Build better products with our product team
As part of a recent update, the ability to edit the status of a timesheet inline from the timesheet list was removed. This, coupled with the changes to the overall timesheet list visuals, has made it very difficult to make quick updates and revisions to timesheets.As a related comment, PLEASE stop removing functionality without understanding the full downstream impacts of doing so. If you feel the need to remove functionality, please consider adding a setting to allow users that WANT to continue to use the functionality being removed, to continue to use it.
The xtkBuilder.GenCreateOrUpdateSchemaSequenceDDL function is really cool to change the sequence of an existing schema.It is used by the postUpgrade process, for example to go avoid the use of xtkNewId in old builtin schema.But this function doesn't manage negative values : when it creates the new sequence, it use the 0 as min value. As some sequences can go to negative values (XtkNewId does), the sequence creation failed when it try to get the current value of the old sequence.We had errors on a postupgrade last week in stage (the postupgrade worked, but several days after, we noticed that we cannot create new nms:group list beceause the sequence were missing). We fixed that by editing the SQL Code generated by GenCreateOrUpdateSchemaSequenceDDL, taking in account the old sequence min value. Thank youCedric
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Match previous AEM versions that allowed for stackable metadata profiles where folders accepted multiple metadata profiles Use-case: Larger libraries with multiple levels of folders can quickly apply metadata during upload/processing without the need to endlessly create new profiles for every folder. Current/Experienced Behavior: In AEM Cloud, a metadata profile assigned to a child folder neglects/ignores the profile applied to the parent. Improved/Expected Behavior: Can there be a toggle option to inherit the parent folder metadata profile in addition to the one applied to the child folder. This toggle option to "Accept Parent Folder Metadata Profiles" could be within folder properties on the Asset Processing tab. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Dominique Green / Keurig Dr Pepper Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
i would like to be able to turn development mode on and off in Launch Tags Client Side. i cannot copy data elements, rules from one property to another. For context, the property with it on, has never done any extension development (but might have wanted to at some point). The property i want to move it to, has it off. If there is no custom extension development, why cant it be moved ? why was it designed in such a way that simple things like data elements cannot be copied over or rules (things that have nothing to do with Extensions).
We are wanting to set caps or restrictions on certain resources in our resource pools so that they only have a specific number of hours allotted for the year to limit their engagement in Workfront. This use case is governed by certain contracts or seasonality of the workers. Does anyone else have a similar use case and how to support this need? Any inputs or feature enhancements in Workfront would be great to include this ask for putting a limit or cap on certain resources within the resource pool.
Provide Tool / Capability to Bulk Edit database records based on record ID to Migrate data, update in Bulk via API. Similar to Kick Start but for updating data rather than creating new.
When something gets copied, (especially projects, but also tasks, issues, etc. - anything that can be copied in the system), we want to know from what object it was copied. Ideally, a link to the object in its Details tab. Also, being able to report on the original object's name and ID.
Hello, Now, Salesforce supports a new feature to add an account as Campaign member in addition with a lead/contact optionally.But currently, it is not synced with Marketo side, even I make the function enabled in Salesforce.If Marketo's standard Salesforce connector can pull the contacts as a program member, existing in the account that is added as a campaign member in Salesforce, it would become an useful function, I just imagine this,,,
need proof hq to properly integrate with workfront meaning that it is a seamless addition to include a proof approval task to any worker OR reviewers dashboard. currently project managers have to take more then 3 steps to even try to make this kind of work and you still cannot sort in order of priority OR see time in which it is due. For actual proof readers & creative team members who owe approvals there is often a time associated with the task and you cannot see this within the tool only in the initial email the person gets which defeats the purpose of teaching people to rely on the my work dashboard as their guide. Because of this we are unable to prioritize work as project managers that needs to be approved/proofed etc. And for the people proofing/approving etc. there is no easy way to see what is needed to be done and by when.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/administration/email-setup/filtering-email-bot-activity.html?lang=en i'd like to see a couple of things change here Ability to toggle the 2 second rule to up to 60s. My team has found that 30s is far better at capturing 90%+ of Bot Clicks than 2s. Make it clearer what happens when the Bot Log - just log the activity anyway and then you can toggle on/off at the EPR or Smart List level if you want to see the bot clicks. Update text to be clear that if you turn this on, then you need to manually add bot filters to smart lists and EPR.
I have workers that work solely from the Worklist tasks and never open the project/object. Current state: if a percentage is marked on the task, WF removes this task from the workers list. Example: Worker has a task covering 5 days, Day one they do 30% of the job and mark it as such. Upon returning to work from the weekend, the task has been removed from the Worklist and the job has now slipped their mind. (hey it happens)Would like for the task to remain on Worklist and show until set at 100%
Currently if I select a data element from the pool it is just copies to the text field surrounded with %%. If for some reason I change my data element, I need to find all rules where I used it manuall and change it. If the element would be linked to the rule, a change in the data element name would be applied to all rules. One additional gain would be to be able to see where a data element is actually used.To be able to see where something is used would also be a good feature for events, conditions, exceptions and actions based on the suggestion here: Reuse events, conditions, exceptions in rulesCommunity Manager EditThis idea is also requested by the following ideasAutomatically Update Names of Data Elements Used in Launch Rules Automatically Update Names of Data Elements Used in DTM Rules
Ability to remove the setup details from a users layout when editing projects. We have user's that do not need to be able to alter any of the project setup including Project Settings, Task Settings, Request Settings and Access. The ability to remove these from a user's layout would help immensely.
It would be good to have an option related to the rules' events to fire the rule only once per page. This way, even if you have multiple events or one event that can be dispatched multiples times on a page, it would be possible to automatically block the rule from fire more than once.
Super simple ask: When selecting/highlighting multiple records in a view (e.g. Smart Campaign Results, Smart List People, etc), show how many out of total are highlighted. This will make troubleshooting and auditing so much easier
Description - we have over 1900 old scheduled reports that wee need to remove, and we have to do it one by one, since the bulk delete feature is not availableWhy is this feature important to you - it saves time and workHow would you like the feature to work - be able to delete by user and report nameCurrent Behaviour - manual work
For consistency, clarity, and accountability across the organization, it would be handy to be able to configure and apply a custom project status update template to all projects:Today's date with the 'Status Update' titleCurrent Phase Deliverables sections (completed, currently being worked on, future)Current Phase Obstacles sectionNext phases sectionEstimated Project Closure (utilizing an existing custom form field)Something along the lines of:{Today's Date} Project Name Status UpdatePhase 2 (in progress)Deliverable 1 Name: The BU and BA are wrapping up validation. It is on track for its 06/30 production release date.Deliverable 2 Name: Development will be complete this week and handed off to the BU and BA for validation. Deliverable 2 is on track for a 07/15 production release.Deliverable 3 Name: Development is 65% complete and targeting validation to begin 07/01. Deliverable 3 is on track for a 07/30 production release date.The lesson learned process item identified in the previous sprint retrospective has been updated in the dev team's procedures.Phase 2 obstacles: None at this timePhase 3:Deliverable 1 (short deliverable name): 09/01/22Deliverable 2 (short deliverable name): 10/31/22Estimated Project Closure: 11/15/22 {existing custom form field}
I would love a new program token that automatically links to the Marketo program in question in the Marketo UI via either a URL or the ID which you could add to the end of the UI link. This would be more operationally efficient as we could then click straight through from an operational / internal email alert rather than having to copy and paste the program name in the search bar to find it first.
Please can you make the custom form area more user-friendly, I'd love to see a search function, bulk edit option for all forms - so if I need to add groups or change permissions then I can do that for all forms. Also be helpful if they displayed A-Z even if grouped.
The current Workload Balancer Filter Sharing Module allows all users to enable "View System-Wide Setting". This would cause the unnecessary and approved filter to share with all users.It would be great if the System Administrator had the option to disable/hide the "View System-Wide Setting" for the Workload Balancer Filter Sharing Module.
We've recently noticed some campaigns taking a long time to process e.g. almost an hour to make a trigger-based data update. The answer from support is that it's because of the priority that Marketo gives to the campaign queue as outlined here: https://nation.marketo.com/t5/knowledgebase/how-campaign-processing-works/ta-p/248264 This creates a challenge where our priorities for the campaign queue doesn't match what Marketo developers think our priority should be. For example, Change Status in SFDC Campaign is a medium priority for Marketo but for our company, this is for reporting purposes only and should be the lowest priority. In contrast, Change data value is in many cases a high priority e.g. someone fills out a demo request on our Website and we want to make sure all of the correct data gets populated as soon as possible before our BDR Team is notified. You can see on this page that Send Alert is the highest priority but then means the alert (which has tokenized data in it) goes out without the right data because change data value is low priority. The suggestion is that each Marketo customer can specify the overall priority for each of these items for their instance of Marketo and then in addition, prioritize certain Smart Campaigns beyond this.
Hi i wonder if you could implement this : be able to get an evidence that one customer well received an email. Indeed, i would like to have the email as it would look on the outlook platform of the customer Because this one said that he did not received this email, whereas he did, but the email went probably on the spam inbox, i already checked in the results of the email. I would like to get a copy of the email with his contact email address as recipient with the date and the hour (when he received it) is it somehting possible? Because in my case, we got a security issue on our product so we sent a press release to the customers concerned, one of them is complaining about not be aware of the problem. We wanted to have the evidence that he received the communication, we would like to get the visuel of the email he got on Outlook. it will be very interesting to create this feature thanks best regards valentine
Test for customer
Hello,It would be very useful to have combo charts in analysis workspace so that we can trend metrics against previous periods like we can do in the standard reports:Thank you,Melissa
Stop forcing everything to be in alphabetical order onlyWorkload Balancer does not have an option to view other than by user, this is so inflexible.We resource hundreds of hours daily across 50 users, yet if I filter these team members by multiple roles or groups in Balancer it automatically puts them in one alphabetised bucket paying no attention to the sub groups that I listed, designers, writers, producers.If I filter by multiple roles, groups, projects etc then I would like the resource list to be have a view functionality to allow me to list them as such and not as one long list by name, this forces me to view one sub group at a time, then switch to another sub group, back to the original sub group etc. so much time wasted.Give us more flexibility ways to group views within Balancer please.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
