Build better products with our product team
Description - When a request/issue is made we have a custom form where a user can select a product or program associated with a different portfolio. When the request is converted into a project, our project manager has to manually change the product or program field that in the overview section for the newly created project, based on what was input in the custom form on the request. Why is this feature important to you - It creates a lot of confusion and extra work for our project manager to try to manage these two fields. If they forget to change one of them it alters reports and dashboards for them and for management. How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice if there was a way to automatically populate the product or program field in the overview section of the project based on the field in the custom form of the request and even better to tie the two fields together so that if it's updated in the overview, it's updated in the custom form. Once the request is converted into a project the field in the custom form is used as a reference only, so it could even turn into a read-only or calculated field. Current Behaviour - Right now, the custom form field is separate from the product or program field on the project and both fields must be maintained and updated separately.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I often find my self in difficulty while comparing properties of a node in AEM CS instance, where crx/de is not accessible. So for accessibility purpose this will be a very good enhancement for Repository Browser in AEM CS. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Repository Browser in its current form, is not having property type option as it used to be in CRX/DE so it is often confusing where it is String or Long or Boolean for some of the value. Though it is provided "[]" for array type but which type of array it is. Some time we just need to compare number of property, since there is no numbering for each property we need to count one by one property this is very problematic. Improved/Expected Behavior: Type column for property and serial number for the same should be there. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): CRX/DE: Expected: Repository Browser: Should be improved: Code package (if applicable): NA
There are several UX issues with how the notes are implemented Why is this feature important to you - In a large scenario it's often useful to see notes when fairly zoomed out. It's a nuisance to have to zoom in to see if the note is even the one I need. The positioning takes the cake. Now I get to drag, too, just to read notes. Notes should make my dev life easier - not add to my cognitive burden 🙂 How would you like the feature to work - I want note cards to open exactly where I positioned them I also want to not have to erase boiler plate text when creating a note I also want to be able to READ the note without having to zoom in So: - don't auto position notes, ever unless someone clicks Auto-align. Then move the note along with the module/filter it's attached to. Don't move the note as if it were a module - clicking a note should open what is the "editor" and show me the full note body (with scroll bar if needed) and and edit/delete button - use the attribute "placeholder" instead of hard-coded content Current Behaviour - - notes are parked a mile away - notes are illegible unless I zoom in - i have to delete a boilerplate text when creating a new note
The current function of the Workfront Boards filters seem to be set up on an OR statement meaning if multiple filter options are selected the filter will pull [this selection] OR [that selection], and not [this selection] AND [that selection]. For example, we have a member of our team attempting to use the Boards column filter to see any tasks that are aligned to one particular project AND assigned to one particular user, but for some reason it is only pulling tasks assigned to the one particular user. It is extremely important to have flexible filtering options throughout Workfront and especially for Boards since they are used to allow teams to work in an agile way. If the filters are not flexible and easy to use then they present roadblocks to the teams attempting to use them. In a perfect world, the Workfront Boards column filter would work similar to the way the report filters do or work the same way as the intake filters do in boards. We are currently able to select OR or AND filters when crafting Workfront Boards intake column filters (found by clicking Configure), but the regular column filters do not give you the same options (found by clicking Filter). I've provided screenshots below to highlight the differences.
I wanted to suggest an improvement regarding how we handle delegated issues in Workfront. As it stands, unless a delegate user takes ownership of a project, the delegated issue will only appear in their "my work" widget. This setup isn't quite streamlined enough for our needs. Could we request to have Workfront include delegated tasks in the "my task" widget as well? This adjustment would provide a more cohesive and efficient view, allowing us to better track and manage our responsibilities. Thank you for considering this suggestion. Looking forward to your thoughts on this matter.
Description - Allow recurring advanced search filters to be saved so users don't have to re-enter the filter parameters every time. Why is this feature important to you - The new advanced search page isn't "sticky", so users are spending time re-entering search filters every time they navigate away
Can we get shortened URL links for sharing Workfront proofs similar to bit.ly URLs?When there is a need to reference another Workfront proof in a comment or to share the link another way, the URL is very long (about 180 characters). A short URL is always better.
Subscribing to Projects, Tasks, and Issues is a great feature... and our users would love to view and manage all of their subscriptions in one place. This could be incorporated into the Recent Items & Favorites, or added as a new "Subscriptions" icon in the top right. If that's too much of a stretch, could we at least create a report or reports that filters on items subscribed to?
Description - I use Boomerang's return to inbox functionality in Outlook frequently (where you can set a time for an email to return to you or send you an alert if you haven't received a reply yet). But, most of my communication happens in Workfront, so it would be nice to have a similar feature there. Why is this feature important to you - It would be an easier and automated way to make sure that time sensitive responses are not missed without having to manually manage them. How would you like the feature to work - When you post a comment, have the ability to send me (the comment poster) an alert or email or something if I haven't received a reply to my comment by a certain date (allow the user to pick the date / time). Bonus points if you could select the specific user that you specifically need a response from. ie - there are 5 people tagged, but I REALLY need a response from Bob. Send me an alert if Bob hasn't replied by Friday at 3pm (or whatever day/time I choose) Current Behaviour - I don't think this exists at all?
Description -Why is this feature important to you - we need to track documents, specifically proof versions, to gage the extent of approvals on each verison of a document.How would you like the feature to work - It would function like most other reports in WF: a dropdown in the upper left to export data as PDF, Excel, etc.Current Behaviour - Not able to export data from this type of report
So I select a bunch of report suites and go to edit the classifications to make them consistent. "The classifications for this report do not match for all report suites. Only classifications that match exactly can be viewed and edited across report suites." Now wouldn't it be helpful to tell me which report suites aren't exactly the same?
Hi, Currently there is not simple feature to allow us to update the approver ID through Fusion so that we can read data from either custom form or assigned to ID fields and accordgly assign that ID as an approver ID for a existing approval process.It will greatly help in streamlining approval processes where an approver can be dynamic entity from a wider team depending on some conditions
Description - Allow the option for passwords to be added to proofsWhy is this feature important to you - Our clients want to add a guest to proofs but want a layer of security on the document in case incorrect emails get added.How would you like the feature to work - When creating a proof, have a tickbox option to add a password. Current Behaviour - External users don't need any password.
WF currently generates 2 timesheets: one for the current week + 1 for the following week. Some users take 2 or 3 weeks of vacation and we would like for them to pre-populate timesheets to show that vacation. This would prevent Timesheet exception reports from flagging those users for having 0 hours. Can this be enabled enterprise-wide or can it be an option per Timesheet Profile?
Description - Once upon a time there was auto-provisioning, and it was awesome. Then came the dark times, the times of the Adobe Admin Console, and there was wailing and gnashing of teeth across the land. We were promised "zero-touch administration", which would be just like auto-provisioning, but these were lies! Why is this feature important to you - We have a large bank of users who just need to get to request forms. The lack of this functionality means that we either have to touch each account or someone has to walk each person through the multi-step process. How would you like the feature to work - Solution 1 (preferred): when a user who qualifies for zero-touch provisioning accesses any WF link, account creation occurs, and the user ends up wherever they were trying to go.Solution 2 (also would be acceptable): Add Workfront to https://experience.adobe.com/ (which is where the activation link dumps them). Current Behavior - The user has to click on the "activation link", which effectively takes them nowhere. THEN they can proceed to Workfront via the usual link.
Description - Allow a user the ability to group proofs by the deadline day or hourly time frames so the user has a way to quickly see what they need to review first and not miss reviewsWhy is this feature important to you - Currently, all the proofs are clumped together making it incredibly difficult to be able to prioritize what needs to be reviewed first. This feature would help the end user by being able to review the most time sensitive proofs. Currently, our users are clicking into each proof manually to try and prioritize their reviews to know the stage deadline of the proof which is time consuming and inefficient.How would you like the feature to work - Add an option to be able to group the proofs on the "Awaiting my approval" widgetCurrent Behaviour - Does not exist 10/24/24: Update to this original idea Now that we have the Proof due time (yay) available to us on the My Approvals widget, the current experience shows no sense of order when proofs are due. Users are spending time clicking through the pages to find the urgent proofs over the non-urgent proofs. Allowing the grouping would significantly help with prioritization. Current experience:
Description - The revised UI/UX for the calendar area coming with the next release is missing the "Hide Weekend" feature Why is this feature important to you - Work does not occur on the weekends with our team and this would allow more real estate on the screen for the 5 business days we care about. How would you like the feature to work - Add the "Hide Weekend" option back to the new calendar options. Current Behavior: New Calendar:
Sometimes we need to send a reminder to someone in an approval stage who is holding up the approval process as a whole. Could we have a button that triggers an pre-formatted email notification to said individual?
Description - Please enable a way to us to automate the moving of regular Workfront documents (i.e. local in the Project) into an AEM Linked Folder via the API (preferably a Fusion action module).Why is this feature important to you - It's laborious and prone-to-error for users to manually drag and drop Workfront Documents into an AEM Linked Folder. We have many clients where this could be a big time-saver both in terms of reducing the effort to move files and also improving the accuracy of where they place them as we could automate that based on Document metadata.How would you like the feature to work - Have a Workfront module in Fusion where we can map in the Document ID and also the ID of the (Linked) Folder or its associated Linked Folder ID it is to be moved into. Even if we have to use a Workfront Custom API call or plain old HTTP Request that would be fine as long as it is via a Production API.Current Behaviour - There are various internal API calls we have tried to emulate via Fusion and there is an experience league article from last year with a accepted answer post from @victorto2 (please note that the original question is not relevant...only the answer) which indicates it was possible at that time but I've been unable to get that to work yet. And, even if I did, it is an unsupported internal API call which is not ideal for production use by customers. So, basically there is no current workaround.
Currently, timesheets are created for the current period and the next period. Can we have the option to create timesheets up to five periods. For example, we use weekly timesheet option. The system generates timesheets for current week and next week. This is fine most of the time, but sometimes people go on vacation for 4 or 5 weeks straight. It would be great if they would have the ability to enter the timesheets for the 4 or 5 weeks before they go on vacation.
Description - Workfront calendar (Month View) no longer shows all the active/upcoming tasks for each dayWhy is this feature important to you - This affects the holistic view of the calendar when planning because now the user has to individually go into every day to see which projects are there, instead of seeing themHow would you like the feature to work -Workfront calendar (Month View) to show all the active/upcoming Projects/tasks within each dayCurrent Behaviour - The previous WF view used to show all the active/upcoming Projects/tasks within each day, now it only shows a maximum of 3 and then the user has to click on the "more" button to see the projects. This affects the holistic view of the calendar when planning because now the user has to individually go into every day to see which projects are there, instead of seeing them
In the Queue Set Up: Routing Rules: Default Assignee area, allow to assign to multiple users upon entry. Only way to assign to 2 or more users for a queue topic routing is to create a new team. Sometimes it's not a full team but rather a couple of individuals. An issue can be assigned to multiple users why can't the request route that way as well?
Our Marketing team works in different time zones (EST, PST, India) The campaign dates on our calendar and project plan are all different, because we are in different time zones. For everyone to see the same date, we need to manually change our computer time to align to East Coast time. I'd like to recommend Workfront build a time zone feature in Workfront as a profile preference.
Description - How do I know a report is on which object like Task, Project, Proof, Document. A report doesn't show it either in view mode or in edit mode. In view mode it is showing in bottom right corner only if that report is fetching/showing any records. If no records are there in report then we can't see it. In edit page it is not showing at all which is very inconvenient.Why is this feature important to you - To know on a report is built on which object How would you like the feature to work - Show it somewhere in edit page. Show it on view page other than bottom right corner.Current Behaviour - In edit page it is not showing at all which is very inconvenient. In view mode it is showing in bottom right corner only if that report is fetching/showing any records.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - we make informed strategic business decisions based on the data available to us. We require the ability to export large data sets from the Adobe Analytics platform that can be modified and presented to leadership, cross functional teams, and for analysis purposes. In order to do this, we need to utilize data warehouse requests. How would you like the feature to work - we would like the data warehouse tool to me more flexible to allow for basic functionality. The ability to edit, modify, and delete data warehouse requests does not exist yet should be bare minimum functions given how important and expensive the Adobe Analytics platform is for publishers. Current Behaviour - we cannot edit a data warehouse request that has been completed nor can we delete data warehouse requests. We can only inactivate them which doesn't help with organization and also creates confusion. Being restricted to the current functionality is unsustainable. It allows for unnecessary mistakes and double development time as we plan to use this data in an automated fashion.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
