Build better products with our product team
Why are marketo landing pages so much more primitive than emails? With the emails I can give my coworkers so many more options with lists which aren't available in landing pages. Also, why are booleans not really booleans? A real boolean would just completely not render an entire block of code if it were truly a boolean. And why do emails have the capability of modules but not landing pages? There are a lot of improvements that need to be done to marketo landing pages, they're soooooo basic and primitive and really they cost me more time than just hard coding something which completely defeats the purpose of using a service like this.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable toggling side panel while using any component's dialog. In general, whenever a author tries to author and image or drag any asset on to the component, the author might require the side panel to be toggled on before even opening the dialog.So how about we provide the ease of accessing side panel while editing the page even when the author opened the dialog box. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Author is not able to open side panel when component's dialog is opened. Improved/Expected Behavior: Author should be able to open/toggle side panel when component's dialog is opened in order to drag any asset. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): All versions Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): I saw a few solutions to make this possible with some custom JS but I believe it would be better if we could keep this out of the box to have a proper user experience while authoring/editing a page or template.
Create document outlining all regular and advanced flow steps that trigger campaigns can use but batch can't and vice versafor example advanced wait flow steps using date tokens
For Global Form Validation Rules, allow the marketers to provide various error messages based on select languages. Although marketo user can change the language of the form, the error message for the rules that were setup under Global Form Validation Rules can not be customized.
Currently you must view the tasks in a backlog and click 'move to' and then select the iteration. Instead of finding the task in the team's backlog it would be helpful if we could move the task to the iteration from within the task. In this scenario the task would need to be assigned to the team and the team would have planned iteration(s).
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adding syntax highlight feature in CRX DE editor Use-case: While updating HTML/CSS/JS file in CRX DE editor, it should highlight the syntax. It will give a better understanding and help to navigate quickly to the particular element of the code. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, it is not highlighting the syntax for any of the files Improved/Expected Behavior: at least a basic syntax highlight should be there. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 On-Premise AEM Cloud as a Service Customer-name/Organization name: Bounteous Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When creating/editing a filter in the Workload Balancer. If the user deletes all the filter settings, they are unable to add new filter rules in the Save Filter Screen. The no option to add new filter rules. It would be great if there's an "Add Filter" button to allow users easily add and update filters in the Filters setting panel.
Hi Community 👋, Although, Marketo provides the leverage to export details of all fields on a single click where we can see the data type, API names of all fields but If we are required to check that which field is blocked from which update then we have to look for each field 1-by-1. Marketo should append the block field update information as well when exporting all field details from Admin > Field Management. Thanks!
Currently in the Workload Balancer, when a user is deactivated, the work is not visible in either swimlane on the Workload Balancer. The current workaround is creating a custom filter to filter the deactivated users in Workload Balancer. When this filter is applied, the assigned work swimlane does not provide information/indication the user is a deactivated user which will cause confusion to the Project Manager when managing resource adjustmentsThis means the project manager is unable to gain oversight and make resource adjustments on their projects. It would be great if:Project Manager can easily identify the deactivated users in the Assigned Work section.Does not require users to create a filter to filter deactivated users.
I'd love to see the CRM field mapping when downloading all fields in "Export Field Names" in Field Management.
Hello. I am using Program Member Custom Field Object which I use to capture Program utm_source, Program utm_campaign, yada yada for what brings a registrant in for that specific webinar. What I would like is the ability to add these Program Member Custom Fields to Smart List so I can automate sending out List Subscription Report....OR....I would like the ability to create a List Subscription Report from the Program Member tab (which contains the Member Fields I would like in my List Subscription).
Hello!It'd be great if you could delete multiple assets in one go that are part of a program / nurture. We sometimes will clone a program / nurture program and need to tidy them up to repurpose and having to delete all the cloned assets that aren't required 1 by 1 can be tedious. If the is already a solution someone has it'd be great to give it a try, thanks!
We've found ourselves wasting time and creating a case regarding "missing" data within the program field of the project details screen. Performing a standard scroll to search for the program displayed only a short listing of data rather than going through the full list of programs we have. This led us to believe the field was faulty and were then told this was the intended design and a user should begin typing the first letter in order for the results to change. I can live with this design provided, that it prompts me to do that- an empty box with a dropdown option would allude to a full list of potential data.
Hello, I would like to suggest that you add the ability to search for the name of an event in the events dropdown.
When searching in Workfront, the ability to sort the results by date would be very helpful!
Ability to default the search option to stay on Projects instead of All. Most of our associates only look up projects this would be great if the admins were able to set defaults within the search option.
You know how in Slack when you highlight text in a message to add a hyperlink, and in the pop-up that appears, your cursor lands in a blank URL box, ready for you to paste in the URL? So efficient. However, in WF, you get a pop-up with a URL box that for some reason contains the text you've highlighted -- the same text that is also in the text box within the pop-up, for some reason. You then have to click, highlight, and delete before you can paste in your URL. So, three steps instead of 1 before you can paste. Be great if WF could take some inspiration from Slack!
When a system admin is doing large bulk updates, especially on historical data or back-end data, they often do not need to notify the project owner, etc. of the update. These notifications happen when a closed project has to be reopened, updated and reclosed. This causes confusion to project owners as to why an old project is being touched.Suggestion: On bulk update, add a checkbox to "disable notifications during this bulk update"
I would love to see more Marketo support for custom business days. The ability to set up a calendar with days of the week where cadences would be paused and support for wait steps that wait "business days" or end on "business days" instead of only the option to end on M-F would be excellent. This would be a great feature to roll into some of the existing ideas for holiday support (which I thought I remembered in the past, but I can't find any documentation on existing functionality now).
I like the auto-align feature but wish I could turn it off at will. I want to be able to lock a scenario layout so it can't be moved around. Some of my layouts get very complex and when the system decides it is going to move things around it wreaks havoc and I have to reposition every module. Thanks!
This may apply to other types of modules, but the Search module is the one where it is most prevalent to me.I would like to see the search module interface changed to be easier to work with in environments where there are a lot of custom fields. Instead of it loading every custom field in the system as part of the Search Criteria and Outputs, have it only load the system fields by default. Then have a place where you can provide an ID of the custom custom forms whose custom fields you want to be included as well. Or you could have a list of checkboxes with the custom forms listed and let them be selected that way. personally, i like the idea of just making me provide the ID rather than having to store that whole list of custom forms in the module. This could cut down on the size that the module adds to your blueprint because the list of custom forms is inherently always going to be smaller than the list of custom fields in the system. More so if you just make the end user provide an ID rather than giving a list because then you aren't having to store either list in the module. This would also make using the modules easier. Particularly in environments where you have a lot of custom fields. When configuring these modules right now, you pretty much have to use the Find feature of the browser or something similar to efficiently get to the fields you want to use. If only the fields from the forms you're interested in are displayed, it is much easier to just scroll through them.It would also help you be aware of what all fields are on the particular form(s) you're working on.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use-case: AEM is sending duplicate content to the third party applications like smartling when the page is submitted for the translation which has Experience fragment referred in it. Example: Let's assume, we have a page where experience fragment component is used. The moment experience fragment is added on the page, 'text' property gets created at node level and all the experience fragment content will be stored at page level as well which is not required. Current/Experienced Behavior: 'text' property gets created at node level and all the experience fragment content will be stored at page level as well which is not required. Improved/Expected Behavior: 'text' property should be removed Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.12 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Steps to reproduce: 1. Create Experience fragment add test component. 2. Create Page and add 'Experience Fragment' component. 3. Edit component & Refer experience component path and Save dialog. 4. Verify the experience fragment node property at content level where you can see unused 'text' property. Code package (if applicable):
Description - Parse JSON values into their own table rows in the network requests view, so that the values within the JSON can be more easily inspected/verified in downloaded Excel files.Why is this feature important to you - Verifying values within the JSON is very important to verify correct tracking, instead of seeing the long JSON string.How would you like the feature to work - The debugger automatically parses JSON values into their own (nested) rows in the network requests table.Current Behaviour - JSON values are one long string value, so in the downloaded Excel file, it is difficult to read the individual values properly without additional manual parsing.
See screenshot below and case 00318010
When there are a lot of items in a scenario's queue due to a user trigging the scenario multiple times there should be a way to customize the view of the queue list. If the scenario has actually stopped I have the opportunity to compare the details of each item in the queue and remove duplicates, but finding those duplicates is difficult when I need to go into each one.In the instance on 6/27/2022 where event subscriptions were delayed I had people trying to trigger events multiple times so I went into Fusion and turned a couple scenarios off so that I would have a chance to review those queues when the delay was over. Once scenario had 56 issues to be converted to projects by Fusion, but the scenario's queue had 93 items listed due to users triggering the scenario multiple times. Finding those duplicate IDs was a challenge, if I could create a view that showed the New State: ID in a column, dups would be easier to identify
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
