Build better products with our product team
Currently if you drag a segment A into another segment B in the builder it will just copy it in i.e. it rebuilds A in B. This means if you change the original segment A it won't update in B.What would be great is if you could drag a segment into another segment in a similar way to how a calculated metric works. This means you only need to maintain the original A segment as it will feed through into any other segments that reference it.
I would like a option to see the maintenance time information based on my own timezone. Or as a minimum it should show what timezone it is based on.
Because this sounds obvious, and would allow us to sequence user behaviour across different channels.Sounds like it's what appeared in the "Experience Analytics" sneak at the Summit this year.
Currently, page event ids are only documented in the clickstream reference documents. New ids have been added in the past, and there's no way to know when this occurs. I would suggest adding page event to the list of lookup files that are delivered with the clickstream feeds. ThanksKeric
The search textbox is too broad. For example, we have segments names per country and per site, so Site ABC AU, Site ABC US, Site XYZ AU, Site XYZ US, etc. If I want to search for Site AU, I expect to see only Site ABC AU, Site XYZ AU, but instead I also see Site ABC US and Site XYZ US.
I would like the Workspace to include the line breaks we have made in our descriptions on the variables (evar, prop and events)In Admin i can make a description like this:I make the line break for a reason. It makes it easier to read.But in Workspace it look like this.
I have about 400 scheduled reports that I need to audit. It would be nice if I can export the scheduled report list to excel for further analysis.
It would be great to have the ability to archive old segments so that they’re not gone forever, but perhaps only show up when using a new "Archived" filter in Segment Manager. It becomes extremely distracting and cluttered to have old segments show up in Segment Builder, Analysis Workspace, etc.
It seems like "instances" is only available in the regular Reports & Analytics interface. When using a listvar, I want to be able to see instances, not occurrences, associated with the dimension. Thanks!
It will be great in the FLOW chart, specific pathes could be keeping highlighted between 2 checkpoints.Sorry I have no idea how to well describ this in words.
We need to be able to identify if we reach the 250 values limit or not.List Variable Adobe Client Care answer:The limit of 250 values is saved at a visitor by visitor level in the back end of the data base. This information is not available for which visitor has the value reached 250 and for whom it has not. The report for list variable shows aggregate values. Further, impressions may not be exactly same in case user had got some values expired because of reaching the limit of 250 values already saved for that visitor and only the latest value could be sent to reporting.
I would be very useful to have an overview of which projects have been sent via the 'Send File on Schedule' option. Whilst the “Scheduled Projects” tab shows you which schedules exist and allows you to check the associated rules/recipients there’s no log of projects that have already been sent. If a queue and a log are too complicated, then even just having a “Date Last Sent” column would be better than nothing.
The bar charts in a fallout take up 2/3 of the size of the panel. This is ok when it is the full width of the screen. However when condensing the size it ends up leaving very little room for the dimension title but lots of wasted space in the bar chart. Either make the bar chart size adjustable or prioritise the dimension name when shrinking.
I would like a option to choose a Report Suite or Virtual Report Suite directly from the Workspace "start page".The report suites should be placed in the left side menu, where project links are located now (My Favorite Project + Frequently Viewed Project)When i then select a report suite from the list the project listed should reflect those made/assigned* for that specific report suite.(* assigned: This is a part of the idea Assign a Workspace Project to multiple Report Suites ) As it is now, i need to first choose a project, and then i can shift report suite after. And in many cases you start working on the wrong report suite.A user/analyst would normally know WHERE (specific Website or App), he want to see data for, and then chose WHAT after that.And you would normally have multiple WHAT (project) question to one WHERE (Report Suite):But in Workspace the logic is turned around, where a user first need to chose WHAT, and then have to chose WHERE after that.I'm new to Adobe and Workspace, and it came as a big surprise that Workspace did not worked this way already.I predict so many cases where a user, make wrong conclusions, (or waste time) because they look into data for a wrong report suite.
In Analysis Workspace, provide a new table type called “Details Table”. I would think this would be on the level of Freeform Table. From there dimensions and metrics can only be applied across the top It would treat everything at the Hit level. Dimensions that are Visitor/People level would align automatically to the left, Visit level would be to the right of Visitor/People and Hit level dimensions and metrics would always be right most.Hits would be sorted and grouped by Visitor, Visit and Hit in chronological order. There should be some type of shading to show the groupings.Any Visitor or Visit level values would repeat itself for each Hit in their respective Visitor or Visit grouping (note that Data Workbench does not repeat the value for each Hit but I think it should to make it easier to create Pivot Tables after exporting to Excel).Allow up to ten dimensions/metric combinations. Any dimension or metric could be applied. It would be great if the Marketing Cloud ID were available since that would be an easy way to show a unique Visitor and might be used to drill down to one Visitor (such as a potential fraud use case).It may make sense to default a timestamp dimension. Ideally it would show down to the minute but Data Workbench typically only goes to the hour.The table would only show a sampling of the data but users could narrow their applied segment to potentially show non-sampled data.The table could be exported to show more data.Use Cases To troubleshoot suspected tagging issuesTo explain unusual data. It is typically always explained when looking at the lowest (Hit) level.To research suspected cybersecurity or fraud Visits and Visitors. The Cybersecurity team may provide a customer ID, IP address or other identifiable attribute to drill down to a single Visitor. They want to understand the online traffic pattern of that user to confirm or clear suspected fraud.
can we see custom link instances or occurrences in the data warehouse tool ?
Now that Analysis Workspace includes "copy to clipboard" and "show only selected rows" functionality as options in the right click menu, I think it would make sense to add another option to create and/or add to already existing filters from resulting dimensions/row items in a Freeform Table.For example, if I created a Pages report with a number of filters already applied, but I was still seeing a few pages that needed to be excluded, it would be great to be able to just right click on the resulting row(s) and select exclude selection (or filter by selection to zoom in on that item) without having to open the filter dialogue.Selecting the "Create filter from selection menu" item from the menu could open to a sub-menu with several more options, but below are two as an example (exclude and focus):Choosing one of the sub-menu options would then reload the newly filtered report.This would be super helpful if you needed to whittle down to specific item/s from a larger list ON THE FLY, i.e., for troubleshooting or isolating/identifying issues.Please let me know your thoughts!!Thanks!- Randy
As an admin, I would like to push specific calendar events only to specific distribution lists as long as we have a multi brand account.This way it would be quicker to share the calendar event, instead of selecting (and potentially forgetting) all the users interested in the event. Thanks
Would love to be able to perform the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test on our a/b test data due to the fact that our main driver for testing is revenue. This would allow me to perform these tests directly in Analysis Workspace instead of having to export the data each time.
It would be very useful having the option of updating an existing scheduled datawarehouse report instead of creating a new one by duplicating an existing one.
As a digital analyst I would like to create a rich dashboard in Analysis Workspace and share this with both Technical and non-Technical users. However, I don't want them to save their changes over my project. I would like a way to disable the Save button and force them to save their changes as a new project. This is the same behavior that is already available in OOTB ACS Reports.
When we modify or delete a segment, can we get an alert that precises how many reports are affected ?
As an Admin on the Microsoft Store account of Adobe, one of the most popularly requested features we encounter is the ability for users (non-Admins) to selectively grant "write-access" to other's Workspace projects so that teams may collaboratively edit one another's work. Within the same feature request, it would be great to have a view of the "recent edit history" so this way teams can track any changes made.Current Issue:Right now, users (non-Admins) are limited to only having "read-access" to others workspace projects and components (segments, metrics, etc.). This prevents teams from being able to effectively collaborate on projects. For example, let's say team member A creates a workspace project, and wants team member B to edit and update it. Team member A may share it with team member B, but team member B cannot make any edits to the original version. Instead, team member B only has "read" access to the original copy. Team member B must "save as" a copy of the original project, and then make edits to the copied version, and then re-share the project to Team member A. This causes confusion as multiple versions of the same project are shared around, and it may not be clear which one is the most updated version, and it prevents effective collaboration.Proposed SolutionTo streamline the collaboration on workspace projects, it would be great for users to be able to grant "write/edit" access to other users who they share workspace projects & components to. There are multiple way that this can be achieved -- here is one idea:Allow users to share "write-access" permissions to other users in two scenarios:When a user shares a workspace project or component to another users, the original creator user will have the option to grant "write-access" to other users (or entire user group--this is another feature request).When a user group is created, the admin can grant all users in the user group the ability to write/edit all the items that are created by members of the user group. In this scenario, user groups represent teams, and all team members will have the ability to write/edit any other team members projects or items.BenefitAllowing users to collaboratively edit workspace projects will team collaboration across large teams. As Adobe is used by enterprise level clients who have large teams of digital analysts, this feature will greatly help with collaboration within the tool. It will prevent "multiple copies" of the same project being shared around, and will help ensure teams are all using the same version/copy. it will help users standardize methods of measurement, and streamline the process of creating workspace projects.As I conclude writing this idea/feature request, I notice above the "publish" that there's an option to "add author" to this post. I imagine this "add author" option is similar to the feature I'm requesting for Workspace. It would be great for users to be able to add multiple authors to their workspace projects.Please add this feature!!! Thanks!
This is a suggestion to incorporate a feature that would auto-detect the implications of a new custom bot rule prior to saving the rule. The thought would be to have the tool function similarly to the current segment previewer that runs a check on historical data to detect what percentage of the population would be included in the segment. I suspect a similar check could be run to determine if a bot rule is too broad in definition, etc. Such a tool would help clients avoid expansive definitions that might be costly in nature and/or negatively affect legitimate traffic.
Adobe Mobile Marketing Services has great two-metric donuts under "Usage -> Technology". Can we please have thsi grpah type in Workspace, too? It is so useful to break down a donut graph further.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
