Why is this feature important to you - We have enterprise wide campaigns that consist of several projects. We put these projects into a portfolio to track how that campaign is going. It would great to see how much of that campaign is complete by showing the percentage complete for that portfolio. How would you like the feature to work - If a portfolio has 10 projects in it, and two are 100% complete and one is at 50% complete, then the portfolio would show that it's overall completion percent is 25% complete. This could be shown in the portfolio optimization page at the top, or be a filter when creating portfolio report. Current Behaviour - No option exists to track percent complete of a portfolio.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This is a request to add a functionality to be able to generate a list recently modified dita topics and be to choose the topics (from the list) to generate output for. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to identify recently updated topics and chose which ones to generate output for. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.512 ; AEM Guides 4.1 Customer-name/Organization name: Verizon Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
In light of the latest discontinuation notice informing that Adobe will be ending the services of "Reports and Analytics" section including all of its exclusive metrics and reports, and replacing it with Workspace, we'll be losing one of the metrics which is of an utmost importance to our daily analytical tasks, and also important to other markets, which is "Monthly Unique Visitors" metric. What makes this metric very essential is being able to breakdown the monthly active base across the month's days, in order to identify which users have appeared for the first time in exactly which day of the month.It'd be great if Adobe can either retain their metric somehow, and replicate it to be used in Workspace, due to its great importance. Also, my question is, is there a work-around to calculate this metric under custom metrics? Thanks.
The ability to turn on/off various layers present on an Adobe Workfront file aka the uploaded PDF. While reviewing a document it would be invaluable to be able to turn on various layers in Workfront, those layers can indicate PMS colors, special effects, etc. A simple layers palette similar to Acrobat would be the easiest and most direct solution as users would be most familiar with that approach. Currently there is no layer access in Adobe Workfront.
Description - Allow calculated field values to populate list of same field that can be used for drop down. Why is this feature important to you - I want to create separate IDs associated with certain projects and I want to be able to tie like projects to another project (it is our workaround for no real campaign object). How would you like the feature to work - A calculated field creates a value upon project creation when project type = campaign. The value generated will be "campaign-1234"; the field name will be "campaign custom ID" it is a calculated field. I want to then create a custom form for a non-campaign project object and on this form i want to have a drop down of the existing values in the "campaign custom ID" field. That way, I can tie projects to one or many other campaign like projects. Current Behaviour - I don't believe there is currently an option to do this.
Today, users have the ability to use the "New --> New Person" menu option inside the Database section of Marketo to directly add a record if necessary. However, the New Person flow does not account for pre-existing records with the same primary key—even if both versions of the record are Marketo-only and not synced to a distinct CRM record. Would it be possible to update this behavior to either explicitly prevent creating a duplicate in the Marketo database or notify the user that a user with that record's email address is already associated with a record? Again, I'm not sure if this is an "intentional" workaround for creating duplicates, but it's unexpected behavior.
It would be nice to hide the task condition update independently from just turning on or off system updates on task updates. Currently when someone clicks "Work on It" for a task an update is posted saying the task condition is "Going Smoothly". Our users don't agree that just because they start work on a task instantly means that everything is fine for the task. Showing this in the task updates causes a lot of confusion, but we don't want to turn off system updates since other system updates are important
User management in Adobe Analytics is one of the most "special" access and rights management configuration I have seen. Next to that, the possibility to share components (namely Segments, Calculated Metrics, Workspace Projects...) with Groups is only possible for Admin Users.So, imagine you configure different groups within your organization: one group per functional team. Adobe users within those teams cannot share specific Segments or Workspace Projects directly to their own team. They would need to do it user by user instead... If there are more than 10 people in one team, you understand it can quickly become annoying.Whishlist: allow non-admin users to see in sharing option pre-configured groups and allow them to share with these groups Segments, Calculated Metrics, Workspace Projects, etc they created_ _ _Update 1Linked idea: For Non-Administrators: Ability to SHARE Segments to a Select Group of People
We have found that 628,000 IP addresses, or 23% of IPs that have accessed our site in the last two months, do not resolve to a domain in the Domain report. This is despite the fact that the first 20 no-domain IPs we tested are listed in APNIC and commercial databases like IP2Location with a domain. Additionally, domain is only so useful, as it's often the ISP's domain and not the registering organization. We're looking into using a third party data source to bring this information in, but surely other Adobe customers want to know which companies and organizations are visiting their sites. Is there any chance of integrating with one of these databases to provide whois organization?
Giving an option to add user comments during add/edit > new/current > eVar/prop/events will help a lot to manage variable change log in Adobe at the report suite level. This can be used to annotate "change reason" in reports.Thanks,Asheesh
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK