Description - Currently, we can add only one condition in exclusion rule. In some cases if I need to combine multiple condition for exclusion that becomes difficult. Why is this feature important to you - Having ability to combine multiple condition in single rule would help keep track of all conditions in one exclusion rule itselfHow would you like the feature to work - as we can add multiple rules in collection, it would be great if we do same in exclusionCurrent Behavior - Currently, we can add only one condition in exclusion rule. In some cases if I need to combine multiple condition for exclusion that becomes difficult.
As the On Hold Status does not allow an Issue to be notified or actioned - Why allow the issue to be raised at all. Suggestion is to not allow the Issue to be raised while the Project is in On Hold Status. This would eliminate the confusion of raising an Issue that cannot be Actioned or Notified, essentially the Issue is stuck in nowhere land while the Project is On Hold.
We are adding and updating Opportunity Contact Role through REST API associating with Marketo Lead. For this use case we are facing an duplicate issue, it is added duplicate Opportunity. Because as per the de-dupe fields logic ('externalOpportunityId','LeadId','Role). But the native Salesforce connector updated correctly even if the Role is empty or If the Role is updated, that same Opportunity record getting updated. Recommended to remove Role field from de-dupe fields logic in REST API.
Add search bar in updates section so that I can see all the updates made on a particular field. This can also be a filter to multi-select fields.Example: I want to track all the status updates and condition updates.
Recently I found out that datetime fields in custom activities are displayed in US Central time.This is what customer support said:Whilst activity timestamps adjust based on the timezones set on the Marketo instance, the information inside activity details do not support date-time localisation. These only return raw data for field values in those activities.UTC is ok but US Central is a bit of confusion for me as I live in New Zealand.Ideally I think it should show timestamp in user's configured timezone.If it's too difficult, I'd rather see them in UTC.
When you share a view at the project level and the end user receives the email link, it takes you to "Home" when you click on the link. Most of our people don’t live in "Home", so it taking you to a place that wasn’t shared with you, is completely confusing. Have the link in the email notification take you to the shared view.
Current view of Team Requests screen is limited to type of request submitted, user making the request, date of the request and the Work On It/Start button. Would like to be able to add additional fields/visibility onto this screen in a similar fashion as reports and issue/task/report views.
As part of a recent update, the ability to edit the status of a timesheet inline from the timesheet list was removed. This, coupled with the changes to the overall timesheet list visuals, has made it very difficult to make quick updates and revisions to timesheets.As a related comment, PLEASE stop removing functionality without understanding the full downstream impacts of doing so. If you feel the need to remove functionality, please consider adding a setting to allow users that WANT to continue to use the functionality being removed, to continue to use it.
The xtkBuilder.GenCreateOrUpdateSchemaSequenceDDL function is really cool to change the sequence of an existing schema.It is used by the postUpgrade process, for example to go avoid the use of xtkNewId in old builtin schema.But this function doesn't manage negative values : when it creates the new sequence, it use the 0 as min value. As some sequences can go to negative values (XtkNewId does), the sequence creation failed when it try to get the current value of the old sequence.We had errors on a postupgrade last week in stage (the postupgrade worked, but several days after, we noticed that we cannot create new nms:group list beceause the sequence were missing). We fixed that by editing the SQL Code generated by GenCreateOrUpdateSchemaSequenceDDL, taking in account the old sequence min value. Thank youCedric
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Match previous AEM versions that allowed for stackable metadata profiles where folders accepted multiple metadata profiles Use-case: Larger libraries with multiple levels of folders can quickly apply metadata during upload/processing without the need to endlessly create new profiles for every folder. Current/Experienced Behavior: In AEM Cloud, a metadata profile assigned to a child folder neglects/ignores the profile applied to the parent. Improved/Expected Behavior: Can there be a toggle option to inherit the parent folder metadata profile in addition to the one applied to the child folder. This toggle option to "Accept Parent Folder Metadata Profiles" could be within folder properties on the Asset Processing tab. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Dominique Green / Keurig Dr Pepper Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
i would like to be able to turn development mode on and off in Launch Tags Client Side. i cannot copy data elements, rules from one property to another. For context, the property with it on, has never done any extension development (but might have wanted to at some point). The property i want to move it to, has it off. If there is no custom extension development, why cant it be moved ? why was it designed in such a way that simple things like data elements cannot be copied over or rules (things that have nothing to do with Extensions).
We are wanting to set caps or restrictions on certain resources in our resource pools so that they only have a specific number of hours allotted for the year to limit their engagement in Workfront. This use case is governed by certain contracts or seasonality of the workers. Does anyone else have a similar use case and how to support this need? Any inputs or feature enhancements in Workfront would be great to include this ask for putting a limit or cap on certain resources within the resource pool.
Provide Tool / Capability to Bulk Edit database records based on record ID to Migrate data, update in Bulk via API. Similar to Kick Start but for updating data rather than creating new.
When something gets copied, (especially projects, but also tasks, issues, etc. - anything that can be copied in the system), we want to know from what object it was copied. Ideally, a link to the object in its Details tab. Also, being able to report on the original object's name and ID.
Hello, Now, Salesforce supports a new feature to add an account as Campaign member in addition with a lead/contact optionally.But currently, it is not synced with Marketo side, even I make the function enabled in Salesforce.If Marketo's standard Salesforce connector can pull the contacts as a program member, existing in the account that is added as a campaign member in Salesforce, it would become an useful function, I just imagine this,,,
need proof hq to properly integrate with workfront meaning that it is a seamless addition to include a proof approval task to any worker OR reviewers dashboard. currently project managers have to take more then 3 steps to even try to make this kind of work and you still cannot sort in order of priority OR see time in which it is due. For actual proof readers & creative team members who owe approvals there is often a time associated with the task and you cannot see this within the tool only in the initial email the person gets which defeats the purpose of teaching people to rely on the my work dashboard as their guide. Because of this we are unable to prioritize work as project managers that needs to be approved/proofed etc. And for the people proofing/approving etc. there is no easy way to see what is needed to be done and by when.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/administration/email-setup/filtering-email-bot-activity.html?lang=en i'd like to see a couple of things change here Ability to toggle the 2 second rule to up to 60s. My team has found that 30s is far better at capturing 90%+ of Bot Clicks than 2s. Make it clearer what happens when the Bot Log - just log the activity anyway and then you can toggle on/off at the EPR or Smart List level if you want to see the bot clicks. Update text to be clear that if you turn this on, then you need to manually add bot filters to smart lists and EPR.
I have workers that work solely from the Worklist tasks and never open the project/object. Current state: if a percentage is marked on the task, WF removes this task from the workers list. Example: Worker has a task covering 5 days, Day one they do 30% of the job and mark it as such. Upon returning to work from the weekend, the task has been removed from the Worklist and the job has now slipped their mind. (hey it happens)Would like for the task to remain on Worklist and show until set at 100%
Currently if I select a data element from the pool it is just copies to the text field surrounded with %%. If for some reason I change my data element, I need to find all rules where I used it manuall and change it. If the element would be linked to the rule, a change in the data element name would be applied to all rules. One additional gain would be to be able to see where a data element is actually used.To be able to see where something is used would also be a good feature for events, conditions, exceptions and actions based on the suggestion here: Reuse events, conditions, exceptions in rulesCommunity Manager EditThis idea is also requested by the following ideasAutomatically Update Names of Data Elements Used in Launch Rules Automatically Update Names of Data Elements Used in DTM Rules
Ability to remove the setup details from a users layout when editing projects. We have user's that do not need to be able to alter any of the project setup including Project Settings, Task Settings, Request Settings and Access. The ability to remove these from a user's layout would help immensely.
It would be good to have an option related to the rules' events to fire the rule only once per page. This way, even if you have multiple events or one event that can be dispatched multiples times on a page, it would be possible to automatically block the rule from fire more than once.
Super simple ask: When selecting/highlighting multiple records in a view (e.g. Smart Campaign Results, Smart List People, etc), show how many out of total are highlighted. This will make troubleshooting and auditing so much easier
Description - we have over 1900 old scheduled reports that wee need to remove, and we have to do it one by one, since the bulk delete feature is not availableWhy is this feature important to you - it saves time and workHow would you like the feature to work - be able to delete by user and report nameCurrent Behaviour - manual work
For consistency, clarity, and accountability across the organization, it would be handy to be able to configure and apply a custom project status update template to all projects:Today's date with the 'Status Update' titleCurrent Phase Deliverables sections (completed, currently being worked on, future)Current Phase Obstacles sectionNext phases sectionEstimated Project Closure (utilizing an existing custom form field)Something along the lines of:{Today's Date} Project Name Status UpdatePhase 2 (in progress)Deliverable 1 Name: The BU and BA are wrapping up validation. It is on track for its 06/30 production release date.Deliverable 2 Name: Development will be complete this week and handed off to the BU and BA for validation. Deliverable 2 is on track for a 07/15 production release.Deliverable 3 Name: Development is 65% complete and targeting validation to begin 07/01. Deliverable 3 is on track for a 07/30 production release date.The lesson learned process item identified in the previous sprint retrospective has been updated in the dev team's procedures.Phase 2 obstacles: None at this timePhase 3:Deliverable 1 (short deliverable name): 09/01/22Deliverable 2 (short deliverable name): 10/31/22Estimated Project Closure: 11/15/22 {existing custom form field}
I would love a new program token that automatically links to the Marketo program in question in the Marketo UI via either a URL or the ID which you could add to the end of the UI link. This would be more operationally efficient as we could then click straight through from an operational / internal email alert rather than having to copy and paste the program name in the search bar to find it first.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
