Build better products with our product team
The moment any task updates have been made on a Project Plan, if it is still in Planning mode, a notification/alert should go out to Project Owner asking if they meant to change the status to "Active". This is a step that is easy for people to miss and critical to project management/collaboration.
It would be nice if when submitting a request through any request queue, a user could select a "copy request from" option and then find an old issue or project, then this information would feed into the new form (as long as the fields were the same). This would at least give a head start on some of the huge forms our requestors have to fill out. OR, if they could go to an old issue/project and there was an option there to "Submit request from" then they could select the appropriate queue (that way the routing would work as designed). If the fields would just go blank if they do not exist anymore, that would prevent issues with custom form changes. I know this is probably a long shot, but I get requests for it frequently.
Right now, there is no way to change the order of column rules that are in place. It would be great if you could drag them into the desired order so that you don't have to delete them all and start over every time there is an addition of a column rule that needs to be considered first.
Currently Workfront calculates Estimate at completion by using the cost performance index and planned cost to estimate the the cost at completion. This method assumes that performance to date will match performance in the future. I would like an additional EAC field that would assume that the remainder of the project will go according to plan. EAC = Actual Cost to Date + Planned Cost Allocated for the future
Hello all, We would love the ability to attach documents when creating an expense. This would allow for us to attach expense pdfs and other items to the expense object Thanks, Al
I have customers that I have given a reviewer license to. They want to be able to see the details behind the summary hours and expenses I can make available on a project or task report. Unfortunately, if I create the report - natively Reviewer user levels cannot see the data. So I need to setup the report to Run As another user with higher level access (e.g. me). This creates a problem b/c they can then run the report as me and I have full access to the data - so they can conceivably see others folks data if they run it outside of the dashboard that I present to them.
I am currently unable to grant permission for review users to be able to view expenses and legacy resource estimates that have been added to a project. I appreciate that a review user should not be able to edit these - but they should be able to view them rather than just seeing a blank screen.
Description - Currently there isn't an ability to configure CORS for tracking servers. Especially in the case of setting up first-party tracking, it would be great if more restrictive origin traffic could be specified.Why is this feature important to you - It could cut down bot/undesired tracking and it would flag fewer exceptions when probing a site for CORS compliance.How would you like the feature to work - During the process of engaging in discussions of first-party tracking and using first-party cookies, it would be ideal to provide both the necessary CNAMEs to reference the tracking servers as well as any additional configuration changes that would be needed on the client side. Ideally, we could limit origin to the specific site we expect to send data from, and maybe a less restrictive, non-public endpoint that can be used for any server-side API data insertions.Current Behaviour - Right now the following header is allowed "Origin: null". Every endpoint, including those that that are specifically set up for first-party tracking can recieve requests from any origin.
Currentyl the notification formattting of emails from Updates gets lost in the clutter of other emails, as well as the WF notificatins which themseslves we find useless (given they're a tiny number in the top right with no context of importance).An example of the issue is our team regularly send out important "Alert Updates" for critical info and milestones to several tagged teams of key stakeholders.The email notification just shows this as a "Comment" on <WF PROJECT JOB NAME>, which in their current formatting just becomes noise.We tend to put some bolded key words in the body of the update, such as *** ALERT.....blah blah blah *** to indicate the importance of the particular message that others need to pay attention to, but there's no chance for this to be seen in the email notification subject line (only visible once they open the email), which is the critical part of the message, with the Project name being secondary.What feels like might be an improvement, is if Updates had the ability to have a 'Subject" line, (much like emails do) which would become the title of the notification email, appended with the Project name for additional context. I expect this issue likely reaches beyond just Updates too...?!
When a card is moved as active on the kanban storyboard you can no longer edit the estimate of points. It is very common that estimates increase once someone starts working a story.
For SCRUM we fill out the goal on the iteration but it is not referenced on the Storyboard during the sprint. The idea of a goal is that it should be very visible during the sprint. Having this on the Sprint Board would be fantastic.
When using color coded comments in the proof, make the comment color more obvious. Color code the initial circles with the assigned color.
I would like the option to make the Description field (and perhaps others) mandatory on the Business Case..
It would be great for a team to have the option to create tasks that are not part of a larger project.
The Kanban board is missing the ability to add cards from the board. This feature is available in many other products and would save our team time when creating tasks.
Once cards are active on the Kanban board, you lose the table view of the task. It would be valuable to our teams to be able to filter and group active work much like you can in the Stories tab on a Scrum iteration.
Workfront has been touting that we can add rich text to custom fields for a while now, but in order to get this new feature, you have to create NEW fields to apply it (and then have all your forms reference the new field). Why not give users the ability to add this functionality on existing fields? We have 280 custom fields in our library and changing them all PLUS the forms is a daunting task.
With the new editor, the preheader has been completely redesigned. It's now editable as part of the email properties. The drawback is that there is no way to make it dynamic. This is an issue, especially of one wants to use the dynamic content to manage multiple languages.So, please Marketo, please make the preheader able to support segmentation based dynamic content in the pre-header.-GregP.S: the workaround is to set the preheader as an editable section in the email, and not use, but in the case, the user may make an error and enter in 2 places. See
It would be very helpful if the Subject line would be automatically added inside the tag: <title></title> when downloading the HTML. We would appreciate this a lot!!
Description -Evenly Split Traffic for Activities Using A4T with Redirects.Why is this feature important to you -This is skewing data for some important tests we are running.How would you like the feature to work -Splitting 50/50 traffic actually 50/50. Current Behaviour -It seems that it is splitting the traffic more like 35/65 or 40/60 giving the default experience the larger portion of traffic.
It was be a big help for an Admin to be able to bulk "force" Complete old Projects. This "Force Complete" process would automatically do the below actions on a Project (or group of Projects):Assign a Status to all open Issues (Closed, Cancelled, etc) with an Update messageDelete any "stalled" Task Approval ProcessesMark all Tasks to 100%Add an Update message at the Project-level ("This is an old Project, force "Completed" on xxxx date", etc)Currently Project Tasks with stalled Approval Processes have to have those Approval Processes manually deleted and that just eats up an Admin's time.
Hi folks, Is it possible that when we Deactivate users within Workfront that the User's email or profile no longer appears in the pop-up contact field when adding a recipient to a Proof? We are often getting complains from our Project Managers that old users are still appearing after being Deactivated in the pop-up and the only way to remove the account is by deleting the user out of ProofHQ. It seems irrelevant to me to have the Deactivation feature if the only option to hide Deactivated users is deleting them out of ProofHQ. Thank you for your time.
It would be a nice feature if we could globally replace a component across all tables withinin a panel where that component exists. For example, our company has over 15,000 product categories. If I want to build a dashboard showing one category (s.products = snack foods) I would have to drop 'snack foods' on top of each table wihthin my project. I am unable to use a hit segment, because the hit segment would include other categories where 'snack foods' was present (i.e. on an order that includes 'snack foods' and 'pet supplies'. If our project contains multiple tables, then I (or other users) have to update each table with the category to be analyzed each time we want to see metrics for just that category. Having a 'replace all' would all us to update the dashboard with one action. Users of the table would have to follow fewer instructions to update a dashboard and it would allow us analysts to create fewer dashboards to support the company.
Please support more than 10 agile status columns in the Agile view. We have some projects with up to 15 statuses/states that we would like to be able to track in Workfront.
We have 3-5 dashboards on our project screens, some with names that are similar. All dashboards on that page get the same "icon" on the left menu. If we could customize those icons in some way, I think it would improve the navigation for our users while also creating some continuity between different user types that have the same dashboards but in a different order on that page.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
