Description - Need an ability to search for error entries for queues in process so that they can be batch removed rather than removed individually. Why is this feature important to you - This would save lots of time and allow scenarios to run more efficiently. How would you like the feature to work - A search function that allows users to find and filter for errors in their process scenarios. Current Behaviour - You need to select "Detail" for individual entries until you find the right item to delete. Sometimes there are already hundreds of entries that need to be sorted through manually. The scenario only functions after the right entry has been deleted. This idea is based on a Community post submitted by @randyroberts. Please view this Community post for further details.
Description - It would be helpful to have the ability to mark documents in a project like process guides to auto delete when the project status is set to complete/done. Why is this feature important to you - We have process guides in the documents tab of tasks in project templates that users can refer to during the life of the project. Before the project is completed the users have to manually go back and delete those guides. having this feature would save time for the users from having to remove these guides or any other documents that they don't need in the project once it's completed. How would you like the feature to work - It would be helpful if on the project template or during the life of the project that users can select the documents that they would like to be deleted once the project status is set to complete/done. Those documents would go to the recycling bin (like the currently do) just in case they need to be restored or whatever reason. Current Behaviour - Users have to manually delete documents they no longer want in the project before it is completed.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Dynamic Media currently restricts outputs to 25 megapixels. Many customers have larger source files and may need renditions of higher quality as well. You can configure higher quality renditions as static renditions, but these renditions aren't available on the Brand Portal. Use-case: Download or deliver image renditions larger than 25 megapixels Current/Experienced Behavior: Dynamic media will not deliver image renditions larger then 25 megapixels. Improved/Expected Behavior: Allow Dynamic Media to deliver (or even just create) image renditions larger than 25 megapixels. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): All AEM environments (since the limitation resides with Dynamic Media). Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description: It would extremely helpful when attempting to use the Gantt chart functionality if there were a way to (make sure that a user could) display the full line of a task name, without cutoff widthwise. The support team explained that I could delete other columns to show more tasks, but my internal project team needs the info there, like dates etc. along with the task title. This display issue seems like it could be fixed if the task title could continue onto a second line, rather than only run across, horizontally. Why is this feature important to you: I would love to use the Workfront Gantt chart because it has fantastic and understandable features. However, since the internal team cannot view the task titles in full (and without sacrificing the other columns) I need to look into other software to display the information we already have in Workfront. How would you like the feature to work: It would be wonderful if there were either an automatic setting to wrap text in the task name column so that it is not cut off, or it would be great to have an option to turn it on. Current Behavior - Currently, in downloading the PDF of the Gantt chart, the task name is cut off, even when multiple columns are deleted, once it surpasses a certain number of characters; this makes the task title unclear.
Description - Ability to manually input data into a "sheet" similar to an Excel in order to generate a report/chart, etc. This should be a supplemental option available in addition to the more automated options that pull from project data. Why is this feature important to you - 1) This would help our company in the first few months/years as we are onboarding to workfront while we are getting the project-level data accurate and up to speed. If we want to report out on things like resource capacity, it would be great to have the option of inputting data in one sheet instead of trying to keep up with the hundreds of new timelines we are learning to maintain as an organization. 2) This would be a great supplemental option and ensures we can keep all of our companies data in one platform and don't need to keep some data separate in Excel. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how an Excel sheet operates. Current Behaviour - Does not exist.
Hi, I wish we could add a portfolio and program to an Issue or a Task. Many of our requests stay as Issues assigned to specific people, mainly for web updates or copy updates, so they don't warrant a whole project creation. I still want to attribute a portfolio/program to these items to pull for reporting and there is currently no way to do this in a way that feeds from the master portfolio/program options (i.e. if I create a custom form with this question, it's manual and the options aren't linked to the master portfolio/program options in the system).
It would be great to be able to attach a document to an update so there is just one step instead of two. Right now, we have to upload the document first and then add an update to it but sometimes you want to include the document in an existing thread and not have to break from it.
Currently, the native Workfront search module in Workfront Fusion does not allow you to search or read the TEMPLATE ASSIGNMENTS object. I bet there's a way to do this with the custom API call tool but us non-developers would definitely benefit from being able to do this without coding. My use case is that I would like to be able to get the total amount of planned hours by job role out of a template. I'm going to push that data into our CRM to create "products" that are informed from the hours within our templates. Thank you!
I propose Marketo allow us the add in a Details constraint into the "Synched to SFDC" filter and trigger so we can operationalize workflows to inform us when a record fails to sync. I would like to be able to create an alert that fires off to my Operations team with the lead info and include the Details on the Sync failure so that both Marketo Ops and SFDC Ops are aware of something going wrong.Currently this is a manual process where we have to look into our workflows that sync records to SFDC and manually extract the lead information including the failure reason. This is time consuming and not an efficient way to ensure that all records are coming over as expected.
As outlined on Merging Person Records Disconnects Marketo Custom Object Record Marketo custom object records can be disconnected when person records are merged. This is annoying as the custom object records then need to be re-connected. It would be good if when person records were merged that the remaining person record automatically had all Marketo custom object records associated with the merged records associated with the remaining person record.
Description - Today, components in CJA are presented as a flat list, like we know it from Core Analytics: While this makes sense in Core Analytics, where components have no inherent relation to each other, components in Customer Journey Analytics come from the XDM Schema, where fields are always contextual to the Schema. For example, the standard Web SDK Field Group positions the ID and Click number of Link Clicks at "Web > Web interaction > Link Clicks > ID/Value": This context for individual components provides CJA with the potential to solve a few long-standing challenges in Analysis Workspace: For similarly named components, provide an intuitive way to explain the context (and thereby use case) of individual components As a novice user, help them to combine the right dimensions and metrics by showing that they come from the same context (in the example above: "combine the value metric with the id dimension") As an advanced user, give hints and inspiration to explore the available context for already used components (in the example above: "I'm using the Interaction Name already, maybe I can also use the Interaction Type or Interaction Region from the same XDM level?") In the UI of the component lists, a more context-rich view could be an alternative to or integrated with the existing flat list in Analysis Workspace. Inspiration could be taken from the Data Views manager, where we can explore the Schema in a contextual way: An alternative would be the tree-like view we know and love from the Schema view in AEP. This context would be a great addition to the informational overlays and could be very helpful to make CJA more accessible and efficient.
As we are now able to expire users instead of deleting them, some companies are adopting a rule of no longer deleting users (mainly for compliance issues).The consequence is that the user list can and will become very long over time.It should be possible to filter out the inactive and/or the active users from the admin -> User list so that only the active or the inactive users could be displayed.-Greg
It would be nice to have a public calendar view for scheduled emails for all non Marketo users to view.
Description - We have projects where assignee's are in multiple geo-locations. They each have their own location-specific schedules and customized holidays. Projects are the only place to set the schedule to use to calculate timeline, but it does not allow for this situation where assignees are spread out globally. This could be handled by allowing individual user profiles, teams, and groups to be assigned a default schedule. This schedule priority would be as follows from highest to lowest: user, team, group, project, default schedule Why is this feature important to you - To support accurate task timeline calculation, schedules should be set at different levels of granularity. How would you like the feature to work - Add option to specify a schedule at the individual resource level, on a team, and on a group. The order of precedence from highest to lowest would be user, team, group, project, default schedule Current Behaviour - Only a project can have a schedule assigned. This assumes all resources are using the same schedule, which is not true for a global workforce.
We have found out that there is a difference between Time spent on page - bucketed and Time spent on page - granular.The bucketed takes into account only the pages, the granular also takes into account the link events.In our interpretation the "time spent on page" should take into account the link events. That means that we can only use the "granular" definition, but the data we receive is almost useless, because almost every page has a different time spent on page, and it becomes impossible to make conclusions of those data.So we would like to have a dimension "Time spent on page - Bucketed" taking into account the link event (as it is or the granular definition now).
We've just had an issue where a Project was in one Schedule (VIC, australia), the Project Owner is in NSW, Australia, with assigned users across other Schedules (SA, QLD, VIC australia). The Public Holiday for the Project Schedule from VIC doesnt show in Workload Balancer under the assigned users, the task appears but it populates as 0hrs, regardless of task constraint. If the Project Owner and Management Chain arent aware of the Public Holiday, they wouldnt know its there and can potentially lead to over-allocation. These tasks should appear in the Workload Balancer should include a notification, public holiday note, or something should be populating showing that the Project Schedule has a Public Holiday. Description - Why is this feature important to you - How would you like the feature to work - Current Behaviour -
Description - One main selling point of Customer Journey Analytics is the ability to do cross device analysis. However, workspace in CJA has limitations which make cross device analysis difficult and not easy. For example, a simple question such as how many people are viewing a product on a device and purchasing it on a different device is not easy to answer when you have multiple different devices. For example, we have 3 devices: desktop, mobile and app. I have to create a filter that includes every possible cross device scenario which would include: (viewed product on desktop and purchased on mobile, viewed product on desktop and purchased on app, viewed product on mobile and purchased on desktop, viewed product on mobile and purchased on app, viewed product on app and purchased on desktop, viewed product on app and purchased in mobile). That is a rather large filter to answer such a simple question.Why is this feature important to you - The current limitations are very time consuming and makes cross device analysis difficultHow would you like the feature to work - A solution to this would be if CJA workspace allowed for two layer identification, meaning that cross device could identify on the customer ID along with device ID. Another solution would be to update filters so that we can maintain an element across the filter criteria or simply put that I could state in the filter that that purchase of the product happened on a device that does not match the device at the time of product view.
Description - Allow a requester to copy a submitted request Why is this feature important to you - We have many dept.'s that have reoccurring projects that occur weekly or monthly that require a request to be submitted. Having a copy button for the previous submission would save time and effort. How would you like the feature to work - When the new request window opens, have a button that says "Copy Previous Request" and maybe show the last 3 requests that were submitted. The user then chooses the request to copy, is shown the previous request form filled out and is required to confirm dates, and then they would save it creating a new request. Current Behaviour - You can't copy any submitted request and have to fill out a new request for a project every time.
When using the variables.json endpoint today, the returned data does not include the type of variable used (e.g., boolean, string, img, color). As a result, filtering through complex email variables is more onerous than necessary. Could the variable type be added to the data that's returned, and ideally a parameterized filter when calling the endpoint?
I actively use dozens of scheduled projects. I have two suggestions: 1. Projects occasionally don't get delivered. there is no means of checking on them. The additional of a log (as there is with scheduled reports) would be helpful. 2. Adobe sends renewal emails for each scheduled project when it is slated to expire. These emails often get lost because they have the exact same Subject Line as the project email. Alter the subject line so that it sames something like "Renewal Notice"
Hello, I am thinking if I could use a value of the field existing in a Salesforce Object sync's object more efficient,,,I know that I can use it in a Smart List's constraint checking of "Has a record in the object", but it is not possible to use it in a flow of Smart Campaign.Please expand the Smart Campaign's function more and more,,,
Description - Why is this feature important to you - as others view the Board and the various Cards aligned they would be able to tell how far someone has gotten on any card and subsequent checklist items How would you like the feature to work - similar to the Agile board which has the % complete slider available Current Behaviour - you can provide a due date for your individual checklist items but no indicator where you might be regarding that checklist item
Description - Currently, there is an option to select either "Eventual path" or "next hit" between touch points. In addition to the "next hit" option what we really need is a "next page" option (which ignores all link tracking data). Why is this feature important to you - Currently you cannot look at the conversion between two pages where you want to specify the second page is viewed immediately after the first. This is because any link tracking calls that happen in between the two page views will cause users to fall out, even if the pages are view one after another. Worryingly, people may incorrectly be assuming that "next hit" is the equivalent to "next page" (this has happened inside our company.) Note: The same issue used to exist with sequential segments but it was fixed i.e. there is now a "next page" option, in addition to "next hit". How would you like the feature to work - A new "next page" option that ignores link tracking calls.
Description - I'm missing following functionalities that were previously available in WF One: I cannot re-assign ticket to my peer admins (e.g. when I plan longer leave) I cannot tag other users in support communication thread I cannot sort my ticket by "last update" Escalate case, seems to be always greyed out for me, so I'm unsure when will I be able to use it I cannot see details of my ticket submission. With multiple tickets constantly in the queue, I don't always remember all details relevant for the case, and lack of preview of my original submission forces me to keep track of this. Why is this feature important to you - I want to manage my support tickets more efficiently How would you like the feature to work - apply all above mentioned missing pieces. Current Behaviour - see above
Description - Add the Workfront widget such that Outlook meeting invites can be exported into Workfront as a task or an issue in a project Why is this feature important to you - Being in enablement, we track, report, share WF calendars and collaborate on events scheduled by our team. Specific projects can support 25 events in a quarter. It would make updating events a lot easier if we could add these outlook events as tasks in Workfront without manually updating them as tasks. How would you like the feature to work - Similar capabilities exporting emails into Workfront projects as tasks or issues. In addition, it would be great if the event start and end date could be picked up as the Planned Start and Planned completion date of the task, and the meeting duration be updated as the task duration Current Behaviour - Feature doesn't exist.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
