Build better products with our product team
Hi Marketo & Marketo Measure Teams, Seeing this conversation come into the fold more and more - the ability to track multi-funnels in the stage mapping in Bizible. Right now you can only track one type of funnel/set of stages, but it would be great to build logic to build multiple funnels (i.e. for different opportunity types if they have different sets of stages). Thanks, Meredith
We have Ref ID on project, task, document, issue, etc. Why is there no Ref ID for Programs? I realize there is Program ID, but this is a much longer string of characters we don't want. This seems like it would be very easy to implement for WF. Help!
Added feature request: Add PATH as API Parameter Issue Reports in order to filter by queue topics and/or groups easily. Add popup or some kind of indication how the object hierarchy (in this case, queue topic /topic group) while displaying the value to reduce confusion or provide disparity between similar named values.Context:While working with several stakeholders wanting to gather requests submitted to specific topics and groups, filtering by these objects proves very difficult and time consuming. Essentially, we have multiple request queues (Projects) where multiple queue topics and/or topic groups may have the same name. When it comes to filter by these names, its near impossible to identify which belongs to a specific topic or group as there is only the name. There is a workaround by finding the specific GUID (global unique ID) and then pasting it into the typeahead field but this is cumbersome and a bad user experience. Problem:The only way to identify if the queue topic/group is correct is to either limit naming convention or by adding through GUID. However, this method requires the admin to navigate to the project, open the desired topic/group, edit the field and copy/paste, or similarly, navigate to the Requests tab, select the correct queue topic/group, copy the "Path", paste on a new tab, and copy/paste from the URL.Proposed solution:Add either a parameter in the API table that allows for Request Queue fields (Queue Topic, Topic Group, Routing Rule, etc.) or for an object's Path to be visible (popup or typeahead) so that objects can be added quickly into the Filter section.
We would like to schedule and send only the summary section of reports.
We no longer have RCE in our instance and are not able to hide fields that were in use in RCE. This prevents us from doing clean up that is necessary to get and keep our instance clean.
"Recent Updates" will not display on timesheets if the "Show System Updates" toggle is not turned on by a user. A user must navigate away from timesheets to turn on the "Show System Updates" toggle in another object, such as a Project or Task. This is not intuitive and, at the moment, is not documented on the "View and manage comments on a timesheet" page in Workfront One. (https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=the-new-workfront-experience&topicId=Content%2FTimesheets%2FCreate_and_Manage_Timesheets%2Fview-and-manage-comments-timesheets.html&_LANG=enus)Please add the "Show System Updates" toggle to timesheets and update the Documentation on Workfront One so it's more clear and intuitive for the user to understand and manage the visibility of their timesheet "Recent Updates."
Hi Community, Once I received a task where I need to send 3 emails to records as per activity on different dates, but I was unable to check that what number of records are stuck in which wait steps of Smart Campaign. Although, We can see total records in wait step in a campaign but can not differentiate count between the further wait steps.
Currently, the used by tab of each field shows which assets (SC, SL, Email, LP, etc.) are referencing/using the field - it would be great to include a column for the email/LP assets with the module/section name/id along with their name, this'll help find/update/remove the database field token association and users would not have open every single asset to check where the token is being referenced in the asset. This can also be extended to custom tokens ({{my.}}) when used feature for them is released for GA.
When expanding a project the tasks now appear to the left of the project. They have made the expand button take up much more space & put a little paper project icon to the left of the project title this combined takes up too much space. Nowit looks weird to me as the task names are to the left of the project title. Doesn’t look neat and it backwards in position to how you would expect a task to appear under a project.
Be given the ability to tag groups in a proof comment instead of having to add them through a workflow.
With the WF plugin for Teams Chat, it's great that you can reply to threads you're tagged in and it is published in the proper place in WF, but it would be awesome if you could START a thread on an object from the plugin in Teams chat too.
Test
We have the "Project Completion to Project Team" notification enabled which notifies everyone on the project.It would be helpful if we had the option to notify only the Project Sponsor when their project is complete to cut down on emails/notifications. When people are finished with their tasks on a project they move on and don't care when the project gets completed. Thanks
It would be so helpful in Updates to be able to toggle conversation view on and off, or quickly be able to put updates and replies in date/time order. It's hard to locate the most recent replies if they're nested under an older update.
With the Release 22.2, there was a functionality introduced to allow Users to Edit/Delete a Comment within 7 seconds before it becomes permanent. But this option is only available of the Access Level option "Never allow users to delete comments" is deselected.This functionality needs to be separated from the more permanent access level, so that users can update a comment within 7 seconds if they need to and not have the ability to later delete a comment.
We would like the option to automatically set the company-level billing rate to override the standard system rates.
Ability to set up and use similar functionality to Advanced Column Rules on Chart, that would allow to call out specific data within a chart based on the grouped criteria. IE.. We use Pie Charts to show how much work is in our queues grouped by due date. Would like to be able to call out $$TODAY as a bold or a pull out or red text to allow users to do a quick assessment of the data being reported and what has the highest priority.
We'd like our sign-off team to be able to pick from a drop-down list of reasons as to why they rejected a document or a proof. If we can report on this, then we can understand the most common reasons for rejections and amends, and give colleagues the support and training they need to stop getting rejected for the same things over and over.
Hi Marketo Community, We have an option to download all Landing pages from design Studio but there is no option for emails and Forms. Sometimes, we need to audit all the emails and forms and we are unable to download all information at one place.
I find that I sometimes forget who the requester is once I get to the screen where I turn the Request into a Project, after having attached a template. It would be nice if the person requesting populated under Basic Information or somewhere near the top. Because we assign the requester as Project Sponsor, it's something I need to know once I get to that screen.
Would love to be able to stylize comments in Proof, Bold, Color, Italics, Highlight, Underline Options, so that they can be be implemented directly as intendend
A feature to show tasks that people may remember but are no longer valid by striking through completed tasks.
Currently a Typehead field must be connected to a "Referenced Object Type" which includes Company, Group, Job Role, Portfolio, Program, Project, Team, Template and User. While this is very helpful, the current Typeahead feature is limited in functionality and misses important option.Users should be able to connect the Typeahead fields to a list of values as an option to Checkboxes and Dropdowns allowing a single or multiple value selection. Example: We have a list of approximately 250 aircraft a user should be able to select from. Scrolling through a Dropdown list of 250 values is not practical. 250 Checkboxes is not a good option either.Short of having this option, we are using a Single Line Text Field for the user to enter the aircraft number which leads to inconsistent data entries. Please help !!!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
