It would be great if there's a way to create a option to limit if issues can be duplicated multiple times. Clients run into issues when they're seeking a 1:1 ratio between an issue and a project. It causes confusing and impacts reporting when multiple projects are created from one issue.
The new Out of Office Delegation feature for tasks/issues/requests in the latest 22.3 release is AWESOME, however I think there was a fairly big miss. You can delegate from the Home screen and within the task/issue/request itself, but NOT within the Time Off section of your user settings, where you can delegate Approvals (see below).This is where all of our users are trained to delegate their approvals at the moment, and I think it makes to the most sense to include it where people are logging their time off so they can delegate at the same time.
Allow Milestones to be edited in bulk or inlineIf I want to do a mass change to milestones, I'd have to go into each task and edit? This is highly inefficient.
A single line text field which includes .zip assumes a link and when saved tries to makes the .zip area a link, would like an option to deactivate this so it can just display as text. Sample of text field on Custom form:
Currently, the stats/usage.json API endpoint only returns the number of API calls used, which we can compare to our daily limit. It would be beneficial if there is a way to include the current Bulk Extract usage as well so as to prevent business process failures. We have several processes that use the bulk extract API and it would be nice to be able to retrieve analytics as far as which days we are approaching our limit as well as which services are using the most data.
We would like to see in a future iteration of the new project Metrics functionality, an ability to modularly turn off data pertaining to tasks, for intake queues. As we frequently leverage designated intake queues solely for issue/request routing purposes, information pertaining to completed/incomplete tasks is not relevant in these scenarios. This is a great feature, but it should be modularly customizable depending on use case.Ideal state (or some equivalent solution):Project Metrics configuration menu:Show project metrics for tasks and issues (shows all data)Also provides ability to toggle between showing only task or only issue data, and provides the ability to configure one or the other as a default view.Show project metrics for issues only (shows only issue data)Show project metrics for tasks only (shows only task data)
Add the option to notify users when they are unassigned (removed) from any type of workflow object; projects, tasks, requests, proofs, etc.As of right now, there is no way for a user to be notified if they are unassigned from any type of workflow object in Workfront. You can be a project sponsor, assigned to a task, and later unassigned from a task but there is no way for the system to notify you that you have been unassigned. Same with requests - you can be assigned a request, unassigned, and you will not receive a notification that you were removed.I tested this in multiple ways, once specifically in real time. When I was assigned to a task I received a notification saying such. When I was removed from that same task, not only was I not notified, but the notification saying I was previously assigned was removed from my user notification list. The history was removed. Essentially, Workfront is behaving as though being unassigned (removed) from an object is equivalent to never having been assigned in the first place.There needs to be an option to notify users they were unassigned from objects in Workfront. Otherwise, there is the potential for tremendous gaps or oversights.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Published Status Visualization with colours Use-case: People with access to an AEM author should be able to be quick in recognizing a node as “never published”, “published”, “unpublished”, “modified” and/or “locked”. This should be true in each of the view modes, “Card View”, “Column View” and “List View”. Current/Experienced Behavior: a) In Column View, there user has no possibility to get a quick view of the published states. The status of a single file can be verified only when clicking it. b) in Card View a user can see the published status but also does not easily detect whether a node is published or unpublished – although the cards can vary in size in case they need to show more meta data. c) In “List View” a user gets the only possibility to get a pretty quick view of the matter, although – as said earlier – the different icons look pretty alike. Improved/Expected Behavior: If the three view modes would be enriched with colours a user would immediately see what status a node is in. I would imagine such colours: red = unpublished, green = published, blue = modified, grey = locked, no colour = never published. Please see the attached “paintings” for an idea I had how this could look like. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Any AEM version which offers TouchUI. Customer-name/Organization name: Credit Suisse AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
In segment builder, we have fiew options such as "equals", "contains", "contains all of", "contains any of", "start with", etc. but there is no RegEx and no "equals any of"...Here is my problem:I have a prop or an eVar containing an id. I want to filter on this prop or eVar to have only a list of specific ids.I can't use "equals" and the "OR" operator because the list is too long and I can't add the ids one by one.I can't use "contains any of" because it's ids, so if I enter "id contains any of 42, 1804, 23", it will return 42, 1804 and 23, but also every id containing those numbers!!! (ex. 425 because it contains 42, 623 because it contains 23, 1000018040002. because it contains 1804)So I need a "equals any of" that would be an automatic combination of "equals" and OR, in order to match exactly the list.I guess this would be useful for many users that could be in the same trouble I am.
If Ad Hoc is going to die then Workspace needs to be an acceptable replacement. It is already better in many ways, but not good enough.I hear 50,000 rows is coming. Good.But we NEED the ability to send via FTP (and sFTP). We cannot stop using Ad Hoc until this happens (workbench is not an option for a lot of segments).
Similar to the update for the 22.3 release, it would be great to be able to customize the header view on the task level in a project.Our team members would like to see their Project Owners at the task level (our production/traffic team) and currently this is only viewable/searchable in the project details or project view.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - On Daily basis we are moving 4 Extracts(Transaction,store,customer,Product) to Adobe storage. While sending extracts to Adobe storage, we used to connect to Adobe storage manually and Delete those extracts once Archived to refresh with the new set of extracts(files). Since it is happening on daily basis and that to manually we have requested you for any possibility of Archiving files once Ingestion is completed rather deleting it manually by our team.Adobe Azure storage path- https://4fbd3ac440stg.blob.core.windows.net/cdp Extracts name-Customer_Profile.csvProduct_Lookup.csvStore_Lookup.csvTransaction.csv ingesting data happening at 3am(BST) and 3pm(BST).How would you like the feature to work - it should work like once your ingestion is completed files should be moved to Archive folder (i mean once ingestion is completed files should be deleted after moving to Archive folder)Current Behaviour - We are deleting those files manually by connecting Adobe storage.
In the classic version when a task was set for high priority there was a red flag to visually denote. In the new task list you have to click into each to see the priority. We need the visual identity back to get work done faster.
Description - Logic update to Cart Based criteria to loop through the products in your cart (up to 10) and display a single recommendation for each, then loop through again and display another recommended item. Why is this feature important to you -This would allow representation for multiple carted items in the recommendation slots. By alternating the recommendations will allow the customer to see recommendations for multiple carted products before advancing through the slots. How would you like the feature to work -Update logic to loop through the products in your cart (up to 10) and display a single recommendation for each, then loop through again and display recommended item. The process would keep repeating until all slots are filled. Current Behaviour -“Cart Based” criteria currently returns recommendations for up to 10 items in your cart. It returns all recommendations for 1 item before moving to the next item. This usually results in recommendations displaying for only 1 item. This will depend on the number of slots you have available in your recommendations mBox. For a retail department store, customers normally have carts containing several products. We are seeing where there is not representation in the recommended products for more one or two carted items as a result.
Hi, Please create a solution to filter the link scanner issue from the reports so we can see the actual numbers from a campaign. Each email campaign receives extremely high number of clicks which are recorded even before an email is delivered. This is causing trouble in internal strategy and engagement. This needs to be fixed. Please give a solution to filter link scanner counts from the reporting and the lists. Thanks
Right now, only current projects are considered in the Agile board. Kindly enhance to include projects not yet in current. This will allow us to include in our planning the stories from projects not yet current.
There are many occasions where I need to check the composition of a smart list (for example, what % of a list is CRM leads vs contacts). Currently, to do this, I either need to modify the smart list multiple times to get a count of each field value, or export to excel to do analysis that way. I would love to be able to view simple charts of data values on a smart list for on-the-fly analysis.
Currently, only a single user can be selected in the User Typeahead. We would like to have a toggle on the field to allow multiple user selection, or enforce single value only.
It would avoid accidental data lost to add a warning when clicking Cancel or anywhere outside of a pop window such as New Task, New Issue, etc., since currently the behavior is that everything is lost instantly without warning and the user has to restart from scratch the creation of the New Task, New Issue, etc.
Workfront already has a Risk Register and Issue tracking. It would be very nice to have a Change Request Log too. This would be a place to record customer change requests, effect to cost, effect to timeline, acceptance date, etc.
It would be great if user statuses could be added to each user name - similar to Microsoft Teams chat, a red bubble if the person is online but busy or green if the user is online and available, etc.
See attached image.When I attach templated tasks to project, the directions are very misleading. Because there are no selected tasks! Can you please have these tasks all selected so that I can deselect the ones I want to exclude like the directions say? Or update the directions.
Today, there is no way to check the contents of an email's preheader aside from creating a draft to review the text in Email Settings. However, all other content within an email can be checked using the Preview functionality. Moreover, there is a logical place in Marketo's UX to display this content: inside Preview, there is the View Summary panel. Rather than simply note that a preheader is set, can the contents be placed here rather than "Yes"?
Are you looking for a new way to stand out from the competition and make a great first impression? If so, LinkedIn may be just what you need. By adding your LinkedIn URL to your business card, you can give potential clients and business contacts a quick and easy way to learn more about you.Everyone, who wishes to build a successful career, has to know little tricks. The most popular of them is the creation of your individual logo, namely a business card. Furthermore, applying social networks also allows for finding reliable potential employers. In my experience, LinkedIn.com is one such website, which is credible. Thereby, if you can combine these opportunities, you will have all available chances to your goal achieves. The only remaining question lies in how to put LinkedIn on business card.The inhabitants of the modern world don't imagine being without data storage devices. Moreover, we live in times of a worldwide spread pandemic, and everyone thinks about one's safety and precaution measures. The best way to avoid transferring personal info from hand to hand is to invent your cipher. Every good has its model and barcode, which can give you valuable information.The awesome idea is based on that you can put it wherever you wish, either on social networks or on customized cards. The immediate question is how to put LinkedIn on business card through the QR code? Oddly enough, it is effortless to create such code, which would be linked to your website even without leaving home. Various free platforms can assist in the generation of personal QR codes. Thus, an ordinary business card can become an advanced tool for keeping personal data.Once you’ve updated your business card information, it’s time to print or order your cards. We recommend using high-quality paper stock and printers if you’re printing them yourself. You can find some excellent business card templates online, or you can design your own. If you’re ordering business cards from a print shop, double-check that your LinkedIn profile URL is included and correct before submitting your order. You don’t want to end up with a batch of cards with the wrong URL on them.
Currently, A/B testing allows you to compare multiple versions of a delivery against each other, in order to identify which one will have the biggest impact on the targeted population. This requires a delivery to be presented to the client and doesn't work well for different inbound offer options. Idea is for A/B testing to be able to be preformed at the Inbound Offers level.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
