Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Will you please consider changing the Brand Portal Share Link Expiration date or allowing admins to create a custom date for all assets. My users are complaining that they have to change it every time they use it to extend it further and one week is too short of a time frame. Use-case: My primary User's customers revisit old links and/or take longer that 2 weeks to gather the linked information. The primary users are also not happy about having to set a more appropriate future date every time they share a link. Current/Experienced Behavior: Linked items expires after one week (default) Improved/Expected Behavior: Linked items expires after one year (default) or enabling a default date set by the admin for our instance. We use 01-01-2049 for example. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Fluke Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Documentation says: "You cannot edit the Admin and Standard User roles" and that is true. But I think a role that can't be edited - like "Standard User" - is borderline useless, and I'd love to be able to delete it. Or edit and rename it. If you can't edit it, you should at least be able to delete it. And if you can't delete it, you should at least be able to edit it. 🙂
Description - Make task entry experience smooth (if possible as easy to use as MS Project) Why is this feature important to you - Our Project Managers hate Workfront because: 1) It is not easy to navigate 'Tasks' page. Example: MS Project allows up, down, left, right navigation making it easy and faster to enter tasks. It also allows easy edit (unlike Workfront taking time to save and recalculate) 2) 'Free View' is functionality is desirable - This should allow hiding and adding columns without editing the view. 1 Free View for everyone, on all objects. 3) Reduce lag while saving a task after edit. How would you like the feature to work - Better user experience resulting in adoption. Else, they flock on MS Project, Wrike, Monday.com making our life difficult in creating KPIs for leadership due to incomplete data, as like hate Workfront and are using MS Project. Current Behaviour - Gives a feel of 90's tool. Slow, difficult to navigate and hard to understand. Not trying to be rude. It is what it is.
Description/Current Behavior - A user enters/selects prompt options on a report, report loads, user edits filter or edits the report (report settings), the report saves but goes back to the original report prompt screen which causes the user to re-enter (again) the prompt selections. Why is this feature important to you - Retaining the user's prompt selections would save the user time and frustration from having to enter prompt info over and over again as building/editing reports and filters. How would you like the feature to work - Retain the user's prompt data and when the report reloads with the edited filter or report, the prompts' selections are still applied.
Description - Currently when configuring a new user (via Integration/Manual), when User Hour Type is not configured. The default setting will be enabling all the 200++ hour types we have in our instance. Why is this feature important to you - This is important due we would like to ensure the correct users are using the correct hour type. How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if the system admin level have to option to Disable (or Enable) hour type setting. Example: When a new user is set up, by default, no hour type will be assigned to the users. Current Behaviour - When User Hour Type is not configured. The default setting will be enabling all the 200++ hour types we have in our instance.
ISSUE: Cannot get and share the path of the topmost level of a request new issue page/button. CSure you can get/share the Issue/request page that shows the "New Issue" blue button but then it's an extra click and explanation to the user.And yes, once you select the issue type (queue) then the "share path" link becomes available to copy and share.I need to share the link to the page you see (top level before a type/queue is selected) when the blue "New Issue" button is clicked on the issue page.I can't even put the "New Issue" page on the PIN bar because, again, there is no URL for the New Issue page until you select it. An alternative would be for all Admins to place the blue "new issue" button right on the top nav.
I would like to be able to share a smart folder
Description - On Custom Forms allow a field type of Dynamic Checkbox/Radio Button/Dropdown Values. The checkboxes would be determined by using filters to return values in the same way as Typeahead can be filtered, but you get discrete values that can be selected. The filter should allow for contextual limitation. This should include the ability to look at values in a collection and surface these as the values in the checkboxes (For instance: If i am on a project, be able to have a checkbox value list populated with the task names, or document list or issues. The field to be returned in the value list should be selectable by the person doing the configuration. The resulting list should only show unique values and also allow an ALL selection Why is this feature important to you - This gives me the option to relate what may seem unrelated fields on different objects or a selection of child objects to a parent. How would you like the feature to work - Allow new field type on custom forms, allow user to define the filter that returns the value list Current Behaviour - No option
Description: We should be able to have Billing Rates at the Portfolio and Program Levels. Currently, Billing Rates are at the Company and Project Levels. Workfront best practice is to have the Companies be the Company or Divisions, Departments, etc. in your Company. If I have clients with various rate cards, I need to create a Company to include the rate cards. Why is this feature important to you: This feature is important because we have various clients with rate cards and our heirarchy has clients set up under programs. Currently, I have to set up a Client under Companies which needs to be filtered out for reporting purposes. How would you like the feature to work: I would like an Object on the left pannel under Portfilios and Programs to have Billing Rates, same feature as Companies and Projects. Also under project set up/details and option: Is Billing Rate being used? Yes or No. Current Behaviour: There is no Billing Rates under Portfolios and Programs so I have to create a Company for our Clients that have rate cards. Prefer to have my Company as the only Company since we do not have Clients as users in Workfront.
Description - Many visualizations in Analysis Workspace are based on Freeform tables. Some of those visualizations, like the Histogram viz, can therefore be used to create complex Segments or Freeform tables from a simple interface. That's awesome! However, not all visualizations are based on Freeform tables and don't offer a quick way to take the generated data a step further. Luckily, those visualizations usually offer some form of right-click magic to create single tables or Segments, which is a concept I would like to extend on. For example, consider this Flow viz: We can right-click individual nodes to break it down but not show a full column (only when we hack it to show a full table) or even the full viz as a table. This could be added quite easily with some new buttons to show the full Flow or just a single column as a table: Clicking those would create a new Freeform table with the respective Segment(s), dimension, and metric applied, potentially like this: This view would make it very easy for users to build further dashboards and reports based on those very complex Segments. The same principle could be applied to other visualizations, like: The Cohort Table, to make the creation of retention Segments super quick and easy The Fallout viz, to easily monitor funnel performance and build audiences for specific audiences
Curently, you can't bulk edit a Task custom form if the custom form is already attached to a Project or Template. When you create a project based on a template you cannot bulk edit the task custom form. I've been recommeded to remove the task custom forms from templates, remove from current projects, then add them back in to be able to bulk edit them.... OR for templates, you can only bulk edit the first time you add the custom form to the template, not aftwards. But there's also the issue of not being able to bulk remove the custom form within the project as it may only be in a few tasks. This removing any efficiencies for Templates or Projects. No-one should have to remove custom forms after they've been put in a template, or Project, only to add it back in to be able to bulk edit. Otherwise whats the point to a template? Why do we need extra steps after a project goes live (adding custom forms) for a Project Manager to actually begin planning or even using that custom form.
Description - Add an icon/indicator to let you know that a scenario save is still in progress. There is only a text notification once a save is completed. Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes when you click the 'Save' icon it takes quite a long time to save. After a while you wonder whether the save has completed yet or not. There is no indicator currently to show if it is still in progress. Sometimes you click save again and then the first save finishes and you later get another save confirmation. Alternatively you might close the browser before the save completed and then you lose your edits. How would you like the feature to work - Either change the colour of the Save icon to indicate that it is pending, or add a spinning circle on top of it, or even a progress bar. Something to show that it is still working on it.
From what I understand, Smart Assignments in Workload Balancer are based on someone’s primary job role/home team and how recently I’ve assigned a specific user to a task. At my organization, that’s not particularly helpful, since we assign work based on a combination of the project specs and bandwidth. Just because I’ve assigned a designer to a task in the past month, doesn’t mean I’ll need to assign that same person to the project I’m kicking off next week. Likewise, I might need to assign someone to a task who I haven’t assigned work to recently, but they wouldn’t appear in the suggestions. While I can still search for the person I need to assign, this means that Workload Balancer provides no specific benefit to my team and is actually less functional than Scheduling, which shows a simple list of everyone with a specific job role. I’d like organizations to have the option to turn off Smart Assignments, if it doesn’t work for them.
It'd great to have a Used by tab for the webhooks in Marketo. Sometimes we'd need to switch/delete webhooks, and without the used by details available, it becomes rather difficult to ensure the webhook has been removed from all the campaigns.
Description - Currently custom time ranges are limited to an 800 day lookback. I would love this to go back a little farther, enough to accommodate a Last 90 Days two years ago rolling range.Why is this feature important to you - With pandemic, YoY comparisons are not all that telling so I've been using Prior Prior Year to establish a better baseline for how much business we've recovered this year. Last 90 days is a standard comparison window for us but I can't create that period two years ago because I hit the 800 day limit.How would you like the feature to work - Specifically, I'd just need the lookback window for days extended to 825 days. Though since we have a rolling 37 months window of data, ideally the custom time range limit would go would go back to that (~1125 days). Current Behaviour - Days in time ranges stops at 800. You could theoretically maybe do it in weeks or months, but for us "last 90 days" is the optimal time comparison range.
This is needed as it is required on materials. Current behavior is inconsistent rendering when Proofed.
Description - The legacy field "layoutTemplate" has values for some users, but it is not updated when the new field "uiTemplate" is updated. This is causing issues for our older reports that utilize "layoutTemplate:name" to display a user's layout template. Requiring users to update all of their reports to use "uiTemplate" is not feasible. Since both "layoutTemplate" and "uiTemplate" has similar attributes available (ID, name, etc.), please make sure "layoutTemplate" table stays in sync with "uiTemplate". Why is this feature important to you - to prevent reports using "layoutTemplate" from being broken How would you like the feature to work - matching fields for "layoutTemplate" should be updated to match "uiTemplate" Current Behaviour - "layoutTemplate" is not updated and only the previous values remain, creating confusion.
Description - Trying to resize columns is very difficult as the hotspot to trigger the column resize is very small. If you slightly deviate from the trigger point, the cursor no longer is in column resize mode. The trigger hotspot should be larger so that it does not require micro-movements of the mouse to resize columns. Why is this feature important to you - User experience with column resizing is bad How would you like the feature to work - Make it less sensitive to be able to resize columns Current Behaviour - Requires pinpoint accuracy to initiate a column resize
Description - In Workfront Classic, you can group users by their layout template, but in New Workfront Experience, layout template is no longer a groupable option. Why is this feature important to you - Managing users by assigned layout template helps to make sure users are properly configured. Without the ability to group by user's layout template, each user's layout has to be reviewed by column How would you like the feature to work - Add layout template as a groupable object again Current Behaviour - Layout template is removed as a groupable object.
Description - 1 - Does WF have the ability to only let people log the same amount of time (or less) toward the task time that their given within a WF project? For example, if we give someone an hour task, is there a way they can only put 1hr toward that job if that’s all they’re tasked with and no more? 2 – Is there also a way to get notifications of when a projects actual hours are coming close or off track to the planned hours? Why is this feature important to you - to implement time limits (ceiling) to tasks that cannot go over set budgets. How would you like the feature to work - to not allow team members to enter in more hours that what is budgeted to a particular task. Current Behaviour -
Description - Sometimes different Custom Fields will share the same options... For instance "Yes", "No", "N/A" could be defined as a Parameter Option Set and then used to answer multiple questions. Often the field could have way more options but be reused. Why is this feature important to you - I have been creating checklists for a client where the same answers apply to all 50 questions. I have to define the answers for each question. It would be nice just to define them once and then apply the Option Set for each field How would you like the feature to work - Define Custom Field Sets with option values. On the custom field add a field that defines the values to come from the option set. If that is completed do not ask for parameter options to be completed Current Behaviour - Must define same set of options for each field
Currently there is a built-in profile available for the user agent (user.browser) but not one that returns how Target evaluates a given user agent (and any of the other fields that are used to determine iphones) as a device.This enhancement request is to have a profile that returns either device or device type.This would be tremendously useful for the purpose of validation (mbox Trace) and having the ability to troubleshoot any issues related to device identification.
Right now Goals is seen by all parties in the entire enterprise that has access to Goals. When a goal is entered, there's no way to create groups or share specific goals to a set group of teammates. It's problematic, because teams may not want to share visibility or see everything that's out there. It also makes it hard to navigate or filter. It would be great to create the functionality to create goals by groups/portfolios and filters, so it's easy to navigate and house goals for a specific teammate(s) or groups in the enterprise.
when a user has a large project (500 lines+) scrolling is very difficult to find a specific task (or set of tasks to understand context) Request: Allowing the user to jump to a certain task ID using a keyboard short cut or other tool on the screen would make this interface easier and more digestible, allowing for quicker navigation within the tasks view. Current Behaviour - Currently the only way to finf this is to search by a row number, but that does not really solve the issue, because it provides me a very limited view of only the selected row, without the context of tasks before and after the searched task.
Why is this feature important to you - this will allow enterprise organizations using this functionality to be able to show/ track the goals that are only pertinent to their team or group. How would you like the feature to work - Be able to Separate by teams, groups or users Current Behaviour - Currently Goals cannot be separated using a team or group within Workfront.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
