Build better products with our product team
Description - On Custom Forms allow a field type of Dynamic Checkbox/Radio Button/Dropdown Values. The checkboxes would be determined by using filters to return values in the same way as Typeahead can be filtered, but you get discrete values that can be selected. The filter should allow for contextual limitation. This should include the ability to look at values in a collection and surface these as the values in the checkboxes (For instance: If i am on a project, be able to have a checkbox value list populated with the task names, or document list or issues. The field to be returned in the value list should be selectable by the person doing the configuration. The resulting list should only show unique values and also allow an ALL selection Why is this feature important to you - This gives me the option to relate what may seem unrelated fields on different objects or a selection of child objects to a parent. How would you like the feature to work - Allow new field type on custom forms, allow user to define the filter that returns the value list Current Behaviour - No option
Description: We should be able to have Billing Rates at the Portfolio and Program Levels. Currently, Billing Rates are at the Company and Project Levels. Workfront best practice is to have the Companies be the Company or Divisions, Departments, etc. in your Company. If I have clients with various rate cards, I need to create a Company to include the rate cards. Why is this feature important to you: This feature is important because we have various clients with rate cards and our heirarchy has clients set up under programs. Currently, I have to set up a Client under Companies which needs to be filtered out for reporting purposes. How would you like the feature to work: I would like an Object on the left pannel under Portfilios and Programs to have Billing Rates, same feature as Companies and Projects. Also under project set up/details and option: Is Billing Rate being used? Yes or No. Current Behaviour: There is no Billing Rates under Portfolios and Programs so I have to create a Company for our Clients that have rate cards. Prefer to have my Company as the only Company since we do not have Clients as users in Workfront.
Description - Many visualizations in Analysis Workspace are based on Freeform tables. Some of those visualizations, like the Histogram viz, can therefore be used to create complex Segments or Freeform tables from a simple interface. That's awesome! However, not all visualizations are based on Freeform tables and don't offer a quick way to take the generated data a step further. Luckily, those visualizations usually offer some form of right-click magic to create single tables or Segments, which is a concept I would like to extend on. For example, consider this Flow viz: We can right-click individual nodes to break it down but not show a full column (only when we hack it to show a full table) or even the full viz as a table. This could be added quite easily with some new buttons to show the full Flow or just a single column as a table: Clicking those would create a new Freeform table with the respective Segment(s), dimension, and metric applied, potentially like this: This view would make it very easy for users to build further dashboards and reports based on those very complex Segments. The same principle could be applied to other visualizations, like: The Cohort Table, to make the creation of retention Segments super quick and easy The Fallout viz, to easily monitor funnel performance and build audiences for specific audiences
Curently, you can't bulk edit a Task custom form if the custom form is already attached to a Project or Template. When you create a project based on a template you cannot bulk edit the task custom form. I've been recommeded to remove the task custom forms from templates, remove from current projects, then add them back in to be able to bulk edit them.... OR for templates, you can only bulk edit the first time you add the custom form to the template, not aftwards. But there's also the issue of not being able to bulk remove the custom form within the project as it may only be in a few tasks. This removing any efficiencies for Templates or Projects. No-one should have to remove custom forms after they've been put in a template, or Project, only to add it back in to be able to bulk edit. Otherwise whats the point to a template? Why do we need extra steps after a project goes live (adding custom forms) for a Project Manager to actually begin planning or even using that custom form.
Description - Add an icon/indicator to let you know that a scenario save is still in progress. There is only a text notification once a save is completed. Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes when you click the 'Save' icon it takes quite a long time to save. After a while you wonder whether the save has completed yet or not. There is no indicator currently to show if it is still in progress. Sometimes you click save again and then the first save finishes and you later get another save confirmation. Alternatively you might close the browser before the save completed and then you lose your edits. How would you like the feature to work - Either change the colour of the Save icon to indicate that it is pending, or add a spinning circle on top of it, or even a progress bar. Something to show that it is still working on it.
From what I understand, Smart Assignments in Workload Balancer are based on someone’s primary job role/home team and how recently I’ve assigned a specific user to a task. At my organization, that’s not particularly helpful, since we assign work based on a combination of the project specs and bandwidth. Just because I’ve assigned a designer to a task in the past month, doesn’t mean I’ll need to assign that same person to the project I’m kicking off next week. Likewise, I might need to assign someone to a task who I haven’t assigned work to recently, but they wouldn’t appear in the suggestions. While I can still search for the person I need to assign, this means that Workload Balancer provides no specific benefit to my team and is actually less functional than Scheduling, which shows a simple list of everyone with a specific job role. I’d like organizations to have the option to turn off Smart Assignments, if it doesn’t work for them.
It'd great to have a Used by tab for the webhooks in Marketo. Sometimes we'd need to switch/delete webhooks, and without the used by details available, it becomes rather difficult to ensure the webhook has been removed from all the campaigns.
Description - Currently custom time ranges are limited to an 800 day lookback. I would love this to go back a little farther, enough to accommodate a Last 90 Days two years ago rolling range.Why is this feature important to you - With pandemic, YoY comparisons are not all that telling so I've been using Prior Prior Year to establish a better baseline for how much business we've recovered this year. Last 90 days is a standard comparison window for us but I can't create that period two years ago because I hit the 800 day limit.How would you like the feature to work - Specifically, I'd just need the lookback window for days extended to 825 days. Though since we have a rolling 37 months window of data, ideally the custom time range limit would go would go back to that (~1125 days). Current Behaviour - Days in time ranges stops at 800. You could theoretically maybe do it in weeks or months, but for us "last 90 days" is the optimal time comparison range.
This is needed as it is required on materials. Current behavior is inconsistent rendering when Proofed.
Description - The legacy field "layoutTemplate" has values for some users, but it is not updated when the new field "uiTemplate" is updated. This is causing issues for our older reports that utilize "layoutTemplate:name" to display a user's layout template. Requiring users to update all of their reports to use "uiTemplate" is not feasible. Since both "layoutTemplate" and "uiTemplate" has similar attributes available (ID, name, etc.), please make sure "layoutTemplate" table stays in sync with "uiTemplate". Why is this feature important to you - to prevent reports using "layoutTemplate" from being broken How would you like the feature to work - matching fields for "layoutTemplate" should be updated to match "uiTemplate" Current Behaviour - "layoutTemplate" is not updated and only the previous values remain, creating confusion.
Description - Trying to resize columns is very difficult as the hotspot to trigger the column resize is very small. If you slightly deviate from the trigger point, the cursor no longer is in column resize mode. The trigger hotspot should be larger so that it does not require micro-movements of the mouse to resize columns. Why is this feature important to you - User experience with column resizing is bad How would you like the feature to work - Make it less sensitive to be able to resize columns Current Behaviour - Requires pinpoint accuracy to initiate a column resize
Description - In Workfront Classic, you can group users by their layout template, but in New Workfront Experience, layout template is no longer a groupable option. Why is this feature important to you - Managing users by assigned layout template helps to make sure users are properly configured. Without the ability to group by user's layout template, each user's layout has to be reviewed by column How would you like the feature to work - Add layout template as a groupable object again Current Behaviour - Layout template is removed as a groupable object.
Description - 1 - Does WF have the ability to only let people log the same amount of time (or less) toward the task time that their given within a WF project? For example, if we give someone an hour task, is there a way they can only put 1hr toward that job if that’s all they’re tasked with and no more? 2 – Is there also a way to get notifications of when a projects actual hours are coming close or off track to the planned hours? Why is this feature important to you - to implement time limits (ceiling) to tasks that cannot go over set budgets. How would you like the feature to work - to not allow team members to enter in more hours that what is budgeted to a particular task. Current Behaviour -
Description - Sometimes different Custom Fields will share the same options... For instance "Yes", "No", "N/A" could be defined as a Parameter Option Set and then used to answer multiple questions. Often the field could have way more options but be reused. Why is this feature important to you - I have been creating checklists for a client where the same answers apply to all 50 questions. I have to define the answers for each question. It would be nice just to define them once and then apply the Option Set for each field How would you like the feature to work - Define Custom Field Sets with option values. On the custom field add a field that defines the values to come from the option set. If that is completed do not ask for parameter options to be completed Current Behaviour - Must define same set of options for each field
Currently there is a built-in profile available for the user agent (user.browser) but not one that returns how Target evaluates a given user agent (and any of the other fields that are used to determine iphones) as a device.This enhancement request is to have a profile that returns either device or device type.This would be tremendously useful for the purpose of validation (mbox Trace) and having the ability to troubleshoot any issues related to device identification.
Right now Goals is seen by all parties in the entire enterprise that has access to Goals. When a goal is entered, there's no way to create groups or share specific goals to a set group of teammates. It's problematic, because teams may not want to share visibility or see everything that's out there. It also makes it hard to navigate or filter. It would be great to create the functionality to create goals by groups/portfolios and filters, so it's easy to navigate and house goals for a specific teammate(s) or groups in the enterprise.
when a user has a large project (500 lines+) scrolling is very difficult to find a specific task (or set of tasks to understand context) Request: Allowing the user to jump to a certain task ID using a keyboard short cut or other tool on the screen would make this interface easier and more digestible, allowing for quicker navigation within the tasks view. Current Behaviour - Currently the only way to finf this is to search by a row number, but that does not really solve the issue, because it provides me a very limited view of only the selected row, without the context of tasks before and after the searched task.
Why is this feature important to you - this will allow enterprise organizations using this functionality to be able to show/ track the goals that are only pertinent to their team or group. How would you like the feature to work - Be able to Separate by teams, groups or users Current Behaviour - Currently Goals cannot be separated using a team or group within Workfront.
Description - Need an ability to search for error entries for queues in process so that they can be batch removed rather than removed individually. Why is this feature important to you - This would save lots of time and allow scenarios to run more efficiently. How would you like the feature to work - A search function that allows users to find and filter for errors in their process scenarios. Current Behaviour - You need to select "Detail" for individual entries until you find the right item to delete. Sometimes there are already hundreds of entries that need to be sorted through manually. The scenario only functions after the right entry has been deleted. This idea is based on a Community post submitted by @randyroberts. Please view this Community post for further details.
Description - It would be helpful to have the ability to mark documents in a project like process guides to auto delete when the project status is set to complete/done. Why is this feature important to you - We have process guides in the documents tab of tasks in project templates that users can refer to during the life of the project. Before the project is completed the users have to manually go back and delete those guides. having this feature would save time for the users from having to remove these guides or any other documents that they don't need in the project once it's completed. How would you like the feature to work - It would be helpful if on the project template or during the life of the project that users can select the documents that they would like to be deleted once the project status is set to complete/done. Those documents would go to the recycling bin (like the currently do) just in case they need to be restored or whatever reason. Current Behaviour - Users have to manually delete documents they no longer want in the project before it is completed.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Dynamic Media currently restricts outputs to 25 megapixels. Many customers have larger source files and may need renditions of higher quality as well. You can configure higher quality renditions as static renditions, but these renditions aren't available on the Brand Portal. Use-case: Download or deliver image renditions larger than 25 megapixels Current/Experienced Behavior: Dynamic media will not deliver image renditions larger then 25 megapixels. Improved/Expected Behavior: Allow Dynamic Media to deliver (or even just create) image renditions larger than 25 megapixels. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): All AEM environments (since the limitation resides with Dynamic Media). Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description: It would extremely helpful when attempting to use the Gantt chart functionality if there were a way to (make sure that a user could) display the full line of a task name, without cutoff widthwise. The support team explained that I could delete other columns to show more tasks, but my internal project team needs the info there, like dates etc. along with the task title. This display issue seems like it could be fixed if the task title could continue onto a second line, rather than only run across, horizontally. Why is this feature important to you: I would love to use the Workfront Gantt chart because it has fantastic and understandable features. However, since the internal team cannot view the task titles in full (and without sacrificing the other columns) I need to look into other software to display the information we already have in Workfront. How would you like the feature to work: It would be wonderful if there were either an automatic setting to wrap text in the task name column so that it is not cut off, or it would be great to have an option to turn it on. Current Behavior - Currently, in downloading the PDF of the Gantt chart, the task name is cut off, even when multiple columns are deleted, once it surpasses a certain number of characters; this makes the task title unclear.
Description - Ability to manually input data into a "sheet" similar to an Excel in order to generate a report/chart, etc. This should be a supplemental option available in addition to the more automated options that pull from project data. Why is this feature important to you - 1) This would help our company in the first few months/years as we are onboarding to workfront while we are getting the project-level data accurate and up to speed. If we want to report out on things like resource capacity, it would be great to have the option of inputting data in one sheet instead of trying to keep up with the hundreds of new timelines we are learning to maintain as an organization. 2) This would be a great supplemental option and ensures we can keep all of our companies data in one platform and don't need to keep some data separate in Excel. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how an Excel sheet operates. Current Behaviour - Does not exist.
Hi, I wish we could add a portfolio and program to an Issue or a Task. Many of our requests stay as Issues assigned to specific people, mainly for web updates or copy updates, so they don't warrant a whole project creation. I still want to attribute a portfolio/program to these items to pull for reporting and there is currently no way to do this in a way that feeds from the master portfolio/program options (i.e. if I create a custom form with this question, it's manual and the options aren't linked to the master portfolio/program options in the system).
It would be great to be able to attach a document to an update so there is just one step instead of two. Right now, we have to upload the document first and then add an update to it but sometimes you want to include the document in an existing thread and not have to break from it.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
